“The COVID-19 Vaccines DO NOT Prevent Transmission of the Disease” – Judge’s Ruling Destroys Biden Vax Mandate

Health care workers, Youtube
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
Louisiana US District Judge Terry Doughty blocked Biden’s federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers nationwide earlier this week. In Judge Doughty’s ruling, he pointed out the illogical contradiction in the mandate and asked “If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?” The Judge stated, “In other words, even if you are fully vaccinated, you still may become infected with the COVID-19 virus.”

The Judge’s ruling continued: ““Although CMS spent pages and pages attempting to explain the need for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, when infection and hospitalizations rates are dropping, millions of people have already been infected, developing some form of natural immunity, and when people who have been fully vaccinated still become infected, mandatory vaccines as the only method of prevention make no sense.”

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty blocked a federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers on Tuesday.

The ruling by Judge Doughty follows Missouri US District Judge Matthew Schelp’s ruling on Monday that blocked mandates in 10 states.

Judge Doughty pointed out all of the illogical and irrational contradictions in the mandate. “If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?” says Judge Doughty in his ruling.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Freedom

Canada: Unvaccinated Father Loses Right to See His Child

January 13, 2022 BBC 1

A Canadian father who has not been vaccinated against Covid has temporarily lost the right to see his 12-year-old child. A judge ruled his visits would not be in the child’s “best interest”. The judgement is the first depriving a parent of access rights on immunization grounds.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments