Climate-Kids’ “Trump Is Endangering Our Future” Case Crushed By 9th Circuit Court

image_pdfimage_print
The 9th Circuit US federal appeals court dismissed a lawsuit by 21 ‘climate kids’ who claimed the US government’s climate policies and reliance on fossil fuels harms them, jeopardizes their future and violates their constitutional rights. The Oregon-based youth advocacy group, Our Children’s Trust, filed the lawsuit in 2015 seeking an injunction ordering the government to implement a plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions and draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide emission. A lawyer for the children said the group intended to appeal the decision.

On the same day as 17-year-old Great Thunberg stood in front of thousands of young people in Switzerland, fearmongering their imminent death due to old white men in charge of the world refusing to listen to her; a US federal appeals court dismissed a lawsuit by 21 ‘climate kids’ who claimed the U.S. government’s climate policies and reliance on fossil fuels harms them, jeopardizes their future and violates their constitutional rights.

The Oregon-based youth advocacy group Our Children’s Trust filed the lawsuit in 2015 in Eugene on behalf of the youngsters (aged between 8 and 18). It sought an injunction ordering the government to implement a plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions and draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide emission.

The Ninth Circuit ruled that the children must look to the political branches – Congress and the executive branch – for action, rather than the courts.

The plaintiffs have made a compelling case that action is needed; it will be increasingly difficult in light of that record for the political branches to deny that climate change is occurring, that the government has had a role in causing it, and that our elected officials have a moral responsibility to seek solutions,”

We reluctantly conclude, however, that the plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large, the latter of which can change the composition of the political branches through the ballot box. That the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes.”

As KOIN reports, the 2-1 vote for dismissal was a major blow for the climate activists, who have filed numerous similar cases in state and federal courts and currently have nine cases pending in state courts from Alaska to New Mexico.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Health

Gates Vaccine Spreads Polio Across Africa

October 15, 2020 F. William Engdahl 7

The UN recently admitted that new cases of polio have resulted in Africa from an oral polio vaccine developed with support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates pushes polio vaccines in Africa when many more lives could be saved with investments in clean water and proper sanitation.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
christopher david scallio
christopher david scallio
9 months ago

Ha!
The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals thinks that it is an Article 3 Court!
Only the Supreme Court is an Article 3 Court. The U.S. Circuit Courts are Creatures of Congress; Not Creatures of the Constitution. Therefore the 9th Circuit is an Article 1 Court. Worse yet are the Article 2 Courts under the President which are the supposed remedies within the Alphabet Soup Agencies.