Portland Plans to Force New Construction Sites to Include ‘Rest Spaces’ for Homeless People

Portland local government
Portland’s “planning and sustainability commission,” which writes and enforces the city’s building codes, approved a new rule that would require new construction to feature “opportunities to rest and be welcome” for those who do not number among that building’s residents or customers. One member of Portland’s planning and sustainability commission confirmed that the goal is to benefit homeless people. Inviting the homeless to rest is inviting them to squat. Once squatting takes place, claims to ownership will follow, based on long-held norms that property is possession. An estimated 34% of Portlanders want to leave the city due to the homeless problem.

To ensure that homeless “campers” have all the comforts they need, the very woke blue city of Portland is preparing a regulation to require all new homeowners to provide “rest spaces” for the homeless.

According to the Daily Wire:

The city’s “planning and sustainability commission,” which writes and enforces the city’s building codes, approved a change to building guidelines in November that would require new constuction [sic] to feature “opportunities to rest and be welcome” for those who do not number among that building’s residents or customers.

The requirement can be read a number of ways, but at least one member of the Portland planning and sustainability commission was clear to local reporters that the requirement is to the benefit of the city’s “unhoused,” who are often kicked off of private property for loitering, sleeping, or camping — as is (typically) a private property owner’s right.

“Just one of the realities of Portland right now is that we have a lot of folks who are unhoused who benefit from some of these spaces that provide weather protection,” she said when introducing the idea at a recent meeting.

Problem one is that this is an expropriation of private property.  Inviting the homeless in to “rest” is inviting the homeless in to squat.  And once squatting takes place, claims to ownership can follow, based on long held norms that property is possession.  Too bad about the people who actually paid for the property.

Problem two is that it’s pretty insulting to the homeless.  Instead of the city providing them with the housing and drug treatment many require, they get these private “rest spots” instead. 

It’s also supremely ignorant of who the homeless are and what homeless dynamics are.  Some homeless people are temporarily down on their luck.  Some are driven to living in their cars based on NIMBY environmental regulations and high housing costs that don’t jibe with their earnings.  Those are people who can be helped in far more dignified ways than “rest spots” on private property.

There are also “lifestyle” homeless, who have chronic drug, mental health, and drug-linked mental health issues who are very difficult to help because they won’t accept help.  Typically, they gather around a drug dealer and set up camp.  The rest spots can be new camps.  And once in, they can be fiercely territorial.  The new “rest spots” are likely to become battle grounds as these homeless seek to stake out new territory on private property.  Sound like a place to build some new construction in?  Lucky owners.

It almost sounds as if Portland’s insanely blue government is attempting to deputize the private sector to take on some of the city’s abundant homeless population in a bid to reduce stress on public spaces.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


Document Shows Pfizer Anticipated That Those Injected with mRNA Might Transmit Infection to Those who Are Non-Injected

The document defines SAE (Secondary Adverse Event) as an adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who received the mRNA shot. It lists ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and neonatal death as SAEs. It then says that exposure during breastfeeding can occur through inhalation or skin contact.


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Charles Andrew Robinson
Charles Andrew Robinson
1 year ago

It always comes down to Real Estate. Wars are fought for it, Royalty and Landlords take advantage of supply and demand and make absolutely sure the demand is high and the rents are as high as they can get. There used to be homesteads. If a person worked hard to improve the land they owned it. There could be very much more affordable land and housing of course. It’s a slavery scam. When people are able to make a decent living and save, much less of this kind of scar would be seen. It is totally idiotic to allow people… Read more »

1 year ago

Has the country gone completely nuts? As CAR below says, there will be war if they try this crap in my area.