Journalist Jon Rappoport Says Google, Facebook and Other Social Media Censor Their Critics, Not Only Because They Are Left-Leaning, But Because They Are Appendages of the State

Pixabay
image_pdfimage_print
Jon Rappoport argues that Big Tech and social-media corporations are serving mainstream news outlets by silencing their competition – commentators like Alex Jones, Dennis Prager, and Stefan Molyneaux. Rappoport shows that Google, Facebook, and YouTube are deeply influenced by government intelligence agencies. Facebook received $13-million in 2004 from Accel Partners, which is indirectly funded by the CIA and DARPA, a research division of the US military. Google works closely with the military-industrial complex and has huge contracts with the US national-security apparatus. Rappoport concludes: “Google and Facebook are nurtured creatures of the national-security state.” -GEG

Several of the biggest “conservative/libertarian” figures on the Net—Alex Jones, Dennis Prager, Stefan Molyneux, among others—have recently been banned/censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and other social media companies.

When you ask why this is happening, one obvious answer pops up right away:

These social media corporations are fulfilling desperate pleas from major news outlets, who have been losing audience, in massive chunks, to the likes of Jones, Prager, and Molyneaux.

The newspapers and TV news networks came to end of their rope. They had no solutions to their problem—so they went to Google, Facebook, and others, and said, HELP US. Meaning: Censor our competition.

On one level, understanding censorship is that simple.

But then you have to ask yourself this question: Why would Google, Facebook, and other social media giants bend to the needs of mainstream news outlets?

These social media operations are richer and bigger than mainstream news. They could easily have said: “No, we like open forums and a wide variety of opinion, and we think people should be able to deal with ideas they don’t like. We stand for an open society, and we vigorously defend the 1st Amendment.”

But they didn’t say that. Instead, they’re enacting bans and censorship. Why?

The obvious answer staring us in the face is: Google and Facebook and You Tube, for example, the largest social media corporations, are not “free companies.”

They’ve been in bed with the intelligence community for a long time, and they favor wall to wall surveillance of the population. They favor the “liberal” version of a policed State, where correct opinions are let in the door and incorrect opinions are shut down.

Let’s quickly review a bit of Facebook history:

The big infusion of cash that sent Mark Zuckerberg and his fledgling college enterprise on their way came from Accel Partners, in 2004.

Jim Breyer, head of Accel, attached a $13 million rocket to Facebook, and nothing has ever been the same.

Earlier that same year, a man named Gilman Louie joined the board of the National Venture Capital Association of America (NVCA). The chairman of NVCA? Jim Breyer. Gilman Louie happened to be the first CEO of the important CIA start-up, In-Q-Tel.

In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999, with the express purpose of funding companies that could develop technology the CIA would use to “gather data.”

That’s not the only connection between Jim Breyer and the CIA’s man, Gilman Louie. In 2004, Louie went to work for BBN Technologies, headed up by Breyer. Dr. Anita Jones also joined BBN at that time. Jones had worked for In-Q-Tel and was an adviser to DARPA, the Pentagon’s technology department that helped develop the Internet.

Read full article here…

Related Post

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
MJ Raichyk, PhD, mathematical decision analystolde rebTom Ball Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Tom Ball
Guest
Tom Ball

One doesn’t have to be a neo-Nazi to say that Facebook and Google are Jewish owned and operated.

olde reb
Guest
olde reb

Ed, What is it about the scheme of the Federal Reserve’s embezzling money from the auctions of Treasury securities that you do not understand ? Ref. https://thedailycoin.org/2018/08/16/a-look-at-the-federal-reserve-through-a-different-lens/.

olde reb
Guest
olde reb

It is strange that some of the larger targets of censoring by facebook, twitter, google, etc. rely upon them for public access to their websites/comments,

MJ Raichyk, PhD, mathematical decision analyst
Guest
MJ Raichyk, PhD, mathematical decision analyst

Apparently WORDPRESS is part of the censorship scheming. clicking through for the rest of jon rappoport’s article produces… drum roll…

jonrappoport.wordpress.com is no longer available.
This site has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service.
For more information and to contact us please read this support document.

and so the idea that this is jewish is nonsensical as you may agree if your dig a little on who he is… not to mention that he has not been to favorable to banking misbehaving, rotfnl.. ttyl