AG Sessions Has A Disgusting ‘Reason’ for Not Prosecuting Hillary Clinton

Judge Napolitano says that US Attorney General Jeff Sessions refuses to prosecute Hillary Clinton, despite ample evidence of her guilt, because politicians rarely go after their predecessors because they do not want their successors to come after them. [There may be an additional reason that no one wants to think about, and that is the possibility that Sessions is a mole who is beholden to the Clinton political machine.] -GEG

During a Tuesday appearance on Fox Business Channel’s “Varney & Co.,” legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano told Stuart Varney that he’s disappointed in his “friend” Attorney General Jeff Sessions for refusing to prosecute Hillary Clinton.

Napolitano told Varney “there’s ample evidence of her guilt,” in connection to her private email investigation.

The Trump supporting Fox contributor then gave Varney an explanation as to why Sessions refuses to go over Clinton.

Fox Business Channel reports:

A Maryland judge has order an investigation into three lawyers who reportedly helped Hillary Clinton delete her private emails.

[…]Napolitano sees criminal charges against Clinton as unlikely at this point.

“The government has chosen not to prosecute. [Attorney General] Jeff Sessions, the Justice Department, can investigate, indict and prosecute, but they choose not to do so,” he said.

Napolitano disagreed with the decision not to prosecute, telling Varney, “I think it’s a terrible decision not to prosecute. They should prosecute Mrs. Clinton because there’s ample evidence of her guilt, and they should prosecute anybody that destroyed evidence in a criminal investigation.”

[…]According to Napolitano, the culture in government is holding back Sessions from pursuing an investigation against Clinton.

“It’s an institutional culture in government,” he said. “We don’t want to go after our predecessors because we don’t want our successors to come after us.”

On Monday, the Maryland state bar was ordered by County Circuit Court Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. to investigate the lawyers who assisted Hillary Clinton with deleting her private emails.

Washington Times reports:

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. said the complaints lodged against David E. KendallCheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were egregious and the state bar couldn’t dismiss them as frivolous.

“There are allegations of destroying evidence,” Judge Harris said at a hearing Monday morning.

He said the state’s rules require the bar to conduct investigations no matter who raises the complaint and can’t brush aside accusations.

The judge made the announcement a day before Mrs. Clinton releases her latest book, “What Happened,” and begins a monthslong book tour attempting to explain how she lost an election she thought she had secured.

If Judge James E. Boasberg has his way, details of Hillary Clinton’s email investigation by the FBI will see the light of day. The U.S. District Judge isn’t buying the FBI’s claim that a “lack of public interest” justifies withholding the documents.

Napolitano told Varney “there’s ample evidence of her guilt,” in connection to her private email investigation.

The Trump supporting Fox contributor then gave Varney an explanation as to why Sessions refuses to go over Clinton.


Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


Jon Rappoport Investigates the Cult of COVID

July 10, 2020 Jon Rappoport 1

No one has done a proper study for a novel, never-seen-before virus, and it will never be attempted because it would destroy the theory that one virus is causing a pandemic. A few people at the top know the truth, but the cult operates on blind faith.

GEG Commentary

Dr. Scott Jensen Accused by the State of Spreading Misinformation

July 8, 2020 Dr. Scott Jensen 3

The State’s Medical Practice Board accused Dr. Jensen of ‘providing reckless advice’ on a news program by comparing COVID-19 to the ordinary flu. [Dr. Jensen is correct, of course, and If this goes to court, there is a good chance he will prove his case. Our guess, therefore, is that it will never go to court.]


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dick motta
dick motta
2 years ago

Hillary for Prison 2017. Where the hell is AG Sessions?

2 years ago

how was it he said —it is not politically correct to prosecute Hillary—kick sessions out of our DOJ and replace him with someone who enforces the law—-this man is weak.

2 years ago
Reply to  franksharon

Weak? nah, he’s a swamp creature just like all the rest. Swamp creatures make the rules, they don’t abide by them. Consider the technology we have today and what solutions could be created to deal with this kind of issue. First, we don’t need “representatives” to do what is right, we can do that ourselves now. Ask yourself how likely the system that we are currently under would be the system the founding fathers would have created if they were starting from scratch today. “Representative” government was the only choice they had at the time because of the time, effort… Read more »

2 years ago

I think the truth about Sessions is the truth about a lot of the parasites in Wash D.C.: they are controlled by blackmail. Here’s the formula that’s used: find a guy or gal who is a sociopath and who has done something obscene and there are pictures of it, videos even, pour money on their campaigns for public office, help get them elected and now you are the one who occupies the seat of power. Sessions, Mueller, McCain, Ryan, both Clintons, the Bush family, and many others fall into this category. They are all dancing on the end of someone… Read more »

2 years ago

That’s too innocent. The gang of reprobates in Washington D.C. already have something “on” him and they’re holding it over his head. It’s the same with all of them. There isn’t enough money to buy them outright, so it has to be for an obscene reason like pedophilia or a video of a homosexual act or even murder. It’s how the game is played out there in the armpit of our country. We have been taught that goodness will always triumph, but apparently Power Central hasn’t got the message and they live by another standard: they are predators, we are… Read more »