Alex Jones Learns on Witness Stand that Lawyers Sent his Text Messages to Rival Attorney

Alex Jones' attorney Federico Adino Reynal, Youtube
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
Alex Jones was informed that his own attorney accidentally sent two years of text messages from Alex’s cellphone to the lawyer suing him for $150 million on behalf of the parents of a Sandy Hook victim. Mark Bankston, the lawyer for the Sandy Hook parents, advised Jones, who was on the witness stand, that his attorneys sent the data to him and said that when Jones’ attorney was informed, he did not take any steps to identify it as privileged or protect it in any way! Plaintiff’s attorney accused Alex of perjury, saying that there were text messages about Sandy Hook on his phone when Alex denied it in deposition. Additionally, it seems curious that Alex was the only witness called by his defense team. The jury has ordered Alex Jones to pay more than $4 million for calling the Sandy Hook massacre a hoax.

Federico Andino Reynal filed a request for a mistrial and ask the judge to order Bankston to return the documents and destroy what they kept. Reynal appears to have committed malpractice. The January 6 committee now wants Alex’s text message data.

While being cross-examined at his defamation trial in Austin, Texas, on Wednesday, Alex Jones was informed that his attorneys accidentally sent two years of text messages from his cellphone to a lawyer for the Sandy Hook parents suing him — and then failed to note that the messages were protected under attorney-client privilege.

Mark Bankston, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, presented a text message about Sandy Hook that Bankston said came from Jones’s cellphone.

“Do you know where I got this?” Bankston asked Jones.

“No,” Jones replied.

Bankston explained: “Twelve days ago, your attorneys messed up and sent me an entire digital copy of your entire cellphone with every text message that you’ve sent for the past two years — and when informed, did not take any steps to identify it as privileged or protected.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Kakistocracy

The Global Elites Are Normalizing Pedophilia

August 17, 2022 The People's Voice 7

Mcaron’s government voted against having an age of consent in France, which means that adults who have sex with children of any age will not be prosecuted for rape. The media is complicit not only in turning a blind eye to child sex abuse, but also to normalizing child rape and abuse.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ragnar D.
Ragnar D.
13 days ago

With defense attorneys like this, who needs plaintiff attorneys?

SGlord
SGlord
13 days ago

Sandy Hook is a hoax. The school had been closed due to asbestos concerns. The wayback machine proved it. Also, the only person murdered was a woman in real estate who started questioning the free homes given given to certain crisis actors. Another revealing fact was in the parking lot. Other elementary schools in the area with concrete parking had, using an aerial view, showed oil stains. Sandy Hook’s parking lot had none. And there was more evidence that proved hoax… It was a poorly run op, another attempt to whittle away American’s 2nd Amendment rights.

obvious_bob
obvious_bob
13 days ago

I have never regarded lawyers as necessarily being particularly smart, but this one takes the absolute cake. Jones’s attorney should have insisted, in the first instance, on a jury trial, as is Jones’s Constitutional right, and should have declared the Court a Star Chamber, because that is what this Court was. A one man Bench in a criminal trial is obscene, as we do not know the private allegiances, of this Judge and whether the Judge has any negative attitude towards Jones, especially given his high profile. This trial represents a major miscarriage of Justice, and with Jones’ well known… Read more »

inorganic
inorganic
13 days ago

Nobody messed up. His defense attorney was working for the prosecution. What do you expect from a pack of predators?

BVforFreedom
BVforFreedom
12 days ago

They are trying to silence any dissenting voices. They are trying to kill free speech. People must wake up and fight for the First Amendment!!!

A. Barrett
A. Barrett
12 days ago

Why isn’t Alex screaming bloody murder at his attorney Federico Andino Reynal? Why was Alex the only witness that his lawyers called to testify? Why, as we have seen over and over again, was no evidence presented that NO ONE DIED AT SANDY HOOK? Alex’s lawyer didn’t sell him out, both Alex and his lawyer are in the bag. They are dirty. They have been bought off. And now we have a precedent against free speech and criticizing government staged shootings and hoaxes.

GenEarly
GenEarly
12 days ago

Alex Jones is protected by the 1st amendment in reporting on Sandy Hook, All of these school shootings are fishy. Each one has something that doesn’t add up, questions left unanswered.Psych Drugged shooters always a constant factor but ignored. Big Pharma seems to be committed to killing people one way or another. The Judge is a Total Nazi or Bolshevik, take your pick, democRat for sure.

Betty
Betty
11 days ago

Oops, Jones can ask for a miss trial or appeal it. He can also sue his attorney for malpractice. This is ridiculous that he should pay any sum of money for his comments. What actual damages are there?

wilma
wilma
10 days ago

Who was this wonderful jury? Imported CCP? It should be mandatory for each Juror, Judge, and Lawyer to take a test on the Constitution. If it were me, I would have shown up, stated I was only there as a courtesy and to protect myself from abuse of power when judges award the loss to those who don’t show, even if the case is frivolous e.g. when the court allows a case which is already directly covered by law. Ref. Jurisprudence settled case law. That there is no basis for a case in the law.

Robert BC
Robert BC
9 days ago

Proving that there is only one good use of a lawyer, Boat Anchor.