US Supreme Court, Supported by Both Parties, Declines to Hear Case against Vax Mandates

Supreme Court
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a challenge by four teachers and teaching assistants in New York City who sought to halt enforcement of the vaccine mandate by Mayor Bill DeBlasio. All 148,000 staff in New York City school district were ordered to be vaccinated against Covid-19 by October 1, 2021, or face being placed on unpaid leave. While Sotomayor is a Democrat, she is not alone in this decision. ‘Conservative’ Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett similarly denied a petition by Indiana University students to block that school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in August. Former President Trump funded Operation Warp Speed to bring the Covid-19 shots to market faster than any other vaccines in US history. Journalist Brian Shilhavy wrote that the conservative right supported the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which gave pharmaceutical companies legal immunity in the courts from being sued due to injuries and deaths caused by their vaccines, and Republican President Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law. All of the “conservatives” on the bench sided with Big Pharma, including Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito. -GEG

From Reuters

Oct 1 (Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Friday refused to block New York City’s requirement that its public school teachers and employees be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Sotomayor denied a challenge by four teachers and teaching assistants who sought to halt enforcement of the vaccine mandate while their lawsuit challenging the policy continues in lower courts. Public school system workers were ordered to be vaccinated by 5 p.m. EDT (2100 GMT) on Friday or face being placed on unpaid leave until September 2022.

Some governments and private employers have embraced vaccine mandates to guard against the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace as they try to return to some degree of normalcy after coronavirus pandemic-related disruptions that began last year. Such mandates have become a flash point in the United States, with opponents including those in New York City saying their constitutional rights are being violated.

New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio, a Democrat, announced on Aug. 23 that all 148,000 staff in the largest U.S. school district would be required to submit proof of at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. After a lower court temporarily blocked the measure – an order since lifted – the deadline was pushed to Oct. 1.

Around 1 million students attend the city’s public schools.

Sotomayor rejected the emergency request without offering an explanation or referring the matter to the full nine-member court. Her decision mirrored one by Justice Amy Coney Barrett in August denying a bid by Indiana University students to block that school’s vaccine mandate.

Excerpts from Brian Shillhavy at Health Impact News

“Right” vs. “Left” divisions are what is hampering this nation to mount a united effort to fight against medical tyranny right now. Newly appointed “Conservative” Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett made a similar ruling in August denying a petition by Indiana University students to block that school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. (Source.)

And let’s not forget that it was the hero of the “Right Wing Conservatives” who took $TRILLIONS out of the American economy to fund Operation Warp Speed and bring these COVID-19 shots to market faster than any other vaccines in U.S. history, Donald Trump, who still brags about his accomplishments to this day.

And for you “johnny-come-lately” pundits just now jumping on the anti-vaxx bandwagon, let me give you a brief history lesson about how what little opposition has been made in the past to slow down corporate America’s rush to enslave the population through the medical system, has usually come from the left.

The “Conservative Right” is who supported the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which gave pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines legal immunity in the courts from being sued due to injuries and deaths caused by their vaccine products.

“Conservative” President Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law.

The law was challenged at the Supreme Court in 2011 with Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, and the law was upheld as the Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” All of the “conservatives” on the bench sided with Big Pharma, including Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, considered “solid conservatives.”

And who wrote the dissenting opinion complaining that the Court was overstepping its bounds and ruling beyond what Congress intended by giving Big Pharma too much power?

“Liberal” Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. (You can read her opinion here.) She was joined in dissent only by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, now deceased and no longer on the Court.

So when I learned earlier this week that Justice Sotomayor was going to be the one on the Supreme Court to hear the complaint of New York City school teachers who are faced with losing their jobs now for failing to receive a COVID-19 shot, I thought, OK, this will be the final test to see if there is any opposition left in the judiciary to these unlawful vaccine mandates.

If ever there was a cause worth fighting for in regards to civil liberties and progressive liberalism, standing up for the masses enslaved by corporate America, this was it.”

“…Change will only come when people wake up and say “Enough is enough!” and stop obeying the tyrants.

This is what they fear, and it doesn’t take a majority to start a revolution. Courage begets courage, and liberty begets liberty. It is contagious. If just 10% of the population resists, it will become infectious and draw others into resisting as well.

This is what they fear, and this is the fear motivating them to censor all contrary information in the corporate media and Big Tech.

They fear YOU!!”

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GenEarly
GenEarly
1 year ago

Soopreme Courtesans rule Citizens do not have “Standing” to dispute NWO Pogroms. If you are not a Commie Bolshevik Marxist democRat or a Quisling Rino Fascist; Then you Are a Domestic Terrorist.
Welcome to the USSA, ruled by Elitist Political Cartels for longer than anyone reading this has been alive.
Is that “long enough” to qualify for the phrase, “a long train of abuses”???

Victoria
Victoria
1 year ago

I can see clearly now… that our country is no longer ruled by the laws that have been established to protect our freedom and individual liberties. We the people should start a national petition to remove every tyrant in political office from their position, and that includes the “supreme court justices.” If they can’t follow the supreme law of the land that they swore to uphold… what the heck are they good for? The answer to that question is absolutely nothing! They are basically what the fallen ones, aka, global elite have called humanity, useless eaters. They live like kings… Read more »

Jim
Jim
1 year ago

Since the passing of RBG, the Supreme Court has become more ruthless. They can’t blame her for their globalist anti-human tyranny anymore.

Fastt Ed
Fastt Ed
1 year ago

In the Constitution, there is no mention / suggestion (?) to have a “supreme” court. Kinda’ like the USA having to go to the Hague or UN for ‘approval’ of a national issue. The cabal of the “evil 9” as far as I’m concerned.

r slomovic
r slomovic
1 year ago
Reply to  Fastt Ed

The “evil 9” is a good description of these people who are supposed to protect us from the tyrany of the so called “rulers”!!!

tom matt
tom matt
1 year ago

We need to increase the Supreme Court to 50 justices (?). They should be selected from each State and not be part of the political games played by the POTUS & CONGRESS .This could allow a lottery system which would choose 9 members to hear cases .Leaving the other 41 available to do the next case .We wouldn’t have so many cases turned down .>>It would be difficult to impute the will of outside forces to the Court .>>+ age limit 70 years old !

Karl McGaugh
Karl McGaugh
1 year ago

I used to be a law and order man but I can’t support the legal system anymore. There are still a few judges who seek the truth but the majority are political ideologues. I have come to realize that when we take God, “Supreme Being”, out of the culture there is no longer a good way to judge right from wrong. Taking God out of the public schools, 1962, has had disastrous consequences. In the last 60 year’s we have gone from the shining beacon on the hill to the giant commercial billboard on every corner. Money and political power… Read more »

Aunt Jemima
Aunt Jemima
1 year ago

They are obviously utterly corrupt … just like at least 99.999% of everyone else in the fiction called “government”.

r slomovic
r slomovic
1 year ago

shame on all of these people!!!
They are totally sold out to the lefties of this country and they have taken our freedom away.
Unnelievable!!!

Petra Sarmiento
Petra Sarmiento
1 year ago

In the Philippines, there are no such appeals for lifting of mandatory vaccinations for employees of private companies or in schools. Everybody follows out of fear of the CON-VID 19 Hoax. Even the dominant Catholic Church recommends the bioweapon jab to its faithful, even priests are afraid of being infected with the non-existent virus.