OSHA Tells Employers They May Be Liable For Any Adverse Reactions If They Mandate Covid Shots

Pixabay

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has put employers on notice that should they attempt to require employees to receive injections of experimental COVID-19 gene-therapy vaccines a resulting adverse reaction will be considered “work-related” for which the employer may be held liable and will be vulnerable to workers’ compensation claims that could affect their safety record. In addition, it is possible that employers requiring COVID-19 injections may be held legally liable for violating federal law. According to America’s Frontline Doctors, products approved for emergency use only “are prohibited from being mandated by federal law.” The US Food and Drug Administration’s emergency use authorization (EUA) specifically states that individuals must have the free “option to accept or refuse” these vaccines. Many argue the prospect of being terminated from one’s job by refusing such vaccines certainly undermines such necessary freedom. America’s Frontline Doctors’ legal team prepared a template letter to put employers and schools on notice that “experimental medical treatment cannot be mandated.”

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has put employers on notice that should they attempt to require employees to receive injections of experimental COVID-19 gene-therapy vaccines a resulting adverse reaction will be considered “work-related” for which the employer may be held liable.

OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance.

The question asks whether an employer who mandates employees receive these experimental COVID-19 shots is required to record any adverse events as a result of these injections. Such recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may not only leave an employer vulnerable to worker’s compensation claims, but such incidents could also impact the employer’s safety record.

The question and answer in full:

If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

This clarification comes as an increasing number of employers seek to mandate the experimental injections despite possible illegality. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported this beginning trend in varieties of fields, including machine operators, office workers, restaurant waiters, and medical staff.

“The Houston Methodist Hospital network is mandating vaccines for both existing employees and new hires, barring an exemption,” Chip Cutter of the WSJ wrote. “Those who fail to comply will at first be suspended without pay, and later terminated.”

Under the new OSHA clarification, such employers may be held liable for injuries due to these requirements.

For example, 39-year-old nurse aide Janet More died last New Year’s Eve within 48 hours of receiving one of these injections. According to her brother, she at least had the impression “it was a mandatory vaccine that she had to take for her job.”

Read full article here…

Link for Frontline Doctors’ notice to businesses and schools about mandating the COVID vaccine:   https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classified Ads

The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We cannot vouch for accuracy of statements or integrity of advertisers. We will investigate complaints, however, and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent or unethical.
For ad rates, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zorro
Zorro
2 years ago

Very good. About time.

terry shead
terry shead
2 years ago

This policy should be for all employers, this gene therapy is poison, for flip sake wake up?

Pascal Mangoria
Pascal Mangoria
2 years ago

It’s a good start, but only half-way there. How about the requirement for proof of an equally bogus and invasive ‘negative test’ before being allowed to work?

Boomer Lady
Boomer Lady
2 years ago

To get around this, the vaccines will ultimately be fully approved, even with all the deaths and severe injuries.

FreeOregon
FreeOregon
2 years ago

So many ways to coerce without an official mandate.

Questionit21
Questionit21
2 years ago

Should it be about time that we do not call this Covid 19 shots Vaccines even the Eugenics Manufacturers stated that will not prevent anyone getting Covid 19 from the shots or stop spreading covid 19 to anyone else this definitely does not portray a Vaccine. So let’s call it what it really is Experimental Gene therapy Toxin. It’s a death sentence before the 2 year human lab rats trials are over. The millions that will die will be based on a very deadly strain. Has anyone heard about that the injection site attracts magnets plenty of videos and say… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Questionit21
Voco Veritas
Voco Veritas
2 years ago

Anyone doubting the dangers of this toxin should watch this video from a real professional with no agenda: https://thenewamerican.com/covid-shots-to-decimate-world-population-warns-dr-bhakdi/