California: 41 District Attorneys Oppose Early Release of 63,000 Prison Inmates that Will Endanger the Public

Pixabay
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save

California may release more than 63,000 inmates convicted of violent crimes, but are eligible for good behavior credits that shorten their sentences by one-third. The policy was enacted after the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) was “granted authority” to make the changes by tacking it onto the current budget. Because the new policy was implemented as “emergency regulations,” CDCR was able to impose the new rules without holding public comment, which angered prosecutors. Allowing the early release of the most dangerous criminals and shortening sentences as much as 50% impacts crime victims and creates a serious public safety risk. The district attorneys are filing a petition for a court order to repeal the CDCR emergency regulations and begin the process anew, which would allow for public input.

District Attorneys for jurisdictions all around California are petitioning the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation not to put in place an upgraded good behavior credit system that could result in the release of some 76,000 inmates in state prisons.

Sacramento DA Anne Marie Schubert is spearheading the effort that seeks to repeal temporary emergency regulations.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported on the campaign:

The regulations, which were announced April 30 and went into effect May 1, are part of the state’s plan to continue trimming what was once the country’s largest state correctional system, according to the Associated Press. Under it, more than 63,000 inmates convicted of violent crimes are eligible for good behavior credits that shorten their sentences by one-third, an upgrade from the one-fifth that had been standard since 2017.

The regulations were passed under a “claim of emergency” and would result in the early release of “some of California’s most violent criminals,” according to the statement from Schubert’s office.

The changes were approved by California’s Office of Administrative Law, according to the AP. The department was “granted authority” to make the changes through the rulemaking process and under the current budget. Because they were implemented as “emergency regulations,” CDCR was able to impose them without holding public comment — which angered prosecutors.

CDCR spokesperson Dana Simas said in a statement to AP:

The goal is to increase incentives for the incarcerated population to practice good behavior and follow the rules while serving their time, and participate in rehabilitative and educational programs, which will lead to safer prisons. Additionally, these changes would help to reduce the prison population by allowing incarcerated persons to earn their way home sooner.

The DAs disagree and said “the public will be put at risk.” Schubert said:

Allowing the early release of the most dangerous criminals, shortening sentences as much as 50 percent, impacts crime victims and creates a serious public safety risk. His petition asks CDCR to repeal these regulations, begin the process anew, and allow for transparency and public input. Victims, their families, and all Californians deserve a fair and honest debate about the wisdom of such drastic regulations.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Health

California Man Pressured to Take Covid Vax Dies, Blows the Whistle from the Grave on the Killer Vax

November 21, 2021 Covid Vaccine Injuries 8

Mike Granata wrote, “I wished I would have never gotten vaccinated. If you are not vaccinated, don’t do it unless you are ready to suffer and die.” He revealed that that the medical profession is hiding the true number of deaths from Covid vaccines and that nurses begged him to reveal the truth about the dangerous vaccines to the public.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments