Nancy Pelosi Rejects Borders, Saying Trump Wants a Wall Due to a ‘Manhood Issue.’

Nancy Pelosi's gated neighborhood in Presidio Terrace, San Francisco. Youtube
image_pdfimage_print
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi said in an interview that building a border wall is expensive, ineffective and “not something people do between countries.”  She went on to state that Trump’s proposed border wall was a “manhood issue.”  However, Nancy Pelosi lives in the prestigious Presidio Terrace neighborhood in San Francisco behind a guarded gate.  Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) wrote the ‘Keep Families Together Act’ bill in June, which critics say is a bill for open borders.  The bill provides that “[a]n agent or officer of a designated agency shall be prohibited from removing a child from his or her parent or legal guardian at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border of the United States.”

Democrats believe in “restorative justice”.  They do not believe in incarceration.  For illegal aliens a bill by California Senator Dianne Feinstein, signed to by many of the incumbents already in trouble, would totally open our borders, if two adults claimed a child as theirs—they would go free to roam our nation.

“Let’s break down Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed “Keep Families Together Act” to see where Democrats went wrong. The bill provides that “[a]n agent or officer of a designated agency shall be prohibited from removing a child from his or her parent or legal guardian at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border of the United States” (with three exceptions to be discussed later). Four immediate warning signs in this provision should put the reader on notice that this bill is not what Democrats claim.

First, “designated agency” here is defined as the entirety of the federal departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. The scope of the bill is not limited to those portions of these departments involved with the border crisis, and there is no other limiting factor in the bill that would cabin the prohibition on family separation to immigration-related matters. In other words, this bill is going to regulate conduct across a great many federal offices that have nothing to do with separating children from families arriving unlawfully in the United States.

Imagine, within 100 miles of our borders, illegal aliens can take over and law enforcement can do nothing!  That is turning over San Diego, Detroit, upstate New York, major part of Texas Arizona, New Mexico and Minnesota to illegal aliens.  Democrats literally want to turn over major U.S. cities to criminals.  Watch as this explodes.

Every Senate Democrat has signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between foreign children at the border and U.S. citizen children.

 

By Gabriel Malor, The Federalist,  6/19/18

 

Democrats’ proposed legislation to prohibit so-called border separations would actually prevent federal law enforcement agencies almost anywhere inside the United States from arresting and detaining criminals who are parents having nothing to do with unlawfully crossing the border and seeking asylum.

Every Senate Democrat has now signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between migrant children at the border and U.S. citizen children already within the United States. The bill further does not distinguish between federal officers handling the border crisis and federal law enforcement pursuing the ordinary course of their duties.

Let’s break down Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed “Keep Families Together Act” to see where Democrats went wrong. The bill provides that “[a]n agent or officer of a designated agency shall be prohibited from removing a child from his or her parent or legal guardian at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border of the United States” (with three exceptions to be discussed later). Four immediate warning signs in this provision should put the reader on notice that this bill is not what Democrats claim.

First, “designated agency” here is defined as the entirety of the federal departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. The scope of the bill is not limited to those portions of these departments involved with the border crisis, and there is no other limiting factor in the bill that would cabin the prohibition on family separation to immigration-related matters. In other words, this bill is going to regulate conduct across a great many federal offices that have nothing to do with separating children from families arriving unlawfully in the United States.

Second, “agent or officer” is not defined by the legislation, except to say that it includes contractors. Federal law, however, already defines “officer” to include (with exceptions not relevant here) every federal employee appointed to the civil service by the head of an executive agency and ultimately overseen by the head of an executive agency.

Here again, this bill is not limited to controlling the behavior of the DHS, DOJ, or HHS officers involved in the border crisis. The proposed law would apply with equal force to, say, FBI agents (part of DOJ), Secret Service agents (part of DHS), and Centers for Disease Control officers (part of HHS) in the exercise of their everyday duties.

Third, “at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border” does not meaningfully limit the geographic scope of this bill. That area includes almost the entirety of the geographical territory of the United States and the vast majority of people living in it. Two hundred million people live within 100 miles of the border. That’s roughly two-thirds of the U.S. population. Even more live near ports of entry, including in places far from the border crisis, like Salt Lake City, Utah (nearly 700 miles from the nearest border crossing), Tulsa, Oklahoma (more than 600 miles from the nearest border crossing), and Nashville, Tennessee (nearly 600 miles from the nearest border crossing). All major U.S. metropolitan areas fall within either 100 miles of the border or are near a port of entry or both.

Read full article here…

 

Related Post

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Politics

Mom Says that Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, Who Is Implementing George Soros Soft-on-Crime Agenda, Should Be Arrested for Obstruction of Justice in Son’s Murder Case

November 10, 2019 Fox news, Whyy and ABC 1

The decedent’s mother claims that District Attorney Larry Krasner should be arrested for obstruction of justice because he reduced the charges from first degree murder to third degree murder and then to manslaughter. Mrs. Schellenger said that evidence suppressed.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of