Congress Moves Toward Automatic Registration for a Military Draft

Female soldier, Unsplash

Proposals for changes to Selective Service registration were tucked into the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, a budget appropriations bill that is usually over a thousand pages and is passed as a package. NDAA bills sometimes contain controversial and unpopular items that may have trouble passing in a separate bill on its own merit. There are two new proposals, one expands the required draft registration to young women. The second one is an automatic registration for eligible young men only, as compliance is low. The automatic registration would use data gleaned from the Social Security Administration, IRS, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, etc to identify and locate the young men. These proposals could be as “bargaining chips” intended to be withdrawn in exchange for concessions on other issues during the conference negotiations.

.

A proposal to expand registration for a possible military draft to young women as well as young men is moving forward again this year in Congress, along with a seductively simple-seeming but in practice unfeasible proposal to switch from the current system in which young men are required to register with the Selective Service System (SSS) to a system in which the SSS tries to identify and locate everyone eligible for a future draft and automatically register them based on other existing Federal databases from the Social Security Administration, IRS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, etc.

Friday both the U.S. Senate Armed Service Committee and the full U.S. House of Representatives approved different proposals to expand and/or make it harder to avoid the requirement for men ages 16-26 to register with the Selective Service System for a possible military draft.  The House vote was 217-199.

The proposals for changes to Selective Service registration were approved during consideration of the Senate and House versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, a “must-pass” annual bill that typically runs to more than a thousand pages.

The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) approved a version of the NDAA that would expand Selective Service registration to include young women as well as young men. This version of the NDAA will now go to the floor as the starting point for consideration and approval by the full Senate.

Also on June 14th the full House of Representatives approved a different version of the NDAA that would make Selective Service registration automatic while keeping it for men only.

A House amendment proposed by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), a West Point graduate and Army veteran, which would have replaced the provision to make draft registration automatic with a provision to repeal the Military Selective Service Act, was not “made in order” by the Rules Committee to be considered or voted on by the full House. There was no separate House floor vote on the proposed change to Selective Service registration, only a single vote on the entirety of the NDAA as a package.

The SASC markup was conducted in closed session, and only a summary of highlights of the version adopted by the SASC was released. It’s not clear whether the SASC version also includes the provision in the House version of the NDAA to try to make Selective Service registration ‘automatic’ or only the provision to expand the registration requirement (with which compliance is currently low) to young women as well as young men. A spokesperson for the SASC told The Hill today that the full text of the Senate version of the NDAA won’t be released until sometime in July.

Floor amendments are still possible in the Senate before it approves its version of the NDAA. But as of now, it seems likely that competing bad proposals with respect to expansion and/or attempted enforcement through automation of Selective Service — one from the Republican-majority House to try to make it automatic, and one from the Democratic-majority Senate to expand it to women — will be included in the House and Senate versions of the NDAA and go to the eventual House-Senate conference committee to sort out in closed-door negotiations late this year, after the elections.

It’s possible that either or both of these proposals are intended as “bargaining chips” intended to be withdrawn in exchange for concessions on other issues during the conference negotiations. The conference committee could include either, neither, both, or some other compromise on Selective Service in its final package of compromises, which typically are voted on and approved “en bloc” without further amendments.

Either of these misguided proposals would be the most significant change to the Military Selective Service Act since 1980. There have been no hearings, debate, or recorded vote on either of these proposals, and there appear unlikely to be any. The decision will probably be made in secret by the House-Senate conference committee for the NDAA.

Currently, most but not all male (as assigned at birth) U.S. citizens residents are required to register with the Selective Service System (SSS) within 30 days of their 18th birthday, and report to the SSS, within 10 days, each time they change their address until their 26th birthday. Few young men fully comply with these requirements.

Proposals to expand draft registration to women as well as men are anti-feminist and militarist. They wouldn’t salvage the failed system of registration of men: young women would be more likely to resist being drafted than young men have been.

Proposals to “automate” draft registration are a response to decades of failure of the current registration system, and an attempt to enable war planners to pretend that ongoing contingency planning and preparation, including Selective Service registration, makes a draft a viable possible option. The perceived availability of a draft as a “fallback” enables planning and commitments to endless, unlimited wars, without needing to consider regard for whether young people will volunteer to fight them.

Compiling a list of potential draftees by aggregating existing Federal government databases wouldn’t produce an accurate or complete list of draft-eligible individuals or of their current addresses for provable delivery (i.e. by certified letters that have to be signed for) of induction notices. But without informed Congressional opposition, hearings, or debate, the impracticality of automated draft registration based on an aggregation of other lists probably won’t become apparent until long after the change in the law is enacted.

“Automatic” Selective Service registration legislation would also be a privacy and data aggregation nightmare, giving the tiny, inept Selective Service System unprecedented new statutory authority to issue regulations compelling all other Federal agencies — even during “peacetime” and before an actual draft is authorized — to turn over any or all other Federal records, in bulk, that might identify or locate potential draftees.

Whether based on other existing Federal databases or on state driver’s license records, “automated” registration would generate an inaccurate and incomplete list with many out-of-date addresses that omits some individuals who are required to register and includes others who are not required to register.

The National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service (NCMNPS) studied this option of “passive” registration of young people, but rejected it. An internal memo prepared by the NCMNPS research staff, and released in response to one of my FOIA requests after the NCMNPS disbanded, suggested that “The integration of one or more state/federal databases for a post-mobilization registration system would be an inherently difficult integration challenge”, and that, perhaps more importantly, no current Federal database actually contains the information needed to identify all those required to register, weed out those not required to register, and deliver induction notices.

Attempted “automated” draft registration would be a privacy-invasive fiasco, even if its failure might not be noticed right away.

The main effect of “automated” registration would be to eliminate noncompliance with the current registration system as a way for young people to indicate that they don’t want to be drafted and would resist if they were actually drafted.

Proposals to try to “automate” draft registration or expand it to young women as well as young men won’t stand up to serious scrutiny. Unfortunately, though, they are unlikely to be subjected to any public or Congressional scrutiny or debate if they are considered only as part of a package of hundreds of compromise amendments, adopted “en bloc, to a thousand-page “must-pass” bill.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Technocracy

Meta’s Creepy Skin Deep ‘Security’ Idea

July 16, 2024 Reclaim the Net 4

Meta, aka Facebook, filed a new patent application detailing a method of authenticating users by combining vocalization – “and skin vibration.” Documents reveal that this is the kind of biometric data which uses not only a person’s voice but also how speaking causes that person’s skin tissue to vibrate.

Classified Ads

The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We cannot vouch for accuracy of statements or integrity of advertisers. We will investigate complaints, however, and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent or unethical.
For ad rates, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ragnar D.
Ragnar D.
1 month ago

I just read a great article which discussed how huge wars are enabled by conscription by the state. Militaries are of three types: volunteer, mercenary, and slave. A nation that needs a slave army isn’t worth defending.

JoeInMissouri
JoeInMissouri
29 days ago
Reply to  Ragnar D.

Don’t forget the creation of Fiat money in addition to the Public’s acceptance of slavery under the euphemism of conscription. Go and read the 13th Amendment about slavery then look up slavery in the dictionary and tell me what you think.

Ed
Ed
1 month ago

“What if they had a war and nobody came ?”

JoeInMissouri
JoeInMissouri
29 days ago
Reply to  Ed

Never happen as long as we have the 12-year-long mandatory brainwashing camps we call government schools. Go and read the 10th plank of the Communist Manifesto which most all Americans are totally unfamiliar with. The 10th plank of the satanic Communist Manifesto guarantees Us free government schools!

Major Tom
Major Tom
1 month ago

If a nation of 400,000,000 souls has to draft it’s women for military service…..that is a sad state of affairs indeed. Are there not enough men? Must women be pulled further and further away from their traditional roles?

JoeInMissouri
JoeInMissouri
29 days ago
Reply to  Major Tom

I think you should be upset with slavery whether it applies to males or females. Read the 13th Amendment, then go to the dictionary and look up slavery, and see what conscription is.

Phillip Mezzapelle
Phillip Mezzapelle
1 month ago

The next step will be automatic citizenship for any illegal immigrants willing to serve in the military.

JoeInMissouri
JoeInMissouri
29 days ago

They’ve been doing that for well over 20 years! American don’t even understand citizenship or the fact that we’ve been fooled into accepting 14th Amendment citizenship for ourselves! The purpose of the 12-year long dumbing down camps that we were forced at gunpoint to attend, were so that you don’t understand any of this and it’s worked wonderfully on the American public.