Over the last 18 months, I’ve reported on some of the numerous studies showing how remarkably ineffective the so-called COVID-19 “vaccines” have turned out to be. However, it’s one thing to find out that these unproven, experimental drugs are not doing what they are supposed to do. It’s quite another to find out that they’re doing the exact opposite. We are now learning that the more of them you get, the more likely you are to come down with a COVID-19 infection.
Recently the British government released data comparing the rate of COVID-19 infections depending on how many COVID-19 “vaccines” a person has had. I am sure that you did not hear about this from our government agencies or on network TV, so let me give you the run down. The report titled, “UK Health Security Agency COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report,” looked at various age groups during the weeks March 6 to March 27, 2022. When the data listed on pages 41-45 is quickly analyzed, the numbers are shocking. Why is this information not the leading story on every network?
When you look at the age group 50-59, there were 234,309 total COVID-l9 cases reported. Of those cases, 7,669 were in the un-injected group, 27 were in the group that had one injection within three weeks before their infection, I4,5l4 were in the group that had two injections, 210,265 were in the group that had three injections.
Basically, the more injections a person had, the more likely they were to get infected. Do the math and it comes out to anyone with 3 injections was 27 times more likely to come down with COVID-19 than those who never had one injection.
OK, so that’s only the 50-59-year-old group. Surely the other groups fared better. Not so. In every single other age group except those under 18, the case rate increased dramatically as the number of injections increased from one to three just like it did in the 50-59 age bracket.
Those in the under 18 group did not show the same response. Although the number of cases increased with each injection, there was an overall decrease in cases compared to the un-injected group.
To be fair, in a footnote on page 41 the report pointed out that it was likely that a “larger proportion of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated, and no vaccine is 100% effective.
“Well, that turns out tb be true in concept, but when you look at the percentage of people who came down with COVID-19 and were never injected to the percentage of those injected, you see that this is just not true. The same trend is there.
For example, Iet’s look at the 50-59 group again. The number of people who came down with COVID-19 who were never injected was 779.8 per hundred thousand people.
Absolutely no surprise here.
Its the same in the uk the people vaxxed are the ones in hospital with covid, no wonder Gates laughed at these stupid people getting vaxxed. Wake up.
Many of my friends are fully vaccinated and quite a few of them have had Covid. None of my unvaccinated friends have had Covid yet, including me. I used to do the drive-through antigen quick test but it’s not offered anymore in my town. So I test at home, still always negative, in order to sing in my church choir, which is how I pray…through music. I refuse to get the PCR test because the inventor said it isn’t a diagnostic tool. Finding tiny bits of the virus in someone with no symptoms means the virus tried to get inside… Read more »
Examine which people (Jones, Griffin, Bigtree, Tenpenny) have been saying all along that these COVID “vaccines” are going to harm your health and even kill you. Then examine which people (Fauci, Biden, Trump, Gates) have been telling you that the “vaccines” are great and that you should/must take them. Now in light of these ongoing disastrous consequences, which group has earned its credibility, and which group needs to be summarily rejected from this moment forward?