FDA Rejects Pfizer 3rd Booster for 16 and up, but Recommends it for Elderly and Those at High Risk

Unsplash
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
An FDA advisory group voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of Pfizer’s vaccine for those ages 16 and over, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and the potential risk of heart inflammation, especially among young men. During the 8-hour hearing, Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, argued that the vaccines kill more people than they save. Steve Kirsch also pointed out that early treatments are more successful than boosters, noting that cases in Israel are at an all-time high while cases in Uttar Pradesh, India, where they administer Ivermectin, the cases are nearly non-existent. The advisory board did recommend a third booster for people 65 and older or individuals at high risk of severe COVID. Reporter Jordan Schachtel wrote that the FDA shut down Biden’s plans to roll out boosters on Monday, September 20, in a revolt against the Pfizer’s shot that was sparked by two top FDA officials retiring and denouncing booster shots in a Lancet paper. Although the FDA isn’t obligated to follow the advisory panel’s decision, it typically does. A final decision likely will arrive next week. -GEG

On Friday an FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.

The panel voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of an experimental vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and the potential risk of heart inflammation – especially among young men.

The FDA hearing prior to the decision was stunning. The hearing was 8 hours long and it included SHOCKING testimony from American doctors.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial than it is harmful for teenage boys.

Dr. Fraiman told the FDA panel he has NOT seen that those who show vaccine hesitancy are uninformed. “That is not what I’ve seen… The vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more COVID deaths and devastation than most people have.”

Dr. Fraiman went on to say he cannot assure a nurse associate who is 30 that the vaccines are safer than catching the virus is for a healthy woman her age.

Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund was up next to testify before the FDA.  Kirsch argued the vaccines kill more people than they save.

Kirsh pointed out that there patients were 71 times more likely to suffer a heart attack after taking the vaccine than those taking other vaccines. 20 died from the drug, 14 from the placebo.

Kirsh argued that the vaccine killed more people than saved lives.

Read full article here…

ZeroHedge:   https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fda-advisors-meet-decide-booster-jabs-science-remains-uncertain

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Health

Harvard Study Finds Covid-19 Surged Most Among Vaxxed Communities

October 21, 2021 NewsWars 0

Of the top 5 counties in the US that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the CDC identified 4 of them as ‘High’ Transmission counties. Conversely, of the 57 counties that were classified as ‘low’ transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% had a population fully vaccinated below 20%.

  • Save
Kakistocracy

Colorado Governor Pays Children to Get Tested for Covid and Encourages People to Lie to their Families about Getting Vaxxed

Governor Polis encouraged kids and spouses to lie about taking a Covid vaccine: “A spouse, a parent you live with who doesn’t want to get it, is against it… you can still privately get that vaccine without your partner knowing if that’s what keeps the harmony in the family and you are protecting yourself.”

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments