UK Scientists Admit to Using “Totalitarian” Fear Tactics in the COVID Response to Control the Population

  • Save
  • Save
A book by journalist Laura Dodsworth, A State of Fear, How the UK Government Weaponised Fear During the Covid-19 Pandemic, features testimony by members of the UK government’s influential Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) who regret their ‘unethical’ methods of coercion that amounted to “totalitarianism.” An unnamed SPI-B member explained that in March 2020 the government was very worried about compliance with lockdowns, and there were discussions that fear was needed to encourage compliance, and how to ramp up the fear. The source said, “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared. The way we have used fear is dystopian.” Another noted that the psychologists became intoxicated with the power to control.

David Kurten, leader of the Heritage Party and critic of the UK government’s actions, praised the book for revealing the strategy of the government that weaponized fear of a “virus that is no worse than a bad flu” in order to destroy our fundamental freedoms. He said the SPI-B group’s strategy threatened arrest, fines, and imprisonment for doing normal things like meeting friends in a park, while simultaneously using mainstream media to smear, denigrate and stir up hatred towards non-conformists, which is totalitarian. He noted that it was shocking that the majority of the population succumbed to these fear mongering techniques with little resistance, and even voted in greater numbers for the ruling parties that perpetrated the harmful propaganda. The UK government manipulated people into accepting lockdowns and mass injections of experimental mRNA, and now they are on the next phase of the plan to increase acceptance of a Chinese social credit system. They have used all the tactics laid out in Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, which is a blueprint for abuse.

A scientific advisory committee in Britain has expressed “regret” in a newly released book which outlines the group’s use of “dystopian” fear tactics to influence public behavior following the outbreak of COVID-19.

The Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior, or SPI-B for short, is a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that advised SAGE on the role of psychology in nudging the British public into complying with government lockdown measures. SAGE, in turn, advises government ministers, wresting far-reaching influence on public policy.

On the back of SPI-B advice, SAGE issued guidance to the U.K. government, as they locked down the country last March, advising that they would need to couple their actions with a targeted fear campaign to ramp up the “perceived level of personal threat” from the virus. This would help the government to control “a substantial number of people” who were thought to “not feel sufficiently personally threatened,” according to SPI-B.

Journalist and author Laura Dodsworth, in her latest publication A State of Fear, documents “how the U.K. government weaponised fear during the COVID-19 pandemic.” The book features the testimony of SPI-B members who admit that the tactics used by the group were tantamount to “totalitarianism.”

“Fear is the most powerful emotion,” Dodsworth’s website states. “Hardwired into humans, fear is … one of the most powerful tools in the behavioural psychology toolbox and it has been used to manipulate and control people during the pandemic.”

An unnamed SPI-B member explained to Dodsworth that “[i]n March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance, and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

“The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable,” the source continued. “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared. The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

SPI-B psychologist Gavin Morgan told Dodsworth that “using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government.” Morgan related that, in spite of his normally optimistic outlook on life, seeing the government implement fear tactics to control the population “has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments