New Gun-Control Bills Requiring Public Registry Include 40-Year Prison Sentences

AR-15 style rifles, Wikipedia
image_pdfimage_print


Members of Congress are seeking to pass an extreme and unconstitutional gun-control bill, HR 127, the “Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act,” that would nullify the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms. The bill proposes a national firearm registry that anyone can access. It informs where firearms are stored, requires an $800 license with mandatory “psychological evaluations”, enacts extreme ammunition restrictions, and, if any of the provisions are violated, it could lead to a prison sentence of up to 40 years and a fine of up to $150,000. -GEG

Members of Congress are seeking to pass an extreme and unconstitutional gun control bill that would effectively nullify the Second Amendment.

Here are the highlights of H.R. 127’s provisions:

  • It creates a national firearm registry that anyone – including every level of law enforcement and the military – can access.
  • The registry would require one to tell the government exactly where one’s firearms are stored.
  • One would need a license simply to own a firearm.
  • Mandatory “psychological evaluations” are required receive this license.
  • One would need to pay $800 for “firearm insurance.”
  • It would enact extreme ammunition restrictions, including a ban on magazines more than 10 rounds.
  • Violating the above provisions could lead to a prison sentence of up to 40 years and a fine of up to $150,000.

Additionally, Congress is seeking to pass the following other unconstitutional gun control bills:

  • H.R. 8, titled the “Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021”: This bill would criminalize most private firearm transactions and expand background check requirements. The House of Representatives passed this bill on March 11, 2021, by a 227-203 vote.
  • H.R. 1446, titled the “Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021”: This bill would expand the federal waiting period for purchasing and obtaining a firearm from 3 to at least 10 days. The House passed this bill on March 11, 2021, by a 219-210 vote.
  • H.R. 1808 / S. 736, both titled the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2021”: These bills would ban 205 specific firearms erroneously classified as “assault weapons,” along with any other firearm meeting certain characteristics.

H.R. 127, titled the “Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act,” was introduced by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) at the beginning of the 117th Congress. It would enact a number of extreme gun control measures.

Among the bill’s other provisions, it would create a national firearm registration system that every gun owner would need to submit to. Although maintained by the U.S. Attorney General, it would be “accessible to all members of the public, all Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces, and all State and local government.”

Not only this, but among other information that gun owners would need to provide, they would need to inform the government where, exactly, they store their firearms and the identity of any person they loan it to.

Such a registry would enable the government to easily confiscate people’s weapons at a future date, similar to what actually happened in other countries like Australia.

Although a national gun registry is a blatantly unconstitutional proposal that would also violate the privacy of millions of Americans, it is far from the only extreme provision of H.R. 127. For example, the bill would create a nationwide gun license that every American would be forced to have simply to own a firearm – such a license is a direct violation of the core constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Among other burdensome requirements to receive such a license, one would need to undergo a “psychological evaluation,” take a training course, and have “firearm insurance” that would cost $800 to obtain – a requirement that discriminates against the poor.

Additionally, the U.S. Attorney General would have relatively broad authority to deny, suspend, or revoke licenses. Not only this, but after only three years, one would have to renew their license – subject to taking another training course.

If passed, H.R. 127 would make it illegal to own magazines with more than 10 rounds, along with ammunition at or over 0.50 caliber. Since the bill does not contain a grandfather clause, the government could confiscate firearms banned by the bill.

Last, but not least, the penalties for violating any of H.R. 127’s provisions range up to a 40-year prison sentence and/or a $150,000 fine.

H.R. 127 represents an assault on the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and if passed, it would directly infringe upon it in multiple ways. Additionally, its provisions – particularly its national gun registry – would enable the federal government to more easily implement further gun control measures, including confiscations.

The ability of a person to defend him- or herself is a fundamental God-given right. Stripping individuals of this right would make them utterly dependent upon the government for their very lives and allow it to strip them of other rights without fear of reprisal.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Health

Simple Steps to Prevent Breast Cancer

May 10, 2021 Dr. Mercola 2

Susan Wadia-Ells said that having high levels or vitamin D3 and losing excess weight can reduce the risk of contracting breast cancer by 80%. Dr. Mercola said that the risk can be further reduced to over 95% by also cutting out dangerous vegetable oils.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael
Michael
1 month ago

This is going to be a big problem if this sees the light of day.

Tim
Tim
1 month ago
Reply to  Michael

Don’t see how this would be remotely Constituional.

Pepe the Frog
Pepe the Frog
1 month ago
Reply to  Tim

Neither was the election fraud, and the Supreme Court cucked on that too, despite having five cuckservative judges, including three “hardcore culture warriors” appointed by a President they promptly turned their backs on.

Do not look to the judicial system for relief. We are not litigating our way out of this, any more than we are voting our way out of this.

Ed
Ed
1 month ago

It’ll never happen. Try as they may.

Wally58
Wally58
1 month ago

As Duke Wayne said several times in “The Searchers,” “That’ll be the day!”

Eowyn
Eowyn
1 month ago

Their “laws” do not apply if they are unconstitutional.

SS-The Independent
SS-The Independent
1 month ago
Reply to  Eowyn

Yeah, considering how the ‘ constitutional ‘ ” laws ” applied/worked at the last electoral process in Nov.’20 ( in the former ‘ land of the free and home of the brave ‘, lately ‘ land of the fee and home of the slave ‘ )…one should expect that ( not so ) our Judicial branch of the Government will protect us against tyranny…NOT ! Part of the ( American ) ‘ dream ‘ – see George Carlin ( ‘ The American dream ‘ and ‘ The Real Owners of America ‘ )…

Jim
Jim
1 month ago

What part of “shall not be infringed” do they not understand!?

Rouge1
Rouge1
1 month ago
Reply to  Jim

“Constitutional rights are not absolute” Administrator Pedo Joe.

Cal
Cal
1 month ago

“Members of Congress are seeking to pass an extreme and unconstitutional …” The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of this land, and it must be observed that the only crimes assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations not the American people’s weapons. Bertrand Russell,1953: “… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible…” (“The… Read more »

SS-The Independent
SS-The Independent
1 month ago
Reply to  Cal

Very impressive dissertation ( like in ” My cousin Vinny “, with Joe Pesci – highly recommended )…but we are way, way past due…no offense, man…In my humble opinion, Cal, I think it’s time for that ‘ call to arms “…Not today, but YESTERDAY…

Joe
Joe
1 month ago

Take this “bill” and roll it into a tight ball, then shove it up your [email protected]@ congress. p

Badabing
Badabing
1 month ago

Maybe a 40 year prison term for anybody that violates the Bill of Rights (My Rights) including the A$$hats who violate their oath of office.

eoypunfrcibjk
eoypunfrcibjk
1 month ago

This is going to be a big probleThis is going to be a big problem if this sees the light of day.

m if this sees the light of day.

SS-The Independent
SS-The Independent
1 month ago
Reply to  eoypunfrcibjk

Again, for WHOM is going to be a big problem ?! I am kinda of fresh of the boat ( born under commies, in Eastern-Europe )…and I like to see a more detailed explanation of the subject…please…