US: Justice Thomas Issues Scathing Dissent that Blasts Supreme Court for Dismissing Election Fraud Lawsuits

Wiki
image_pdfimage_print
The Supreme Court declined to hear a dispute over whether it is constitutional to count absentee ballots that were received up to three days after Election Day. In a 6-3 split decision, the Court dismissed the lawsuit, claiming it was “moot” now that the 2020 presidential election is over. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote, “One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections.” He added, “The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.” President Trump’s Supreme Court picks, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, voted with the liberal wing of the Court not to the hear the lawsuit. -GEG

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a dispute over whether absentee ballots received up to three days after Election Day in Pennsylvania was constitutional.

The Court dismissed in a 6-3 split decision the lawsuit – with conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito dissenting – against the Pennsylvania state court decision over the extended mail-in ballot deadline, claiming it was “moot” now that the 2020 presidential election is over.

Justices Thomas and Alito issued scathing dissents over the Court’s decision not to settle the dispute about mail-in ballots, especially to avoid more allegations of fraud in future elections.

“One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections,” Thomas wrote.

“The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.”

Thomas blasted Pennsylvania Democrat officials exercising powers they don’t have and warned that unless these unconstitutional practices are addressed, they will likely continue in future elections.

Read full article here…

Additional source:    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/22/clarence-thomas-dissent-election-cases/

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Other

Minneapolis City Council Candidate Rita Ortega Suggests Torching Wealthy Neighborhoods, and BLM Supporters Imply that White People Should Be Killed

In a shocking collection of interviews from the George Floyd memorial in Minneapolis, BLM supporters agreed that the city should be burned and implied that white people need to be killed. They claim that thousands of unarmed black men are killed by police each year. The real number from last year was 18.

Kakistocracy

US Congresswoman Maxine Waters Calls for BLM to ‘Get More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Is Acquitted. Shooter Targets National Guard.

Hours after Congresswoman Maxine Waters called for BLM to get ‘more confrontational’, the Minnesota National Guard was targeted in a drive-by shooting. [It s clear that Waters and others like her are hoping to incite warfare in the streets to justify calling for martial law – which will never be lifted.]

Freedom

Censored News: Kentucky Passed SB 8 into Law Allowing Opt-Out of COVID  Experimental Vaccines, Even During an ‘Emergency’

Other bills filed in Kentucky would bar the government from requiring any person to get a vaccine, prohibit employers from requiring a vaccine, ban discrimination against an employee who declines to get a vaccination, and prohibit colleges from requiring students to be vaccinated except for students in health care programs.

Freedom

Orange County Govt. Backs Down from Requiring Vaccine Passports, But Will Keep Vaccine Records for Businesses to Implement System

Following backlash, Orange County scrapped its plans for a vaccine passport program to restrict travel, conferences/meetings, concerts, sports, school and more. Their new plan is for businesses to implement the passports that can discriminate against people’s health status if they reject vaccines, which is illegal.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed
Ed
1 month ago

For that reason alone, the SC is scum of the lowest order. Cowards at best.