Steve Cortes lays out four cases of statistical irregularities that provide more than enough reasonable suspicion to require hand recounts and immediate investigation into fraudulent activities. The voter turnout is suspect as Wisconsin had 90% voter turnout, which is too high to be plausible. The breakouts higher for Biden relative to Obama’s performances in key areas simply do not seem credible. Reports indicate that 450,000 Biden-only ballots were cast, meaning the voter allegedly selected Biden but then neglected down-ballot candidates, including closely-contested Senate and House races. Democratic governors clamored for massive amounts of mail-in voting, knowing full well that most states would become overwhelmed.
The statistical case is, admittedly, circumstantial rather than conclusive.
But the numbers also firmly point to the intense improbability of the accuracy of the present Biden lead. The statistical case provides more than enough reasonable suspicion to require hand recounts and immediate investigation into fraudulent activities, including the new damning revelations of on-the-record whistleblowers.
There are four key elements to the numerical thesis:
Clearly, high turnout was expected in an intensely political year with vastly expanded access to mail-in voting. But the kinds of numbers reported simply defy reasonable expectations.
For Wisconsin overall, the turnout was above 90% of registered voters. Even in a state with same-day registration, such a number seems implausible.
After all, in Australia, a place where voting is mandatory, and failing to vote is punishable with stiff fines, the total turnout for the most recent election was still only 92%.
Even more importantly, looking within the Wisconsin vote, the decisive locale for Biden was, unsurprisingly, Milwaukee. Wisconsin’s largest city reported an 84% turnout to secure a 145,916 vote lead there for Biden.
Consider a comparison to another very similar Midwestern city, Cleveland, OH. Milwaukee has a population of 590,000, 67% of them minorities. Cleveland has 381,000 people with 60% of them minorities.
But Milwaukee’s 84% turnout dwarfs Cleveland’s more believable 51% turnout rate. Like many of the suspect statistical trends evident from last Tuesday, the abnormal factors favoring Biden seem only present in the key swing states that Biden allegedly won.
2. Outperformance vs. Obama
The breakouts higher for Biden relative to Obama’s performances in key areas simply do not seem credible.
Could a candidate as doddering and lazy as Biden really have massively outpaced the vote totals of a politician who boasted rock star appeal?
For example, consider that in key Pennsylvania counties of Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery, Biden bested the Obama election performances by factors of 1.24-1.43 times. For Montgomery County, Obama won this swing county by 59,000 votes in his 2012 re-election.
But in 2020, Biden won Montgomery County by a whopping 131,000 votes, more than twice the prior Obama margin.
Biden’s 2020 total vote in Montgomery is reported at 313,000, crushing Obama’s 233,000 take in 2012 – and population growth does not explain the gains, as the county only grew by 22,000 residents during those eight years.
Such eye-popping outperformance vs.Obama, in just the right places, naturally raises a lot of suspicion.
3. Biden-Only Ballots
Trump campaign legal counsel Sidney Powell reports that, nationwide, over 450,000 Biden-only ballots were cast, meaning the voter allegedly selected Biden but then neglected down-ballot candidates, including closely-contested Senate and House races.
Again, this phenomenon appears far more prominently in battleground states, raising the alarm for manipulation.
Why would so many people vote Biden–only in battleground Georgia, but not in deeply-red Wyoming, for instance?
In the Peach State, President Trump’s vote total almost exactly trackedthe vote totals for the Republican senate candidates, separated by merely 818 votes out of 2.43 million votes Trump earned there. But, Joe Biden saw an astounding surplus of 95,801 votes over the Democratic Senate candidates.
By comparison, in Wyoming Biden only registered a surplus “Biden-only” take of just 725 votes over the Democratic Senate candidate there, or about 1/4th his take in in Georgia, on a percentage basis.
The Biden-only ballots do not conclusively prove fraud, but they sure reek of something very amiss.
4. Absence of Mail-In Vote Vetting
Democratic governors clamored for massive amounts of mail-in voting, knowing full well that most states would become overwhelmed and wholly unable to establish the validity and legality of almost all the votes that poured in via mail.
In the case of Pennsylvania, Governor Wolf made such changes unilaterally, in stark violation of Pennsylvania law and in contradiction of the clear US Constitutional assignment of voting regulatory authority to state legislatures, not governors. Governor Wolf’s election boards clearly just accepted the ballots… en masse, without appropriate vetting.
By their own admission, the scant 0.03% of rejected ballots represents a refusal rate that is just 1/30th the level of 2016 in Pennsylvania.
First-time mail-in voters typically see a rejection rate of about 3% historically, or 100 times the rejection rate of Pennsylvania in 2020.
When neighboring New York state moved to widespread mail-in voting this summer, their election officials rejected 21% of mailed ballots in June, representing a rate 700 times higher than Pennsylvania’s.
This total lack of filtering or controls raises enormous suspicion regarding a seriously-tainted ballot pool in the Keystone State.
A social distancing device emits a loud sound if people are too close to each other. China is already linking coronavirus rules to its onerous social credit score system, so the idea that people could be publicly shamed or punished for getting too close to others is a very real possibility.
Big Tech is moving from wearable monitoring devices to devices embedded within our bodies. IoB will likely be marketed as improving lives and health care. However, the negative consequences, as discussed in this article, far outweigh the benefits.
Martin says Moderna describes its product not as a vaccine, but as “gene-therapy technology” in SEC filings. Neither Moderna or Pfizer make any claims about their products creating immunity or preventing transmission. Moderna’s own clinical study says it is “impractical to measure infection.”
The US Treasury proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges should collect identity data on their own customers and those who transact with their customers. They would be able to see what products they buy, what political preferences they have, where they go, and how long they remain.
Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman said that “lies” about the legitimacy of the election were not protected under the Constitution. He said, “This idea that saying that Pennsylvania was rigged, or that we were trying to ‘steal the election, that’s a lie.” He said: “That is not protected speech.”
Gates has an estimated net worth of nearly $121-billion and owns 242,000 acres of farmland in the US. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos also is investing in land on a large scale. Media mogul John C. Malone owns 2.2-million acres of ranches and forests, and CNN founder, Ted Turner, owns 2-million acres of ranch land.
Auburn, New York: The Commons on St. Anthony nursing home, a 300-bed care facility, reportedly had zero deaths from Covid-19 prior to December 29th. After the nursing home began administering the Covid-19 vaccine on December 22, 2020, they reported that 24 people died.
A document published by the CDC on anaphylaxis following an injection of the RNA COVID-19 vaccine that shows by December 18, a total of 112,807 people received the RNA vaccine. 3,150 of that group were “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.”
Since no one has ever isolated a sample of this theoretical virus, a precise description of its genetic composition is unknown. Therefore, the fact that authorities have published what they claim is its genome is scientific fraud.
John Sullivan, the man who has a history of inciting violence and who was seen urging demonstrators to violence inside the Capitol, appears to have been denounced by Black Lives Matter, leading critics to wonder if the denunciation is a public-relations gesture or if he is working for a government agency.
The CDC, when contacted by the Courier-Press, weighed in on Skelton’s claims — not by casting doubt on them, but by endorsing vaccination for COVID-19 and saying side effects “tend to be mild to moderate and go away quickly.”
Matt Aitchison says a new law in California, SB 1079, will result in the State entering the real-estate-foreclosed home business, which essentially removes competition from investors, and could ultimately socialize real estate as a whole. He warns that this policy may spread to other Democrat-run sates.
After the event in the Capitol last week, Deutsche Bank AG announced it is terminating business with President Trump. American Express, MasterCard, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Stripe are cutting ties with Trump and other Republicans who opposed the 2020 election results favoring Joe Biden.
Dr. Martin said that Americans have been forced us to participate in a clinical trial that violates the Federal Trade Commission Act that forbids the promotion of the treatment or prevention of disease by an untested medical technology.
John Bush is co-organizing a 5-day event with many expert speakers focusing on practical steps toward personal liberty and decentralization. It will be live-streamed for free, January 25th – 29th, 2021.
John Sullivan, the founder of InsurgenceUSA, who is affiliated with Black Lives Matter and held an anti-Trump rally just before the the event at the Capitol, was at the scene when Ashli Babbitt was shot. He shouted that she was dead, and the analyst said it was to perhaps cause a violent reaction by Trump supporters.
For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.
Private money was used to fund city and county election managers. The director of the investigation said, “This report paints a clear picture of a cabal of billionaires and activists using their wealth to subvert, control, and fundamentally alter the electoral system itself.”
A whistleblower said Democrats rig elections by paying homeless voters, taking advantage of the elderly in nursing homes, fraudulently posing as registered voters, printing up phony ballots, and replacing real ballots with counterfeit ballots. Sometimes workers with the US Post Office are in on the scam.
Democrats dominate the House with 225 seats while Republicans have 200 seats. Ten seats are still being decided. Republicans hold 51 Senate seats and Democrats hold 47 seats. Democrats hold 23 governorships and Republicans control 25, with two still undecided.