Real Science Finds Carbon Dioxide’s Effects on Climate Are ‘Negligible’

global warming alarmism, Pixabay
image_pdfimage_print
More than 100 different scientific papers and counting show that carbon dioxide’s effect on the climate is actually quite small. In addition, 95% of climate software models have actually turned out to be wrong. MIT Professor Richard Lindzen, an atmospheric sciences emeritus professor behind more than 200 different scientific papers, pointed out that the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admitted that it’s not possible to predict future climate states.

Climate change activists love to insist that carbon dioxide is behind global warming, and they’ve made a sport out of refuting claims to the contrary. However, it’s getting harder to defend their delusional stance as more than 100 different scientific papers and counting show that carbon dioxide’s effect on the climate is actually quite small.

The papers use terms such as “negligible” to describe the effects of CO2 on the climate. For example, a paper from last year said there was not “a consistent warming with gradual increase (in CO2) in low to high latitudes in both hemispheres, as it should be from the global warming theory.” After pointing out the complexity of climate predictions, the researchers said it is simply not possible to support the notion that global warming stems from human-caused greenhouse effect.

Last fall, a group of 500 scientists and other professionals in the climate science space penned a letter to the United Nations sharing their view that there isn’t a climate crisis and that they consider spending so much money on the issue to be “cruel and imprudent.”

In the letter, they encouraged the UN to follow a climate policy that is based on “sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation.”

The fact remains that the so-called global warming science that many adherents love to quote is based on a biased interpretation of questionable science that keeps getting repeated as though it were fact.

MIT Professor Richard Lindzen, an atmospheric sciences emeritus professor behind more than 200 different scientific papers, said that climate alarmists’ voices seem to get louder and louder as the climate changes less. He also noted that in a 2007 paper, the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admitted that it’s not possible to predict future climate states.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
milanWilliam BurkeMJ Raichyk, PhD Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
MJ Raichyk, PhD
Guest
MJ Raichyk, PhD

What i would hope is that some of those who have delved into the strangeness worlds of CLIMATE ENGINEERING could ferret out the shape of the CONSPIRACY THAT PRODUCED THE FALSE CLIMATE MODELS and the ORGANIZED NETWORK OF HYSTERIA-GENERATING POWER-GRABBERS…….

surely the origin of these two ‘change’ and ‘engineering’ are in-common. Where are the pieces and perpetrators… digging in history should find it… ttyl

William Burke
Guest
William Burke

“Impudent”! Made me smile.

milan
Guest
milan

Real Science? How about the military application as in the high strangeness accompanying the Iraq War!!!! Go here for an interesting read on military issues and applications of climate change by a very dangerous individual!!!! Heb. 10:31

https://thesaker.is/book-review-andrei-martyanovs-the-real-revolution-in-military-affairs/#comment-729151