California Passes Law Banning Trump from State Ballot Unless His Tax Returns Are Made Public

California Governor Gavin Newsom
image_pdfimage_print
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill requiring President Trump to either release his tax returns or be denied having his name on the California ballot. Trump’s spokesman, Tim Murtaugh, says the Constitution is clear on the qualifications for someone to serve as president, and there is nothing in them that relate to tax returns or personal finance. Furthermore, states cannot add requirements of their own. -GEG

We’re thrilled to see the far-left in America has the same respect for the Democratic process as their forebears did (for a reference to their forebears, see here).

On Tuesday, Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill requiring President Trump to either release his tax returns or he won’t appear on the ballot in the state.

Under SB 27, called the “Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act,” any candidate running for president or governor in California must file copies of their tax returns from the previous five years to the California secretary of State, or their names will be stricken from the ballot, the Hill reports.

Newsom argued that, as the largest economic engine within the US, California has a “responsibility” to demand this additional information (for the record: the Constitution doesn’t say anything about candidates releasing tax returns – though the federal income tax didn’t exist back on).

“As one of the largest economies in the world and home to one in nine Americans eligible to vote, California has a special responsibility to require this information of presidential and gubernatorial candidates,” Newsom said.

“These are extraordinary times and states have a legal and moral duty to do everything in their power to ensure leaders seeking the highest offices meet minimal standards, and to restore public confidence. The disclosure required by this bill will shed light on conflicts of interest, self-dealing, or influence from domestic and foreign business interest.”

A Trump campaign spokesman called the new law “unconstitutional,” and insisted that there was a good reason why California’s last governor, Jerry Brown, refused to sign the legislation.

In a statement, Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh called the move “unconstitutional.”

“There are very good reasons why the very liberal Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed this bill two years ago – it’s unconstitutional and it opens up the possibility for states to load up more requirements on candidates in future elections. What’s next, five years of health records?” he said.

Murtaugh said states cannot add requirements to presidential candidates’ qualifications for running.

“The Constitution is clear on the qualifications for someone to serve as president and states cannot add additional requirements on their own,” he said. “The bill also violates the 1st Amendment right of association since California can’t tell political parties which candidates their members can or cannot vote for in a primary election.”

Read full article here…

Related Post

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Boomer LadyWilliam Pitsker Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback
California Passes Law Banning Trump from State Ballot Unless His Tax Returns Are Made Public | WeAreChangeTV.US

[…] 31, 2019 ZeroHedge No Comments This post was originally published on this […]

William Pitsker
Guest
William Pitsker

I’d like to know how the noisome Mr. Newsom feels about the prior president, vis a vis HIS past, conveniently sealed and marked secret.

Boomer Lady
Guest
Boomer Lady

So what happens now? Can Trump petition the U.S. Supreme Court over this? He would run the risk that the high court might agree with CA, so doing nothing and seeing what the GOP does about it might work better. There isn’t any law mandating a president release his tax returns. It has been completely voluntary to date.