Anti-Jihad Blogger Kicked Off Patreon by MasterCard

Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, Youtube
  • Save
  • Save
Author Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch was informed that he was cut off by Patreon on orders from MasterCard after he posted a video announcing that he was refurbishing a video studio for weekly live streams titled, “This Week In Jihad.” Spencer believes that MasterCard and Patreon are deleting accounts that have been targeted by the leftist Southern Poverty Law Center, which labeled him as a “hate group leader,” “white nationalist” and “anti-Muslim extremist.”

Some Libertarians argue that social-media and Big-Tech companies are private and can operate their business any way wish because, in a free market, competition will fill the demand. However, there have been three other companies, Hatreon, Free Starter, and Makers Support, that tried to compete with Patreon after it banned “hate speech,” but all of them were shut down.

To create a free-market competitor to Patreon would require a currency outside the US dollar, a credit-card company independent of the banks, a payment processor, and a startup all at the same time. In other words, this is no longer a free market. -GEG

The targeting of conservatives, libertarians, and critics of political Islam has been further targeted by progressive social media giants. After Alex Jones of InfoWars and conservative personality Gavin McInnes were banned by several social media platforms (including Facebook and YouTube), author Robert Spencer of JihadWatch was informed that he was cut off by MasterCard once he tried to go online with a new video studio. Some observers are calling it a coordinated attack by social media giants against conservatives and supporters of President Trump.

On Tuesday, Spencer — the author of “The History of Jihad” and other books about political Islam — received an email from fundraising website Patreon that it was removing his account because of a complaint from MasterCard, the multinational credit card compan. The missive from Patreon said that “Mastercard has a stricter set of rules and regulations than Patreon,” and that the credit card company reserves the right to deny services to accounts of their choosing. “This is in line with their terms of service, which means it’s something we have to comply by.” Spencer was refunded $475.22 by Patreon. “I’m sorry for the inconvenience and frustration this might cause,” it said.

Spencer later stated that he had not received any prior warning that he was in violation of MasterCard’s rules despite having uploaded a single video announcing that he was refurbishing a television studio for his planned weekly livestreams titled, “This Week In Jihad.”

When Spencer responded to Patreon’s email, he received no response. Instead, when Spencer announced on Twitter his banishment from Patreon, Patreon responded:

“Hi Robert, we emailed you earlier today which explained that unfortunately Mastercard required us to remove your account. You replied to us but if you have further questions we’re happy to keep emailing.” Patreon later tweeted, “Hey, we’ve been emailing with Robert today to explain the situation as unfortunately Mastercard required us to remove his account. We will continue to email with him if he has further questions.”

Spencer stated that Patreon had not been emailing him, nor had the company explained why MasterCard objected to him. On his website, Spencer wrote that Patreon did not explain why Patreon was obligated to comply with MasterCard. “I don’t have a MasterCard and didn’t have one attached to my Patreon account, so MasterCard really wasn’t involved — unless it owns Patreon, which is apparently the case.”

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save

Fraud: $163 BILLION in COVID Unemployment Funds Stolen

May 16, 2022 Newsmax 3

An estimated $163 billion in pandemic-related benefits were fraudulently obtained by criminals, according to the Labor Department. The Biden administration said that it inherited the problem and blamed out-of-date systems and the lack of state-by-state data sharing.


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments