Germany Enforces Political Correctness by Raiding the Homes of 36 People Who Posted Comments on Facebook

German authorities raided the homes of 36 people who posted Internet comments that could upset someone. Germany, not only pursues the authors of these comments, but also is considering punishing the social-media sites that publish those comments. The law now being drafted would fine Facebook, Twitter, and other social-media outlets as much as $56 million if they fail to remove the so-called hate speech.

This week, Germany launched a major crackdown on free expression. In 36 simultaneous raids across multiple states, German authorities sought evidence for speech-related criminal offenses based on things people posted on the Internet.

Most of these offenses come under incitement to racial hatred laws. That might sound good to some, but it isn’t.

There’s a major difference between U.S. and German incitement laws. U.S. law — at federal and state levels — criminalizes only incitement that is designed to foster imminent unlawful violence. The incitement must also be likely to lead to unlawful violence. This three-prong test means that saying “I [expletive] hate [racial/religious/social group] and think they should all burn,” for example, is not illegal in America.

And Americans take that for granted. But such postings would be illegal in Germany and in much of Europe.

In the U.K., the Public Order Act mandates that, “A person is guilty of an offense if he uses threatening [or abusive] words or behavior … within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.” Importantly, proven intention and actual harm are not necessary for conviction. It is enough that the speech possibly alarmed someone nearby.

Consider what impact that law might have on the willingness of individuals to discuss sensitive issues like immigration, or abortion, or terrorism? It is a recipe for chilled speech.

Amazingly, however, Germany takes things further, proactively punishing speech that might feasibly upset someone on the Internet. Which, if you’ve ever been on the Internet, could be said of almost everything on it.

The head of Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office, Holger Münch, explained the government’s position. “Our free society must not allow a climate of fear, threat, criminal violence and violence either on the street or on the Internet.” Again, think carefully on those words. Germany seeks not simply to punish offending speech, but to “not allow a climate” of offense.

To accomplish this objective, Germany isn’t simply arresting speakers, it is punishing the platforms of speech. As Germany’s Justice Minister, Heiko Mass, put it, “We need to increase the pressure on social media companies.” Mass is referring to a draft law that would impose $56 million fines on Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies, if they fail to remove offending speech within a short period. As I’ve noted, similar legislation is also being considered in Britain.

There’s an immensely pathetic quality to this authoritarianism. Such coordinated efficiency and absent restraint raises troubling parallels with another era in German history.

Read full article here…


Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


EU to Create Transatlantic Facial-Recognition Database with Link to US

February 24, 2020 RT 0

National police forces of 10 EU member states are calling to create a system of interlinked facial recognition databases in addition to Prüm, the EU-wide database-cross-referencing system that already allows for all-at-once scanning of individual DNA, fingerprint, and vehicle registration databases.


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Leave a Reply

3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Christine BreeseRobert James Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Robert James
Robert James

Collusion between Trump and Putin would be a great thing for our country, which is in the grip of Zionist traitors who want to continue endless war including WWIII!!

Robert James
Robert James

Perhaps I’m missing something, but as a retired Software engineer and Test Director who has honchoed some multi-million dollar builds, I have carefully duplicated the code word unsuccessfully, several times.

Christine Breese
Christine Breese

It’s true, we have to be so careful about what we say online, facebook, blogs, emails, all of them. I heard of someone facing similar things for a health blog and recommending certain supplements that he used for healing his ailments, and they worked, and he just wanted to share his experience, got in a lot of trouble for it.