Google’s New Tool For Censoring “Toxic” Comments

Breitbartt
image_pdfimage_print
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, is introducing its new software, ‘Perspective,’ that uses artificial intelligence to detect so-called toxic comments so that they may be censored. Mainstream media often censors comments because studies show that the comments under an article have more influence on a reader than the article itself. -GEG

Google’s new tool, Perspective, works by comparing comments left on news websites to comments left on Wikipedia and the New York Times that were deemed “toxic” by a team of human reviewers.

The only criteria given for what constitutes a “toxic” comment is that it causes someone to leave a conversation. Obviously, this could also include someone who lost a debate or who is merely offended or triggered by another comment.

With trust in mainstream media plummeting, the real goal behind the censorship and in some cases entire removal of comment sections is to manipulate public opinion.

As the Daily Tech revealed, Popular Science admitted that the decision to pull its comment section was in order to preach a “scientific doctrine” on global warming without being challenged.

Popular Science acknowledged that their decision was based on a study by Dominique Brossard, a Life Sciences Communication professor at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, that appeared in the February 2013 edition of the peer-reviewed Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications.

The study found that, “People reacted neutrally when comments were disabled, but even when comments were generally positive their reactions did not noticeably improve. However, when the reader feedback took on a “less civil” tone with people questioning the merits of nanotechnology, user perception of the publication itself (not just the topic discussed) took a decidedly negative turn.”

In other words, the credibility of the article in question is largely dependent on the tone of the comments left in response. The more negative, uncivil and “toxic” the tone, the less likely the reader is to trust the article and the publication.

Once these “toxic” comments are removed, the reader is more likely to trust CNN, the New York Times, or whoever publishes the article.

Any technology developed by Silicon Valley to combat so-called “hate speech” is inevitably going to have a liberal bias baked in.

Read Full Article…

Recent stories & commentary

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Cartoon Commentary

Classifieds

List your service, product, or request here and reach our informed and motivated readers each month. Ads with greatest seniority appear at the tops of their listings. New ads carry a pointer during their first month. For rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar
wpDiscuz