Congress Impeaches Trump Based on New, Undefined Standards called Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress

NY Post
image_pdfimage_print
The Democrat-majority House of Representatives has impeached President Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, neither of which is grounds for impeachment according to the Constitution. The first charge is based on Trump’s pressuring the president of Ukraine to investigate the son of his political rival, Joe Biden. The second charge is based on the claim that Trump blocked subpoenas and, in some instances, refused to allow senior officials to testify before Congress [The irony of these charges is that Presidents of both parties have a long record of doing these things, which means that impeachment now will be based, not on Constitutional law or even on principle, but solely on party loyalty. From now on, it will be possible to Impeach any minority-party president whether Republican or Democrat. There goes one more of those precious checks and balances that are so essential to a free society, because the common man losses either way.] -GEG

The impeachment of President Trump is more about the future than it is about the present.

The present-day consequences aren’t trivial, to be sure. There will be a trial, which will no doubt deepen our national polarization. And henceforth, in the history books, Trump will go down as an impeached president — one of a precious few.

Or at least, a precious few for now. The count isn’t apt to stay small in coming decades.

There was only one impeachment, Andrew Johnson’s, in the first century of constitutional governance. There wasn’t another one for a century after that, with President Richard Nixon and Watergate. Knowing he would almost certainly be impeached in the House and convicted in the Senate, Nixon spared the nation by resigning.

It was another quarter-century until President Bill Clinton’s impeachment and acquittal by the Senate. That was 20 years ago. But it won’t be two decades until the next one. Bank on it.


Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Technocracy

EU to Create Transatlantic Facial-Recognition Database with Link to US

February 24, 2020 RT 0

National police forces of 10 EU member states are calling to create a system of interlinked facial recognition databases in addition to Prüm, the EU-wide database-cross-referencing system that already allows for all-at-once scanning of individual DNA, fingerprint, and vehicle registration databases.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Charles Andrew Robinson Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Charles Andrew Robinson
Guest
Charles Andrew Robinson

It’s a bit late for that. Instead of these phony trumped up charges, this Congress and Senate should write up an amendment to the US Constitution outlawing any president being allowed to sign an Executive signature. Executive signatures by pass the critical steps taken by the Founding Fathers to keep the three branches of government – Legislative, Judicial and Executive – separate in their powers so that one cannot overwhelmingly dominate the others. I suppose the Supreme court with it’s power to have the final say on Constitutional law is quite powerful in the end; but, an executive signature is… Read more »