Victory: Federal Court Rules Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and Laptops Unconstitutional

Pixabay
In a victory for privacy rights at the border, a federal court in Boston ruled that suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices by federal agents at airports and other US ports of entry are unconstitutional. Border officers must now demonstrate individualized suspicion of illegal contraband before they can search a traveler’s device. Last year, Customs and Border Control conducted more than 33,000 searches, almost quadruple the number of searches conducted three years ago.

In a major victory for privacy rights at the border, a federal court in Boston ruled today that suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices by federal agents at airports and other U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional.

The ruling came in a lawsuit, Alasaad v. McAleenan, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and ACLU of Massachusetts, on behalf of 11 travelers whose smartphones and laptops were searched without individualized suspicion at U.S. ports of entry.

“This ruling significantly advances Fourth Amendment protections for millions of international travelers who enter the United States every year,” said Esha Bhandari, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “By putting an end to the government’s ability to conduct suspicionless fishing expeditions, the court reaffirms that the border is not a lawless place and that we don’t lose our privacy rights when we travel.”

 

“This is a great day for travelers who now can cross the international border without fear that the government will, in the absence of any suspicion, ransack the extraordinarily sensitive information we all carry in our electronic devices,” said Sophia Cope, EFF Senior Staff Attorney.

The district court order puts an end to Customs and Border Control (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) asserted authority to search and seize travelers’ devices for purposes far afield from the enforcement of immigration and customs laws. Border officers must now demonstrate individualized suspicion of illegal contraband before they can search a traveler’s device.


Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Kakistocracy

Free Movie: ‘The Fall Of Minneapolis’ Reveals Info that Was Withheld in the George Floyd Case

‘The Fall of Minneapolis’ reveals startling information that was withheld from the public in the George Floyd murder case, including an undercover drug investigation of of Floyd in 2019 and an arrest of Floyd a year prior to his death when he was agitated and said that he could not breathe, but he was not held down.

  • Save
Health

Death of 12-Year-Old Boy in France Following HPV Vaccination Triggers Probe Into Gardasil Safety and School Vaccine Campaigns

No study has yet proven that HPV vaccines prevent cervical cancer. Some experts questioned the necessity of giving the HPV vaccine to teenage boys. An attorney noted that the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) “has paid more than $70 million in damages and awards to children injured by Gardasil.”

Classified Ads

The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We cannot vouch for accuracy of statements or integrity of advertisers. We will investigate complaints, however, and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent or unethical.
For ad rates, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
Victory: Federal Court Rules Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and Laptops Unconstitutional | WeAreChangeTV.US
4 years ago

[…] 15, 2019 Activist Post No Comments This post was originally published on this […]