UK Parliament Declared Theresa May’s Government in Contempt for Hiding Legal Advice About Brexit

The Center of Immigration Studies also is suing SPLC President Richard Cohen and Heidi Beirich, who runs the group’s so-called Hatewatch blog. The CIS asserts it does not meet the SPLC’sown definition of a hate group. CIS says the SPLC’s true agenda is to stifle debate on important issues and to silence opposition to the leftist agenda.

Americans have low fertility rates and little incentive to have children while immigrants are subsidized by welfare to have many children. The American system is deliberately being overwhelmed in order to cause it to crash. Out of the rubble, the plan is to build a totalitarian regime which most people will think is there to help them.

During a live radio show, Areva Martin, a black female legal analyst for CNN, accused John Webb, host of the ‘Patriot’ radio show of being out of touch due to his “white privilege”. Webb then informed her he is a black male and scolded her for basing her opinions of false assumptions.

The Prime Minister’s Brexit deal was crushed by a historic margin of 202 in favor to 432 against. This is the worst-ever defeat in the House of Parliament. Theresa May barely survived a no-confidence vote in parliament on the next day.

A recent poll found that 59% of registered voters in America agree with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ plan to increase taxes as income rises to as much as 70%. Many voters apparently believe that wealth inequality is inherently evil and should be prevented by taxes.

When deaths from overdosing on OxyContin could no longer to be ignored, Sackler devised a corporate strategy to blame the victims for misusing their unethical products. Doctors were told that signs of addiction were ‘pseudoaddiction’ and should be treated by prescribing more of the drug.

Nancy Pelosi, who has refused to fund the US-Mexico border wall, refused to meet with the Angel Moms as her staff said she was not there. However, Pelosi was reported to be hiding behind the wall in her office as someone who had an appointment was escorted into her office.

Some critics have argued that the definitions of cyberbullying are not as clear cut as they may sound and that clever attorneys could interpret them in such a way as to violate the First Amendment or to imprison someone for merely hurting others’ feelings.

Does anyone else notice the smell of corruption in this? Isn’t it obvious that the system must eventually self destruct and pull down the nation with it? Does anyone even care?