The Case Against Obama for ‘Bugging’ President Trump

DailyTech
image_pdfimage_print

Mark Levine, a top-rated radio analyst and former Chief of Staff for Attorney General, Edwin Meese, draws on public records to confirm the accuracy of President Trump’s recent tweet. The tweet read, “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!” Levin shows that, in 2016, the Obama administration did, indeed, wiretap Trump and his campaign team during the presidential campaign. [Ironically, that is what Obama and Hillary Clinton accused Russia of doing to the DNC and which they claimed was ‘interference in an American election’.]  -GEG

Radio talk show host Mark Levin joined “Fox & Friends Weekend” Sunday to discuss President Donald Trump’s allegations of wiretapping of Trump Tower by the Obama administration.

On Thursday, Levin laid out the potential executive overreach of the Obama administration, possible prompting Trump to take to Twitter Saturday morning to make his accusations public.

“This is not about President Trump’s tweeting; this is about the Obama administration spying,” said Levin, chief of staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese in the Reagan administration.

Levin brought up a report that the Obama administration made two Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court requests in 2016 to monitor Trump communications and a computer server in Trump Tower focusing on possible links with Russian banks. The first one in June was denied, but the follow-up in October was granted.

“The issue isn’t whether the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign or transition of surrogates; the issue is the extent of it,” Levin said.

“Donald Trump is the victim. His campaign is the victim. His transition team is the victim. His surrogates are the victim,” he said.

Read FullArticle Here…

Recent stories & commentary

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar
wpDiscuz