Nathan Larson is running for Congress on a platform of less government, an end to wars in the Middle East, defense of the Second Amendment, and closing the borders. However, he also has a background of violence, rape, and pedophilia. His candidacy is ideal for collectivists who want to paint all who oppose them as despicable characters. Could it be that collectivists are his hidden sponsors and handlers? If so, this is a classic case of controlled opposition – which means action that appears to be opposition but really is designed to damage or destroy genuine opposition.