WHO Joins EU and Flips — Suddenly Warns Against Taking Continued Covid Booster Shots

The World Health Organization (WHO) released a statement about Covid vaccines that read: “a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.” Instead the WHO is now promising/demanding vaccines based on whatever the dominant Sars-Cov-2 strain is at the moment. However, even the mRNA vaccines cannot be cooked up and delivered fast enough to match whatever strain of virus becomes dominant. WHO explicitly said in the statement that future vaccines against Covid must “be more effective in protection against infection thus lowering community transmission.”

WHO released a statement about Covid vaccines yesterday. It’s filled with the usual public health jargon and ass-covering, but one line stands out:

a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.

It’s over, people.

Aside from a few unlucky Israelis, no one is going to receive a fourth dose of the original vaccine; everyone with eyes can see it doesn’t work against Omicron. (And if you haven’t gotten a third dose, at this point, why would you? You are getting at most weeks of marginally improved protection for potentially severe side effects.)

Instead the WHO is now promising/demanding vaccines based on whatever the dominant Sars-Cov-2 strain is at the moment.

That promise is as empty as all the others the health bureaucrats and vaccine companies have made.

At least five major variants (“variants of concern”) have developed in the last year, and two have become globally dominant. Even the mRNA vaccines cannot be cooked up and delivered fast enough to match whatever strain of virus becomes dominant. Covid is faster than the scientists.

Read full article here…

Gateway Pundit:   https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/frightening-joins-eu-changes-direction-suddenly-warns-taking-continued-covid-booster-shots/




Burundian President Dies Suddenly after Expelling WHO for False Pandemic

Burundi, Africa: President Pierre Nkurunziza, 55, died following a cardiac arrest despite being known for his good health. Some have speculated that his death is linked to the fact that, less than a month ago, the Burundian government expelled experts from the World Health Organization responsible for ‘advising’ on the false COVID-19 pandemic. Burundi had only one COVID death. Nkurunziza’s unexpected death is reminiscent of the mysterious plane crash that killed Polish President Lech Kaczyński in 2009 shortly after he refused the vaccine from the WHO against the H1N1 flu. -GEG

President of Burundi Pierre Nkurunziza, 55, has died “following a cardiac arrest”. The sudden death comes as a surprise as he had been evaluated recently as being in good overall health.

But controversy has emerged in the African country as local pundits have suggested that his death could have been the consequence of poisoning.

Less than a month ago, the Burundian government ordered the expulsion of experts from the World Organization of Health (WHO) responsible for ‘advising’ on the false pandemic COVID-19.

RevContent InArticle SOLO

The President and his Ministry of Foreign Affairs had declared that the WHO representatives would henceforth be ‘persona non grata’, that is not welcome on Burundian territory.

Read full article here…




World Health Organization Pushes Vaccines – Says COVID May Never Go Away

WHO Health Emergency Director Mike Ryan said, “..this virus may never go away…We do have one great hope, if we do find a highly effective vaccine that we can distribute to everyone who needs it in the world, we may have a shot at eliminating this virus.” He said, “That vaccine will have to be available, it will have to be highly effective, it will have to be made available to everyone, and we will have to use it.” He continued, “Science can come up with the vaccine, but someone’s got to make it, and make enough of it that everyone can get a dose of it, and we’ve got to be able to deliver it. And people have got to want to take that vaccine.” [Bill Gates is receiving a nice return on his funding of the WHO.] -GEG




FRAUD: The World Health Organization Pushed a Fake SARS Epidemic in 2003

In 2003, the World Health Organization plunged the world into fear and panic by releasing a travel advisory against Toronto, Canada, claiming that the city was “infected” with epidemic SARS. However, there were 438 probable cases of SARS in Canada, resulting in 44 deaths, and, worldwide, out of a population of 6.3-billion people, there were only 774 deaths. [This is the organization that is accepted world wide by governments and news outlets as the world’s top authority on COVID-19.] -GEG

History matters.

If the World Health Organization (WHO) deceived the world into fear and panic THEN, in 2003, why should you believe them NOW re COVID, when both instances involve epidemics?

As some readers will recall, in 2003 the World Health Organization (WHO) put out a travel advisory—don’t go to Toronto. Toronto was “infected” with epidemic SARS. The loss of tourist income was significant. At the time, I was in touch with a Canadian activist who was trying to assemble a group of Toronto merchants and file a law suit against WHO for a few billion dollars, but it fell apart.

The Canadian Encyclopedia describes the wild scene in the country: “The outbreak led to the quarantine of thousands…and took an economic toll on Toronto. It also exposed the country’s ill-prepared health-care system…In late April 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued an advisory against all non-essential travel to Toronto. Government officials and experts criticized the decision as being unnecessary…During the outbreak, thousands of Canadians were quarantined. Many voluntarily quarantined themselves in their homes. Airports in Toronto and Vancouver screened travellers for high fever. News coverage spiked with each wave of the outbreak in Toronto and right after the WHO travel advisory. Major Canadian newspapers would each publish up to 25 stories per day on SARS…”

You can see how the World Health Organization stimulated a panicked response with its travel advisory.

So SARS must have been a large outbreak, an epidemic of major proportions.

Canadian Encyclopedia: “In total, there were 438 probable cases of SARS in Canada, resulting in 44 deaths.”

What??

What about the total number of SARS cases and deaths, worldwide? WHO states: “An epidemic of SARS affected 26 countries…Other countries/areas in which chains of human-to-human transmission occurred after early importation of cases were Toronto in Canada, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, Chinese Taipei, Singapore, and Hanoi in Viet Nam.”

Sounds quite serious.

The CDC: “During November 2002 through July 2003, a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS] that was accompanied by either pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome (probable cases), according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Of these, 774 died. By late July 2003, no new cases were being reported, and WHO declared the global outbreak to be over.”

I see. Across the entire planet, in this sweeping epidemic—8098 cases and 774 deaths. Out of 6.3 billion people.

CDC: “In the United States, only eight persons were laboratory-confirmed as SARS cases. There were no SARS-related deaths in the United States.”

The capper? Let’s go back to Canada. As the Canadian Encyclopedia states, a mere week or so after WHO declared the “epidemic” was over, “English rock band The Rolling Stones headlined a benefit concert in Toronto in response to the outbreak’s economic toll on the city. Informally called ‘SARSStock’ and ‘SARS-a-palooza,’ the concert took place on 30 July 2003. Estimated attendance at Downsview Park was 450,000 to 500,000 people.”

Right. And the residue of this “deadly virus”—with half a million people standing cheek to jowl—did…

Nothing.

History matters.

If you want to believe anything the World Health Organization is claiming now, in 2020, do so at your own peril.

Read full article here…




UN World Health Organization Holds Secret Talks With Tech Giants To Stop Spread of Coronavirus “Misinformation”

California: Facebook reportedly held a secret meeting with the World Health Organization to combat the spread of information on social media about the coronavirus that they claim is misinformation and conspiracy theories, characterizing it as an ‘infodemic’. Both Facebook and Twitter already announced that they would remove content deemed to be misinformation regarding the virus, however, what is considered “misinformation” is totally subjective. Amazon, Twilio, Dropbox, Google, Verizon, Salesforce, Twitter, YouTube, Airbnb, Kinsa and Mapbox were all at the meeting.

The World Health Organization has held talks with tech giants to stop the spread of coronavirus “misinformation,” despite the fact that some things once labeled “misinformation” have since turned out to be true.

The meeting was organized by the WHO but hosted by Facebook at its Menlo Park campus in California. Attendees included representatives from Amazon, Twilio, Dropbox, Google, Verizon, Salesforce, Twitter, YouTube, Airbnb, Kinsa and Mapbox.

According to the WHO’s Andy Pattison, an “infodemic” of misinformation has accompanied the coronavirus outbreak and big tech giants need to respond by censoring “fake news” content.

Both Facebook and Twitter already announced that they would remove content deemed to be misinformation regarding the virus, a dangerous new lurch to mass censorship given that what is considered “misinformation” is totally subjective and beholden to partisan bias.

Read full article here…




“Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine



The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program that was designed to control the population of Africans, under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government. UNICEF and WHO use local disasters to mass vaccinate people, mainly children and young women. All of the samples that were tested returned positive for the HCG antigen, which is used to curb fertility. The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association said, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”

According to LifeSiteNews,
a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is
charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women
under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the
Kenyan government.

The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.

The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the
contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from
various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in
South Africa for testing.

The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines,
but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and
women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic
Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:

“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO
campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a
well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise
using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was
presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of
immunization but was ignored.” (Source.)

Dr. Ngare brought up several points about the mass tetanus
vaccination program in Kenya that caused the Catholic doctors to become
suspicious:

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted
doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83
health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility
the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs”
as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it
applied only to women of childbearing years, and why is it being
conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we
give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women
or children.” said Dr. Ngare.

But it is the five vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The
only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is
used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the
pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO
in 1992.” (Source.)

UNICEF: A History of Taking Advantage of Disasters to Mass Vaccinate

It should be noted that UNICEF and WHO distribute these vaccines for
free, and that there are financial incentives for the Kenyan government
to participate in these programs. When funds from the UN are not enough
to purchase yearly allotments of vaccines, an organization started and
funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, provides extra
funding for many of these vaccination programs in poor countries. (See: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India.)

Also, there was no outbreak of tetanus in Kenya, only the perceived “threat” of tetanus due to local flood conditions.

These local disasters are a common reason UNICEF goes into poorer
countries with free vaccines to begin mass vaccination programs.

Read full article here…




World Health Organization Widely Criticized for Claiming Vaccine Refusal Is in Top-10 Health Threats


The United Nations’ World Health Organization has listed ‘vaccine hesitancy’, which means refusal to accept vaccines, as one of the top-10 threats against health in 2019. General immunization rates are high, but the number of children not receiving some or all of recommended vaccines is on the rise. An Australian poll shows that lack of trust in institutions and government is a major factor. Although there are many studies that show vaccines are a major cause if autism, WHO continues to carry the flag for the pharmaceutical industry and insists that the studies are not valid. -GEG

Vaccine
hesitancy, where people are reluctant or refuse to have themselves or
their children vaccinated, is a growing trend among those fearing
negative health outcomes from immunizations, such as the (non-existent)
risk of autism. This collective uncertainty has now gathered such
momentum that the World health Organization (WHO) sees fit to list
vaccine hesitancy as one of its 10 threats to global health in 2019,
alongside other more established dangers such as air pollution and
drug-resistant bacteria.

While
general immunization rates are high, the number of young children not
receiving some or all of their recommended vaccines is on the rise. Health data
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention charts a concerning
uptick since 2000. According to its analysis, 1.3 percent of the
children born in 2015 in the US went without any recommended
vaccinations, up from 0.9 percent in 2011 and 0.3 percent in 2001.

The
reasons for this are varied, but according to its vaccines advisory
group, WHO lists complacency, inconvenience in accessing vaccines and a
lack of confidence as driving factors in vaccine hesitancy. One survey
carried out by the University of South Australia involving 604 pregnant
women found a lack of trust in institutions and government to be a
major factor, along with a parent’s lack of personal experience in their
child falling sick.

Read full article here…




UN Lies about Measles to Promote Vaccines in Europe

The UN’s World Health Organization is falsely blaming people who refuse vaccinations for causing the current measles epidemic in Europe.  WHO is focusing its campaign on Italy, where protesters are outraged at a new law mandating vaccination for children. The facts behind the propaganda are revealing: There are 3,300 cases of measles and two deaths; the pre-measles health of the two that died is not revealed; and deaths caused by the vaccines themselves is not discussed – such as infants who contract measles from the vaccine injected into their mothers. –GEG
\

There is an invariable first rule of propaganda: know exactly what your agenda is, and then design every statement to forward that agenda.

The World Health Organization is now touting a measles epidemic in Europe. And of course, they’re explaining it with propaganda—it’s the fault of people who refuse to allow their children to take the measles vaccination.

The focus is on Italy, where, “coincidently,” protesters are outraged at a new law mandating vaccination for children. Perfect. “You see? Don’t take the shot and this is what you get. A massive outbreak.”

Well, here is an official report. In Italy, there are 3300 case of measles and two deaths.

That’s the classic and traditional and age-old picture of measles. 3298 children have survived. Kids get measles, they recover, and thereafter they’re immune.

As for the two children who died, you would have to do a very careful independent investigation, to determine what health problems they may have had before they contracted measles. And “health problems” would include prior toxic medical treatment. The actual cause of death isn’t always what health authorities say it is.

In addition to the above, here are two revealing quotes to consider:

“…the window of vulnerability of an infant may be even greater in vaccinated women than in with women with natural measles infection.” (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(5), 2008, pp. 787–792).

Translation: Measles occurring in infants—which is unusual and dangerous—is more likely to occur when the mother has been vaccinated against measles. Why? Because, as a result of her being vaccinated, she no longer passes down, to her child, the natural components of immunity to measles from her having had the disease. And the vaccination she received didn’t confer immunity to her baby.

“Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

In other words, the measles vaccine can create a worse form of measles. This is not the normal form of the illness, from which children routinely recover with the bonus of lifetime immunity. No, this is a severe, atypical, dangerous, synthetic, vaccine-induced disease.

Read full article here…