Supreme Court Rules 9-0 for Trump to Stay on Ballot, But There Is More to the Story…

The Supreme Court made a unanimous ruling 9-0 against Colorado’s removal of former President Trump from the 2024 ballot. Former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy echoed Trump’s belief that it represented a “case of national unity,” and that the United States cannot essentially be united if a “patchwork” of states can make unilateral decisions about a national candidate’s eligibility beyond the typical age and tenure statutes.

However, Ramaswamy warned that while states don’t have the authority to remove national candidates from the ballot, the federal government, even those outside of Congress, may have that authority. The concurrence written by the three liberal justices, Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson and Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, plants the seeds for the liberal judges to go the other way in future Trump cases.

.

.

Former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy praised the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling against Colorado’s removal of former President Trump from the 2024 ballot but warned of potential foreshadowing within the written decision.

After the decision was handed down, Ramaswamy echoed Trump’s belief that it represented a “case of national unity,” and that the United States cannot essentially be united if a “patchwork” of states can make unilateral decisions about a national candidate’s eligibility beyond the typical age and tenure statutes.

“That doesn’t work if we’re one nation. So that’s what this case was really about,” he said. “I do think that this is not just about President Trump, but about the future unity of our country itself. And the Supreme Court, 9-0, came down on the right side of that question.”

Of the concurrence written by the three liberal justices, Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson and Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Ramaswamy said the subtext therein is that the bench is “buying themselves some political latitude to say there’s going to be other Trump related cases that come before the Supreme Court now.”

“What you see from the liberal justices is – the three of them did swing over for the 9-0 unanimous ruling here, but they say other actors in the federal government, even outside of Congress, could have had that authority anyway,” he said.

Read full article here…




Red State Governors Stand with Texas Against Biden Regime Over Border Crisis

Recently, the US Supreme Court authorized federal agents to remove the razor wire barrier installed by Texas at the border. The deadline is today. Texas responded by installing more razor wire. Texas Governor Abbott declared an invasion under Article I, § 10, Clause 3 to invoke Texas’s constitutional authority to defend and protect itself. He said that authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary.

Governors from Virginia, Florida, South Dakota, Georgia, Montana, and Oklahoma have publicly declared their support for Texas’s right to self-defense against the lawless Biden regime. In total, 14 states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Idaho, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming—have stepped up to support Texas’ efforts and deployed personnel and resources to secure the border in President Biden’s absence.

Meanwhile, Democrats are urging President Biden to seize control over the Texas National Guard. 

.

.

In a significant escalation of tensions over the U.S.-Mexico border policies, several Republican governors are uniting in support of Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s challenge against the Biden regime.

This move comes in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision allowing the removal of razor wire installed by Texas at the border.

Governor Abbott deployed approximately 30 miles of razor wire near Eagle Pass, Texas, as a barrier against illegal immigration.

However, this move was challenged in court, leading to a complex legal battle. Despite setbacks in lower courts, the state’s efforts were momentarily buoyed by a decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which was overturned by the Supreme Court’s 5-4 vote.

Conservative justices Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett (Trump appointee) sided with the liberals and granted the Biden Regime’s emergency request. This is the 9th time that the Supreme Court has sided with the Biden regime out of 14 emergency applications.

Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, Texas officials, including Governor Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, have expressed their intent to continue measures to reinforce the border. Texas National Guard members began installing more razor wire in Eagle Pass.

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said.

“The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty,” he added.

Governor Abbott, in a fiery statement, lambasted Joe Biden for failing to enforce immigration laws and thereby violating his oath of office. He then declared an “invasion” under Article I, § 10, Clause 3, asserting Texas’s right to self-defense.

Read Abbott’s statement:

Despite having been put on notice in a series of letters—one of which I delivered to him by hand—President Biden has ignored Texas’s demand that he perform his constitutional duties.

  • President Biden has violated his oath to faithfully execute immigration laws enacted by Congress. Instead of prosecuting immigrants for the federal crime of illegal entry, President Biden has sent his lawyers into federal courts to sue Texas for taking action to secure the border.
  • President Biden has instructed his agencies to ignore federal statutes that mandate the detention of illegal immigrants. The effect is to illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States.
  • By wasting taxpayer dollars to tear open Texas’s border security infrastructure, President Biden has enticed illegal immigrants away from the 28 legal entry points along this State’s southern border— bridges where nobody drowns—and into the dangerous waters of the Rio Grande.

The failure of the Biden Administration to fulfill the duties imposed by Article IV, § 4 has triggered Article I, § 10, Clause 3, which reserves to this State the right of self-defense. For these reasons, I have already declared an invasion under Article I, § 10, Clause 3 to invoke Texas’s constitutional authority to defend and protect itself. That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary. The Texas National Guard, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and other Texas personnel are acting on that authority, as well as state law, to secure the Texas border.

The Texas response has drawn backing from several other Republican-led states, fueling a growing standoff between state and federal authorities. Governors from red states have publicly declared their support for Texas’s right to self-defense against the lawless Biden regime.

Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis expressed his stance, emphasizing constitutional principles and pledging ongoing assistance to Texas.

“If the Constitution really made states powerless to defend themselves against an invasion, it wouldn’t have been ratified in the first place and Texas would have never joined the union when it did. TX is upholding the law while Biden is flouting it. FL will keep assisting Texas with personnel and assets.”

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem praised Texas’s actions and criticized the Biden regime for creating a national security crisis.

“Greg Abbott is exactly right to invoke Texas’ constitutional authority to defend itself. The Biden Administration has created a national security crisis and put Americans in danger. Their failure is an unconstitutional dereliction of duty. South Dakota has been proud to help Gov. Abbott’s efforts to secure our border.”

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin also weighed in, arguing that the Biden regime’s policies have effectively turned every state into a border state, with widespread implications for national security and public safety.

“Virginia stands with Texas. Greg Abbott is doing the job Joe Biden and his border czar refuse to do to secure our border. The Biden administration has turned every state into a border state. We must stop the flow of fentanyl, save lives, and secure our southern border.”

Oklahoma’s Kevin Stitt and Montana’s Greg Gianforte echoed the sentiments of their colleagues, with Gianforte condemning the federal government’s inaction and attributing it to an increase in drug trafficking and related criminal activity.

Oklahoma’s Kevin Stitt and Montana’s Greg Gianforte echoed the sentiments of their colleagues, with Gianforte condemning the federal government’s inaction and attributing it to an increase in drug trafficking and related criminal activity.

Read full article here…

Gateway Pundit:        https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/democrats-urge-joe-biden-seize-control-texas-national/




Showdown: Texas Defies Supreme Court, Installs More Razor Wire Along Border

The Texas National Guard  responded to the Supreme Court’s order allowing the Biden regime to cut and remove razor wire installed along the southern border by defying the ruling and adding more razor wire. Republican Governor Greg Abbott previously installed about 30 miles of razor wire at the Texas-Mexico border near Eagle Pass to stop the flood of illegal aliens being let in by the Biden administration. ‘Conservative’ Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts voted in favor of Biden along with liberal Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The decision will remain in effect pending a final ruling on Biden’s lawsuit against the State of Texas.

Critics Alex jones and Wayne Allen Root have suggested that the Supreme Court Justices may be being bribed, threatened and extorted due to rulings made against the Constitution and the American People.

A coalition of concerned Americans from across the nation announced a massive convoy will travel to major border cities in Arizona, California and Texas to raise awareness about Biden’s open border policies and the drug trafficking and human smuggling they are facilitating.

.

.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that federal agents are allowed to cut down the razor wire installed along the Texas border.

The Court in a 5-4 ruling will allow Border Patrol agents to cut the concertina wire barriers that Gov. Greg Abbott (R-Texas) ordered to be installed along the state’s border in response to the massive numbers of illegal aliens crossing into the U.S. due to Joe Biden’s open border policies.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts voted in favor of Biden along with liberal Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

The decision will remain in effect pending a final ruling on Biden’s lawsuit against the State of Texas.

From NPR:

Gov. Greg Abbott launched a controversial state-led, border security effort called “Operation Lone Star” in 2021. Since then, Texas has installed razor wire, a floating barrier in the Rio Grande, and added thousands of Texas state troopers and National Guard soldiers to patrol parts of the state’s 1,254 mile long border with Mexico.

Earlier this month, the Biden administration turned to the Supreme Court over the installation of razor wire on the northern banks of the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass. That came after the state sued the administration in October, claiming federal agents were destroying state property and preventing Texas National Guard and Department of Public Safety officers from securing the border.

A federal judge ruled in the Biden administration’s favor, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later decided the judge misunderstood a law that spells out what the federal government can be sued for.

The Department of Homeland Security argued in a memo supplemented with their lawsuit last week that the razor wire makes it more difficult to allow illegal aliens to enter the country.

That’s the entire point!

We are not a serious country anymore.

Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin noted that Texas National Guard will have to allow Border Patrol agents back into the Shelby Park area of Eagle Pass for them to begin cutting the razor wire, “potentially setting up a significant state vs federal showdown if push comes to shove.”

Read full article here…

Gateway Pundit:      https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/texas-national-guard-responds-supreme-court-order-installing/

Wayne Allen Root:        https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/wayne-root-i-say-loud-what-others-only/

Alex Jones suggests bribery of Supreme Court Justices:      https://www.bitchute.com/channel/9c7qJvwx7YQT/

Protests at the border in Texas, Arizona and California:        https://www.infowars.com/posts/take-our-border-back-americans-announce-multi-state-convoy-to-descend-on-southern-border/ 




Colorado Supreme Court Rules Trump Disqualified From The 2024 Ballot

In a historic decision on December 19, 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court barred Donald Trump from running in the state’s presidential primary after determining that he had engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021. The 4-3 ruling marked the first time a court has kept a presidential candidate off the ballot under an 1868 provision of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The ruling comes as courts consider similar cases in other states. The four judges who ruled against Trump are Monica Marquez, Melissa Hart, William Hood and Richard Gabriel. If other states follow suit, it is unlikely that Trump will receive the Republican nomination that is essential to win the presidency in November. A Trump campaign spokesman said that Trump will appeal the case at the Supreme Court and added, “We have full confidence that the US Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.

.

The all Democrat-appointed Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday staged an insurrection against our sacred democracy by ruling that former President Donald Trump is ineligible to appear on the ballot in 2024.

From The Washington Post, “Trump disqualified from Colorado’s 2024 primary ballot by state Supreme Court”:

In a historic decision Tuesday, the Colorado Supreme Court barred Donald Trump from running in the state’s presidential primary after determining that he had engaged in insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021.

The 4-3 ruling marked the first time a court has kept a presidential candidate off the ballot under an 1868 provision of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The ruling comes as courts consider similar cases in other states.

If other states reach the same conclusion, Trump would have a difficult — if not impossible — time securing the Republican nomination and winning in November.

The decision is certain to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it will be up to the justices to decide whether to take the case. Scholars have said only the nation’s high court can settle the issue of whether the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol constituted an insurrection and whether Trump is banned from running.

“A majority of the court holds that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” the decision reads. “Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot.”

More from The Hill:

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s campaign, blamed the decision on the “all-Democrat appointed” court, swearing to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The seven-member bench of Colorado’s Supreme Court was entirely appointed by Democratic governors; six later faced voters and won retention elections, while the seventh will do so next year.

“The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision,” Cheung said. “We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.”

Read full article here…




Companies Lay Off Chief Diversity Officers after the Supreme Court Overturned Affirmative Action

Since last year, thousands of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) officers workers have been laid off. Less than half the companies in the S&P 500 employed chief diversity officers in 2018, but by 2022, 75% of those companies had created a position. According to the Wall Street Journal, when the Supreme Court overturned affirmative action for college admissions in June, companies started anticipating spillover legal action might impact them, and they are laying off DEI workers en masse. We have reported before that DEI is tied to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) goals that can be enforced through restrictions or denial of financial and insurance services.

Last week, Trump-appointed US District Judge Clifton Corker struck down the Department of Agriculture and Small Business Administration’s race-based contracting schemes favoring minority-owned businesses, citing the Supreme Court’s recent ruling gutting affirmative action. Richard Hanania pointed out that now in the 6th Circuit, the only way to have race preferences is under very narrow circumstances by showing past discrimination by the specific government agency and that the discrimination was intentional against the group in question. Almost nothing can meet this standard.

.

The best way to get rid of ants is to kill the queen. The most effective way to do away with the spread of toxic progressive ideology is to eliminate its advocates from positions of power.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion officers are like queens in the progressive anthills of corporations and universities. The good news? They’re beginning to die off.

The Wall Street Journal published an article by Te-Ping Chen and Lauren Weber this month entitled, “The Rise and Fall of the Chief Diversity Officer.” The findings will enrage leftist ideologues. Those who have been wondering what happened to common sense can sigh a breath of relief. Conservatives are likely to cheer.

According to the Journal, Netflix, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery have recently been rethinking their progressive stand on DEI to the extent that high-profile diversity, equity and inclusion executives are going to lose their jobs. Just since last year, thousands of diversity-focused workers have been laid off.

For those of us who have been scratching our heads wondering how and why corporations ever thought that DEI, gender theory, critical race theory, and the rest of the progressive nonsense would make money, the downfall of DEI not only makes sense, it was inevitable. Most people — no matter how many times progressives pump their lies through establishment media — don’t buy it, figuratively or literally.

In other words, though DEI is an effective method for radical progressives to spread their gospel, it’s bad for business. It was only a matter of time before corporate stakeholders would notice their investments were suffering because corporate leaders opted to hire postmodern-infused wokeness into their ranks.

Miriam Warren, chief diversity officer for Yelp, told the Journal about some of the challenges facing executives in the DEI field. “There’s a combination of grief, being very tired, and being, in some cases, overwhelmed,” Warren said.

I don’t want to come off as callous, but I could care less how Warren feels. How many people has she damaged while pushing her radical left agenda into the workplace? She’ll feel better in an honest line of work.

The DEI craze began in the wake of George Floyd’s death in May 2020. According to the outlet, companies rushed to hire chief diversity officers. It doesn’t say why the rush occurred, but it must have been a misguided attempt to claim the moral high ground.

Read full article here…

Information Liberation:     https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63870

Information Liberation (USDA and SBA):      https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63868




Supreme Court Ends ‘Stay in Mexico’ Policy Expanding Open Border

The Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration can terminate former President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy that required migrants seeking asylum to the US to stay on the other side of the southern border while awaiting hearings, which stemmed the flood of immigrants. The Court voted 5-4 vote, and Chief Justice John Roberts was joined by ‘conservative’ Justice Brett Kavanaugh as well as the court’s three liberal justices — Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The southern border has expanded the open invitation to migrants into the US, despite most of the nation opposing open borders; 78% of people polled viewed a mass influx of illegal immigrants as a critical or an important threat.

With the Supreme Court’s ruling Thursday letting President Joe Biden end his predecessor’s “Remain in Mexico” policy — which required migrants seeking to enter the US to stay on the other side of the southern border while awaiting hearings — the tools Donald Trump used to slow the flood of illegal migration are largely gone.

Worse still, with the end of Remain and a possibly dubious future for the Title 42 rule, which allows expulsions of illegal migrants as a COVID mitigation measure, the United States could be heading for a situation where nearly all migrants apprehended are released here. 

In effect, an open southern border. Or “La Invitación” (as some call Biden’s posture) on steroids. Democrats simply have no plan other than “let them all in.”

That’s troubling, especially since it flouts the will of much of the nation. Indeed, illegal immigration is a big concern for Americans, with 60% saying they worry about it a great deal or a fair amount and 78% seeing a mass influx of illegal immigrants as a critical or an important threat. 58% report being very or somewhat dissatisfied with the current level of immigration, and 49% want to see that level stay the same or go down.

Read full article here…

NBC New York:    https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-to-end-stay-in-mexico-policy/3756697/




Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson Criticized for Soft Sentences in Child Porn Cases

Senators grilled Supreme Court Nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during the confirmation hearing and Ted Cruz noted that in child pornography cases, Ketanji Brown Jackson gave the defendants an average 47.2% less sentence than what prosecutors recommended. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) slammed Jackson over her “endorsement of progressive indoctrination of our children” in Critical Race Theory  (CRT) materials and said that Jackson has made it clear that judges must consider CRT when deciding how to sentence criminal defendants.

Judge Jackson defended her record of giving pedophiles light sentences, arguing that it’s easier for them to procure large volumes through the internet – vs. the effort required to obtain child porn through the mail.

Link for video:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/zsxxW3x3NYRy/

Update (1647ET): As Tuesday’s confirmation hearing of Ketanji Brown Jackson continued, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) got into heated exchanges with the nominee over several issues – including her views on Critical Race Theory and her record on child predators.

When Cruz asked her opinions on CRT, referring to a 2020 speech she gave at the University of Michigan where she mentioned Nikole Hannah-Jones’ revisionist 1619 project, Brown responded: “It doesn’t come up in my work as It’s never something that I have studied or relied on, and it wouldn’t be something that I would rely on if I was on the Supreme Court.”

She also says she hasn’t reviewed “any of those books” that are available at Georgetown Day School, where she sits on the board.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1506349237990219779?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1506349237990219779%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fsupreme-court-nominee-gave-pedophiles-lighter-sentences-because-internet-makes-it-so-easy

Cruz also pressed her over her record on pedophiles.

Read full article here…




Biden Nominates Ketanji Jackson to Supreme Court, Keeps Vow to Base Choice on Race and Sex

Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is President Joe Biden’s choice to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the US Supreme Court, fulfilling a campaign promise to nominate a black woman. A critic wrote that she is not highly regarded as a judge and has a striking record of reversals by the DC Circuit Court due to getting things ‘very wrong’.

The White House announced Friday morning that D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is President Joe Biden’s choice to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the U.S. Supreme Court, fulfilling a campaign promise to make the nation’s highest court more “diverse.”

“Judge Jackson is one of our nation’s brightest legal minds and has an unusual breadth of experience in our legal system, giving her the perspective to be an exceptional Justice,” the White House said in its announcement of the nomination.

Jackson is a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard University, cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School, and a former editor of the Harvard Law Review. Former President Barack Obama appointed her for Vice Chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2009 and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2012, and Biden appointed her to her current judgeship last year. She previously worked as a federal public defender and as a law clerk for the outgoing Breyer, whose retirement was announced last month.

The announcement makes no mention of Biden’s pledge that his first Supreme Court nominee would be a black woman, but instead focuses on Jackson’s qualifications, and claims she “has a unique appreciation of how critical it is for the justice system to be fair and impartial,” and specifically highlights the fact that she has “multiple law enforcement officials in her family,” presumably to stunt suspicions of left-wing bias against police.

Undercutting that suggestion, however, is the fact that just days before this announcement, a coalition of “progressive” groups including MoveOn and Demand Justice wrote a letter to Biden stating that they wanted a nominee “with civil rights or public defense experience,” knowing Jackson was the only name on the president’s shortlist who qualified.

“Jackson is not highly regarded as a judge” and “has a striking record of reversals by the D.C. Circuit — including by liberal judges — in her high-profile rulings” for getting things “very wrong,” writes Ed Whelan of the Ethics & Public Policy Center. “Inquiries I have made recently of folks knowledgeable about her work confirm that she continues to have a middling reputation. This criticism, I’ll emphasize, is on grounds of quality, not ideology. Indeed, she is not regarded as ranking high among the ten or so district judges that President Obama appointed to the federal district bench in D.C.”

Read full article here…




Justice Breyer to Retire, Biden Vows to Nominate A Black Woman to Supreme Court

President Joe Biden that he will nominate the first black woman to serve on the Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, a liberal. Critics say Biden’s candidate will be nominated not on merit, but based on race and sex and suggest that the move could re-energize Black voters before the mid-terms, as many have grown disillusioned with the president.

President Joe Biden said Thursday that he will nominate the first black woman to serve on the Supreme Court as retiring Justice Stephen Breyer’s replacement.

The president, flanked by Breyer, told the nation in televised remarks that he would make his pick by the end of February and that the nominee will be “worthy of Justice Breyer’s legacy and excellence and decency.”

“I’ve made no decision except one. The person I will nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience, and integrity, and that person will be the first black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court,” he said. “It’s long overdue in my mind. I made that commitment during my campaign for president. I will keep it. I will fully do what I said.”

The president added that he would specifically lean on Vice President Kamala Harris throughout the selection process because “she was an exceptional lawyer, the attorney general of the state of California, and a former member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.”

Read full article here…

Information Liberation:   http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62840




Supreme Court to Hold Special Session to Determine Legality of Biden’s Vax Mandates in January

Joe Biden’s controversial vaccine mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees, using OSHA to implement the rule, will be considered by the Supreme Court during a special hearing in January. The court will also decide on the lawfulness of a separate vaccine mandate for health care workers in which federal funding through CMS has been threatened if workers do not comply. The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has previously refused to take action on emergency requests in both cases that sought an immediate decision.

Joe Biden’s controversial nationwide order that large businesses either mandate COVID-19 vaccinations or test their workers regularly will be considered by the Supreme Court during a special hearing in January, the justices announced on Wednesday.

The court will also decide on the lawfulness of a separate vaccine requirement for health care workers.

The brief court order said the justices will hear oral arguments on January 7 in the two cases, with rulings likely to follow swiftly after.

The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, delayed action on emergency requests in both cases that sought an immediate decision.

The workplace mandate is currently in effect nationwide, while the health care worker mandate is blocked in half the 50 U.S. states.

Read full article here…




US Supreme Court, Supported by Both Parties, Declines to Hear Case against Vax Mandates

US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a challenge by four teachers and teaching assistants in New York City who sought to halt enforcement of the vaccine mandate by Mayor Bill DeBlasio. All 148,000 staff in New York City school district were ordered to be vaccinated against Covid-19 by October 1, 2021, or face being placed on unpaid leave. While Sotomayor is a Democrat, she is not alone in this decision. ‘Conservative’ Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett similarly denied a petition by Indiana University students to block that school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in August. Former President Trump funded Operation Warp Speed to bring the Covid-19 shots to market faster than any other vaccines in US history. Journalist Brian Shilhavy wrote that the conservative right supported the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which gave pharmaceutical companies legal immunity in the courts from being sued due to injuries and deaths caused by their vaccines, and Republican President Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law. All of the “conservatives” on the bench sided with Big Pharma, including Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito. -GEG

From Reuters

Oct 1 (Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Friday refused to block New York City’s requirement that its public school teachers and employees be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Sotomayor denied a challenge by four teachers and teaching assistants who sought to halt enforcement of the vaccine mandate while their lawsuit challenging the policy continues in lower courts. Public school system workers were ordered to be vaccinated by 5 p.m. EDT (2100 GMT) on Friday or face being placed on unpaid leave until September 2022.

Some governments and private employers have embraced vaccine mandates to guard against the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace as they try to return to some degree of normalcy after coronavirus pandemic-related disruptions that began last year. Such mandates have become a flash point in the United States, with opponents including those in New York City saying their constitutional rights are being violated.

New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio, a Democrat, announced on Aug. 23 that all 148,000 staff in the largest U.S. school district would be required to submit proof of at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. After a lower court temporarily blocked the measure – an order since lifted – the deadline was pushed to Oct. 1.

Around 1 million students attend the city’s public schools.

Sotomayor rejected the emergency request without offering an explanation or referring the matter to the full nine-member court. Her decision mirrored one by Justice Amy Coney Barrett in August denying a bid by Indiana University students to block that school’s vaccine mandate.

Excerpts from Brian Shillhavy at Health Impact News

“Right” vs. “Left” divisions are what is hampering this nation to mount a united effort to fight against medical tyranny right now. Newly appointed “Conservative” Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett made a similar ruling in August denying a petition by Indiana University students to block that school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. (Source.)

And let’s not forget that it was the hero of the “Right Wing Conservatives” who took $TRILLIONS out of the American economy to fund Operation Warp Speed and bring these COVID-19 shots to market faster than any other vaccines in U.S. history, Donald Trump, who still brags about his accomplishments to this day.

And for you “johnny-come-lately” pundits just now jumping on the anti-vaxx bandwagon, let me give you a brief history lesson about how what little opposition has been made in the past to slow down corporate America’s rush to enslave the population through the medical system, has usually come from the left.

The “Conservative Right” is who supported the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which gave pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines legal immunity in the courts from being sued due to injuries and deaths caused by their vaccine products.

“Conservative” President Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law.

The law was challenged at the Supreme Court in 2011 with Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, and the law was upheld as the Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” All of the “conservatives” on the bench sided with Big Pharma, including Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, considered “solid conservatives.”

And who wrote the dissenting opinion complaining that the Court was overstepping its bounds and ruling beyond what Congress intended by giving Big Pharma too much power?

“Liberal” Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. (You can read her opinion here.) She was joined in dissent only by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, now deceased and no longer on the Court.

So when I learned earlier this week that Justice Sotomayor was going to be the one on the Supreme Court to hear the complaint of New York City school teachers who are faced with losing their jobs now for failing to receive a COVID-19 shot, I thought, OK, this will be the final test to see if there is any opposition left in the judiciary to these unlawful vaccine mandates.

If ever there was a cause worth fighting for in regards to civil liberties and progressive liberalism, standing up for the masses enslaved by corporate America, this was it.”

“…Change will only come when people wake up and say “Enough is enough!” and stop obeying the tyrants.

This is what they fear, and it doesn’t take a majority to start a revolution. Courage begets courage, and liberty begets liberty. It is contagious. If just 10% of the population resists, it will become infectious and draw others into resisting as well.

This is what they fear, and this is the fear motivating them to censor all contrary information in the corporate media and Big Tech.

They fear YOU!!”




Supreme Court Refuses Remaining Election Fraud Cases Without Explanation

The Supreme Court last week refused to review the 2020 election fraud cases against Pennsylvania, claiming it was ‘moot’ because the election was over. This week, the Supreme Court rejected, without comment or explanation, the remaining 2020 election challenges by Attorney Sidney Powell in Arizona and Wisconsin.

She said that the Court’s rejection is an absolute tragedy for the Rule of Law, the future of what was a Republic, and all freedom-loving people around the world.

Last Monday the United States Supreme Court refused to review the Pennsylvania 2020 Election cases.

The court made the announcement on Monday morning.

Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented from the denial.

On Monday, following their inaction from last week, the US Supreme Court rejected without comment or explanation, lingering 2020 election challenges by Attorney Sidney Powell in Arizona and Wisconsin.

The Supreme Court refused to secure the integrity of the US elections.

Later on Monday night Attorney Sidney Powell released a statement on the refusal of the court to hear the election fraud cases.

Sidney Powell says the ruling completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of the sinkhole of corruption.

Read full article here…