SF Gay-Men’s Choir Sings about Coming for Your Children, Chicago to Offer Condoms to 5th Graders

The San Francisco Gay-Men’s Choir released a controversial viral video in which the singers promised to “corrupt your kids” and “convert your children” knowing that it would trigger a strong negative reaction. Then, when people pushed back, they claimed to be victims. In another case, the Chicago Public School Board of Education announced it will put free condoms in every school for children in 5th grade and higher. Kenneth Fox, the head doctor for CPS, said that while it is not the norm for 10 and 11-year old children to engage in sex and that not everyone would be on board with the new policy from the start, he added, “I do think society has changed.” The policy is guided by critical-race theory as Chicago Public Schools released an “equity statement” that states it “seeks to mitigate the effects of numerous inequities experienced by CPS students, such as access to sexual-health education and services.” A third example of the hypersexualizing of children occurred in London last week when a library was forced to apologize after a man, dressed in a rainbow-colored bare-bottomed monkey costume with a visible fake penis, was hired to perform in front of children. No one was fired. GEG

The San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus is facing a wave of backlash after offering up what it described as ironic humor about fears surrounding children and the “gay agenda.”

The backlash came after the chorus posted a video in which members sang about indoctrinating children into being more concerned about “fairness” and “justice.”

“You think that we’ll corrupt your kids, if our agenda goes unchecked,” one of the members sings. “Funny, just this once, you’re correct.”

“We’ll convert your children. Happens bit by bit. Quietly and subtly. And you will barely notice it. You can keep them from disco. Warn about San Francisco. Make ’em wear pleated pants. We don’t care. We’ll convert your children. We’ll make them tolerant and fair.”

Later, the lyrics continue: “We’ll convert your children. Someone’s gotta teach them not to hate. We’re coming for them. We’re coming for your children. We’re coming for them. We’re coming for them. We’re coming for your children.

“Your children will care about,” the chorus adds, “fairness and justice for others. Your children will work to convert all their sisters and brothers. Then soon we’re almost certain, your kids will start converting you!”

“The gay agenda is coming home. The gay agenda is here! But you don’t have to worry because there’s nothing wrong with standing by our side.”

The video received plenty of pushback from the community. “Man, this suuuure sounds like a cult, doesn’t it?” an article for Not The Bee read. “This is grotesque and unacceptable!” tweeted Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America.

Commentator Raheem Kassam tweeted: “LGBT in 2010: ‘NO WE ARENT INTERESTED IN KIDS YOU BIGOT WE JUST WANNA GET MARRIED LIKE YOU.’” He proceeded to tweet “LGBT in 2021,” directing followers to an article about the song.

Republican Ohio state legislator Christina Hagan said: “They are pompously singing about undermining traditional values of families.”

According to The Post Millennial, the video was made private after receiving 88 likes and 5,000 dislikes. The group said it made the video private out of concern for its members’ safety. Although the original was removed, footage emerged on other YouTube pages and on Twitter.

Read full article here…

Federalist article about Chicago schools:  https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/chicago-schools-claim-dishing-out-condoms-to-5th-graders-is-needed-because-racism/

Summit:   https://summit.news/2021/07/12/uk-library-forced-to-apologize-after-hiring-man-in-monkey-dildo-costume-to-perform-in-front-of-children/

UK Scientists Admit to Using “Totalitarian” Fear Tactics in the COVID Response to Control the Population

A book by journalist Laura Dodsworth, A State of Fear, How the UK Government Weaponised Fear During the Covid-19 Pandemic, features testimony by members of the UK government’s influential Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) who regret their ‘unethical’ methods of coercion that amounted to “totalitarianism.” An unnamed SPI-B member explained that in March 2020 the government was very worried about compliance with lockdowns, and there were discussions that fear was needed to encourage compliance, and how to ramp up the fear. The source said, “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared. The way we have used fear is dystopian.” Another noted that the psychologists became intoxicated with the power to control.

David Kurten, leader of the Heritage Party and critic of the UK government’s actions, praised the book for revealing the strategy of the government that weaponized fear of a “virus that is no worse than a bad flu” in order to destroy our fundamental freedoms. He said the SPI-B group’s strategy threatened arrest, fines, and imprisonment for doing normal things like meeting friends in a park, while simultaneously using mainstream media to smear, denigrate and stir up hatred towards non-conformists, which is totalitarian. He noted that it was shocking that the majority of the population succumbed to these fear mongering techniques with little resistance, and even voted in greater numbers for the ruling parties that perpetrated the harmful propaganda. The UK government manipulated people into accepting lockdowns and mass injections of experimental mRNA, and now they are on the next phase of the plan to increase acceptance of a Chinese social credit system. They have used all the tactics laid out in Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, which is a blueprint for abuse.

A scientific advisory committee in Britain has expressed “regret” in a newly released book which outlines the group’s use of “dystopian” fear tactics to influence public behavior following the outbreak of COVID-19.

The Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior, or SPI-B for short, is a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that advised SAGE on the role of psychology in nudging the British public into complying with government lockdown measures. SAGE, in turn, advises government ministers, wresting far-reaching influence on public policy.

On the back of SPI-B advice, SAGE issued guidance to the U.K. government, as they locked down the country last March, advising that they would need to couple their actions with a targeted fear campaign to ramp up the “perceived level of personal threat” from the virus. This would help the government to control “a substantial number of people” who were thought to “not feel sufficiently personally threatened,” according to SPI-B.

Journalist and author Laura Dodsworth, in her latest publication A State of Fear, documents “how the U.K. government weaponised fear during the COVID-19 pandemic.” The book features the testimony of SPI-B members who admit that the tactics used by the group were tantamount to “totalitarianism.”

“Fear is the most powerful emotion,” Dodsworth’s website states. “Hardwired into humans, fear is … one of the most powerful tools in the behavioural psychology toolbox and it has been used to manipulate and control people during the pandemic.”

An unnamed SPI-B member explained to Dodsworth that “[i]n March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance, and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

“The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable,” the source continued. “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared. The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

SPI-B psychologist Gavin Morgan told Dodsworth that “using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government.” Morgan related that, in spite of his normally optimistic outlook on life, seeing the government implement fear tactics to control the population “has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”

Read full article here…

The ‘Cult of Covid’ – Based on Lies and Blind Faith


Your browser does not support the video tag.

The US Department of Defense Wants to Control Information and Clamp Down on Allowing Americans to Think for Themselves

The US Department of Defense is getting involved in the control of information ahead of the 2020 elections, claiming that fake news and social media posts are a threat to US security and could influence elections. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) wants custom software that can unearth fakes hidden among more than 500,000 stories, photos, video and audio clips, ostensibly to prevent viral fake news from ‘polarizing society.’ [Not to worry. The government would never use this power to prevent the exposure of corruption within its ranks, would it?] -GEG

Fake news and social media posts are such a threat to U.S. security that the Defense Department is launching a project to repel “large-scale, automated disinformation attacks,” as the top Republican in Congress blocks efforts to protect the integrity of elections.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency wants custom software that can unearth fakes hidden among more than 500,000 stories, photos, video and audio clips. If successful, the system after four years of trials may expand to detect malicious intent and prevent viral fake news from polarizing society.

“A decade ago, today’s state-of-the-art would have registered as sci-fi — that’s how fast the improvements have come,” said Andrew Grotto at the Center for International Security at Stanford University. “There is no reason to think the pace of innovation will slow any time soon.

U.S. officials have been working on plans to prevent outside hackers from flooding social channels with false information ahead of the 2020 election. The drive has been hindered by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s refusal to consider election-security legislation. Critics have labeled him #MoscowMitch, saying he left the U.S. vulnerable to meddling by Russia, prompting his retort of “modern-day McCarthyism.”

Risk Factor

President Donald Trump has repeatedly rejected allegations that dubious content on platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Google aided his election win. Hillary Clinton supporters claimed a flood of fake items may have helped sway the results in 2016.

“The risk factor is social media being abused and used to influence the elections,” Syracuse University assistant professor of communications Jennifer Grygiel said in a telephone interview. “It’s really interesting that Darpa is trying to create these detection systems but good luck is what I say. It won’t be anywhere near perfect until there is legislative oversight. There’s a huge gap and that’s a concern.”

False news stories and so-called deepfakes are increasingly sophisticated and making it more difficult for data-driven software to spot. AI imagery has advanced in recent years and is now used by Hollywood, the fashion industry and facial recognition systems. Researchers have shown that these generative adversarial networks — or GANs — can be used to create fake videos.

Read full article here…

UK Government Revealed As Organizer of Fake Public Responses to Terrorist Attacks To Prevent Public Anger

A report from the Middle East Eye reveals that the UK government is the hidden organizer of what appears to be spontaneous public responses to terrorist attacks. It also orchestrates media campaigns to reinforce the theme of these staged responses, which is forgiveness and love instead of anger and resolve to pursue the guilty. The “controlled spontaneity” strategy includes pre-tested hashtags, Instagram images, demonstrators, posters, politicians’ statements, vigils, and inter-faith events. These campaigns have been used in every terrorist incident in recent years, which explains why they all look exactly alike. The goal is to prevent any discussion of the connection between terrorism, mass immigration, and Islam. -GEG

The British government has prepared for terrorist incidents by
pre-planning social media campaigns that are designed to appear to be a
spontaneous public response to attacks, Middle East Eye has learned.

Hashtags are carefully tested before attacks happen, Instagram images selected, and “impromptu” street posters are printed.

In operations that contingency planners term “controlled
spontaneity”, politicians’ statements, vigils and inter-faith events are
also negotiated and planned in readiness for any terrorist attack.

The campaigns have been deployed during every terrorist incident in
recent years including the 2017 London Bridge attack and the Finsbury
Park mosque attack.

Within hours of an attack, other campaigns are swiftly organised,
with I “heart” posters being designed and distributed, according to the
location of the attack, and plans drawn up for people to hand out
flowers at the scene of the crime, in apparently unprompted gestures of
love and support.

The purpose of the operations, according to a number of people
involved in their creation, is to shape public responses, encouraging
individuals to focus on empathy for the victims and a sense of unity
with strangers, rather than reacting with violence or anger.

Many of the operations are said to be modelled on extensive plans
that were drawn up in the UK to channel public anger in the wake of any
attack on the 2012 London Olympics.

Some had been devised the previous year, at a time when social media
platforms were aiding communications between protesters during the Arab
Spring – and when a series of riots were erupting in towns and cities
across England.

One senior figure involved in that contingency planning says that the riots had “absolutely terrified” the British government, and that Theresa May, who was then home secretary and is now prime minister, had been particularly shaken.

The measures drawn up in advance of the Olympics were intended to
“corral the Princess Dianaesque grief” that was expected to emerge after
any mass-casualty attack, a reference to the public mourning that
followed the death of Princess Diana in a car crash in 1997. This person
describes those measures candidly as an attempt at “mind control”.

Although there was no terrorist incident at the 2012 Olympics,
variants are said to have been deployed in the wake of every attack in
the UK since then.

“The point I noticed change was the Olympics,” says one veteran contingency planner in the UK.

“The management of the secret, hidden emergency planning work behind
the Olympics became the social control that we would fall back on if we
had any terrorist attack, or if we had any disruption. It’s ‘this is the
hashtag we go to’. And we’ve never come back from those days.

“This job has changed significantly from planning for organic, people
responses to tragedy, to being told: ‘We would like the people to do
that, how do you get them there?’”

“A lot of the public’s responses are spontaneous, of course. But a
lot are shaped. The [British] government doesn’t want spontaneity: it
wants controlled spontaneity.”

‘That’s what we want’

Officials at the Home Office in particular are said to have been
impressed by football fans’ demonstrations of support for a Premier
League player, Fabrice Muamba, after he suffered a cardiac arrest and
collapsed on the pitch in March 2012, four months before the start of
the Olympics.

At subsequent matches, fans of many different clubs held up placards and banners bearing messages of support for Muamba.

MEE understands that during subsequent contingency planning meetings, Home Officials suggested that replicating such a response could assist the recovery process after any terrorist attack, and result in the Olympic Games continuing.

“They were saying: ‘That’s what we want. If something happens at the
Olympics, we want you to make people respond like that. And then the
people will want the Olympics to carry on.”

A number of Western governments are understood to have exchanged
information about the way in which they use social media in an attempt
to shape public responses following terrorist attacks.

Examples of “controlled spontaneity” within the UK that MEE has identified include:

  • a media campaign that was swiftly deployed after a number of British and American aid workers were beheaded by Islamic State militants in 2014.
  • the use of hashtags, posters and vigils after the London Bridge attacks of June 2017 in which eight people were murdered and almost 50 injured.
  • a Twitter, Facebook and mainstream media campaign that was employed later that month, shortly after a man drove his van into a group of people outside a mosque in north London, killing one person and injuring 10 others.

Read full article here…

Washington State Fusion Center Accidentally Sends Journalist Documents on Mind Control

The Washington State Fusion Center accidentally sent documents containing information about psycho-electronic weapons to a journalist   who had made a FOIA request while researching Antifa and white nationalist groups.  The zip file revealed information on electromagnetic weapons, remote mind control and forced memory blanking.  The document confirms that the devices have been tested on people.  It is clear that world governments are actively developing new classes of weaponry that the public have been led to believe are the stuff of fantasy, thus making it easy to pass off anyone discussing “psycho-electronic” as a wild conspiracy theorist.

Washington, D.C. – A Department of Homeland Security multi-agency counterterrorism center, the Washington State Fusion Center, released some documents this week that exposed research into a secretive class of devices called electromagnetic weapons, which have the potential to be used for “remote mind control.”

A reporter for Muckrock researching Antifa and white supremacist groups received a surprise among a batch of information from the Washington State Fusion Center as part of a FOIA request, as one file within the materials he received was curiously labeled “EM effects on the human body.zip”—a reference to electromagnetic forces on the human body.

Upon closer inspection, the journalist realized the documents contained in the file from the DHS Fusion Center discussed “remote mind control” and “forced memory blanking,” as well as other types of “psycho-electronic” weapon effects. The documents also discussed “microwave hearing,” and “remote brain mapping,” which would let third parties monitor your thoughts.

It is important to note that the existence of these records—which were not created by the fusion center and are not government documents—is not evidence that the U.S. government possesses these devices, but clearly indicates that at a minimum, these types of weapons are being studied. It should also be noted that while these particular records may not be evidence of the existence of psycho-electronic weapons, there is a plethora of collateral documentation that supports their existence and use.


MuckRock reports that aside from being in the possession of the fusion center, the documents are clearly not government material, with one slide seemingly coming from a person named “Supratik Saha,” who is identified as a software engineer. The slide referencing brain mapping has no sourcing, while a diagram of a body being assaulted by psychotronic weapons is sourced from “raven1.net,” which is no longer operational.

While the documents themselves may not be direct evidence of the existence of “psycho-electronic” weapons, there is plenty of supporting documentation regarding the existence and development of such weapons globally.

Read full article here…

Researchers Want to Force Those Who Oppose Mass Immigration To Take ‘Love Drug’

A group of German and American researchers published a study advocating the doping of whole populations if they are deemed to be  ‘xenophobic’, which generally means fear of strangers but, in this case, refers to anxiety over massive immigration by those from other races or cultures. They say the “cure’ for this ‘nationalism’ (their word), is a hormone called Oxytocin. They want to make native citizens more accepting and generous toward migrants, even if the migrants demonstrate patterns of free-loading, rape, and murder. The researchers did not suggest giving the “love drug” to the male immigrants, only to those who were not happy about what the male immigrants were doing. GEG


A group of researchers from Germany and the United States have published a study which concludes that doping ‘xenophobic’ populations with massive quantities of the estrogen-linked hormone Oxytocin will cure nationalism – making native citizens more accepting and generous towards migrants who simply want free handouts from Western taxpayers while Islamic extremists peacefully rape and murder infidels.

Accommodating the large influx of migrants not only challenges the humanitarian capacities of European countries but also requires their native populations to adjust to rapid growths in ethnic diversity, religious pluralism, and cultural differentiation. However, the impetus to adapt to changing social ecosystems is susceptible to considerable interindividual heterogeneity. Resistance to this transition often goes along with xenophobic sentiment, and as a consequence, recent elections in Europe have favored populist candidates who have openly expressed xenophobic attitudes toward refugees.

As co-author René Hurlemann said in a related study; “Given the right circumstances, oxytocin may help promote the acceptance and integration of migrants into Western cultures.

Widely referred to as the ‘love hormone,’ ‘hug hormone,’ and ‘cuddle chemical,’ Oxytocin is secreted from the pituitary gland during sex, childbirth, and lactation – influencing social behavior and emotion. It has been shown to increase romantic attachment and empathy – invoking feelings of relaxation, trust, and psychological stability.

For just €3.11 / day you can destroy your culture! 

The study concludes that a combination of oxytocin nasal spray and social pressure from other doped up participants resulted in ‘xenophobic’ test subjects increasing donations to migrants by 74% – jumping from average of €1.79 to €3.11.

[O]ur results imply that an OXT-enforced social norm adherence could be instrumental in motivating a more generalized acceptance toward ethnic diversity, religious plurality, and cultural differentiation resulting from migration by proposing that interventions to increase altruism are most effective when charitable social cues instill the notion that one’s ingroup shows strong affection for an outgroup. Furthermore, UNESCO has emphasized the importance of developing neurobiologically informed strategies for reducing xenophobic, hostile, and discriminatory attitudes (47). Thus, considering OXT-enforced normative incentives in developing future interventions and policy programs intended to reduce outgroup rejection may be an important step toward making the principle of social inclusion a daily reality in our societies.

Read full article here…


It’s Here. Electrical Brain Stimulation Is Being Developed by the US Military to Create Super Soldiers.

Obama’s BRAIN initiative of 2013 now includes technology to create Navy Seal ‘super soldiers’ through transcranial electrical stimulation for ‘cognitive enhancement’ and  superhuman performance.  It is an extension of the mind-control technology developed by the CIA in the 1950s called MK-ULTRA, which was used to create obedient assassins.