James Corbett’s 7th Annual Fake News Awards Roast Top Media Lies of 2023

James Corbett’s riveting presentation is a review of the mainstream media’s top lies and fake news stories of 2023 featuring topics such as global warming, medicine, science, pollution, AI (artificial intelligence), and war. Corbett explained in his top story that the Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza that was bombed by Israel did have tunnels underneath it, but the tunnels were not built and used by Hamas, but were actually built by Israelis decades earlier. Corbett lamented the loss of life in Gaza, especially the thousands of children who have been killed.

.

Link for video:        https://www.bitchute.com/video/XNOO0I29OsEb/

.

Full transcript:        https://corbettreport.com/fakenews7/




ABC Reporter Sentenced to 6 Years in Prison for Possessing Child Porn and Rape Images

.

.

Disgraced former ABC News reporter James Gordon Meek was sentenced Friday to six years in prison after admitting to trading child pornography content.

Virginia federal judge Claude Hilton handed down the judgment that was just one year more than the minimum term Meek, 54, was seeking, prosecutors announced.

The Virginia US Attorney’s Office last week asked the judge for a much heavier penalty of between 12 1/2 years and 15 years behind bars — what federal guidelines recommended for the once-acclaimed journalist though still far below the 20-year maximum he faced.

Meanwhile, Meek sought leniency emphasizing he had taken total responsibility and had never previously been charged with another crime.

In July, the former national security reporter copped to transporting and possessing child sexual abuse materials.

In arguing for a harsh sentence, prosecutors previously said in court papers that Meek “clearly sought out individuals across the internet for the specific purpose of sharing (and expanding) his [

Child Sexual Abuse Material] collection for his sexual gratification.”

Meek’s lawyer, Eugene Gorokhov, told The Post in a statement that his client was a victim of overzealous prosecution and was grateful the judge recognized that.

“The government has an important job to do in investigating and prosecuting criminal conduct,” Gorokhov said. “Occasionally, in doing so, the government also goes too far and tears down a person’s character completely. This is always devastating.”

“But the sentence in this case represents a rejection of the picture of Mr. Meek that the government tried to present,” the defense attorney said. “We are grateful to the court for taking a careful look at the facts, accurately assessing those facts, and recognizing that Mr. Meek’s worst moments do not define him.”

Meek sent and received disturbing videos and pictures of “infants and toddlers and content depicting sadistic and masochistic abuse of prepubescent children,” the feds said.

He sought out kids online — even once posing as one himself — and was part of a sick chat group called “C–ks, C–ts, and Kids,” prosecutors have said.

He lured one girl into sending him “at least a dozen screenshots” of her breasts and pubic area, and had breast photos of a 14-year-old and 15-year-old girl from chats in which he also sent videos of himself naked, holding his penis, the feds claim.

When Meek was in South Caroline in February 2020, he messaged on an online app, sending and receiving twisted materials including children under 12 getting raped, prosecutors announced Friday. Those items were on his phone and traveled back with him to Virginia, the feds claim.

.

Read full article here…

Valuetainment:      https://www.instagram.com/reel/CvQhSYfNlXQ/?hl=en

NY Post:      https://nypost.com/2023/09/26/ex-abc-news-reporter-should-get-up-to-15-years-for-child-porn-feds/




Americans Ignorant about the Hot War in Mexico near San Diego, Starvation in France, and More Critical Info

Tucker Carlson explains that the US media, often at the behest of the Biden administration, is burying news.  There is a Mexican civil war/ drug war that will spill over the open border, but most Americans are unaware. Carlson showed that high-profile former officials now admit Ukraine is losing the war, yet the continues to fund the lost cause, and he showed enormous protests in France because are starving as they cannot afford to buy food and pay high fuel prices.

.

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Q9Trs9QfyJY/

.

Summary by JW Williams

Tucker Carlson says that the US media is burying major stories that affect our lives and said that news is being suppressed often under the direction of the US government. He said that the media is comprised of information monopolies that are controlled. Carlson explains that Americans are ignorant about a civil war raging in Mexico, “100 yards from San Diego”, that will spill over into the US as the border is open. The Mexican government has lost control over parts of its own country to drug cartels. At least 150,000 people have died in Mexico’s drug war. The fighting ramped up last week following the arrest of drug lord El Chapo’s son, Ovidio Guzman, who is accused of controlling the trafficking huge quantities of fentanyl to the US.

Carlson exposed the media gas-lighting the public on the war in Ukraine, reporting that Ukraine is winning, but the truth was recently printed in the Washington Post that Ukraine’s economy has been devastated, millions of people have fled the country, its infrastructure is being destroyed and Russia controls its assets. Without funding from the US, the country will fall.

Carlson also showed enormous protests in Paris against poverty; a protester reported that the French people are “dying of hunger because of the high prices that they can no longer afford.” Energy prices in France are at an all-time high due to its green climate policies, affecting the ability of people to buy food.

Ending the use of “fossil” fuels is the number one goal of the Democrat party. The US is headed in the same direction as France, due to severe climate policies to stop global warming, which is a hoax. But the media has failed Americans who remain ignorant.




Elon Musk Asks How The People Running The Media Came to Hate America and Americans

An0maly, an internet and streaming personality, posted on Twitter that the people running the news companies in America hate America and Americans. Twitter CEO Elon Musk asked how it came to be this way. An0maly responded by digging up this 2018 tweet from Musk that queried, “Who do you think *owns​* the press? Hello. An0maly then wrote, “I don’t think you’re allowed to answer this question without getting yelled at by both political parties.”

Twitter CEO Elon Musk late Monday night asked how it came to be that the people who run the media hate America and hate Americans.

I don’t think you’re allowed to answer this question without getting yelled at by both political parties. pic.twitter.com/EIcpGW7V3f

— An0maly (@LegendaryEnergy) December 20, 2022

Read full article here…




10-Year Old Girl Was Raped in Abortion Case Mentioned by President Biden, But No Police Report

Joe Biden raged at the Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. Wade and returning the issue of abortion to the States. Biden mentioned the case of a 10-year old girl from Ohio who had been raped, was seeking an abortion, but had to travel to Indiana for the procedure because Ohio has a new law prohibiting abortion after detection of a fetal heartbeat. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost could find zero police reports on the rape of the young girl, although it is mandated by law. He said that the new limits on abortion in Ohio provides an exemption for cases like this, and the girl could have obtained an abortion in his state. The horrific story has been used by the left to gain support for liberal abortion laws. The Indianapolis Star first reported the story, based on the account of a single Indianapolis OB-GYN, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, which has been questioned by conservative media outlets. It was reported that Dr. Bernard took a phone call from a child abuse doctor in Ohio about the case, but the unidentified Ohio doctor did not report the rape. Abortionists in Indiana must report any girls under 16 who obtain an abortion; Dr. Caitlin Bernard failed to report the abortion to law enforcement. She has previously failed to report underage abortions.

UPDATE: Gerson Fuentes, 27, a migrant from Guatemala who is in the US illegally, was arrested for the rape of the 10-year old girl that allegedly took place on May 12. He reportedly confessed to raping the girl multiple times. He was held on $2 million bond and a judge recently denied bond to him. ICE reportedly placed a detainer on Fuentes requesting that he be turned over to them.

“Not a whisper.” That was Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, saying that his search for a notorious child rape case in his state had turned up nothing.

That is odd given the vast coverage by the media, and even condemnation of the president of the United States, of the supposed case of a 10-year-old girl raped and impregnated in Ohio and forced to seek an abortion in Indiana.

What is even stranger than the utter lack of confirmation of the story is the utter lack of interest in confirming it — or in the welfare of the child herself. We have little proof that the story is true despite some significant legal and factual questions.

The story of the child rape united the nation in revulsion, but also became the rallying point for the denunciation of the Supreme Court, including in comments by President Biden. In his White House address, Biden cried that this child “was forced to have to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the pregnancy and maybe save her life. Ten years old — 10 years old! — raped, six weeks pregnant, already traumatized, was forced to travel to another state.”

The president used the story to attack the Supreme Court and ask, “What century are they in?”

The media also exhaustively covered the story. It was written up everywhere from Israel to Bangladesh. On MSNBC, Joy Reid declared, “It is hard to imagine anything more cruel, more disturbing than forcing a child, a 10-year-old still playing with fidget toys and tablets, to carry her father or her brother’s child to term or forcing her to travel across state lines for an abortion. And yet, here we are.”

But are we?

The story remains based entirely on an account from Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis. Indianapolis Star reporter Shari Rudavsky reported, “On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, [Bernard], an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.”

Bernard told her that immediately after “the Buckeye State had outlawed any abortion after six weeks, [she] had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.” She then explained how Bernard performed the abortion.

When the story ran, some of us noted that the Ohio law actually does not prohibit abortions after six weeks but after “fetal heartbeat has been detected.” Being three days over the six-week line is not a bar on abortion. More importantly, it also has the exceptions for cases like this one.

Read full article here…




UK Government Document Admits 19 Million People Have Rejected Covid Jabs

The British public have been told that just 5 million people in the United Kingdom have refused to take the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’, and have been made to feel that they are a small minority. However, in England alone, there are at least 19.2 million people who have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 shot, and 21.8 million people who have not had two doses of a Covid-19 jab.

The UK Health Security Agency hid the data in its weekly Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report that stated in the ‘Covid-19 vaccine uptake in England’ section that the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was only 43,945,696 from a possible 63,130,683 people on April 10, 2022. Therefore, 19.2 million people in England have refused the jabs.

For months the British public have been deceived with tales that there are just 5 million people in the United Kingdom who have refused to take up the offer of a Covid-19 vaccine. But this is a complete fabrication that has no doubt been used to make those who have refused the jab feel as if they are part of a minority.

Because an official UK Government report proves that in England alone there are at least 19.2 million people who have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, 21.8 million people who have not had two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 31 million who have not had 3 doses of a Covid-19 Vaccine, meaning nearly half of England’s population has become wise to the propaganda and lies spouted by the Government and mainstream media over the past two years.

It was back in September that the British public were told there were 5 million Brits who had so far refused the experimental jabs. Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s Chief Scientific Advisor and former president of GlaxoSmithKline, announced in a televised Covid-19 briefing that “There are five million or so people who are eligible for vaccines now who haven’t been vaccinated,”.

Well it turns out the “or so” make up approximately another 14.2 million people in England alone as of 10th April 22 , bringing the grand total of people who have refused the Covid-19 jab to 19.184,986.

The UK Health Security Agency replaced Public Health England in the second half of 2021, and is sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care and headed by Dr Jenny Harries.

Hidden deep within their monotonous weekly Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report, they publish a section on ‘Covid-19 vaccine uptake in England’, and it interestingly states that ’10th April 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was only 43,945,696 from a possible 63,130,683 people. Therefore, 19.2 million people in England are not-vaccinated against Covid-19 vaccine whatsoever.

Read full article here…

[/su_note]

For months the British public have been deceived with tales that there are just 5 million people in the United Kingdom who have refused to take up the offer of a Covid-19 vaccine. But this is a complete fabrication that has no doubt been used to make those who have refused the jab feel as if they are part of a minority.

Because an official UK Government report proves that in England alone there are at least 19.2 million people who have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, 21.8 million people who have not had two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 31 million who have not had 3 doses of a Covid-19 Vaccine, meaning nearly half of England’s population has become wise to the propaganda and lies spouted by the Government and mainstream media over the past two years.

It was back in September that the British public were told there were 5 million Brits who had so far refused the experimental jabs. Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s Chief Scientific Advisor and former president of GlaxoSmithKline, announced in a televised Covid-19 briefing that “There are five million or so people who are eligible for vaccines now who haven’t been vaccinated,”.

Well it turns out the “or so” make up approximately another 14.2 million people in England alone as of 10th April 22 , bringing the grand total of people who have refused the Covid-19 jab to 19.184,986.

The UK Health Security Agency replaced Public Health England in the second half of 2021, and is sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care and headed by Dr Jenny Harries.

Hidden deep within their monotonous weekly Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report, they publish a section on ‘Covid-19 vaccine uptake in England’, and it interestingly states that ’10th April 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was only 43,945,696 from a possible 63,130,683 people. Therefore, 19.2 million people in England are not-vaccinated against Covid-19 vaccine whatsoever.

Read full article here…




Michigan: Mainstream Media Pushes False Narrative about Police Shooting

Grand Rapids, Michigan: The mainstream media coverage of the police shooting that killed suspect Patrick Lyoya, a 26-year old black refugee from the Congo, is designed to antagonize the public instead of presenting the facts of the case. Mr. Lyoya had a criminal record that includes a conviction for a violent crime against a pregnant woman, an arrest for theft of a vehicle that was dismissed, and a DUI. The license plate on Lyoya’s car did not belong to the car he was driving, and it may possibly be a stolen vehicle. The investigation is incomplete at this time. The officer physically tried to arrest Lyoya after he refused to show his license and tried to leave the scene. The officer tackled Lyoya after he resisted and the two struggled. The officer tried use the taser when Lyoya grabbed it and another struggle ensued. The officer then shot Lyoya in the back of the head with his pistol. CNN neglected to inform that Lyoya grabbed the weapon.

The lethal shot was not a response to a traffic infraction, as presented by the media, but was a reaction to Lyoya fighting for control over the officer’s taser weapon that could have caused death or great bodily injury to the officer.

BLM and far-left protesters blocked the street in Grand Rapids and threatened a driver with a gun.




US Officials Admit They’re Literally Just Lying To The Public About Russia

NBC News has a new report out citing multiple anonymous US officials who say the Biden administration has been rapidly pushing out “intelligence” about Russia’s plans in Ukraine that is “low-confidence” or “based more on analysis than hard evidence”, or even just plain false, in order to fight an information war against Putin. The US government’s deliberate lies included impending chemical weapons attacks, Russian plans to orchestrate a false flag attack in the Donbass to justify an invasion, Putin’s advisors misinforming him, and Russia seeking arms supplies from China. Journalist Caitlin Johnstone concluded that NBC revealed that the government is lying so that the public will accept the lies, and those in power can begin openly manufacturing the consent of the public to be lied to for their own good.

NBC News has a new report out citing multiple anonymous US officials, humorously titled “In a break with the past, U.S. is using intel to fight an info war with Russia, even when the intel isn’t rock solid“.

The officials say the Biden administration has been rapidly pushing out “intelligence” about Russia’s plans in Ukraine that is “low-confidence” or “based more on analysis than hard evidence”, or even just plain false, in order to fight an information war against Putin.

The report says that toward this end the US government has deliberately circulated false or poorly evidenced claims about impending chemical weapons attacks, about Russian plans to orchestrate a false flag attack in the Donbass to justify an invasion, about Putin’s advisors misinforming him, and about Russia seeking arms supplies from China.

It was an attention-grabbing assertion that made headlines around the world: U.S. officials said they had indications suggesting Russia might be preparing to use chemical agents in Ukraine.

President Joe Biden later said it publicly. But three U.S. officials told NBC News this week there is no evidence Russia has brought any chemical weapons near Ukraine. They said the U.S. released the information to deter Russia from using the banned munitions.

It’s one of a string of examples of the Biden administration’s breaking with recent precedent by deploying declassified intelligence as part of an information war against Russia. The administration has done so even when the intelligence wasn’t rock solid, officials said, to keep Russian President Vladimir Putin off balance.

So they lied. They may hold that they lied for a noble reason, but they lied. They knowingly circulated information they had no reason to believe was true, and that lie was amplified by all the most influential media outlets in the western world.

Another example of the Biden administration releasing a false narrative as part of its “information war”:

Likewise, a charge that Russia had turned to China for potential military help lacked hard evidence, a European official and two U.S. officials said.

The U.S. officials said there are no indications China is considering providing weapons to Russia. The Biden administration put that out as a warning to China not to do so, they said.

Read full article here…




US Government Paid News Media $1 Billion to Promote Vaccines

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request showed that Health and Human Services paid hundreds of mainstream news outlets, including TV, print, radio and social media, in a $1 billion media blitz to build public confidence in, and uptake of, COVID-19 vaccines. Pfizer is shielded from liability, but they are required to disclose known adverse events and the FDA’s records demonstrate that Pfizer failed to do so, and they may be held liable, according to Dr. Robert Malone.

Story at-a-glance

  • A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by TheBlaze shows Health and Human Services spent $1 billion for a media campaign to build public confidence in, and uptake of, COVID-19 vaccines using mainstream news outlets
  • News outlets that did respond to TheBlaze assured them the editorial staff are not influenced by advertising money, but it’s not hard to imagine management would not look kindly on editorial staff who write content that doesn’t align with the advertising narrative
  • Mounting evidence demonstrates why the government is paying for good press since insurance companies reported a rise in all-cause mortality in late 2021
  • The first batch of Pfizer documents the FDA used to approve Comirnaty (Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine) were released March 1, 2022; mRNA technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone believes these papers show a break in the indemnification clauses, exposing Pfizer to potential civil and criminal liability

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released information to TheBlaze1 in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The information showed that the federal government had purchased advertising to the tune of $1 billion taxpayer dollars as part of a media campaign to build vaccine confidence.

HHS2 has billed the campaign as a “national initiative to increase public confidence in, and uptake of, COVID-19 vaccines while reinforcing basic prevention measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing.” Data don’t support these measures, but the media campaign was likely hiding something more sinister.

HHS Paid News Media to Build Vaccine Confidence

Within the documents sent from HHS, TheBlaze3 found that hundreds of organizations in the news media were paid to produce TV, print, radio and social media advertising timed to coincide with an increasing availability of the genetic therapy shots.

The government also collaborated with social media influencers whose audience included “communities hit hard by COVID-19” and also engaged “experts” to be interviewed and promote the mass vaccination campaign in the news.4 One of those experts was the director of NIAID and chief medical adviser to the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In other words Fauci, the man who has been the “face” of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021,5 who publicly disparaged anyone who questioned the data he was using to support his recommendations, and who blithely referred to himself as “the science,”6,7 was, in fact, a shill.

Virtually every one of the news organizations paid by HHS, including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and the New York Post, covered stories about the vaccines and did not disclose they had accepted taxpayer dollars to support the vaccine effort. It is common practice for the editorial teams to function separately from the advertising departments, so it appears the organizations felt there was no need to disclose their funding.

The advertising took several forms, including an amusing social media campaign featuring Elton John and Michael Caine, fear-based ads that featured survivor stories and straightforward informational ads promoting the safety and efficacy of the current mRNA shot for COVID-19.

Shani George, vice president of communications for The Washington Post made a statement about the funding they received for media advertising from the federal government, saying:8

“Advertisers pay for space to share their messages, as was the case here, and those ads are clearly labeled as such. The newsroom is completely independent from the advertising department.”

A spokesperson for the Los Angeles Times also responded to TheBlaze and gave a similar response. Other publications either did not respond or declined to comment. However, it is important to note that the reporters and editorial staff responsible for news also likely read their own publication or watch the online videos.

It’s not hard to imagine that a large news organization promoting vaccinations through their advertising department would not look kindly on editorial staff who choose to report facts that do not align with large sums of money spent by advertisers. You can guess what the editorial staff may be told to write. TheBlaze offered several examples of thinly disguised advertising published as “news,” including:

  • An October BuzzFeed9 article featured “essential facts” about eligibility for the vaccine and unbalanced, pro-vaccine statements from health agency experts such as CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and epidemiologist Dr. George Rutherford.
  • Articles in the Los Angeles Times10 featured “experts” advising people how to convince their vaccine-hesitant friends and relatives to change their minds.
  • A Washington Post article covered “the pro-vaccine messages people want to hear.”11
  • A Newsmax article in November ran the headline “Newsmax Opposes Vaccine Mandate, Here’s Why.”12 The article, obviously an opinion piece, began by saying the mandate was a “dangerous overreach” and then proceeded to support the vaccine campaign with statements like, “The vaccine …has been demonstrated to be safe and effective” and “Newsmax has encouraged citizens, especially those at risk, to get immunized.”

Journalistic Objectivity Likely Impossible

The U.S. government is not the only entity to recognize the power behind controlling the news media. Bill Gates is another. Using more than 30,000 grants, Gates has contributed at least $319 million to the media, which senior staff writer for MintPress News Alan McLeod revealed.13

Recipients included CNN, NPR, BBC, The Atlantic and PBS. Gates has also sponsored foreign organizations that included The Daily Telegraph, the Financial Times, and Al Jazeera. More than $38 million has also been funneled into investigative journalism centers.

Gates’ influence within the press is far-reaching, from journalism to journalistic training. This ultimately makes true objective reporting about Gates or his initiatives virtually impossible. MacLeod writes:14

“Today, it is possible for an individual to train as a reporter thanks to a Gates Foundation grant, find work at a Gates-funded outlet, and to belong to a press association funded by Gates. This is especially true of journalists working in the fields of health, education and global development, the ones Gates himself is most active in and where scrutiny of the billionaire’s actions and motives are most necessary.”

It is important to note that Gates has an intense interest in health, and specifically vaccinations.15 And with this power to control the media and his strong connections with health organizations such as Johns Hopkins, with whom he collaborated for Event 201,16 it’s not hard to imagine that his influence can be seen in many of the stories you read or watch each day.

This government overreach into the Fourth Estate is not unique to the U.S. Leaked documents17 have demonstrated that the BBC News and Reuters have also been involved in a covert operation in which the U.K. sought to infiltrate Russian media and promote a U.K. narrative using a network of Russian journalists.

Multimillion-dollar contracts were used to advance these aims, which included 15,000 journalists and staff. The campaign closely follows a U.S. clandestine CIA media infiltration campaign launched in 1948 called Operation Mockingbird.18,19 About one-third of the CIA budget, or $1 billion each year, was spent on bribes to hundreds of American journalists, who then published fake stories at the CIA’s request.

While it may sound like ancient history, there’s evidence to suggest it continues today. Although the messages have changed with the times, the basic modus operandi of dissemination remains the same. Other reports20,21,22 have also highlighted the role of intelligence agencies in the global effort to eliminate “anti-vaccine propaganda” from public discussion, and the fact that they’re using sophisticated cyberwarfare tools to do so.

Facts Reveal Reason Government Is Paying News Media

All-cause mortality and death rates are difficult statistics to change. People are either dead or they’re not. There is only one reason a person is included in the National Death Index Database: They have died regardless of the cause. Evidence is mounting that all-cause mortality is rising to levels greater than were seen during 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OneAmerica,23 a mutual insurance holding company, announced the death rate in working-age Americans from 18 to 64 years in the third quarter of 2021 was 40% higher than prepandemic levels. Other insurance companies are also finding similar results and citing higher mortality rates.24

The Hartford Insurance Company announced mortality had increased 32% from 2019 and 20% from 2020 during 2021. Lincoln National also reported claims increased by 13.7% year-over-year and were 54% higher in the fourth quarter compared to 2019. Funeral homes are posting an increase in burials and cremations in 2021 over 2020.25

The overall mortality increase noted after the global release of the COVID shot is also being reported in other countries. A large German health insurance company reported their data26,27 were nearly 14 times greater than the number of deaths reported by the German government. The health insurance company gathered the data directly from doctors who were applying for payment from a sample of 10.9 million people.

A reporter from The Exposé28 notes that while the world has been distracted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the U.K. government quietly released a report29 that confirmed 9 in every 10 deaths from COVID-19 in England were in people who were fully vaccinated.

Each week the U.K. Health Security Agency publishes a surveillance report. The February 24, 2022, report shows 85% to 91% of adults who are infected, hospitalized or died from COVID-19 were fully vaccinated.

Pfizer Documents Show Vaccines Not Fully Safe

Four days after the FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine for ages 16 and older, a group of public health professionals, doctors, scientists and journalists submitted a FOIA request to release the data Pfizer used for the approval of Comirnaty.30 The nonprofit group of professionals is called the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).31

Despite the FDA’s claim that the organization was committed to transparency,32 the agency first requested 55 years33 to release the data that supported the approval of Comirnaty after the FOIA was filed, and then asked for another 20 years to fully comply.34 All told, the FDA wanted 75 years to release documentation that supported their approval of a genetic therapy being promoted for mass vaccination.

When the FDA did not release the data, the PHMPT sued the FDA since it is the FDA’s statutory obligation35 to publish the documentation within 30 days of approving a drug. Although they asked for 75 years, January 6, 2022, the court ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages of the documents each month so they would be completed within 8 months.36

March 1, 2022, the first of those documents were released and have been posted for public view on the PMHPT website.37 What’s included in these documents may answer the question of why the government felt $1 billion was required to boost vaccine confidence.

An initial review of some of the papers by one Trial Site News reporter revealed many errors and anomalies. In an interview with Stephen Bannon, mRNA technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone talked about the documentation and the need to develop a team to comb through the information and catalog it for reference. He said:38

“So, all this information comes piped through pharmacovigilance what’s called the pharmacovigilance shop at Pfizer and BioNTech. I presume Pfizer. And then that’s been summarized and submitted to the FDA as a series of documents. So this is a window into what FDA actually knows, which is by inference what CDC knows.

When they tell us there’s no risks and we should go ahead and start mandating or forcing vaccination on our children, what we have for instance, in that section you’re referring to of the listed adverse events is a huge list of what is considered to be adverse events of interest, which means that they’re not just one-offs.

It happens multiple times throughout the world and what we’re finding is embedded throughout this huge volume of documents that the judge has forced Pfizer and the FDA … remember our government tried really hard to keep this information from us and fortunately the courts have called their bluff and forced them to disclose it. Now it’s up to us to comb through it.”

Malone went on to describe the trouble that will likely arise in the coming weeks and months for Pfizer and the FDA from the information that is now freely available to the public when Bannon asked, why is it so important that the courts demanded the information be released now?

“The courts have forced Pfizer and the FDA to comply with the law which is that after licensure is granted these documents must be made available. Previously they’re considered confidential.

And remember that as Naomi’s [Naomi Wolfe] about to discuss, and the truckers are so upset about, we have been forced to take these vaccines and we have been told that they’re fully safe and effective. What this documents is the government has been well aware that they are not fully safe and has hidden this information from us.

What that really matters for Pfizer is that the indemnification clauses require Pfizer disclose known adverse events and this documentation demonstrates they didn’t do so. A lot of the lawyers are licking their chops over this because it seems to indicate a break in the veil that may allow legal action basically due to fraud and concealment of these risks from the general public.

This is why you have not been able to have full informed consent, is they’ve hidden all this information from you and they’ve used all the propaganda and censorship tools — which you’re about to cover — and paid media, to keep all this information from you and spin it, so that you think the left is right and the down is the up and the moon is made of green cheese.”




Fox News & Newsmax Took Biden Money To Push Deadly COVID Vaccines on Its Viewers

Under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, it was revealed that nearly the entire corporate mainstream media took money from the Biden administration to push Covid vaccines to their audiences, including so-called “conservative” media organizations Fox News and Newsmax. Mainstream media outlets continually claimed Covid vaccines were safe and effective. Although Covid vaccines have now been shown to be ineffective and highly dangerous, the American news media will avoid investigating the biggest medical experiment in the history of the world because they have been paid off, and there is an outright ban on any negative coverage. The media is running Ukraine war footage 24/7 in the hope that the American public will forget the last two years of media-manufactured Covid mania.

Two days ago, Chris Pandolfo at Blaze Media revealed that his media organization had filed FOIA requests regarding the Biden Administration’s covert funding of the deadly new vaccines and the American corporate media. What they discovered will certainly shock you — and it’s a crucial story that our corrupt media will work hard to make the least covered and least discussed news story of the year.

What did Chris Pandolfo find? He discovered that nearly the entire corporate media took money from the Biden Administration to push the vaccines to their audiences without disclosing it. More importantly, so-called “conservative” media organizations took money from the Biden Administration to spin positive stories about deadly and ineffective vaccines to their conservative viwers who were right to be suspicious — and did not disclose it.

Fox News took the money and said nothing to its conservative viewers.

Newsmax took the money and said nothing to its conservative viewers.

In response to a FOIA request filed by TheBlaze, HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations. These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the vaccine in terms of both its efficacy and safety.

That is the largest and most comprehensive breach of journalistic ethics that has ever occurred. Almost everybody took the money. Almost everybody lied about the vaccines (knowingly or unknowingly). Almost everybody refused to report anything negative about the vaccines — because they were paid to close their eyes. Almost everybody is implicated.

Now that the new COVID vaccines have been shown to be not only dangerous and ineffective but highly dangerous, the American public would naturally expect the American news media to do some investigation into the biggest medical experiment in the history of the world. That’s not going to happen. The American corporate media has been paid off by the Biden Administration, and so they’re running Ukraine war footage 24/7 in the hope that the American public will forget the last two years of media-manufactured COVID mania.

Let me add some personal details to the largest corporate media scandal of the year: I have been contacted by a whistleblower inside Newsmax who has confirmed the broad details of this story. That insider confirms: Newsmax executives agreed to take the money from Biden’s Health and Human Services (HHS) to push only positive coverage of the new COVID vaccines.

Let me add another personal detail: I was contacted by top Newsmax executives and told to halt any negative coverage of the vaccines in 2021. I was told that “it was problematic” for Newsmax. I was given some version of this warning multiple times by multiple executives. Obviously, I did not heed their advice.

Of course, almost everyone else employed in the corporate media did keep their mouths shut. I discussed the outright ban on negative vaccine coverage with other Newsmax producers and top anchors at the time, and they were aware that they could not provide negative coverage of the news vaccines without repercussions from the network. I was contacted by PR experts who worked with Newsmax and was told that medical experts and doctors who might say negative things about the new vaccines would not be booked as guests at all.

In other words, the Biden Administration’s money did not just pay for pro-vaccine advertising at outlets like Fox and Newsmax: it paid for an outright ban on any negative coverage. There’s a word for that kind of thing, and the word is: propaganda. Corporate news executives with no medical training and no expertise began to make ludicrous announcements that were basically blanket endorsements of the deadly and untested vaccines. Pandolfo decribes this propaganda:

Other publications, such as the Los Angeles Times, featured advice from experts on how readers could convince vaccine-hesitant people in their lives to change their minds. The Washington Post covered “the pro-vaccine messages people want to hear.” Newsmax has reported how the vaccines have “been demonstrated to be safe and effective” and “encouraged citizens, especially those at risk, to get immunized.”

HHS did not immediately respond when asked if the agency used taxpayer dollars to pay for people to be interviewed, or for a PR firm to place them in interviews with news outlets.

Read full article here…




Joe Rogan: “By the way, 200 Congress People Have Been Treated with Ivermectin for COVID”

Recently, Joe Rogan, a popular internet personality with millions of subscribers, used Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medication, after he was diagnosed with Covid-19, and CNN mocked him and called it a “horse de-wormer. Rogan invited CNN contributor Dr. Sanjay Gupta on his show and accused CNN of lying about Ivermectin by calling it a “horse de-wormer” when there is a human version to be used for legitimate circumstances. Gupta said he did not know why the network did it and did not question it. The video got over five million views in just 24 hours.

Last week, Rogan said that “Dr. Pierre Kory, who one of the doctors from the Frontline Critical Care Group that has been treating people, including by the way, 200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID. Did you know that? Yeah. Google that!” Dr. Kory reportedly also prescribed monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, Z-pak, NAD, and vitamins, along with the ivermectin.

Joe Rogan continued to promote the use of Ivermectin for treating the coronavirus.

Last week Rogan told his audience that Dr. Pierre Kory from FLCCC treated him and 200 members of Congress with monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, Z-pak, NAD, vitamins, and ivermectin.

Joe Rogan: Dr. Pierre Kory, who one of the doctors from the Frontline Critical Care Group that has been treating people, including by the way, 200 congresspeople have been treated with ivermectin for COVID. Did you know that? Yeah. Google that!

Read full article here…




Conflicts of Interest: Pfizer Sponsors News Programs and COVID Vax Manufacturers Employ Former FDA Chiefs

Pfizer spends around $2 billion a year on advertising, including sponsoring biased news programs that promote COVID vaccines. In addition, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and the company that founded Moderna, have fostered a series of former top ranking government officials into top positions in their organizations to navigate government agencies that greenlight their products.

Have an experimental drug that needs rapid authorization from the FDA in order to be sold to the masses? Looking to siphon billions of dollars from the U.S. taxpayer for your newfound pharmaceutical product?

In today’s America, you can buy yourself a former FDA commissioner, and use the public-sector private-sector revolving door system of corruption to impose your will on the American public, and make a windfall for your executives and shareholders in the process.

That appears to be the exact strategy utilized by Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and the company that founded Moderna, which have rostered a series of former top ranking government officials into top positions in their respective organizations.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb

Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottliebthe ultimate personification of the revolving door mechanism, sits on the board of Pfizer. The frequent Pfizer-sponsored CNBC guest also maintains several thousand shares of Pfizer stock, and he is compensated well into the six figures on an annual basis. Gottlieb earns millions from his continually increasing board appointments to a plethora of pharmaceutical and healthcare companies.

The pandemic profiteer also sits on the boards of Illumina and Tempus Labs, which sell FDA-authorized COVID-19 test kits. Additionally, he sits on the board of Aetion, which has partnered with the FDA on researching COVID-19 policy.

Dr. Stephen Hahn

Stephen Hahn, who led the FDA when it authorized Moderna’s COVID shots, recently took an executive level post with Flagship Pioneering, the company that launched Moderna. Flagship holds 20 million shares of Moderna stock, which as of October 16, 2021, is valued at $6.5 Billion. They earned $1.4 billion through the sale of Moderna stock earlier this year.

There is virtually no separation between Flagship and Moderna. Flagship CEO Noubar Afeyan, who co-founded Moderna and owns over 2 million shares of Moderna stock, is the current chairman of Moderna. Additionally, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel is listed as a Flagship “special partner.”

In September, Hahn was appointed the Chief Medical Officer of Flagship-launched YourBio health, a company that sells COVID-19 testing kits.

Dr. Mark McClellan

Mark McClellan was the FDA commissioner from 2002-2004 (and served in other high-ranking government posts). He has maintained a board of directors seat with pharma giant Johnson & Johnson since 2013. McClellan owns thousands of shares in the company and receives around $300,000 annually.

Read the full article on Substack.com

Information Liberation:    http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62619