An American-Thai Couple Are in Deep Water Over Their Attempt to Establish a Community at Sea



The Royal Thai Navy plans to remove a house on a platform 12 miles off the coast of Phuket that was built by Ocean Builders to promote the concept of “seasteading,” which is the concept of permanent dwellings built at sea, outside the territory claimed by any government. The house was occupied by American Chad Elwartowski and his Thai partner Supranee Thepdet, who planned for others to join them in a libertarian-style community that they believed would be beyond legal jurisdictions. Thai authorities filed a complaint accusing the couple of breaching a section of the country’s criminal code that relates to threatening the sovereignty of a state, and erosion of a state’s independence – these charges carry a death penalty! The couple is now in hiding and Elwartowski says he fears for his life.

The Royal Thai Navy plans to remove a house built on a platform 12 miles off the coast of Phuket according to the BangkokPost.

American
Chad Elwartowski and his Thai partner Supranee Thepdet, also known as
Nadia Summergirl, were reportedly living in the house, built by Ocean Builders, to promote the concept of “seasteading.”

Seasteading
is the concept of creating permanent dwellings at sea, called
seasteads, outside the territory claimed by any government,” says the
company on its website.

In a promotional video posted to YouTube
in March, Elwartowski toasts his partner with champagne on the roof of
their ocean dwelling. He says 20 more floating homes are planned so
others can join them in a libertarian-style community that they believe
will be beyond legal jurisdictions.

Governments “have a monopoly on land but they don’t have a monopoly at sea,” Elwartowski says in the video. “We’re looking forward to freedom-loving people to come join us out on the open ocean.”

In an earlier video, he says international waters are “where there are no laws other than the law of the sea.”

But
Thai authorities have a different view. They have filed a compliant,
accusing the couple of breaching a section of the country’s criminal
code that relates to threatening the sovereignty of a state, and erosion
of a state’s independence, according to the Post. The charges carry the death penalty.

Read full article here…




A White Supremacist Rapist and Pedophile Runs for Congress as A Libertarian and Conservative. Could He Be A Facade for Something Else?

Nathan Larson is an independent candidate running for Congress on a platform that resonates with Americans seeking less government, an end to wars in the Middle East, defense of the Second Amendment, and closing the borders. However, he also has a background of violence, rape, and pedophilia. His candidacy is ideal for collectivists who want to paint all who oppose them as despicable characters. Could it be that collectivists are his hidden sponsors and handlers? If so, this is a classic case of controlled opposition - which means action that appears to be opposition but really is designed to damage or destroy genuine opposition. -GEG/su_note]

Nathan D. Larson, 37, an accountant from Charlottesville, Virginia, running as an independent candidate for Congress, describes himself as a “quasi-neo-reactionary libertarian,” whose agenda includes stopping the war on drugs, protecting gun ownership rights, putting an end to American involvement in foreign wars that serve only to protect Israel, and closing the borders.

But Larson also advocates 'benevolent white supremacy,' pedophilia, incest, and subjugating women by force.  HuffPo reported that it captured a screenshot of one of his posts on a pedophile site where he said he wanted to have sex with his infant daughter. He reportedly raped his ex-wife who later committed suicide. He has many other extremist views on guns, feminism, suicide, etc.

In 2009, Larson was convicted of threatening to kill Obama and served more than a year in federal prison. His views are offensive to Jews, women, people of reason, and all who condemn pedophilia.  Is it possible that Larson's political campaign is merely a sophisticated smear against responsible citizens who advocate conservative views without all the garbage?

The Libertarian party gained popularity with Ron Paul in 2012 but was smeared in the media with claims of racism.  In 2016, James Weeks, an overweight candidate for the chair of the Libertarian party, performed a vulgar strip tease that was used to denigrate and shame the party that had gained momentum. Did Weeks really think his performance was a way to promote the Libertarian Party or to damage it?

Here are a few questions the media should be asking: How long has Larson been a Libertarian?  What is his religious background?  How does he currently earn a living in spite of telling the world about his obscene views?  Has the ADL gone after his employer to fire him?  If not, why not?  Who is funding Larson's campaign?  Is he currently in contact with the FBI or other law enforcement or intelligence agencies?  Are any of his family members affiliated with these agencies?

Nathan Larsen has blonde hair and blue eyes and appears to be above-average intelligence. If he is an agent of controlled opposition, the smear is intended to target whites, men, conservatives, Libertarians, Second Amendment supporters, Trump, and anyone who opposes wars in the Middle East.

The FBI is known for recruiting patsies who have served prison time. Larsen's reported views on pedophilia, the rape of his ex-wife, and the death threat against Obama indicate mental illness. The FBI and other covert agencies have a long record of recruiting operatives from among the mentally ill. In view of this history, it's wise for us to ask questions.

Sources:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nathan-larson-congressional-candidate-pedophile_us_5b10916de4b0d5e89e1e4824

Nathan D. Larson: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2018/06/01/virginia-pedophile-nathan-larson-runs-for-congress/




VP of Libertarian Cato Institute Criticizes Ron Paul As A Conspiracy Theorist And Xenophobe

The Cato Institute is a Libertarian think tank, funded by the Koch brothers, that claims to be dedicated to individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace. Cato’s VP of Research, Brink Lindsey, recently sent multiple tweets calling Ron Paul a xenophobe and a conspiracy theorist. He described Paul’s philosophy as a “hideous corruption of libertarian ideas.” [We expect to see a loss of public support for Cato and The Koch Brothers if Lindsay is not jettisoned into deep space for these comments.] –GEG

Following his attack on Ron Paul, Lindsey also attacked libertarian theorist and luminary Murray Rothbard, whom Ron Paul had called “the founder of the modern libertarian movement.” In the tweet, Lindsey blamed Rothbard for the “ugly illiberal streak” within the libertarian movement:

This is not the first time that Lindsey attacked Ron Paul or the people surrounding him. In a 2007 article authored by Chris Hayes for The Nation, Lindsey described Ron Paul supporters as “a weird group of people,” consisting of libertarians, anti-war types, nationalists, and “xenophobes.”

Brink Lindsey has a long history of promoting views at odds with the grassroots libertarians, “xenophobes,” and “anti-war types” he derides. For example, in 2002 Lindsey expressed his support for the Iraq War, the 1991 Gulf War, war in North Korea, and other globalist interventions in Reason, stating that he “would support military action against Iraq even if 9/11 had never happened and there were no such thing as Al Qaeda.”

Read full article here…