1

Top Insurance Analyst Finds 7% Increase In Mortality for Each Covid Vax Dose Received

Josh Stirling, a top insurance research analyst, has found a 7% aggregate mortality increase for each COVID vaccine dose received, meaning a “fully vaccinated” individual who took 5 doses increased their risk of [premature] death by 35%. Stirling used CDC data and compared the vaccination status, ranked by the number of doses across regions in the US, and compared that to the amount of increase or decrease in mortality 2022 versus 2021. He explained that if vaccines actually reduced all-cause mortality, then the data from “highly vaccinated” states would show “lower levels of mortality” in those areas. Instead, data is showing the opposite. Stirling previously noted that overall, all-cause mortality in the US rose in 2022 from 2021 by about 15%.

.

A top insurance research analyst has found a 7% aggregate mortality increase for each COVID vaccine dose received, meaning a “fully vaccinated” individual who took 5 doses increased their risk of death by 35%.

Josh Stirling joined the “American Thought Leaders” podcast last week to break down alarming mortality data from the CDC and from within the insurance sector itself.

“We pulled together an analysis that uses CDC data from the United States that compares the vaccination status, ranked by the number of doses across regions in the U.S., and compares that to the amount of increase or decrease in mortality this year versus last,” Stirling told host Jan Jekielek.

Stirling, the founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives, explained that if vaccines actually reduced all-cause mortality, then the data from “highly vaccinated” states would show “lower levels of mortality” in those areas.

Instead, data is showing the opposite.

“Instead, when we did that analysis…what you end up seeing is the line you created, the regression, goes up and to the right. Which is to say that the more doses on average you have in a region in the U.S., the bigger increase in mortality that region has had in 2022 when compared to 2021,” Stirling noted.

“And so that is an aggregate statistical tool that largely — it exactly confirms the conclusion out of the UK data. It’s a different way of doing it, it’s a totally different data set, but ultimately it leads to a very similar mathematical conclusion.”

“Which is a really unfortunate one, because obviously, hundreds of millions of us personally or our friends and family and all of society have to now deal with these consequences of, ‘what are the long-term health consequences related to these?’” he added.

Stirling then explained how each dose of the COVID shot compounds aggregate mortality risk by 7%.

“If you’re over the age of 50, and you took all 5 doses, that’d be a 35% increase,” he said.

Stirling last month had also noted that overall, all-cause mortality in the U.S. rose in 2022 from 2021 by about 15%.

Read full article here…




Congressman Introduces Bill to Hold Big Pharma Liable for Injuries Caused by Mandated Shots

On November 30, 2022, Louie Gohmert, the former Republican Congressman from Texas who is now retired, introduced legislation to hold Big Pharma liable for injuries caused by publicly mandated ‘vaccines.’ Gohmert released this statement when he filed H.R. 9366: “The immense human suffering our country experienced due to the disgraceful COVID-19 vaccine mandates must never happen again. Through their reckless edict, the Biden Administration forced many Americans to choose between maintaining their livelihoods and protecting their bodily autonomy from an experimental vaccine—one that we now have come to learn does not protect against infection or transmission. Even more important than the financial ruin the mandates have caused to so many Americans are the clear and present dangers these vaccines can pose to the health and safety of those who have received it.”

In 1986, the the National Childhood Vaccine Injury (NCVI) Act was signed into law that shielded vaccine manufacturers from liability.

.

Link for video:  https://rumble.com/v27ej2u-make-big-pharma-responsible-bill-h.r.9366.html

Full text of H.R. 9633:   https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/9366/text?s=1

.
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) introduced legislation to hold Big Pharma liable for injuries caused by publicly mandated ‘vaccines.’
.

Gohmert released the following statement “after introducing a bill to eliminate liability protection for companies when their vaccines are subject to public mandates”:

“The immense human suffering our country experienced due to the disgraceful COVID-19 vaccine mandates must never happen again,” said Rep. Gohmert. “Through their reckless edict, the Biden Administration forced many Americans to choose between maintaining their livelihoods and protecting their bodily autonomy from an experimental vaccine—one that we now have come to learn does not protect against infection or transmission. Even more important than the financial ruin the mandates have caused to so many Americans are the clear and present dangers these vaccines can pose to the health and safety of those who have received it.

“If the United States government wishes to force Americans to take an experimental vaccine, the U.S. Constitution and human rights norms dictate that it must make the case and convince Americans that it is safe and effective, respecting informed consent and the right to refuse.  If the U.S. government refuses to honor even the most basic individual right in such matters, then no reasonable person would argue that there should also be immunity from liability for the very products being forced into the populace.  This bill would rightly eliminate liability protection for pharmaceutical manufacturers for any vaccine subject to a mandate. It is time pharmaceutical companies stand behind their products and face accountability when necessary.”

The bill states:

To amend titles III and XXI of the Public Health Service Act to hold vaccine manufacturers liable for injuries
caused by vaccines subject to a public mandate, and for other purposes.

In the United States, vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable for vaccine-related injuries and deaths due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).

Before the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, vaccine manufacturers were liable for damages caused by vaccines.

If there were any signs of detrimental side effects, the vaccine would be pulled from the market and investigated more thoroughly.

But not anymore.

Today, Big Pharma companies who develop vaccines have no financial risk if their jabs cause injuries, permanent disability, or death.

In related news, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis received approval from the Florida Supreme Court to impanel a grand jury to investigate COVID-19 jab manufacturers.

“Today I’m announcing a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida to impanel a statewide grand jury to investigate any and all wrongdoing in Florida with respect to Covid vaccines,” DeSantis said during a COVID-19 jab accountability roundtable.

“We anticipate that we will get the approval for that, that will be something that will be impaneled most likely in the Tampa Bay area and that will come with legal processes that will be able to get more information and to bring legal accountability for those who committed misconduct,” DeSantis added.

Big Pharma’s poisonous shots have destroyed countless lives.

They must be held accountable for the irreparable harm they’ve caused people for decades.

Any representative who truly represents the American people should support Gohmert’s legislation and push to abolish the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

Read full article here…




New Study Indicates More than 217,000 Americans Were Killed by COVID Vaccines in 2021

Mark Skidmore, author of the peer-reviewed survey study and a Professor of State and Local Government Finance and Policy at Michigan State University, concluded from the collected data that the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation was estimated between 217,00 to 278,000 people (fatalities that may have occurred regardless of vaccination were removed). According to the CDC, about 31% of the United States population rejected the primary vaccination series as of November 2022. A peer-reviewed survey of 2840 participants in December 2021 showed that 34% reported that they knew someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19, and those participants were more likely to be vaccinated. Conversely, 22% of the respondents indicated that they knew at least one person who had experienced a severe health problem following COVID-19 vaccination, and those participants were less likely to get vaccinated. 

.

Abstract excerpt from the BMC Infectious Diseases journal:

Abstract

Background

Around the world, policymakers have clearly communicated that COVID-19 vaccination programs need to be accepted by a large proportion of the population to allow life return to normal. However, according to the Center for Disease Control, about 31% of the United States population had not completed the primary vaccination series as of November 2022.

Aims

The primary aim of this work is to identify the factors associated by American citizens with the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19. In addition, the proportion of fatal events from COVID-19 vaccinations was estimated and compared with the data in the VAERS database.

Methods

An online survey of COVID-19 health experiences was conducted. Information was collected regarding reasons for and against COVID-19 inoculations, experiences with COVID-19 illness and COVID-19 inoculations by survey respondents and their social circles. Logit regression analyses were carried out to identify factors influencing the likelihood of being vaccinated.

Results

A total of 2840 participants completed the survey between December 18 and 23, 2021. 51% (1383 of 2840) of the participants were female and the mean age was 47 (95% CI 46.36–47.64) years. Those who knew someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 were more likely to be vaccinated (OR: 1.309, 95% CI 1.094–1.566), while those who knew someone who experienced a health problem following vaccination were less likely to be vaccinated (OR: 0.567, 95% CI 0.461–0.698). 34% (959 of 2840) reported that they knew at least one person who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness. Similarly, 22% (612 of 2840) of respondents indicated that they knew at least one person who had experienced a severe health problem following COVID-19 vaccination. With these survey data, the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation may be as high as 278,000 (95% CI 217,330–332,608) when fatalities that may have occurred regardless of inoculation are removed.

Conclusion

Knowing someone who reported serious health issues either from COVID-19 or from COVID-19 vaccination are important factors for the decision to get vaccinated. The large difference in the possible number of fatalities due to COVID-19 vaccination that emerges from this survey and the available governmental data should be further investigated.

Read full article here…

InfoGame:    https://infogame.substack.com/p/new-survey-finds-shockingly-high?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web




Huge: Pfizer Executive Says Company Is Exploring “Mutating” COVID for Future Vaccines

Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations – mRNA Scientific Planner, spilled the beans in a Project Veritas undercover video and made disturbing comments about Pfizer creating mutated viruses to pre-emptively create new vaccines. Walker said, “One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.” He explained that Pfizer could “put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them,” to create mutations. He acknowledged that people would not like this information if it went public.

Walker went on to explain how government officials hope to work for pharmaceutical companies and are soft on regulating those companies against the best interest of the American people.

When Mr. Walker was confronted about being recorded, he tried to take Project Veritas’ recording equipment, engaged in physical assault, and he called the police. According to public records, Mr. Walker is a medical doctor who graduated fro the University of Texas in 2018, and is licensed in New York.

.

Link for video:    https://www.bitchute.com/video/cgF9p7w4LYAR/

.

Tucker Carlson shows how powerful Big Pharma is — this story was ignored in mainstream media:

.

Full video of the altercation between Jordan Walker and Project Veritas:

.

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations – mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious — obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”

Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious — obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.

Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs — eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

Read full article here…




UK Becomes Latest Country to Ban Covid Boosters for Under-50s

The UK government said that COVID booster doses will no longer be available to healthy people under 50 beginning next month. A number of countries have imposed similar bans on boosters for healthy under-50s, a trend that has been linked by observers to safety concerns, though public authorities have not confirmed this. The UK will continue to offer the first two doses COVID vaccines to people 16 and over. The UK government is promoting another round of COVID booster jabs in autumn to the over-50s and other risk groups. The advisers have also called for senior citizens and those who are immunosuppressed to receive an extra booster dose this spring. These will be the seventh and eight jabs for thousands of Brits.

The UK ban on boosters for under 50s come at the same time as the FDA in the US is set to recommend annual Covid boosters for Americans of all ages.

Covid booster doses will no longer be available to healthy people under 50 from next month, the Government has said. The reason given by the JCVI, the Government’s vaccine advisory body, is because “the transition continues away from a pandemic emergency response towards pandemic recovery”. A number of countries have imposed similar bans on boosters for healthy under-50s, a trend that has been linked by observers to safety concerns, though public authorities have not confirmed this. The U.K. will continue to offer the first two doses to over-16s.

The Government has also accepted JCVI advice that another round of Covid booster jabs should be dished out this autumn to the over-50s and other risk groups. The advisers have also called for senior citizens and those who are immunosuppressed to receive an extra booster dose this spring. These will be the seventh and eight jabs for thousands of Brits. The Mail has more.

Under the 2022 autumn Covid booster campaign which began in early September last year, over-50s, residents and staff at care homes for older adults and frontline health and social care workers are eligible for a jab.

On top of these groups, five to 49 year-olds who are a clinical risk group, live with an immunosuppressed person or are carers have also been offered a booster – similar to that for the annual flu vaccine.

According to the latest data, published on January 15th, 64.5% of those aged 50 and over and 82.4% of those aged 75 and over have received their [autumn] jab.

In England, the closure of the autumn booster campaign and the first [spring] booster offer will be on February 12th.

The JCVI also advised that the booster third dose which became available in 2021, will no longer be offered to those aged between 16 and 49-years-old who are not in a clinical risk group, from February 12th, “as the transition continues away from a pandemic emergency response towards pandemic recovery”.

Professor Wei Shen Lim, Chair of COVID-19 vaccination on the JCVI, said: “The COVID-19 vaccination programme continues to reduce severe disease across the population, while helping to protect the NHS.

“That is why we have advised planning for further booster vaccines for persons at higher risk of serious illness through an autumn booster programme later this year.”

She added: “We will very shortly also provide final advice on a spring booster programme for those at greatest risk.” …

The NHS will continue to operate a smaller scale vaccine offer from mid-February onwards to ensure those eligible for first and second doses can still get their jabs, it said today.

It comes as the FDA in the U.S. is set to recommend annual Covid boosters for Americans of all ages.

Read full article here…




Must Watch: Bill Gates Admits COVID Vaccines Don’t Work

Australia: Billionaire vaccine pusher Bill Gates just admitted that the COVID experimental mRNA injections don’t work. He said: “We also need to fix the three problems of [mRNA] vaccines. The current vaccines are not infection blocking. They’re not broad, so when new variants come up you lose protection, and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.” He then hinted at a new option: an inhaled blocker.

Gates warned against another pandemic spreading quickly across the globe because people are able to travel, and he proposed sewage and air surveillance in all airports. He praised Australia for imposing indefinite draconian lockdowns on its population during the COVID hysteria.

.

https://youtu.be/038__DssSv0?t=3255

Billionaire vaccine proponent Bill Gates just admitted what COVID vaccine skeptics have been saying for years now: the experimental mRNA injections don’t work.

Gates said during a discussion at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, Australia on Monday that the current COVID vaccines don’t offer much “protection.”

“We also need to fix the three problems of [mRNA] vaccines,” Gates started. “The current vaccines are not infection blocking. They’re not broad, so when new variants come up you lose protection, and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.”

Gates’ candid admission is remarkable considering social media companies censored and banned users for making similar claims.

If the vaccines don’t work, as even Gates claims, then why are so many governments and health institutions still pushing them on the public?

In the discussion, Gates also called for more funding for the World Health Organization to create a “dedicated team not just for when the epidemic comes, but to go to the world’s countries and make sure that these drills are being done” every five years.

Read full article here…




Utah Plastic Surgeon Allegedly Destroyed COVID Vaccines, Gave Fake Shots to Children

A Utah plastic surgeon, Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, two members of his staff, and another accomplice are facing charges after allegedly destroying $28,000 worth of COVID-19 vaccines and providing 1,900 fake vaccine cards. Dr. Moore and his co-defendants are also accused of giving children saline shots at the request of their parents so the children would think they were receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. This story bears a similarity to a German nurse who was charged in 2021 for injecting over 10,000 patients with saline instead of the experimental COVID jab.

A Utah plastic surgeon and three other accomplices are facing charges after allegedly destroying COVID-19 vaccines and handing out fake vaccine cards.

Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Jr., 58, and his neighbor, Kristin Jackson Andersen, 59, destroyed nearly $30,000 worth of COVID shots and distributed about 1,900 doses’ worth of vaccine cards in an effort to “liberate the medical profession from government and industry conflicts of interest.”

Additionally, Dr. Moore also administered saline shots to children at the request of their parents.

The Plastic Institute of Utah Inc., its office manager Kari Dee Burgoyne and receptionist Sandra Flores are also charged with conspiracy to defraud the government and a slew of other charges.

From ABC News 4:

According to court documents, Moore and his co-defendants allegedly ran a scheme out of Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah Inc. to defraud the United States and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The documents say Moore and Andersen were members of a private organization seeking to “liberate the medical profession from government and industry conflicts of interest.”

In the allegations, the four destroyed at least $28,000 worth of COVID-19 vaccinations and distributed at least 1,900 doses’ worth of fake completed vaccination record cards. The court documents allege the fake vaccination cards were sold either for direct cash payments of $50 per person per occurrence or required “donations to a specified charitable organization.”

The court documents estimate the fake vaccination cards have a total value of nearly $97,000.

Moore and his co-defendants also allegedly gave children saline shots at the request of their parents so the children would think they were receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

“By allegedly falsifying vaccine cards and administering saline shots to children instead of COVID-19 vaccines, not only did this provider endanger the health and well-being of a vulnerable population, but also undermined public trust and the integrity of federal health care programs,” said Special Agent in Charge with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General Curt L. Muller.

Read full article here…




After Four Shots, COVID Jabs Produced Collapse of Immune System in Mice

A Chinese study reported that mice that received more than four Covid vaccine jabs had a collapse in their ability to fight the coronavirus. The damage extended past antibodies, the immune system’s front line of defense against viruses and bacteria, to the T-cells that form the crucial backup.

While a similar finding has not been confirmed in humans, large epidemiological studies that measure real-world vaccine results keep finding that people who have received multiple boosters are at higher risk for Omicron infection than unvaccinated people.

.

Mice who received more than four Covid vaccine jabs had a collapse in their ability to fight the coronavirus, Chinese researchers have found.

The damage extended past antibodies, the immune system’s front line of defense against viruses and bacteria, to the T-cells that form the crucial backup.

The researchers reported the finding in a peer-reviewed paper published December 22 in the journal iScience. In surprisingly clear language, they warned:

Our findings demonstrate potential risks with the continuous use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, providing immediate implications [emphasis added] for the global COVID-19 vaccination enhancement strategies.

Later in the paper, the researchers were even more direct:

We found that the protective effects from the humoral immunity and cellular immunity established by the conventional immunization were both profoundly impaired during the extended vaccination course.

The finding has not been confirmed in humans.

But the mice the researchers used are genetically altered to model accurately the human response to the coronavirus and have “been shown to share profound similarities [emphasis added] with humans in response to SARS-CoV-2 infections,” as the paper explains.

The scientists used a vaccine that has a different mechanism of basic action than the mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna, which turn our own cells into spike protein factories. But like them, the Chinese-tested vaccine causes the immune system to focus on a specific part of the coronavirus spike protein to the near-exclusion of other responses.

The finding may help to explain why large epidemiological studies keep finding that people who have received multiple boosters are at higher risk for Omicron infection than unvaccinated people.

Read full article here…




Moderna Begins Trials for New mRNA Shot to be Injected Directly into the Heart

Moderna’s new mRNA shot to treat heart attack patients uses mRNA, which carries a cell’s instructions for making proteins. By injecting the heart with synthetic mRNA that encodes for relaxin, the mRNA shot directs human cells to generate the hormone. Increased blood movement allows for new blood vessels to grow and helps restore blood flow along arteries and veins. This week, the drug maker announced that the first patients were given the injection in a phase one clinical trial. Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said, ‘We have now in the clinic a super exciting program where we inject mRNA into people’s hearts after a heart attack to grow back new blood vessels to help revascularize the heart. Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told Sky News: ‘It’s like science fiction medicine’.

Moderna’s mRNA COVID ‘vaccine’ has been shown to cause major heart problems. A Swiss study found the COVID mRNA shots injured the hearts of ALL its recipients, with 2.8% having levels associated with subclinical myocarditis. NewsWars reported that Moderna has used its profits from its mRNA COVID shot to fund their new product that treats those same heart problems. “Absolutely diabolical.”

  • The shot encodes for relaxin, a hormone which is known to improve blood flow
  • Patients have received the injection in a phase one trial looking at dosage levels
  • Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told Sky News: ‘It’s like science fiction medicine’

Moderna is developing an mRNA shot that is injected directly into the hearts of heart attack and heart failure patients.

The ‘vaccine’ uses the same technology as the company’s flagship Covid jab and is designed for people weeks or months after a heart attack to help them recover.

It works by instructing human heart cells to generate a hormone that is known to improve blood flow, helping restore damaged heart muscles.

During a heart attack, muscle cells can start to die and cannot be re-generated. Roughly one in five people who have had a heart attack will be readmitted to the hospital for a second one within five years.

This week, the drug maker announced that the first patients were given the injection in a phase one clinical trial.

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told Sky News Australia in October: ‘We have now in the clinic a super exciting program where we inject mRNA into people’s hearts after a heart attack to grow back new blood vessels to help revascularize the heart.

‘It’s a bit like science fiction medicine but that’s what is really exciting to me.’

In its latest business update, Moderna this week announced that the first patients have been given the injection, called mRNA-0184, in a phase 1B clinical trial.

The patients have stable heart failure and the trial will determine how safe the shot is and how well patients can tolerate it, as well as perfecting the dosage amount and frequency.

Heart attacks occur when there is a loss of blood supply to the heart, while heart failure is when the heart is unable to pump blood around the body efficiently.

Heart failure can develop after a heart attack if the muscle was severely damaged.

The new shot uses messenger RNA,  which carries a cell’s instructions for making proteins.

DNA, which is stored in a cell’s nucleus, encodes the genetic information for making proteins or hormones.

mRNA transfers a copy of this genetic information outside of the nucleus, to a cell’s cytoplasm, where it can be made into proteins and hormones.

The synthetic mRNA encodes for relaxin, a naturally occurring hormone that is known to cause changes to blood flow that are ‘potentially beneficial for heart failure patients’, Moderna said.

Read full article here…

NewsWars:    https://www.newswars.com/moderna-ceo-announces-new-mrna-shot-to-treat-heart-failure-patients/




Japan Launches Official Investigation Into Millions of COVID Vaccine Deaths

Japanese researchers have been instructed to investigate how the experimental mRNA jabs could cause deaths and severe adverse reactions. A professor at the Hiroshima University School of Medicine Professor discovered that the bodies of vaccinated persons he performed autopsies on were abnormally warm, and concluded that the COVID injections cause immune system abnormalities that prompt inflammation causing high body temperatures at the time of autopsy.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Masanori Fukushima slammed Japan’s Ministry of Health for continuing its COVID vaccination program despite mass deaths linked to the jabs. Fukushima railed at health ministers and said, “Japan’s prestige is at stake. You have vaccinated so many people. And yet, only 10% of the members of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, who are leading members of the vaccine campaign, have been vaccinated. Is this a joke?”

.

Link for video:   https://rumble.com/v1ygpwn-you-idiot-dr.-fukushima-calls-the-ministry-of-health.html

.

Japan has launched an official investigation into the unprecedented numbers of people dying after receiving the Covid-19 vaccination.

According to reports, Japanese researchers have been instructed to investgate the mechanisms by which experimental mRNA jabs could be causing deaths and severe adverse reactions.

Hiroshima University School of Medicine Prof. Masataka Nagao highlighted how the bodies of vaccinated persons he performed autopsies on were abnormally warm, with upwards of 100 degree F body temperatures.

Hiroshima University School of Medicine Prof. Masataka Nagao highlighted how the bodies of vaccinated persons he performed autopsies on were abnormally warm, with upwards of 100 degree F body temperatures.

“The first concern was that the body temperatures of the corpses were very high when the police performed the autopsy,” Nagao declared.

“The body temperatures were unusually high, such as 33 or 34 degrees celsius (91-93ºF).”

In other bodies, Nagao says “temperatures were very high at the time of death. Their body temperatures were above the normal temperature, more like over 40 degrees celsius (104ºF).”

Graphing the data, Nagao’s research team found there were significant changes to the genetic makeup of vaccinated autopsied patients’ immune systems.

The research has led Nagao to conclude the vaccine causes immune system abnormalities that prompt inflammation throughout the body, which is likely the cause of the high body temperatures at the time of autopsy.

“Based on the data and the circumstances alone, it is not possible to conclude that the vaccine was the cause of the deaths,” Prof. Nagao said, adding, “However, it is impossible to say that the vaccine was not the cause. We can only say that it is doubtful, but we believe that vaccination was sufficiently related to the immune abnormalities.”

In another report, dermatology expert Prof. Shigetoshi Sano of the Kochi University School of Medicine discussed discovering spike proteins at the site of skin lesions and other skin problems on patients who were vaccinated.

“The spike protein derived from the vaccine was found in the skin,” Sano explained, highlighting a slide showing a bright green region on a lesion made visible by a special dye.

Spike proteins are locally suppressing the immune system,” Sano told reporters. “As a result, the spike proteins facilitate in reactivation of the herpesvirus.”

The process of the spike proteins degrading in the immune system prompts inflammation throughout the body that also leads to blood clots, Sano concluded.

Read full article here…




Top Cancer Expert Says Aggressive Cancers Are Appearing After Vaccine Boosters

Angus Dalgleish, a professor at St. George’s Hospital Medical School London, said that he has had a number of cancer patients that relapsed after taking a COVID booster shot. He added that some new patients, who did not have cancer before taking COVID jabs, developed cancers. Dr. Dalgleish said, “this does not look like a coincidence to me and we need to join forces and see if this is a real effect and if it is we must stop all the boosters immediately.”

Transcript:

I’m Angus Dalgleish. I’m a Professor of Oncology at St. George’s, a Consultant Medical Oncologist, and I have started to notice that several of my patients have melanoma who’ve been stable with stage 4 disease, they’ve had very good immunotherapy or other treatment and I’ve been reviewing them from five to 20 years. I’ve noticed that I have now over six, possibly seven, even an eighth yesterday, who’ve clearly relapsed following the booster vaccine.

At first we didn’t put the two together, but when a patient said, “I felt awful since the vaccine, I’ve just been drained”, they’ve described symptoms like a Long Covid, and the next thing we know, two, three weeks, couple of months later they’ve got clear evidence of relapse. And these relapses are quite aggressive. They’re not a gentle relapse. They’re relapses that are requiring systemic therapy as opposed to a little nodule that requires surgical incision.

But it’s not just this. I’m now very much aware in my own circle of many people, they haven’t got a melanoma – they’ve never had anything before – but they’ve got lumps and bumps and they’re not felling well. And two people I’ve interviewed at great length, they all put it down to feeling awful after their booster. They were fine with the first two vaccines, they just had shivers, flu etc. But they’ve described being very tired, very fatigued, wanting to stay in bed, and this has dragged on to the point were they’ve gone to the doctor and they’ve had blood counts and investigations and I now know seven of them, two of them have leukemias, and others have lymphomas, and one of them has a very bad melanoma, which he is absolutely sure was instigated by the booster as he developed dreadful symptoms.

So really I want to bring to everybody’s attention that I think that this does not look like a coincidence to me and we need to join forces and see if this is a real effect and if it is we must stop all the boosters immediately. Thank you.

Read full article here…




Peter Hotez Vies for Power as Fauci Steps Down

As Dr. Anthony Fauci steps down from his position as director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and top chief of the American bioweapons program, the scene is open for replacement for someone just as bad, or worse. Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston is vying for the position. Hotez publicly stated he wants to “snuff out” vaccine skeptics and in May 2021, he called for cyberwarfare measures to be deployed against people who share vaccine safety information. Hotez has pushed propaganda about COVID vaccines and claims that “anti-science now kills more people than gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks” and he falsely stated that more unvaccinated people are dying from COVID that vaccinated. Hotez advocates for federal action to curb what he referred to as “anti-science groups” on the right. He has an autistic child, yet he denies evidence that autism is linked to vaccines. He has dismissed evidence of a lab leak as the origin of COVID-19 which may be a defense because he has funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. He is ignoring the national death rates that have increased or stayed the same (but never decrease) following COVID vaccination campaigns.

Story at-a-glance

  • Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, is enamored with dangerous virus tinkering, censorship and state-directed cyberattacks on civilians. He decries the benefits of whole food and nutrition and is a leading advocate for biomedical tyranny and the murder of independent thinkers
  • In a professionally produced PR video for the World Health Organization, Hotez refers to vaccine safety advocates as “anti-science aggressors” and claims “anti-vaccine activism” has become “a major killing force globally”
  • Hotez ignores data showing the jab does more harm than good. For example, a recent Cleveland Clinic study concluded that the risk of COVID-19 infection “increased with the number of vaccine doses previously received”
  • Cleveland Clinic also found the bivalent COVID-19 booster was only 30% effective in preventing infection “during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine”
  • In the fall of 2021, about 3 in 10 adults who died from COVID-19 were jabbed or boosted. By April 2022, 6 in 10 adults who died from COVID-19 were jabbed or boosted, and that remained true through August 2022, which is the latest data available

As Dr. Anthony Fauci steps down from his position as director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and top chief of the American bioweapons program, the scene is open for another word-wrangling science bungler to step into the limelight.

Seemingly vying for the position of lead propagandist for Big Pharma and the global Deep State is Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston — a scientist enamored with dangerous virus tinkering, censorship and state-directed cyberattacks on civilians, who decries the benefits of whole food and nutrition and is a leading advocate for biomedical tyranny and the murder of independent thinkers.

Vaccine Safety Advocates Are Now ‘Anti-Science Aggressors’

An M.D. who writes articles on Substack under the moniker A Midwestern Doctor recently addressed the hateful rhetoric being thrown about by Hotez.1 “Although I am used to seeing inflammatory approaches … being used to silence debates, I was nonetheless quite taken aback by the WHO’s recent tweet,” he writes.

The WHO tweeted out a video2 (above) featuring Hotez, in which he refers to vaccine safety advocates as “anti-science aggressors” — a term he coined in a 2021 article3 — and claims “anti-vaccine activism” has become “a major killing force globally.”4 According to Hotez, 200,000 Americans lost their lives to COVID-19 because they refused the experimental COVID jab.

Hotez goes on to claim that “anti-science now kills more people than gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks” — a statement that makes anti-science sound threatening but actually absolves it, seeing how nuclear proliferation and cyber attacks have killed no one (at least not to my knowledge), and the death toll from terrorism is infinitesimal compared to things like preventable medical errors.

Pouring additional fuel to the fire, he makes the absolute statement that the anti-vaccine movement is a “far-right” political movement. “This is the new face of anti-science aggression,” he says, “so we need political solutions to address this.” In other words, he wants government to pull out the big guns and enforce a one-sided “consensus.”

Hotez Stirs the Pot With Flawed Assumptions

As explained by A Midwestern Doctor, the central claim in that video appears to be based on an October 2021 study5 that estimated 163,000 COVID-19 deaths “could have been prevented by vaccination since June 2021, when safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines were widely available to all adults in the U.S.” However, as A Midwestern Doctor points out, there are several problems with this argument:6

• “Since so many deaths not caused by COVID-19 have been classified as COVID-19 deaths, we don’t actually know how many people died from the illness (this study just assumed the official but inflated figure as accurate).

• In Pfizer’s trial, the survival benefit from the vaccine worsened with time (this has also been observed outside the trials), and at 6 months follow-up (where the trial was abruptly terminated).

• More people who were vaccinated died than those who were unvaccinated (which means that it is impossible that there could have been a net gain of life through vaccinating). Since this is the longest clinical trial that was performed on the vaccines, its conclusion must stand until a longer trial is conducted.

• The vaccines we are using have caused SARS-CoV-2 to rapidly evolve into variants for which it no longer offers protection. For this reason, the alleged benefits of the vaccine have had to be continually modified because it failed to meet each of its previously promised metrics (e.g., it does not prevent transmission of COVID-197).

• The study fails to account for the fact that national death rates consistently increased or stayed the same (but never decrease) following COVID vaccination campaigns …

Video Link

• The estimate also fails to account for the fact that life insurance data has shown that there has been an unprecedented spike in deaths for age groups rarely expected to otherwise die, following the mass vaccination campaigns.”

Research Shows COVID Jab Raises Risk of COVID-19 Infection

Hotez, the WHO and the PR firm that made that video also ignore data showing that the COVID jab increases your risk of contracting COVID-19 over time. For example, a Cleveland Clinic preprint8 posted December 19, 2022, concluded that the risk of COVID-19 infection “increased … with the number of vaccine doses previously received.”

As of April 2022, about 6 in 10 adults who died from COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted.

Moreover, the bivalent COVID-19 booster was only 30% effective in preventing infection “during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine.”

So much for “safe and effective.” The boosters provide minimal protection when well-matched to the circulating strain, and as its protection wanes, it leaves you at higher risk of infection than before. Deceiving people into taking this product? Now THAT’S anti-scientific aggression.

The Jabbed Now Account for Most COVID-19 Deaths

We also have U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data that confirm Cleveland Clinic’s findings. As reported by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF):9

“The share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen. In fall 2021, about 3 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted. But by January 2022, as we showed in an analysis10 posted on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, about 4 in 10 deaths were vaccinated or boosted.

By April 2022, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data11 show that about 6 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted, and that’s remained true through at least August 2022 (the most recent month of data).

The data from this chart come from the CDC, which collects data on the number of deaths by vaccination status from 30 health departments (including states and cities) across the country.

In order to be counted as vaccinated, a person must be at least two weeks out from completing their primary series … Similarly, to be counted as having a booster, a person must be at least two weeks out from their booster or additional dose before testing positive. People who were partially vaccinated are not included in this data.”

The irony here is that the data Hotez cites in the video match an earlier KFF Health System report, but when he was presented with the updated dataset from the same source, now showing that 170,000 vaxxed Americans have died from COVID, he simply blocked the person who shared it.12

A Poster-Boy for Emotional and Physical Ill Health

Of course, maintaining a propaganda narrative demands that you ignore everything that might poke holes in it, and Hotez is no stranger to propaganda tactics. He’s been a relentless vaccine pusher and denier of vaccine-induced autism, even though (or perhaps because) his own child is autistic. As noted by A Midwestern Doctor:13

“Prior to this recent push to criminalize those questioning vaccine safety (which is evil), I viewed him as a comical individual who I genuinely felt bad for, and someone — who like many that do immense harm to the world — is simply controlled by habitual fixations they are never able to move beyond.

I have not done a deep dive into his background. However, everything I’ve seen is consistent with an unhappy, frustrated individual who frequently gets scammed by life and is both physically and emotionally unhealthy.”

Video Link

Case in point: Hotez’s Joe Rogan interview (clip of which is featured in the video above), where he admitted being a junk food-aholic and intends to stay that way. Rogan, who is neither a doctor nor a nutritionist, actually ended up lecturing Hotez about the merits of a healthy diet. As noted by Dr. Pierre Kory:14

“In just a few minutes, Peter Hotez inadvertently shows the world exactly what has gone wrong with our medical system and why his endless push for more vaccines will never create health.”

Indeed, as Ryan Cristiàn, editor-in-chief of The Last American Vagabond, points out in the video above, Hotez nonchalantly discusses his unhealthy choices (and on the largest podcast on the planet) as if it’s perfectly OK to cast the foundations for health aside — because we have vaccines.

“I think he genuinely, to some degree, doesn’t understand why that’s so stupid,” Cristiàn says. “But on the other side of it, there’s obviously a push to make it about, ‘that’s not real health [i.e., food and lifestyle], vaccines are real health.’ It’s just this alarming undertone.”

What’s in a Vaccine?

In that Rogan interview,15 Hotez also makes the ridiculously unscientific claim that vaccines contain just antigens in saline, basically mimicking an advertisement by the Colorado department of health (below). Anyone who knows anything about vaccines — especially the COVID shot — can see how utterly and shamefully deceptive this is.

Another gross piece of propaganda was recently put out by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (video16 below). The ad chastises the West for withholding COVID shots from Africa, resulting in it having one of the lowest jab rates in the world.

Set three years into the future, it claims the virus kept mutating into ever more dangerous variants, which is the complete opposite of what’s been happening in the real world. It portrays Africa as a continent ravaged by COVID-19 due to lack of COVID shots, yet in the real world, Africa has fared far better in terms of cases and deaths than highly-jabbed nations. Frankly, it’s so distorted and contrary to facts, it’s hard to watch.

Hotez Implicated in Creation of Chimeric Coronavirus

Since the beginning of the COVID outbreak, Hotez has repeatedly accused those who disagree with him of committing a hate crime, which is a rather infantile defense mechanism. It’s quite typical for people who know they have no grounds for their argument to resort to name-calling and threats instead.

Not only has he called on government to use its military and intelligence forces to quash public discussion about COVID jab dangers, he’s also been a vocal defender of the natural origin theory, dismissing evidence of a lab leak as pure fiction and conspiracy theory.

This too is an example of that same defense mechanism. It was recently revealed that Hotez funded risky gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in Wuhan, China, so no wonder he wanted people to shut up about the possibility of the virus being a lab creation. His own work might be implicated in its creation. As reported by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK):17

“While casting concerns about Wuhan’s labs as ‘fringe,’ Hotez has not mentioned his own connection to a project involving a laboratory-generated chimeric SARS-related coronavirus that has come under Congress’ microscope. The project was helmed by Zhengli Shi, a senior scientist and ‘virus hunter’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology nicknamed the ‘Bat Lady.’

As part of his NIH grant, Hotez subcontracted funding for research on combined or ‘chimeric’ coronaviruses, a scientific paper18 shows. Hotez’s grant19 underwrote two of Shi’s collaborators on the project.

In the 2017 paper20 co-funded by Hotez, Shi and her colleagues generated a recombinant virus from two SARS-related coronaviruses: ‘rWIV1-SHC014S.’ It’s not clear whether the paper co-funded by Hotez should have been stopped under a temporary ‘pause’ on gain-of-function work before 2017.

However, some independent biosecurity experts have said research on this chimeric virus in some ways epitomizes lapses in NIH oversight of risky research in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

A prior study21 of one of the coronaviruses that comprised the chimera, WIV1, found it to be ‘poised for human emergence.’ Another prior paper22 on the other coronavirus, SHC014, stated that its future study in lab-generated viruses may be ‘too risky to pursue.’

‘The work here should have been at the very least, heavily scrutinized,’ said David Relman, a Stanford microbiologist and biosecurity expert. ‘This work should have been heavily reviewed for [gain-of-function], and probably should have been subject to the pause prior to December 2017.'”

Hotez, One of the Most Shockingly Hateful People in Medicine

Hotez has made headlines a number of times through the years, typically delivering some kind of hateful rhetoric. He’s publicly stated he wants to “snuff out” vaccine skeptics,23 for example, and in May 2021 called for cyberwarfare measures to be deployed against people who share vaccine safety information.24

Hotez has repeatedly spewed vitriol at parents of vaccine-injured children and called for physical harm and imprisonment of people who don’t agree with the one-size-fits-all vaccine agenda, so it was rather funny when he whined and complained about getting bombarded with “anti-vaxx hate speech” in response to his cyberwarfare call.25

Hotez is not above casting an evil eye on other scientists either. As reported by journalist Paul Thacker in an August 9, 2022, Substack article titled, “Peter Hotez Sees Aggression Everywhere But in the Mirror”:26

“Patrolling scientific discourse, Hotez has a knack for discovering ‘antiscience’ in anyone who disagrees with him. Jeffrey Sachs, economics professor at Columbia University and chair of an international commission on COVID-19, charged in a wide-ranging interview27 last week that the National Institutes of Health and allied scientists were impeding an investigation into how the COVID-19 pandemic started …

Hotez went on the assault, tweeting that Sachs, as leader of the Lancet Commission, did not represent the views of science. Much like a Pentagon general wrapping himself in freedom and the flag to demand more federal monies for another foreign war … Hotez has been shrouding himself in the mantle of science to denigrate anyone who questions taxpayer funding for dangerous virus research by the National Institutes of Health.”

What Is Hotez Really Fighting For?

In his article,28 Thacker goes on to review several other bizarre incidences involving Hotez. For example, he referred to the scientific experts invited to testify before Congress as “fringe elements” testifying and promoting “outlandish conspiracies.” So much for Ph.D.s and med school. He also accused Sen. Rand Paul of promoting conspiracies.

Here’s the take-home: The reason Hotez rails against “anti-science” is because he can sense the danger the research community and vaccine industry are in.

If SARS-CoV-2 is conclusively proven to be a lab creation, it would put a massive spotlight on scientists involved in dual purpose viral research. Gain-of-function research may be banned altogether (as it should), which would sink many a career, including his own.

Similarly, public acknowledgement that the COVID jabs are a public health disaster would permanently and perhaps lethally injure the vaccine industry. So, all that hateful rhetoric? It really comes down to protecting self-serving interests.

Sources and References

Link for PDF file:    https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2023/January/PDF/peter-hotez-vies-power-fauci-steps-down-pdf.pdf