1

The FDA Approved Remdesivir Based on a Trial in Which 3 out of 53 Children Died

Remdesivir has now been approved by the FDA in children and babies as young as 28 days old, weighing as little as six pounds. Gilead, the manufacturer of remdesivir performed its human clinical drug trial using only 53 children, and three of them died. Dr. Meryl Nass said, “Over 70% had an adverse reaction, 21% had a serious adverse event, and three of the children died. Because there was no control group, it’s unclear how either Gilead or the FDA determined that the drug benefited children, because there’s nothing to compare it to.” The drug received approval quickly which may be due to Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the US Army both receiving a portion of the royalties for the drug.

Link for video:    https://rumble.com/v133ckl-child-sacrifice-the-fda-approved-remdesivir.html

Child Sacrifice: The FDA Approved Remdesivir Based on a Trial in Which 3 out of 53 Children Died

The trial was conducted by Gilead, the developer of remdesivir, and there was no control group.

The mortality rate of children with no treatment against COVID is 0.005% (1 in 20,000 die).

Based on this trial, the mortality rate of children with remdesivir treatment is 5.66% (1 in 17.7 die).

Dr. Meryl Nass: “Over 70% had an adverse reaction, 21% had a serious adverse event, and three of the children died. Because there was no control group, it’s unclear how either Gilead or the FDA determined that the drug benefited children, because there’s nothing to compare it to.”

Read full article here…




FDA Approves Remdesivir for Babies and Young Children to Treat COVID-19

The US Food and Drug Administration announced that full approval will be granted to Remdesivir, a COVID-19 drug to treat babies and children aged 28 days and older. Reports show that Remdesivir causes severe side effects that includean dysfunction, septic shock and kidney and liver damage. While other COVID-19 treatments have received emergency use authorization for children younger than 12, Remdesivir, marketed under the name Veklury by Gilead Sciences, is the first to receive full FDA approval.

Remdesivir is an investigational drug that was developed as a way to treat Ebola. In April 2020, clinical trials showed that 68% of people in that trial had improved symptoms. However, another trial concluded that remdesivir did not work. The Guardian revealed that this information came from a report accidentally posted by the World Health Organization that was subsequently taken down. According to that report, the trial was halted early in part because some patients were having negative side effects.

Gilead, the manufacturer, admitted that 10% of people in a study showed adverse reactions to remdesivir that included nausea, acute respiratory failure, and elevated liver enzymes. BioSpace reported that “About 25% of patients receiving it have severe side effects, including multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and low blood pressure. Another 23% demonstrated evidence of liver damage on lab tests.”

In November 2020, the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO) issued a conditional recommendation against the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients regardless of disease severity, as there was no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients.

WHO has updated its recommendation for remdesivir in April 2022 for the treatment of COVID-19 and now suggests the use of remdesivir in mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization.

According to a study of acute renal failure (ARF) related to remdesivir last year, the international pharmacovigilance postmarketing databases (VigiBase) under WHO was searched and a combination of the terms “acute renal failure” and “remdesivir” yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the 9 expected.

Sources:

People Magazine:   https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/fda-grants-full-approval-covid-151451018.html

Heavy:    https://heavy.com/news/2020/04/what-are-side-effects-of-remdesivir/

WHO:   https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-recommends-against-the-use-of-remdesivir-in-covid-19-patients




CDC Removed 25% of Pediatric COVID Deaths Overnight and Blamed It on a Coding Error

The CDC eliminated 24% of all previously reported pediatric deaths from Covid-19 their data base because of inaccuracy. Covid public health policy for kids over the past years was based on inaccurate evidence and speculation. The false data enabled the CDC to able to push abusive interventions on children like dangerous vaccines, masking and social distancing. This abuse is still forced on American children in many states.

The Centers for Disease Control changed its data recently representing the number of US children who died from Wuhan coronavirus.

Dr. Nicole Saphier, MD reported on this suspicious update on Thursday.

By fudging their numbers they were able to push abusive interventions on children of all ages like masking, experimental vaccines, and social distancing. This abuse is still forced on American children in many states.

And they wonder why they are losing the trust of the American people?

James Cintolo reported on this stunning development on his Substack account on Thursday night.

Finally, the CDC corrected COVID pediatric deaths because of a coding error. Essentially, they eliminated nearly 25% of all previously reported deaths from their data base because of inaccuracy. You should understand the implications of such an action. To be specific, it means COVID public health policy for kids over the past years was based on inaccurate evidence and speculation. That is to say, kids were unnecessarily exposed to the harms of interventions like masking social distancing, school closures, and mandatory vaccination without appropriate evidence.

Some wonder why there’s next to no trust left in public health. Clearly, it’s because of frequently occurring mistakes like this.

Anyways, the data has been summed up for you and attached below with all sources (which you should read, don’t simply take these summaries at face value- read the supporting literature). Keep scrolling for more 👇

BREAKING: Almost 25% of all paediatric COVID-19 deaths reported by CDC were due to a coding error. Figures have just been adjusted

The proof bad data was driving public health policy for kids this whole time

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/?fbclid=IwAR26Ivl7g0C32dIq1KY8lJGi2OWperLXcv4n4m3tIhFFC0BVE7TbmLJKOnA#pediatric-data

Read full article here…




California: Elementary Student Wearing N95 Mask Outside Passed Out in Extreme Heat

Beverly Hills: 10-year-old Liraz Baradarian was playing on the field when she collapsed. Coincidentally, the 4th grader’s collapse comes a day after the Beverly Hills Board of Education heard from parents rallying against masks…especially outside. She was forced to wear an N95 mask outside in the extreme heat and passed out due to dehydration. Currently, the state of California requires all K-12 students and staff to wear masks indoors. And Los Angeles County also requires wearing masks outdoors on campus.

A parent told FOX 11 that an elementary school student in Beverly Hills who was forced to wear an N95 mask outdoors in extreme heat passed out due to dehydration.

10-year-old Liraz Baradarian was playing on the field when she collapsed.

“I passed out and I didn’t have any water and they wouldn’t give me any water,” Liraz told FOX 11.  “They come and say ‘put your mask on’ but I need a breath,” the 4th grader explained.

Beverly Hills Unified School District Superintendent Dr. Michael Bregy and Hawthrone Elementary School Principal Sarah Kaber sent out a memo to parents Wednesday night stating that there was a medical incident early that day at Hawthorne Elementary.

The school officials said they were unable to disclose private information, but added that they wanted to “address the speculation about the heat, outdoor making lunchtime sports, and the impact these factors may have played in the incident.”

Read full article here…




Chinese Scientists Create Artificial Intelligence ‘Nanny’ to Grow Babies in Robot Wombs

China: Robotics and artificial intelligence have been created to assist in the development of newborns via the use of algorithms and artificial wombs. The researchers say that the AI nanny might aid in the growth of human children in a “long-term embryo culture device.”

Researchers say the technology could help with imminent population crisis, with birth rates in China at their lowest level in six decades.

The artificial intelligence nanny has arrived. Robots and artificial intelligence (AI) may now be used in conjunction to optimize the generation of human life, marking a significant milestone in the science.

Robotics and artificial intelligence can now assist in the development of newborns via the use of algorithms and artificial wombs, which is eerily similar to what we see in the cult classic, The Matrix.

According to the South China Morning Post, Chinese experts in Suzhou have pioneered the development of the latest technological breakthrough. However, there are concerns about the ethical implications of raising human beings in an artificial environment.

The discoveries were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Biomedical Engineering by Suzhou-based scientists. The AI nanny, according to the researchers, might aid in the growth of human kids in a “long-term embryo culture device.”

This artificial womb is a big machine containing compartments for individual fetuses. The infants will be fed as they would be in a real womb if they are in the chamber, which will be filled with an optimized mix of “nutritious fluids.”

Read full article here…




Dr. Fauci Admits Number of Children Hospitalized with Covid are Overblown

Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted the the number of children hospitalized with Covid is false due to over counting. He said, “But the other important thing is that if you look at the children who are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID,” Fauci continued. “And what we mean by that — if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual. When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s overcounting the number of children who are, quote, ‘hospitalized with COVID,’ as opposed to because of COVID.” Over counting Covid cases and deaths is fraudulent and has been occurring since the phony pandemic began. PCR and antibody tests are unreliable.

Dr. Anthony Fauci says statistics for hospitalizations among children with COVID-19 are getting overblown because many young patients are being admitted with unrelated ailments before they test positive.

MSNBC host Ayman Mohyeldin, filling in for Rachel Maddow on Wednesday night, asked President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser to respond to the omicron variant fueling a rise in children ending up in the hospital. Fauci said the surge in numbers has two contributing factors.

“First of all, quantitatively, you’re having so many more people, including children, who are getting infected. And even though hospitalization among children is much, much lower on a percentage basis than hospitalizations for adults, particularly elderly individuals,” he said, “when you have such a large volume of infections among children, even with a low level of rate of infection, you’re going to still see a lot more children who get hospitalized.”

Read full article here…




Johnson & Johnson Executives Warn against Giving J&J Vaccine to Kids.

Justin Durrant, Johnson & Johnson Scientist says “Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though.” He says he took the Moderna vaccine. He said that the vaccine passports create a second grade or class of citizens, and they lose their jobs as a punishment for being unvaccinatedm He laughed at inconveniencing those who refuse to comply with the mandates. Brandon Schadt, Johnson & Johnson Regional Business Lead, repeatedly has warned that children should not be forced to take Covid vaccines. He said that no one knows what the effects of the vaccines will be years and decades into the future, so there is no way to know if they are safe. -GEG

Video link:   https://rumble.com/vn1ks9-project-veritas-exposes-covid-vaccine-part-3-kids-shouldnt-get-a-f-covid-va.html

  • Brandon Schadt, Johnson & Johnson Regional Business Lead: “It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know? Not something that’s so unknown in terms of repercussions down the road, you know?”
  • Schadt: “Kids shouldn’t get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine.”
  • Schadt: “It’s a kid, it’s a f*cking kid, you know? They shouldn’t have to get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine, you know?”
  • Schadt: “J&J is like stepping in the best smelling pile of sh*t you could step in.”
  • Justin Durrant, Johnson & Johnson Scientist: “Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though.”
  • Durrant: “It wouldn’t make that much of a difference” if children are unvaccinated for COVID.
  • Durrant: “Inconvenience [the unvaccinated] to the point where it’s like, ‘I might as well just f*cking do it [and take the COVID vaccine],’ you know what I’m saying?”
  • Durrant: “It’s almost like — you’re almost like a second-grade citizen if you’re not vaccinated…you can’t do anything that a normal citizen can do.”
  • Durrant: “If you can’t work, I feel like that’s punishment enough…Only way people really act and comply is if it affects their pockets, like if you’re working for a big company and you’re going to lose your job, best believe you’ll be the first one in line [to take the COVID vaccine]…That’s what we’re doing.”

[NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. – Sept. 27, 2021] Project Veritas released the third video of its COVID vaccine investigative series today exposing two Johnson & Johnson [J&J] officials, who argue children do not need to take the COVID vaccine in part because of the potential long-term side effects.




President of Mexico Refuses COVID Vaccines for Children – Also Skeptical of Booster Jabs

Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador said, “Mexico will not be held hostage by pharmaceutical companies that only want to do business and scare children with the idea that it is necessary to vaccinate against Covid-19,” as he refused to purchase Covid vaccines for children until there is evidence of benefits for vaccinating minors. Obrador added that pharmaceutical firms seemed to be focused more on making profits than on ensuring medical necessity as they rake in record sales from Covid-19 vaccines. He is also skeptical of booster jabs. Some people on the internet are concerned that Obarador may be harmed as the president of Tanzania and the president of Haiti died after rejecting COVID vaccines for their countries. -GEG

Social media users have theorized that President Andres Manuel López Obrador could face severe repercussions after he refused to purchase Covid vaccines for children, vowing that Mexico wouldn’t bow to pressure from drugs firms.

In remarks made earlier this week, the Mexican leader said his government was still waiting for the scientific community to demonstrate the benefits of vaccinating minors. Until conclusive evidence was provided, Mexico would refuse to purchase jabs for children, Obrador announced, adding that pharmaceutical firms seemed to be focused more on making profits than on ensuring medical necessity as they rake in record sales from Covid-19 vaccines.

Mexico will not be held hostage by pharmaceutical companies that only want to do business and scare children with the idea that it is necessary to vaccinate against Covid-19.

He was similarly critical of plans by drugs companies to introduce third- or even fourth-dose booster shots, opining that the jabs could be “superfluous.”

Read full article here…




Pfizer Is Largest Donor to Doctors Group that Demands Masks for all Kids Over 2

The American Academy of Pediatrics is demanding that all children over the age of 2 wear face masks at schools and nurseries, even if they have been vaccinated. The demand goes further than that of the CDC, which has said that children and adults who work in schools who are fully vaccinated do not need to wear masks. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics website, Pfizer is their largest donor. Coincidence? –GEG

Tuesday, Jul 20, 2021 – 11:21 AM

Update (1010ET): In case you wondered why The American Academy of Pediatricians would over-rule the CDC’s “science”, consider this…

Probably nothing, right?

As Summit News’ Steve Watson detailed earlier,

The American Academy of Pediatrics is demanding that all children over the age of 2 years old wear face masks at schools and nurseries, a suggestion that goes further than any previous restrictions.

The group, which has 67,000 members in primary care, announced that even if kids have been vaccinated they should still be forced to wear masks, suggesting that “Combining layers of protection that include vaccinations, masking and clean-hands hygiene will make in-person learning safe and possible for everyone.”

The group also claims that “masking is proven to reduce transmission of the virus and to protect those who are not vaccinated.”

The group’s statement explains that universal masking is “the most effective strategy to create consistent messages and expectations among students without the added burden of needing to monitor everyone’s vaccination status.”

Read full article here…




Frontline Doctors File Motion to Stop FDA Authorization of COVID Vaccines for Children

A group of parents, along with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed a motion in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent the expansion of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 vaccines to include children under the age of 16. Plaintiffs argue that there is no justification for COVID-19 injections for children because the CDC admits that there is a statistical zero-rate for children dying from COVID-19 while there is a 12,000% increase in deaths from the vaccines. The Secretary of Health and Human Services has failed to make even the minimum statutory disclosures regarding risks and alternative treatments, so informed consent is not even possible for parents, while children are inherently incapable of such consent. The plaintiffs affirm in the motion that the EUAs should never have been granted and numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting these EUAs and pushing these injections on the American people.

A group of parents, along with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) and written by Thomas Renz, Esq., filed a motion in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order “to prevent the expansion of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 vaccines to include children under the age of 16,” according a statement released earlier today.

The motion was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and is directed against Secretary Xavier Becerra and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It consists of numerous plaintiffs representing various interests and backgrounds, including “physicians and the parents of minor children who are alarmed about offering children experimental products that have not undergone long term animal or safety studies.”

“We’ve never seen this level of side effects for any vaccine without the FDA taking action,” stated Dr. Angelina Farella, AFLDS Pediatric Medical Director. “The Rotavirus vaccine was pulled for 15 cases of non-lethal side effects and the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled for 25 deaths. But now, by the CDC’s own data, we are seeing a 12,000 percent increase in deaths with these vaccines and they’re still talking about giving this to our kids.”

“Our children should never be the experiment,” she continued. “No additional authorizations or mandates should be granted. We want to preserve the previously established safety standards.”

Dr. Farella also cited statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which confirms “children are at statistically zero risk for COVID-19, making expansion of the EUA for younger children medically unnecessary.”

The plaintiffs thus argue that “the defendants can make no science-based argument that preserving the status quo will create any hardship for them or for the public.”

As a matter of law, the petitioners contend that “the statistics alone make it impossible for the government to satisfy the balancing test required by federal statute (§ 360bbb–3(c)(2)(B)) as a condition to issuing EUAs for these experimental vaccines.”

As the motion itself reads, “EUA requires that an intervention address a serious or life- threatening condition, and for known and potential benefits of the intervention to be balanced against the known and potential harms.” Yet, the plaintiffs assert, “[t]here is not even a pretense of a factual basis that COVID-19 represents a serious or life-threatening condition for children under 16, since the CDC acknowledges they face 0% risk of mortality from COVID-19 statistically.”

Therefore, according to attorney Lowell H. Becraft, Jr., “[t]here is no public interest in subjecting children to an inoculation program, in order to protect them from a disease that simply does not threaten them.” Further, “since the DHHS Secretary has failed to make even the minimum statutory disclosures regarding risks and alternative treatments,” informed consent is not even possible for parents, while children are inherently incapable of such consent.

Statistics included by the plaintiffs to support their arguments include the following:

  • Under the age of 20, the survivability rate for COVID-19 is 99.997 percent.
  • More than 4,000 deaths that have been tied to the administering of COVID-19 vaccines in the last four months, as opposed to 1,500 total in the previous ten years for all vaccines.
  • Prior experimental vaccine rollout was stopped by the government when there were 25 unexplained deaths (deemed too high).
  • Researchers are concerned that spike proteins from the vaccines cause disease even without the virus, cross the blood-brain barrier, and could increase auto-immune disorders.

Read full article here…




Vail, Arizona: Parents for Face Freedom Hold Mock Election, Choose New School Board, and Declare an End to Mask Mandates

Hundreds of parents protested inside an event at the Vail Unified School District school board because it is keeping its mask mandate for children despite the fact that there is no longer a statewide order compelling them to do so. The school board cancelled their meeting that night. The protesters, however, elected an alternate school board from among their group, which then dismissed the mask mandate. Pima County sheriffs’ deputies descended on the scene but the parents would not be intimidated. -GEG

Parents in Vail, Arizona staged a peaceful protest against their school board, railing against the board’s mask mandate for children in the school system. The Face Freedom protesters then convened a vote to elect new school board members, though the mainstream media is trying not to recognize the authority of that citizen vote. This Tucson-area protest could set a precedent for other parents across the nation who are trying to un-mask their children against the deranged whims of government authoritarians.

The righteous parents protested inside an event at the Vail Unified School District school board Tuesday. That school board is keeping its mask mandate for children despite the fact that there is no longer a statewide order compelling them to do so. The outraged parents got their message across. The school board cancelled their meeting that night. The protesters elected an alternate school board, which then dismissed the mask mandate. However, the mainstream media is claiming that the new school board is “unofficial.” Pima County sheriffs’ deputies descended on the scene but the parents would not be intimidated. One of the protesters pressed the officials on “open meeting law” after the school board chose not to hold the meeting.

Read full article here…




American Children Ten Times More Likely To Die From Suicide Than COVID


FAIR Health assessed 32 billion private insurance claims and published a study, The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health, that showed the COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on mental health, especially for young people, as they face stress and loneliness from school closures, isolation and remote learning.

Tucker Carlson reported on the study and said that “children are ten times more likely to die from suicide than from the coronavirus they’re meant to be protected from.” His guest, Dr. Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, noted that among children aged 13 to 18 – teenagers – insurance claims for intentional self-harm were up 90% compared to the previous year, and rose as high as 300% in heavy lockdown areas. Claims for medical help related to drug overdoses rose by 95% in March. Carlson blamed COVID lockdowns for the mental breakdowns that dramatically increased major anxiety and depression problems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CEOQ1-Dt7o

A thorough study on the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of America’s youth has yielded terrifying results.

The study, titled, The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health, was put together by non-profit organization FAIR Health.

The FAIR Health database has access to more than 32 billion private insurance claims.

After assessing the 32 billion claims, the group tracked “month-by-month changes from January to November 2020 compared to the same months in 2019.”

What they found was disturbing.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on mental health, particularly that of young people. School closures, having to learn remotely, and isolating from friends due to social distancing have been sources of stress and loneliness,” the study revealed.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson covered the study on his Tuesday night show.

“Among children aged 13 to 18 – teenagers – insurance claims for intentional self-harm were up 90 percent in March of 2020 compared to the previous year. The next month, in April, self-harm cases rose by nearly 100 percent,” he said.

Meanwhile, Carlson continued, “claims for medical help related to drug overdoses” rose by “95 percent in March and then to 119 percent in April, and those numbers remained elevated through the fall.”

Read full article here…