Leaked Insider Recording From ABC News Reveals Network Executives Killed Bombshell Story Implicating Jeffrey Epstein

Amy Robach, ABC’s Good Morning America Breaking News Anchor and 20/20 Co-Anchor, was recorded on a ‘hot mic’ during a conversation with a producer last August saying that she had convinced Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a victim of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, to come forward with her story three years ago. However, ABC refused to air Robach’s interview with Virginia Giuffre. Robach said that ABC was threatened by ‘the Palace’ to prevent allegations against Prince Andrew from being reported. Robach also claimed that she had proof that Epstein’s right-hand woman, Ghislaine Maxwell, would recruit the girls for the sex operation. Robach said that she believed Epstein was killed by someone because he made his living blackmailing powerful people. James Goldston was the president of ABC News at the time the story was allegedly censored.

ABC and Robach responded to the video by saying that her interview did not meet the station’s editorial standards. ABC’s claim that it did not have enough evidence to run the story is fishy as it was only a year ago that the network published wild allegations against Brett Kavanaugh without any corroborating evidence. The corrupt media covers for its political allies, but has destroyed the lives of those who oppose their politics.


“I’ve Had This Story for Three Years… (ABC) Would Not Put It on The Air” says Good Morning America Breaking News Anchor, and 20/20 Co-Anchor Amy Robach. “It Was Unbelievable… We Had – Clinton, We Had Everything…”
Robach: “We Had Her Whole Allegations About Prince Andrew…I Got a Little Concerned About Why I Couldn’t Get On.”
Amy Robach Describes How She Interviewed a Woman Who Had the Courage to Come Forward “Years” Ago About Epstein: “She Had Pictures, She Had Everything. She Was in Hiding for Twelve Years. We Convinced Her to Come Out. We Convinced Her to Talk to Us.”
Robach Details ABC’s Initial Response to Her: “Who’s Jeffrey Epstein? No One Knows Who That is. This is a Stupid Story”
Robach: “Now it’s All Coming Out … I Freaking Had All Of It…”

(New York, NY)Newly revealed footage leaked by an ABC insider has exposed how network executives rejected allegations against Jeffrey Epstein years ago, even though there was content regarding the merit of those claims in-hand.

Amy Robach, ‘Good Morning America’ Co-Host and Breaking News Anchor at ABC, explains how a witness came forward years ago with information pertaining to Epstein, but Disney-owned ABC News refused to air the material for years. Robach vents her anger in a “hot mic” moment with an off-camera producer, explaining that ABC quashed the story in it’s early stages.  “I’ve had this interview with Virginia Roberts (Now Virginia Guiffre) [alleged Epstein victim]. We would not put it on the air. Um, first of all, I was told “Who’s Jeffrey Epstein.  No one knows who that is.  This is a stupid story.”

She continues, “The Palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.”

Robach goes on to express she believes that Epstein was killed in prison saying, “So do I think he was killed? 100% Yes, I do…He made his whole living blackmailing people… Yup, there were a lot of men in those planes. A lot of men who visited that Island, a lot of powerful men who came into that apartment.”

Read full article here…

Additional sources:



BREAKING: ABC News and Amy Robach RESPOND to Project Veritas BOMBSHELL #EpsteinCoverup Story

Cloudflare Drops 8chan for Posting Alleged El Paso Shooter Manifesto. FBI Caught Covertly Posting on 8chan in June.

On Saturday, a manifesto attributed to Patrick Crusius, the alleged El Paso shooter, was posted on 8chan, an image board where anyone can post images or content, and is known to be politically incorrect, with no monitoring from site administration. Cloudflare, a system that protects websites from cyber attacks, dropped 8chan and blamed the website for “inspiring” mass murder.

Apparently, the FBI is also posting on 8chan, which was discovered earlier this summer after an application for a search warrant for 8chan was unsealed, revealing that a federal agent , FBI Special Agent Michael J. Rod, was trolling the site, and trying to redirect blame for the April 27th synagogue shooting toward the Russian government, and away from the users’ conspiracy theories against the CIA or Mossad. [Hey, the FBI is supposed to investigate criminal activity, not initiate it.] -GEG

On Saturday the El Paso mass murderer posted a “manifesto” on 8Chan and then went off and murdered 20 at a Walmart.

On Monday Cloudflare Blog terminated service with 8Chan.
Cloudflare also blamed the website for “inspiring” the mass murderer.

This is where we are today with hard left activists running all of our internet properties.

Read full article here…

FBI agent accidentally reveals own 8chan posts; attempts to redirect white supremacist rage against Russia

The unsealing of an application for a search warrant
by the federal government on 8chan’s servers has unintentionally
revealed that a federal agent has been trolling the site and attempting
to redirect the users’ conspiracy theories against the Russian
government instead of the CIA or Mossad.

The legal case stems from the April 27th shooting at a California synagogue
by white supremacist and 8chan user John Earnest. The day of the
shooting, Earnest is believed to have posted to 8chan a link to an
anti-Semitic Pastebin manifesto and a not-so-cryptic suggestion that he
was about to commit a murderous act of violence to back up his beliefs.
In the accompanying affidavit to the search warrant application, FBI
Special Agent Michael J. Rod requests the “IP address and metadata
information about Earnest’s original posting and the postings of all of
the individuals who responded to the subject posting and/or commented
about it. Additionally, agents seek information about any other posting
coming from the IP address used by Earnest to post the subject posting.”

Read full article here…

Additional sources:


Senior Google Engineer Goes Public on Camera and Says that Tech Is “Dangerous” and Politically Biased in Favor of Democrats

Greg Coppola, a senior software engineer at Google who works on artificial intelligence and on Google Assistant, says Google is manipulating public opinion and is politically biased in favor of Democrats. He believes that Google’s news is selected from a handful of media outlets that are “vitriolically against Trump,” which he considers to be interference in an election. Coppola was put on administrative leave by the company the day after his video was released. -GEG

Insider: “It’s time to decide, do we run the technology, or does the technology run us?”

“I really don’t buy the idea that big tech is politically neutral.”

“Are we going to just let the biggest tech companies decide who wins every election from now on?”

look at search and I look at Google News and I see what it’s doing and I
see Google executives go to Congress and say that it’s not manipulated.
It’s not political. And I’m just so sure that’s not true.”

“I have a PhD, I have five years’ experience at Google and I just know how algorithms are. They don’t write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do.”

Read full article here…

Canadian Chiropractor Fined $100,000 for Criticizing Vaccines on Social Media

A Canadian medical committee has ordered a chiropractor, Dr. Dena Churchill, to pay $100,000 to the Nova Scotia College of Chiropractors for ‘professional misconduct’ after she posted messages on social media that vaccines could be harmful – and refused to delete her posts when told to do so. The committee claims that vaccines are outside of the chiropractor’s scope of practice. Canada’s national chiropractic association’s guidelines require chiropractors “not to discuss vaccines in any capacity.” According to reports, Dr. Churchill surrendered her medical license and entered into a settlement agreement with the Nova Scotia College of Chiropractors which required her to admit to being “professionally incompetent as a result of incompetence arising out of mental incapacity.” It is unknown whether Dr. Churchill made the admission of incompetency under duress, but she now is broke. [Question: Can you think of any instances in history where truth required the force of law and the threat of punishment to protect it? Neither can I. Only falsehood needs such protection.] GEG

A former Halifax-based chiropractor has been ordered to pay her
regulator $100,000 as part of a settlement agreement on charges of
professional misconduct related to her sharing anti-vaccination views

In a decision released publicly Thursday,
a hearing committee of the Nova Scotia College of Chiropractors took
into consideration Dena Churchill’s “dire financial circumstances” and
gave her 10 years to pay the money. But it also said if she has not paid
at least $30,000 by Jan. 2, 2022, the full amount becomes due

“Dr. Churchill’s conduct brought the profession of chiropractic into disrepute,” the hearing committee writes in its decision.

“Dr. Churchill has shown no remorse. There is genuine concern that she is ungovernable.”

The college launched an investigation a year ago
after its registrar filed a complaint regarding Churchill’s extensive
posts on social media about topics outside her scope of practice, most
notably posts about vaccines that made disproved claims.

guideline from the national chiropractic association, which is observed
by the Nova Scotia college, is for chiropractors not to discuss vaccines
in any capacity.

Licence surrendered in January

In January, Churchill surrendered her licence
and entered into a settlement agreement with the college, admitting she
was “professionally incompetent as a result of incompetence arising out
of mental incapacity.”

Churchill had been scheduled for a hearing
in late May on 15 allegations of professional misconduct and one count
of conduct unbecoming a chiropractor.

However, the hearing was
cancelled earlier that month when Churchill entered into a settlement
agreement with the college, admitting to the charges.

In that decision, which was also released publicly Thursday,
it is noted Churchill did not comply with multiple requests from her
registrar to remove offending posts from a variety of social media

‘This is an egregious matter’

A separate hearing
was required after the two sides could not agree on costs, with the
college originally seeking the full amount related to the investigation
and administrative process to that point, which was $178,831.34. The
college later reduced its claim to $100,000.

The committee
disagreed with Churchill’s assessment that the finding of professional
misconduct was “not an egregious breach” and awarded the college the
full amount it was seeking.

“This is an egregious matter. Dr.
Churchill admitted she is guilty of professional misconduct. Dr.
Churchill was responsible for social media posts outside her scope of
practice which were harmful to the public.”

Read full article here…

Additional sources:


Sweden: Police Initiate “Hate Speech” Probe of Politician Who Supports Deporting Migrants Who Commit Crime

Gustav Kasselstrand, the leader of the right-wing Alternative For Sweden party, was reported by police for “hate speech” after he gave a speech about deporting migrants who have committed crimes in his country. Kasselstrand said that the police, by reporting him, have engaged in political harassment as he simply advocated for the deportation removal of migrants who have committed crimes.

Swedish politician reported by police for “hate speech” for wanting to deport criminal migrants.

Leader of the right-wing Alternative For Sweden party Gustav
Kasselstrand has been reported by the police for “hate speech”. This
after he held a speech talking about deporting migrants who have
committed crimes in Sweden.

Although the police have not given any details as to exactly what it
was in the speech that was offensive, it is clear to party leader Gustav
Kasselstrand that this is “political harassment”, pointing out that it
is the police themselves who have reported him for “hate speech” while
he was merely holding a political speech.

“We are going to investigate further whether what was said in the speech was hate speech”, says Carina Skagerlind, press spokesperson at the police to Expressen.

This happened in Almedalen, a place where every year all major
political parties and politicians gather for a week having speeches, an
important event in the political calendar.

Read full article here…

Tucker Carlson Warns Republicans that the Koch Brothers Support Open Borders and Censorship of Conservatives

Tucker Carlson says that the Republican Party seems out of sync with conservative voters because the Koch brothers, major funders of the GOP, actually oppose most conservative policy goals. The Koch brothers support open borders. They endorse the ‘soft on crime’ policies of the First Step Act and the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act that reduces prison time for drug dealers. The Kochs have pushed for cuts to social security and Medicare. And they have now joined the left-wing campaign against free speech. Despite their contradictory values, Republicans are allowing the Kochs to run the Party.

Transcript as Follows:

Charles and David Koch are two of the richest men in the
world. Each is worth tens of billions of dollars. Some of their money is
inherited. Much they made themselves. But the Kochs have never been
content merely to get richer. They’re engaged intellectuals, with a
sincere desire to change the world. For years, the brothers have been
the single most important funders of Republican politics in Washington.

The Koch network of donors spends hundreds of millions of dollars
every election cycle. Virtually every major conservative non-profit in
DC takes Koch money. Koch organizations train political organizers and
candidates. Many Republican lawmakers owe their careers to the Kochs.
For people whose main business is making fertilizer and paper towels,
the Kochs have been remarkably effective in politics. Not surprisingly,
the left hates them for it. Both the Koch brothers and their families,
who by the way are very nice people, have been repeatedly and
grotesquely maligned by the media. This, in turn, has convinced many
conservatives that the Kochs much be on their side. Anyone who’s been
slandered by the New York Times has got to be doing something right. That’s the idea. It’s not a bad standard.

But in the case of the Kochs, conservatives might want to pause and
rethink the relationship. As it turns out, the Kochs don’t have much in
common with conservatives. They are totally opposed to most conservative
policy goals. The Kochs are libertarian ideologues, passionate and
inflexible. America first? The Kochs find the very notion absurd, if not
fascist. An economic policy that seeks to strengthen families? The
Kochs denounce that as “crony capitalism,” or “picking winners and
losers.” They think it’s immoral. Controlling our borders? The Kochs
consider that racist. A few years ago, Bernie Sanders noted that the
Koch brothers are far to the left of him on immigration. Open borders?
Quote: “That’s a Koch brothers proposal,” he said.

Read full article here…

Additional source – from The Observer:

Representatives for the Charles Koch Institute and the Anti-Defamation League will join executives from tech companies which currently include Eventbrite, Mozilla, Pinterest, Patreon and Airbnb.

Charles Koch Teams Up With George Soros, Patreon and Airbnb to Fight Online Extremism

Senator Josh Hawley Proposes Legislation to Bring Transparency and Accountability to Big Tech for Political Censorship

Freshman Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) authored a bill to end immunity granted to tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that shields them from publisher liability lawsuits if the companies provide an open public forum. However, the tech giants have engaged in political censorship. Under the legislation, the big tech companies could earn their immunity if external audits prove that their algorithms and content-removal policies remain politically neutral.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) proposed legislation Wednesday to end big
tech companies’ legislative immunity, which would prevent them from
censoring conservative and alternative viewpoints without significant

Sen. Hawley proposed the
Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act, which updates the way the
federal government treats social media companies under Section 230 of
the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

The Missouri conservatives’ legislation removes the big tech’s
immunity received under Section 230 unless they submit to an external
audit that would prove that their algorithms and content-removal
policies remain politically neutral. Sen. Hawley’s legislation would
only apply to large tech companies such as Google, Facebook, and
Twitter, not small and medium-sized tech companies.

“With Section 230, tech companies get a sweetheart deal that no other
industry enjoys: complete exemption from traditional publisher
liability in exchange for providing a forum free of political
censorship,” said Sen. Hawley in a statement Wednesday. “Unfortunately,
and unsurprisingly, big tech has failed to hold up its end of the

Hawley’s legislation arises
as the Donald Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) will reportedly begin antitrust investigations into
America’s largest technology companies.

Other conservatives, such as Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), have proposed eliminating or amending Section 230 to curb big tech companies’ ability to censor conservative and alternative viewpoints.

Sen. Hawley’s legislation would:

  • Remove automatic immunity under Section 230 from big tech companies.
  • Give big tech companies the ability to earn their immunity through external audits.
    • However, the Federal Trade Commission could not certify large social
      media companies from immunity except for a supermajority vote by the
    • Big tech companies would have to pay for the cost of conducting the audits.
    • The companies would have to reapply for immunity every two years.
  • Preserves immunity for small and medium-sized companies.
    • The bill would not apply to companies with less than 30 million
      active monthly users, more than 300 million active monthly users
      worldwide, or those companies that have more than $500 million in global
      annual revenue.

Read full article here…

Justin Trudeau Threatens ‘Consequences’ If Social Media Sites Don’t Ban ‘Hate Speech’

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau threatened social media platforms with “consequences” and “meaningful penalties” if they don’t “step up” and ban everything his regime feels is “hate speech” or “disinformation.” Canadians were not fooled and recognized it as censorship and thought control. Hate, violent extremism, and criminality were not defined in order to be able to change the rules at will. -GEG

Prime Minister Trudeau on Tuesday threatened social media platforms
with “consequences” and “meaningful penalties” if they don’t “step up”
and ban everything his regime feels is “hate speech” or

media platforms must be held accountable for the hate speech &
disinformation we see online – and if they don’t step up, there will be
consequences. We launched Canada’s new Digital Charter today to guide
our decisions, learn more about it here: https://t.co/SH7mpyojsj pic.twitter.com/V2C0TmR49b— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) May 21, 2019

Read full article here…

Canada’s new Digital Charter:

The 10 principles of the Charter

1. Universal Access:

All Canadians
will have equal opportunity to participate in the digital world and the
necessary tools to do so, including access, connectivity, literacy and

2. Safety and Security:

Canadians will
be able to rely on the integrity, authenticity and security of the
services they use and should feel safe online.

3. Control and Consent:

Canadians will
have control over what data they are sharing, who is using their
personal data and for what purposes, and know that their privacy is

4. Transparency, Portability and Interoperability:

Canadians will
have clear and manageable access to their personal data and should be
free to share or transfer it without undue burden.

5. Open and Modern Digital Government:

Canadians will be able to access modern digital services from the Government of Canada, which are secure and simple to use.

6. A Level Playing Field:

The Government
of Canada will ensure fair competition in the online marketplace to
facilitate the growth of Canadian businesses and affirm Canada’s
leadership on digital and data innovation, while protecting Canadian
consumers from market abuses.

7. Data and Digital for Good:

The Government
of Canada will ensure the ethical use of data to create value, promote
openness and improve the lives of people—at home and around the world.

8. Strong Democracy:

The Government
of Canada will defend freedom of expression and protect against online
threats and disinformation designed to undermine the integrity of
elections and democratic institutions.

9. Free from Hate and Violent Extremism:

Canadians can expect that digital platforms will not foster or disseminate hate, violent extremism or criminal content.

10. Strong Enforcement and Real Accountability:

There will be clear, meaningful penalties for violations of the laws and regulations that support these principles.


WordPress Censors Journalist and Vaccine Researcher, Jon Rappoport, By Removing His Blog from the Internet

Jon Rappoport’s popular blog, JonRappoport.wordpress.com, was shut down by WordPress without advance notice or explanation. This is forcing him to collect email addresses in order to share his articles by email. -GEG

Our friend and sometime contributor Jon Rappoport had his blog taken
down by WordPress last week. For those who don’t know, WordPress is a
blogging software and hosting company that is probably the most
ubiquitous on the internet.

Here’s what he had to say about it:

My blog has been taken down!

by Jon Rappoport

past Saturday, between 2 and 3 PM Eastern Time, WordPress suddenly took
down my blog after 10 years of continuous operation.  There was no
warning or advance notice of any kind.

This is outright censorship.

We are attempting to restore service to the blog.  Meanwhile, the situation is this:

You can still access the home page of my site, NoMoreFakeNews.com.

On that page, you can order products by clicking on the “Matrix” graphics on the right side of the page.

consider forwarding this email to those you know letting them know what
happened. They can then go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the
email list at the upper left of the home page.  They will then get my
output of new articles in their email.

I thank you for your
support all these years—NoMoreFakeNews has existed for 18 years.  I need
that support more than ever at this time.

Make your response to this censorship known to WordPress.

Read full article here…

Facebook and Instagram Blacklist Prominent Conservatives Including InfoWars’ Paul Joseph Watson

Instagram and its parent company, Facebook, banned a number of conservative personalities from its platforms, including Infowars host Alex Jones, Infowars contributor and YouTube star Paul Joseph Watson, journalist and activist Laura Loomer, and Milo Yiannopoulos. Louis Farrakhan was also banned at the same time. Facebook and Instagram promised to remove any Infowars videos, radio segments, and articles posted by another account or page. Any Groups related to the banned figures or Facebook Events promoting them will also be removed. Critics say that this sets a chilling precedent for free speech, it is a formula for censoring not just websites and personalities, but their supporters, and that Facebook is openly punishing and rewarding users for their political opinions.

The Masters of the Universe at Facebook have banned multiple conservative personalities from both Facebook and Instagram, including Infowars host Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, and Milo Yiannopoulos.

The Atlantic reports
that Instagram and its parent company Facebook has banned a number of
conservative personalities from its platforms, including Infowars host
Alex Jones, Infowars contributor and YouTube star Paul Joseph Watson,
journalist and activist Laura Loomer, and Milo Yiannopoulos. Louis
Farrakhan was notably also banned from the platforms at the same time.

Paul Joseph Watson confirmed his ban, claiming he has not broken
Facebook’s rules, and commenting, “In an authoritarian society
controlled by a handful of Silicon Valley giants, all dissent must be

Read full article here…

Additional Source:


Anti-Vaxxers Banned from Raising Money on GoFundMe

Anti-vaxxers have been banned from raising money on GoFundMe in an attempt to stop their message warning that vaccines can be dangerous. YouTube has demonetized anti-vaxxer videos, Pinterest has blocked search results for the term and Facebook claims to have reduced the prominence of posts spreading misleading information.

Anti-vaxxers have been banned from raising money on GoFundMe in an attempt to stop the spread of conspiracy theories and misinformation.

The crowdfunding platform announced it was carrying out a
“thorough review” following reports that one campaigner had gathered
nearly $80,000 (£60,000) in donations.

Larry Cook, who promoted his fundraising efforts using Facebook adverts, targeted mothers with claims the medical community was covering up baby “slaughter”.

GoFundMe spokesman Bobby Whithorne said: “Campaigns raising money
to promote misinformation about vaccines violate GoFundMe’s terms of
service and will be removed from the platform.

“We are conducting a thorough review and will remove any campaigns currently on the platform.”

Read full article here…

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, Calls for Governments to Censor the Internet for ‘Harmful’ Speech on Issues Like Mass Immigration

Mark Zuckrberg of Facebook called for governments to regulate speech, which does not target illegal content, but targets “harmful” content that is constitutionally protected. He said that speech on “divisive political issues,” such as mass immigration should be shut down by the government.  FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr says that Facebook, which is worth $500 billion, is motivated to keep its stronghold in the market and the new regulations would make it difficult for start-up companies to compete.