Connecticut City Rejects 5G Citing Evidence of Health Risks

The Board of Representatives in Stamford, Connecticut voted to reject a model agreement that would have allowed AT&T and Verizon to install 5G equipment on city-owned utility poles, risking a lawsuit from the vendors. A 2018 ruling by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) blocks states and municipalities from taking actions that would impede or delay the rollout of 5G technology. Challenges to the 2018 FCC ruling are still being worked out in the court system.

Opponents of the 5G rollout wrote that wireless radiation is dangerous because it can cause cellular stress and DNA damage leading to disease; FCC guidelines are a ‘complete failure’ for protecting children; Other countries have more stringent wireless radiation standards; Pollinators may be impacted by 5G.

.

After being presented with evidence of wireless radiation’s negative health impacts, the Board of Representatives in Stamford, Connecticut, voted to reject an agreement that would have allowed telecommunications carriers to install 5G equipment on city-owned utility poles.

The Board of Representatives in Stamford, Connecticut, earlier this month voted to reject a model agreement that would have allowed AT&T and Verizon to install 5G equipment on city-owned utility poles.

In a bid to get 5G swiftly installed in his state, Gov. Ned Lamont’s office created a template contract between the nation’s top two telecommunication carriers and the state’s five major cities.

Stamford, the state’s second-largest city, is the only city so far to have voted against using the contract. Twenty-one representatives voted against the pact. Five were in favor and eight abstained.

Commenting on the city’s decision, W. Scott McCollough, chief litigator for Children Health Defense’s (CHD) electromagnetic radiation (EMR) cases, told The Defender, “I applaud Stamford’s principled stand.”

Advocates for the contract said Stamford’s rejection might bring a lawsuit against the city, but McCollough disagreed.

“The wireless companies do not have a case yet. It is too early,” he said. “This was merely a decision to reject a model agreement. Federal and state law allow the city to instead negotiate individual terms, and that is what Stamford has chosen to do.”

The 21 representatives were largely persuaded by presentations by six independent experts on the scientific evidence of harm from radiofrequency (RF) radiation, including 5G, according to a local media report.

The experts, including toxicologist and epidemiologist Devra Davis, Ph.D., MPH, said there were many documented health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including brain damagememory lossdecline in reproductive functionDNA damage and harm to insects.

The board’s land use committee voted to recommend rejecting the pact after hearing from the experts.

Davis, founder and president of Environmental Health Trust (EHT), told The Defender, “Confronted with overwhelming, independent scientific information about the real and present dangers of bringing electromagnetic fields closer to humans than ever before, Stamford voted to protect people and their environment.”

She added, “We should stop debating whether we have proof of human harm, and take steps now to prevent that harm from spreading.”

‘The city has an obligation to protect citizens’

Some representatives, like City Rep. Don Mays, worried that rejecting the pact would mean AT&T and Verizon would sue the city. He said at the Oct. 18 meeting, “Until that technology [that emits wireless radiation] changes in the marketplace, we are essentially going to have to accept it.”

2018 ruling by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) blocks states and municipalities from taking actions that would impede or delay the rollout of 5G technology.

Mays added, “If cities try to go against the FCC rules, the carriers will sue the cities … And I don’t think we want to subject this city to that.”

However, City Rep. James Grunberger disagreed, saying, “I don’t think we should back away from this because of the threat of a lawsuit … If we have to be a test case on this, we should be a test case.”

During a November meeting, Grunberger affirmed his position. “The federal government does not have guidelines for long-term exposure, so we need to protect our city ourselves, and not succumb to legal threats.”

Similarly, Rep. Sean Boeger said, “I’m just not willing to take a gamble with my four kids living in this city and my constituents’ children living in this city without some type of concrete consensus.”

Neil Sherman, a Stamford resident, said the contract would allow 5G equipment to go up “close to homes and schools without limitation to the number of antennas. They operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.”

“The city has an obligation to protect citizens from potentially dangerous modalities,” Sherman said.

Do cities and states have to accept the 5G rollout?

McCollough said challenges to the 2018 FCC ruling are still being worked out in the court system.

“Sometimes you have to stand your ground and here’s hoping Stamford does that. They do have some arguments and those need to be raised and evaluated by a court in Connecticut.”

McCollough pointed out that Stamford didn’t issue an “ordinance” or “even a regulation” that blocks telecom providers, so the telecom providers “would be fools to sue now claiming an effective prohibition.” He said:

“The board’s decision was simply to reject a model contract — or right-of-way agreement — that spelled out the terms of access that telecom companies could use for putting their 5G equipment on city infrastructure.

“All that it means is the city will now proceed to negotiate the terms and conditions for access, rather than using this model contract that the Governor’s office suggested cities use.

“The telecoms don’t have a cause of action until those negotiations break down or they submit a permit application that involves a site in right-of-way and it is denied.”

Four takeaways from experts’ presentation on wireless radiation risks

In addition to Davis, the experts who presented to the board’s land use committee included Dr. Rob Brown, an orthopedic radiology specialist, B. Blake Levitt, a science journalist, Theodora Scarato, EHT’s executive director, Kent Chamberlin, Ph.D., past chair and professor emeritus in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of New Hampshire, and Joseph Sandri, a telecom regulatory attorney and CEO of the tech lab Thought Delivery Systems Inc.

Here are four key points they made to Stamford’s city representatives:

1. Wireless radiation can cause cellular stress and DNA damage leading to disease.

Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that exposure to RF radiation can cause individual cells in the body to become stressed, leading to DNA damage and disease, according to Brown.

“The longer a cell is stressed,” he said, “the greater the likelihood it may malfunction.”

Brown said:

“You might think that the term stress implies a manageable state and that it’s not a big deal, but let me clarify. Stress weakens the body’s tissues just as stress can cause a bridge to collapse, stress can cause a bone to fracture and also to develop or an organ system to fail.

“When cells undergo stress, unfortunate things can happen. Membranes — which protect the cell and control the cell’s internal environment — can become damaged, causing the cell to lose its ability to function and put[ting] the cell’s life at risk.”

Proteins in the stressed cell can become damaged, he said, adding that Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body dementia and amyloidosis are all associated with protein denaturation.

“And importantly,” he said, “when the cell is stressed, its DNA can become damaged, which can lead to mutations and possibly cancer.”

Chamberlin, who served on a year-long Land-Use Commission tasked by the state of New Hampshire to investigate the health risks of wireless radiation, pointed this out as well.

Chamberlin said that prior to joining the commission he, a wireless engineer, did not believe that low-level radiation was particularly harmful. “That was the conventional — and is the conventional — wisdom for people working in my field. And it’s a viewpoint that’s routinely reinforced by [the telecom] industry.”

“However,” Chamberlin said, “my beliefs about the safety of wireless radiation soon changed” as the commission identified “hundreds of top-tier publications that showed harm from low-level wireless radiation exposure.”

He said:

“The primary mechanism by which exposure causes harm are oxidative changes, which can lead to an increase in free radicals. Those free radicals can lead to chronic inflammation and a host of adverse outcomes including:

Brown also said that some have claimed 5G won’t have negative health impacts because it only penetrates a few millimeters into the skin — but “radiation doesn’t need to go deep to cause damage,” he said, adding:

“The thyroid gland is often only a few millimeters deep to the skin surface and so are the testicles. Interfering with the function of these glands can cause systemic endocrine dysfunction.

“In addition, many important cells including red blood cells and immune cells are just below the skin surface.”

2. FCC guidelines are a ‘complete failure’ for protecting kids.

Davis pointed out research showing children are especially vulnerable to RF radiation.

Children’s unique physiology, including smaller heads and more fluid in their brains, results in proportionately greater absorption of RF radiation than adults.

Research shows children can absorb up to 30 times more the amount of RF radiation in their hippocampus and 10 times more in the bone marrow of their skull.

The FCC has refused to take this research into consideration when setting its wireless radiation exposure guidelines, she said.

EHT and other organizations, including CHD, successfully sued the FCC by arguing that the agency’s guidelines — which have not been updated since 1996 — were inadequate to protect human health and did not take recent science into account. Davis said:

“The U.S. Court of Appeals, the District of Columbia, determined that we were correct and ruled that the FCC’s policies on standards for testing phones and other devices were arbitrary and capricious and that the testing procedures, particularly as they relate to children and long-term exposures, were a complete failure.

“The court found the FCC had failed to provide evidence of properly examining long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, the testimony of people injured by radiation sickness and impacts to the developing brain and reproductive system.”

The FCC still has not complied with the court’s mandate to review recent science and give a better explanation for how its current standards are adequate for protecting health.

3. Other countries have more stringent wireless radiation standards.

Scarato said that while the FCC’s standards have yet to reflect current science, other countries have taken action to set lower wireless exposure limits.

India, China, Russia, Italy and Switzerland all have limits that are a mere fraction of the FCC’s exposure limit, she said.

“And in some of those countries, there are scientists that are studying this issue ongoing,” she said. “However, in the United States, we don’t have that.”

No U.S. regulatory agency with health expertise has reviewed the scientific evidence of biological effects from RF radiation, she said.

“Not the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency], not the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], not the National Cancer Institute, the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration or] the Department of Labor,” she added.

4. Pollinators may be impacted by 5G.

Levitt, who has researched the biological effects of RF radiation since the late 1970s, shared research on RF radiation’s negative impact on the environment and non-human species.

She said neither the FCC nor the state of Connecticut had ever conducted a NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) review for 5G.

Under NEPA law, federal agencies must assess whether projects they have authorized will cause harm.

Meanwhile, research indicates that rolling out 5G may especially hurt insects as they are “very inefficient thermo regulators” and “particularly vulnerable to temperature changes,” Levitt said, adding that “What impacts insects impacts us all.”

Many frequencies of wireless radiation, including the ranges used by 5G, cause an organism’s tissues to heat up which, in turn, can impact the organism’s functioning.

Research shows that 5G may be lethal to honeybees, she said.

Levitt pointed out that this would impact the human food supply. She warned, “We are flirting with catastrophic impacts from insect deaths alone, capable of punching holes in the entire food web. [The] Human food supply is endangered.”

Watch the presentations to the land use committee here:

Read original article here:      https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/stamford-connecticut-rejects-5g-health-risk/




Birds Die Near Cell Towers But Thrive Away from Them

In 2022, seabirds were found dead on their breeding grounds, as if they had fallen mid-flight, all over the Northern Hemisphere. Ornithologists and bird conservation organizations were quick to call it bird flu that travels round the world in days, spreads like water between species, and kills entire colonies in weeks. However, some populations in different areas were unaffected. Arthur Firstenberg, author of The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life and expert in electromagnetic frequency (EMF) radiation, wrote that this was not “bird flu”, it was radiation sickness. He linked the bird deaths to places that had newly erected 4G and 5G antennas. He showed that some bird populations in Holland had recovered, but only because they nested and laid their eggs in areas with limited EMF radiation.

.

All over the Earth, birds — symbols of freedom and joy — have been disappearing, and unless we stop killing them, they will never more enliven our skies and imaginations. They are terns, seagulls, avocets, gannets, skuas, guillemots, puffins, oystercatchers, ducks, geese, godwits, pheasants, magpies, sanderlings, storks, cranes, pelicans, herons, swans, loons, sparrows, pigeons, red-winged blackbirds, owls, cormorants, grebes, dunlins, crows, ravens, bald eagles, hawks, falcons, vultures, all of them vanishing from the landscapes of our homes, forests, sea coasts and minds. It rarely makes the news, and a world grown accustomed to ever-dwindling resources and diminishing life has not been paying attention. The warning of a Silent Spring, sounded sixty years ago like a trumpet’s blare, has shrunken from a year-round emergency to the almost-meaningless ritual of Earth Day, celebrated just once a year.

But last spring, during May and June, the world was awakened to shocking tales and heart-rending photographs of dead seabirds littering their breeding grounds all over the Northern Hemisphere, nowhere so vividly as in the De Petten Nature Reserve on the island of Texel in the Netherlands, where the corpses of Sandwich terns littered the ground as if they had fallen dead out of the sky in mid-flight.

Ornithologists and bird conservation organizations, reflexively, said to themselves and the world, “This must be bird flu,” and they dressed in hazmat suits and masks as they wandered among the avian graveyards with their specimen collectors and testing equipment, while ignoring obvious signs to the contrary. Bird flu, they pronounced, is so contagious and deadly that it travels round the world in days, spreads like water between species, and kills entire colonies in weeks. While ignoring the fact that two Dutch colonies of Sandwich terns just 20 miles apart during the same breeding season had completely different outcomes: Waterdunen, whose 7,000 nesting birds were completely wiped out, and Yerseke Moer, whose smaller colony suffered zero mortality. That in France, 3,000 Sandwich terns at Platier d’Oye were entirely killed while thousands of pairs of Sandwich terns at Polder de Sébastopol had no disease at all. That bird flu was an autumn and winter disease and had never before been known to occur in spring or summer. And that it had never before affected so many different kinds of birds at once.

But this was not “bird flu”, it was radiation sickness from cell towers, as documented in my newsletter of July 28, 2022. Eighteen new 4G antennas had been added to three cell towers located at De Petten, within the territory where the birds were breeding, just days before they began dying. And a large number of other antennas and towers were aimed at the reserve from across a busy shipping lane whose traffic made heavy use of those antennas. While Yerseke Moer is host to no cell towers, has far fewer antennas aimed at it, and is in an isolated location, not near a major port, and not on a shipping lane.

Read full article here…




Detroit-Area School Superintendent Resigns over 5G Cell Tower on top Elementary School

Michigan: Wyandotte Schools Superintendent Catherine Cost resigned following pushback from parents after a 5G cell tower was attached to a chimney on Washington Elementary School. In exchange, the school gets a little over $1,000 a month. This deal was reached in 2018, but tower has recently been placed at the school. It is currently inactive. If the parents are successful, breaking the contract with the school could cost taxpayers millions of dollars. An attorney working with the parents said that he believes T-Mobile has already breached the contract as it is not in compliance with city ordinances and the company failed to present the board with information needed to make an informed decision to sign the contract.

.

.

Wyandotte’s School Board voted to accept the resignation of Superintendent Catherine Cost on Wednesday, amid controversy over a 5G cell tower on Washington Elementary.

“I’m hoping they find somebody to fill her shoes that will put our children first and be a positive light in this district,” parent Alexandria Cotner said.

An agreement between the district and T-Mobile led to the cell phone provider placing a 5G tower on the chimney of Washington Elementary. In exchange, the school gets a little over $1,000 a month. This deal was reached in 2018, but tower has recently been placed at the school.

This has led to tense school board meetings as parents demand answers about the possible health impacts on children.

“I believe that she’s (Cost) been a huge barrier in getting something done here. I believe that she dropped the ball at every step along the way from 2018 when this contract was signed up through as of yesterday, so I am very happy that we seem to be moving in the right direction,” said attorney Josh Castmore, one of the biggest organizers pushing back against the tower.

It’s been an ongoing battle between parents, the district, and the cell phone provider.

During one meeting, T-Mobile reps walked out.

Read full article here…




5G: CHD Plans Lawsuit After Los Angeles County Approves Fast-Tracking of Wireless Towers

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) plans to sue the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors after the board passed two ordinances allowing for the fast-tracked proliferation of wireless infrastructure without due process and without residents’ right to appeal. The two ordinances establish regulations for small-cell wireless communication facilities on highways and for wireless facilities on private property in the unincorporated areas of LA County. Fiber First LA, a nonprofit that promotes fiber optic networks over wireless infrastructures, wrote, “Citizens have been stripped of their rights, fire and safety concerns have been ignored, critical environmental protections have been dismissed, and any checks on the wireless industry have been virtually eliminated.” The Supervisors were warned that LA County exempts telecommunications facilities from electrical and fire codes. A critic noted that telecommunications companies sometimes pay off city officials to make the application and permit process smooth for their projects in potentially profitable cities like Los Angeles and other coastal cities.

.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) plans to sue the Los Angeles (L.A.) County Board of Supervisors after the board on Tuesday passed two ordinances allowing for the fast-tracked proliferation of wireless infrastructure without due process and without residents’ right to appeal.

Commenting on Tuesday’s unanimous vote, attorney W. Scott McCollough said:

“The board voted 5-0 to betray their county residents, let big telecom put dangerous towers everywhere, ruin more families’ lives through the harms of RF [radio frequency] exposure, pave the way for more surveillance and ignore all the environmental destruction that will ensue.

“We cannot let this stand.”

CHD has retained McCollough, a former Texas assistant attorney general and telecom and administrative law attorney who told The Defender CHD intends to sue the county over its disregard of environmental law and residents’ rights.

He said:

“We will continue to fight on behalf of the people of L.A., California and the entire country. Policies implemented in California rarely stay there, they quickly spread to other states.

“We need to stop this free pass for telecom giants while we still can, so we will take L.A. County to court.”

In addition to legal pressure, McCollough said, “Let it be known the residents will be remembering this one come next election.”

The two ordinances — amendments to title 16 and title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code — establish regulations for small-cell wireless communication facilities on highways and for wireless facilities on private property in the unincorporated areas of L.A. County and associated provisions.

According to Fiber First Los Angeles County (Fiber First LA), a nonprofit that promotes fiber optic networks over wireless infrastructures, the amendments strip residents of the right to have a voice in how wireless technology is deployed in their own neighborhoods by removing “public notice, setbacks, oversight, safety and environmental review, and any opportunities for appeal.”

The ordinances also stipulate that small-cell projects may not have to comply with California environmental law, Fiber First LA said.

The board last month delayed a scheduled vote on the ordinances due to public opposition. But members of Fiber First LA said the board on Tuesday paid little attention to extensive public opposition — including the more than 37,570 messages CHD generated to the supervisors before the meeting.

Commenting on the vote, Fiber First LA said:

“Despite overwhelming opposition from local citizens and support from across the country, the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on Jan. 10 to adopt changes to its zoning code supported by the wireless industry.

“Citizens have been stripped of their rights, fire and safety concerns have been ignored, critical environmental protections have been dismissed, and any checks on the wireless industry have been virtually eliminated.

“We are proud of our work to bring science and facts to the board, and while we are disappointed at the result, we are not finished speaking truth to power.

“To all of you who helped in this effort, our sincere thanks. Your support kept us going, and will keep us fighting.”

Brenda Martinez, an L.A. County resident and activist on the executive committee of Fiber First LA who testified at Tuesday’s meeting, told The Defender the “hypocrisy” in the room was “palpable.”

“The board of supervisors started the meeting acknowledging they were on Tongva land, and yet they completely disregarded a written plea from the Keetoowah people to reverse the categorical exemption from the state environmental law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and oppose titles 16 and 22,” Martinez said.

She added:

“They awarded and recognized the life-long social fights and environmental victories of the prominent L.A. pastor Monsignor John Morreta among marginalized communities — yet disregarded his written plea in opposition to the ordinances.

“They ignored Fiber First LA’s written request to make real meaningful changes on titles 16 and 22.”

The ordinances could result in thousands of wireless transmitters popping up across unincorporated areas of L.A. County in the next few years, Public News Service reported.

Verizon pushed fraudulent petition of support, grassroots organization says

Fiber First LA accused the telecom industry of trying to manipulate public perception on the issue.

In an urgent memo, Fiber First LA told board members Verizon submitted through the public comment portal a petition allegedly signed by more than 1,000 L.A. County residents asking board members to approve proposed changes to titles 16 and 22 — but that many of the signatures were fraudulent.

“Members of the executive committee of Fiber First LA are currently examining the list of names of purported signatories, and we wanted to alert you to our findings to date,” they wrote, adding that the petition was ostensibly generated by a “Verizon-led initiative” called Communities for a Connected Future.

According to Fiber First LA:

“Many of the alleged signers of the petition either (1) deny ever having signed any such petition, (2) are known minors or individuals who are deceased, or (3) do not exist in any public record.

“We have contacted dozens of individuals whose names appear on the petition. So far, not one individual has acknowledged signing the document.

“While we collect evidence of individuals who dispute the use of their names to support Verizon’s effort to adopt the new telecom-friendly code revisions, we ask that you remove the letter from the public record and ignore its fraudulent contents.”

Nonetheless, the board members chose to approve the amendments, allowing for streamlining of wireless rollout and effectively ignoring the evidence of fraudulent manipulation of public opinion by Verizon, Fiber First LA noted.

Recent changes ‘nothing more than window dressing’

The originally scheduled Dec. 6, 2022, vote was delayed because the board said “unanswered questions” remained that couldn’t be addressed in time to meet the deadline for public comments.

L.A. County staff recommended some last-minute changes to the proposed amendments that likely facilitated their passing on Tuesday, McCollough told The Defender.

“The actual wording is not yet available, but based on two supervisors’ descriptions, they appear topical and will not materially solve any of the significant policy and legal issues we raised,” McCollough said.

Fiber First LA also emphasized that the last-minute changes did not “meaningfully address the concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors or those we have brought to the board’s attention.”

In a letter to the board, Susan Foster — co-founder of the nonprofit California Fires & Firefighters and a member of Fiber First LA who attended Tuesday’s meeting — said that the proposed changes were “nothing more than window dressing.”

Foster, who spoke during the public comment section at Tuesday’s meeting, said that the proposed changes “look inviting but are completely meaningless and deceptive.”

Federal lawsuit by United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians paves way for next wireless legal battle

In their letter to the board, the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians (UKB) reminded the supervisors that they successfully sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2019, after the FCC gave a National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) categorical exemption to small-cell tower projects based on the proposition that the projects were “inherently unlikely to trigger environmental and historic preservation concerns.”

Using similar logic to that of the FCC, L.A. County staff recommended that wireless-related provisions through amendments to titles 16 and 22 should be exempt from any environmental or historical evaluation based on a purported “categorical exemption.”

Additionally, Fiber First LA warned the board there likely would be “massive and irreversible adverse environmental consequences” if the cell tower projects allowed via the changes to titles 16 and 22 were granted categorical exemption from CEQA.

“It is truly disturbing that CEQA is not considered necessary by the L.A. Board and logic tells you that when installing hundreds or potentially thousands of small cells, there is a footprint that needs to be considered,” First Fiber LA co-chair Jodi Nelson told The Defender.

“Logic also tells you that at least a small percentage of this infrastructure will have environmental impacts, just based on their footprint — not even considering emissions — and that some of this equipment will potentially be sitting on ecologically vulnerable sites,” said Nelson, who accused the county of allowing telecom to “dictate environmental policy.”

The UKB said their 2019 lawsuit victory shows that categorical exemption already has a precedent of not holding up in court.

The UKB pointed out that the 2019 federal ruling stated, “tribes’ views must be taken into account where the agreement has the potential to affect historic properties on tribal lands or historic properties of religious and cultural significance to an Indian tribe.”

The 2019 legal battle came about when FCC officials claimed they could deploy thousands of wireless antennae for 5G capabilities without meeting tribal consultation requirements by arguing the projects were not defined as “undertakings” under the National Historic Preservation Act or “major federal actions” under NEPA.

However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — after hearing oral arguments from the UKB and 20 other joining tribes — ruled that the FCC must uphold tribal consultation requirements for small 5G cell tower deployments.

In August 2021, the District of Columbia Circuit ruled against the FCC and in favor of CHD, and called for the FCC to reevaluate its wireless radiation exposure standards because it had failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology.

In the 2019 UKB case, the court found the FCC’s choice to skirt U.S. environmental and historical preservation law “arbitrary and capricious” because it “did not adequately address the harms of deregulation or justify its portrayal of those harms as negligible.”

Moreover, the court concluded that the FCC “failed to justify its confidence that small cell deployments pose little to no cognizable religious, cultural, or environmental risk, particularly given the vast number of proposed deployments.”

The UKB reminded the board that “Los Angeles County has more Native Americans than any other county in the country,” adding:

“Fire can damage Native American homes, lands, and artifacts that are irreplaceable.”

According to the UKB, the board has a “duty to protect the environment and as you protect the environment, you are protecting the residents of Los Angeles County.”

By allowing the proliferation of wireless towers without due regard, they said, board members “would be failing to take into account location in sensitive areas, the overall environmental, radiation, and energy usage of 5G antennae.”

“And you would be ignoring the fire risks in a state that cannot afford more fires,” they added.

‘They just tossed a match over their shoulders as they stepped down from the dais’

Foster warned the supervisors that L.A. County exempts telecommunications facilities from electrical and fire codes.

“Telecom will still be left to police telecom and you will have another telecom-initiated Malibu Canyon Fire on your hands or another fire from [Southern California Edison’s] own telecom facilities as with the Woolsey Fire in 2018,” she said, noting that the latter fire burned for over a month and caused more than $6 billion in damages.

“Each one of the supervisors made a decision today to turn away from public safety, to turn away from protecting the environment, and in a sense, they just tossed a match over their shoulders as they stepped down from the dais.”

Foster added that some key L.A. County officials have had a long history of being “enmeshed” with the telecom industry — and that the impact of such enmeshment was evident in Tuesday’s vote.

Telecommunications companies sometimes offer city officials financial incentives to make the application and permit process smooth for their projects in potentially profitable cities, she explained.

Foster told The Defender she heard from reliable sources of six-figure signing bonuses when a macro tower is allowed in a profitable city, such as the city of Los Angeles or other coastal cities.

“That really is a ‘bonus’ for doing business with telecom,” she said.

It’s extremely rare, Foster added, that local leaders are “willing to go to the trouble of finding out what’s really happening in communities where cell towers have been put in people’s midst.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.




How the FCC Shields Cellphone Companies from Safety Concerns as 5G Expands

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has responsibility for protecting Americans from potential radiation hazards generated by wireless transmitters and cellphones, has repeatedly sided with the telecom industry in denying the possibility of virtually any human harm. The standards were set in 1996 and have not been updated. In 2018, a massive, nearly-two-decade study by the National Toxicology Program, part of the National Institutes of Health, found “clear evidence” that cellphone radiation caused cancer in lab animals. Nonetheless, federal law and FCC rules are so aligned with the industry that state and local governments are essentially barred from taking action to block cell towers to protect the health of their citizens, even as companies may sue any government that tries to take such an action.

5G operations require an estimated 800,000 new base stations, including both towers and densely spaced “small cell” transmitters mounted on rooftops and street poles. The current number of transmitters will be nearly tripled, and many of them will be placed close to houses and apartments.

The health complaints started rolling in within weeks of the activation of a new cellphone tower in August 2020 in Pittsfield, an old factory town in Massachusetts’ Berkshire Mountains. Seventeen residents reported headaches, dizziness, insomnia or confusion. A few children had to sleep with “vomit buckets” by their beds.

Like many people, Bobbie Orsi had never paid close attention to questions about the health effects of cellphone technology. She mostly viewed it as an issue that had long ago been put to rest. But after becoming the chair of Pittsfield’s Board of Health as the complaints emerged, Orsi, a 66-year-old registered nurse who had spent much of her career in public health, decided to educate herself. She combed through a stack of research studies. She watched webinars. She grilled a dozen scientists and doctors.

Over several months, Orsi went from curious, to concerned, to convinced, first, that radio-frequency emissions from Verizon’s 115-foot 4G tower were to blame for the problems in Pittsfield, and second, that growing evidence of harm from cellphones — everything from effects on fertility and fetal development to associations with cancer — has been downplayed in the United States.

Orsi and the Pittsfield board decided to try to do something about Verizon’s tower. They quickly discovered that they would get no help from federal regulators. The Federal Communications Commission, which has responsibility for protecting Americans from potential radiation hazards generated by wireless transmitters and cellphones, has repeatedly sided with the telecom industry in denying the possibility of virtually any human harm.

Worse, from Orsi’s perspective, federal law and FCC rules are so aligned with the industry that state and local governments are barred from taking action to block cell towers to protect the health of their citizens, even as companies are explicitly empowered to sue any government that tries to take such an action. It turned out that Verizon, in such matters, has more legal rights than the people of Pittsfield.

Still, the lawyers for Orsi and her colleagues thought they saw a long-shot legal opening: They would argue that the FCC’s exclusive oversight role applied only to approving cell tower sites, not to health problems triggered after one was built and its transmitters switched on. In April 2022, the Pittsfield Health Board issued an emergency cease-and-desist order directing Verizon to shut down the tower as a “public nuisance” and “cause of sickness” that “renders dwellings unfit for human habitation.” (Several families had abandoned their homes.) The order was the first of its kind in the country. It was, Orsi said, “a gutsy move — maybe naively gutsy.

Read full article here…




Verizon and AT&T to Roll Out 5G on January 19 after FAA Requests Delay

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and carriers Verizon and AT&T have agreed to delay rolling out 5G for two weeks before installing 5G at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Department of Transportation, as the FAA is concerned that interference from 5G will cause disruption in flights. Verizon and AT&T spent a combined $70 billion acquiring C-band spectrum last year to provide a boost to their 5G coverage, launching on January 19. The carriers are set to use frequencies from 3.7 to 3.98GHz, but the aviation industry argued those radio airwaves may interact with instruments like altimeters that use the 4.2 to 4.4GHz ranges. Carriers agreed to lowering tower power levels nationwide with even stricter limits around airports and helipads.

The companies were poised to roll out C-band airwaves, which promise improved speed and coverage for 5G networks.

Verizon and AT&T have agreed to delay the launch of their upgraded 5G networks for two weeks, bowing to pressure from the Federal Aviation Administration, the airline companies and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

The two nationwide carriers were expected to kick off the upgrade of their 5G networks with so-called C-band spectrum on Jan. 5. The radio airwaves, which the carriers spent a combined $70 billion acquiring last year, were poised to provide a big boost to their 5G speed and coverage. Instead, they will hold off after initially telling the FAA they would ignore the request.

“We’ve agreed to a two-week delay which promises the certainty of bringing this nation our game-changing 5G network in January delivered over America’s best and most reliable network,” Verizon spokesperson Rich Young said in an e-mailed statement.

“At Secretary Buttigieg’s request, we have voluntarily agreed to one additional two-week delay of our deployment of C-Band 5G services,” AT&T said in an e-mailed statement. “We also remain committed to the six-month protection zone mitigations we outlined in our letter. We know aviation safety and 5G can co-exist and we are confident further collaboration and technical assessment will allay any issues.”

Read full article here…




Scientific Study Concludes that 5G Wireless Radiation Exacerbated COVID-19

A research paper published by the National Institute of Health in October 2021 studied peer-reviewed scientific literature on the detrimental bioeffects of wireless communications radiation (WCR), including 5G, which may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic as a toxic environmental co-factor. The study presented evidence that WCR/ 5G may cause changes in red blood cells (erythrocytes), reduced erythrocyte levels exacerbating hypoxia/deprivation of oxygen to the brain, amplified immunosuppression, increased cellular oxidative stress resulting in vascular injury and organ damage, promoted inflammation, and worsened heart disorders.

COVID-19 began in Wuhan, China in December 2019, shortly after city-wide 5G had “gone live,” and became an operational system, on October 31, 2019. COVID-19 outbreaks soon followed in other areas where 5G had also been at least partially implemented, including South Korea, Northern Italy, New York City, Seattle, and Southern California. During the first pandemic wave in the United States, COVID-19 attributed cases and deaths were statistically higher in states and major cities with 5G infrastructure as compared with states and cities that did not yet have this technology.

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/M4elsPHKHBCi/

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) public health policy has focused on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and its effects on human health while environmental factors have been largely ignored. In considering the epidemiological triad (agent-host-environment) applicable to all disease, we investigated a possible environmental factor in the COVID-19 pandemic: ambient radiofrequency radiation from wireless communication systems including microwaves and millimeter waves. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, surfaced in Wuhan, China shortly after the implementation of city-wide (fifth generation [5G] of wireless communications radiation [WCR]), and rapidly spread globally, initially demonstrating a statistical correlation to international communities with recently established 5G networks. In this study, we examined the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the detrimental bioeffects of WCR and identified several mechanisms by which WCR may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic as a toxic environmental cofactor. By crossing boundaries between the disciplines of biophysics and pathophysiology, we present evidence that WCR may: (1) cause morphologic changes in erythrocytes including echinocyte and rouleaux formation that can contribute to hypercoagulation; (2) impair microcirculation and reduce erythrocyte and hemoglobin levels exacerbating hypoxia; (3) amplify immune system dysfunction, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity, and hyperinflammation; (4) increase cellular oxidative stress and the production of free radicals resulting in vascular injury and organ damage; (5) increase intracellular Ca2+ essential for viral entry, replication, and release, in addition to promoting pro-inflammatory pathways; and (6) worsen heart arrhythmias and cardiac disorders.

Link to study:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/M4elsPHKHBCi/




Watch Out for the Internet of Body (IoB): How Implantable Devices Can Connect Your Body to the Internet


The RAND Corporation, the think tank behind some of the world’s most influential and frightening ideas, has released a report titled The Internet of Bodies: Opportunities, Risks, and Governance. RAND defines the Internet of Bodies (IoB) as a growing industry of devices that monitor the human body, collect health and other personal information, and transmit that data over the Internet. Big Tech is moving from wearable devices to devices embedded within our bodies. Examples include brain reading and writing devices, body-implanted sensors, implantable microchips, mental and emotional sensors, artificial pancreas, and Bluetooth-connected diapers. The technology will be powered by a combination of 5G, next-generation Wi-Fi, and satellite Internet. Nanobiotechnology is being used to manipulate cells and interconnect human bodies to the Internet. IoB will likely be marketed as improving lives and health care. However, the negative consequences, as discussed in this article, far outweigh the benefits. -GEG

The age of the Internet of Things (IoT), and soon to follow the Internet of Bodies (IoB), is now upon us.

The RAND Corporation, the think tank behind some of the world’s most influential and frightening ideas and technologies, has released a report titled The Internet of Bodies: Opportunities, Risks, and Governance.

You should be wary of any reports issued by the RAND Corporation. Alex Abella, author of Soldiers of Reason: The RAND Corporation and the Rise of American Empire, explains why:

RAND was, and is, the essential establishment organization. Throughout its history, RAND has been at the heart of that interweaving of Pentagon concupiscence and financial rapacity that President Eisenhower aimed to call the military-industrial-legislative complex. RAND has literally reshaped the modern world—and very few know it.

With this understanding, there is much cause for alarm with the issuance of this new report.

Read full article here…




The Big Island of Hawaii Calls for a Halt to 5G


The Hawaii County Council, which represents the entire Big Island of Hawaii and over 200,000 residents, overwhelmingly passed a resolution in July 2020 calling for wireless companies to halt 5G deployments, citing health and environmental risks. The council voted 8-1 to approve a resolution calling for “telecommunication companies and public utilities operating in Hawaii County” to halt any 5G development until independent research and testing concludes it is safe for humans.

The Hawaii County Council, which represents the entire Big Island of Hawaii and over 200,000 residents, overwhelmingly passed a resolution last Wednesday calling for wireless companies to halt 5G deployments citing health and environmental risks.

After hearing hours of public testimony decrying the supposed health risks of the new cellular network technology, the council voted 8-1 to approve a resolution calling for “telecommunication companies and public utilities operating in Hawaii County” to halt any 5G development until independent research and testing concludes it is safe for humans, according to the Hawaii Tribune Herald.

Kohala Councilman Tim Richards voted against the resolution, saying that it didn’t go far enough and that the county should investigate scrapping all cellular infrastructure on the island and invest in a safe fiber optic network instead.

Read full article here…




Connecticut: Small Town Passes Resolution to Stop 5G Roll Out Until Proven Safe

Easton is a small hamlet in Connecticut that has a population of about 7.500 people, but it is stopping the rollout of 5G. The city’s leadership approved a 5G ‘cease and desist resolution’ that bans the build-out of small cell antennas “until such technologies have been proven safe to human health and the environment through independent research and testing.” These Connecticut residents are setting an example for demanding an independent 5G safety study and rejecting consent to involuntary radiation. -GEG

People have been on lockdown for the past 2 months, but one freight train that has not been halted by Covid-19 is the fast and furious installation of 4G/5G small cells across the state, including in residential neighborhoods. However, one small town in Fairfield County, Easton, recently decided to put the brakes on the 5G rollout. On May 7, 2020, the Easton Board of Selectmen unanimously approved a 5G cease and desist resolution “until such technologies have been proven safe to human health and the environment through independent research and testing.”

The resolution cited that the Federal Communications Commission has not updated its Radio Frequency (RF) radiation guidelines since 1996 and lacked long-term safety testing of the new 5G wireless technology, despite being advised to do so by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the U.S. General Accounting Office, and hundreds of medical and scientific experts around the world. RF radiation is classified as a Class 2B carcinogen (possible cancer causing agent) according to the World Health Organization.

The resolution came on the heels of the 5G Informational Forum in Stamford, which was hosted by CT State Representative David Michel. Over 150 people attended the forum including a handful of government officials like State Representative Jonathan Steinberg, Co-Chair of the Public Health Committee of Westport and State Representative Anne Hughes, who proudly serves Easton, CT. The Forum focused on facts and science shared by experts Frank Clegg, former president of Microsoft Canada, Dr. Devra Davis, epidemiologist and founder of Environmental Health Trust, and Doug and Patti Wood from Environmental Grassroots Education.

Connecticut residents are demanding an independent 5G safety study and do not consent to involuntary radiation. Connecticut is ranked #3 for connectivity access to the internet and cell phone coverage, therefore, 5G is not a race that Connecticut needs to win.

Read the resolution.

“© May22, 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.




The Brave New World of Bill Gates and Big Telecom

Powerful state and corporate entities that are financially influenced by Bill Gates, are using the current crisis to remove basic rights, and to intensify pressures to promote vaccines and surveillance. Bill Gates’ ‘Brave New World’ includes investments in video surveillance satellites to cover the globe, 5G and data mining, transhumanism/ merging with computers, surgical implants that reward compliance, birth control implant chips, television and internet communications, a planned smart city near Phoenix, Arizona, geoengineering, and digital currency.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wrote last week about Malibu police’s ticketing Point Dume surfers $1,000 apiece for using the ocean during the quarantine. Was this merely an appalling police judgment at which we will laugh post-quarantine? Or does anyone else feel that this is the first wave of compliance and obedience training for something more permanent? Are powerful state and corporate entities using the current crisis to remove basic rights, and intensify pressures to promote vaccines and surveillance? Does anyone else feel the suffocating darkness of tyranny descending on our nation? And finally, does anyone share my dread that Bill Gates—and his long-time associate Tony Fauci—will somehow be running our Brave New World?

Imagine a world where the government doesn’t need police officers to apprehend those surfers or ticket you when you violate social distancing with your girlfriend. Suppose that computers discover your beach trip by tracking your movements using a stream of information from your cell phone, your car, your GPS, facial recognition technology integrated with real-time surveillance from satellites, mounted cameras, and implanted chips. Desk-bound prosecutors or robots will notify you of your violation by text while simultaneously withdrawing your $1,000 penalty in cryptocurrency from your payroll account. Welcome to Bill Gates’ America. It’s right around the corner.

5G Strategies

Recently, Bill Gates announced his financial support for a $1 billion plan to blanket Earth in video surveillance satellites.  The company, EarthNow, will launch 500 satellites to live-stream monitor almost every “corner” of the Earth, providing instantaneous video feedback with only a one-second delay. According to Wikipedia, the company expects its customers to include “governments and large enterprises.” 5G Antennas­­­ deploying a vast array of ground-based 5G spy antennas. Through his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates purchased 5.3 million Crown Castle shares currently worth a billion dollars. The Foundation’s second-largest tech holding after Microsoft, Crown Castle owns 5G infrastructure in every major U.S. market. It operates and leases more than 40,000 cell towers, 65,000 small cell nodes which are the central infrastructure for 5G and 75,000 route miles of fiber to every major U.S. market that, instead of going to your home, providing you safe, fast, wired internet, has been confiscated to connect 5G cell towers.

Data Mining

Big Telecom, Big Data, and Bill Gates are baiting Americans into a digital tyranny-trap with million-dollar TV ads that pretend that their multi trillion-dollar  5G investment is about faster download speeds for video games and movies. But 5G has almost nothing to do with improving your lives; it’s all about controlling your life, marketing products, and harvesting your data for Artificial Intelligence purposes. The 21st century’s “black gold” is data. 5G is the infrastructure for Gates’ “Internet of Things”—a world where tens of billions of “smart” devices: cell phones, computers, automobiles, garage door openers, Apple watches, baby diapers and even our living bodies—are wirelessly interconnected to enable Big Data to gather and sell our personal information.

Gates, Elon Musk, Amazon, Facebook, and Telecom are launching the flagships for the new Gold Rush, a teeming fleet of 50,000 satellites and a network of 2,000,000 ground antennas and cell towers to strip mine data from our smart devices. This microwave radiation-emitting spider web will allow Big Data/Big Telecom and Big Brother to capture what happens inside and outside every person at every moment of life. Gates will harvest, control, sort, characterize, analyze, and sell millions of terabytes of personal information from smart devices—private health data, medical records, our shopping habits, our biometric and behavioral responses to advertising, our children’s ability to learn, our facial expressions, and conversations overheard by Siri, Alexa, and your open cell phone’s microphones. His and other corporations will use these analytics to develop Artificial Intelligence (AI) and turn you into a predictable, easily-manipulated consuming machine.

Next time you buy a “smart” device, remember the device is not the product—you are.

Surveillance State & Transhumanism

Corporations will use Gates’ 5G surveillance system to sell products and escalate AI capacity. Governments will use it to transition the globe to a totalitarian singularity more despotic than Orwell ever imagined. Silicon Valley titans like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Google’s Chief Engineer Ray Kurzweil talk longingly of “transhumanism,” the process by which humanity will transition to become part-human, part-machine via genetic engineering and surgical implants.

Bill Gates is investing heavily to accelerate this altered reality. His ambition to tag us all with injected subdermal vaccine data chips seems to be merely a steppingstone toward an all-encompassing surveillance state.

Rewarding Compliance

Microsoft has patented a sinister technology that utilizes implanted sensors to monitor body and brain activity. It will reward compliant humans with crypto currency payments when they perform assigned activities.

The Patent, WO |2020| 060606 has gained notoriety and the nickname “World Order 2020 666.” Microsoft describes this device as a “Crypto Currency System” and explains that it is “capable of” using body activity data to mine bitcoin in response to compliance with assigned tasks.

People who agree to install the Microsoft harmful wireless sensors will receive periodic “duty” smart phone instructions to watch a certain advertisement, listen to a specific song, walk down a specific grocery store aisle, or to take a certain vaccine. This chip will collect data from embedded sensors that monitor brain waves, blood flow, and other body reactions. The system will transfer cryptocurrency into the subject’s account after completion of the assigned task. On the bright side, Microsoft’s dystopian invention should be a welcome source of income for the 40% of Americans put out of work by periodic COVID quarantines, by Musk’s self-driving electronic cars, which also rely on the 5G rollout, and by Artificial Intelligence, including robots. Will Gates sell the data we freely give him to companies that will take away our jobs?

Owning Smart Cities

Maintaining and analyzing the data collected by a 5G infrastructure require massive computers housed in major data storage complexes. To keep control of this infrastructure, Bill Gates is building his own “smart city” in Arizona. According to KPNX-TV, he spent $80 million on a 24,800-acre plot near Phoenix with the goal of turning it into a “smart city” where everything is interconnected via a wireless grid, including fleets of autonomous vehicles. The 80,000 residents of Gates’ company town will mainly work in data centers.

To consolidate his control over what people hear, learn, and think, Gates bought shares in Liberty Global, one of the largest international television and Internet companies, operating in 30 countries and growing.

Controlling Reproduction

Gates will even control your body, your bedroom, your medicine cabinet and even women’s menstrual and ovulation cycles. He invested approximately $18 million in MicroCHIPS, a company that among other chip-based devices, develops birth-control implant chips with wireless on/off switches and chips for drug-delivery that allow a single implant to store and precisely deliver hundreds of therapeutic doses over months or years. The implants will be operated wirelessly by the patient to deliver medication. Knowing of Gates’ missionary zeal for population control, however, some customers might worry that the system could be remotely activated as well.

Controlling Climate: Geoengineering

Gates’ apparent conviction that God has ordained him to use technology for humanity’s salvation is exemplified in one of his most ambitious projects. Gates is funding Harvard scientists to use Geoengineering to block the sun to reverse global warming and climate change.

That project is a template for both hubris, hypocrisy and risk. The massive expansion of wireless use and the 5G wireless grid—for which Gates is a major player—is the most significant contributor to increased energy consumption. The expansion of the wireless cloud between 2012–2015 was equivalent to adding 4.9 million cars to the roads. 5G is expected to exponentially increase energy use by upwards of 170% by 2026. Proposing to use the wireless “smart” grid to combat the carbon footprint with geotechnology is a hare-brained scheme—not a solution for climate change.

Cashless Society

To consolidate global control, Gates has declared war on cash, and the COVID-19 lockdowns have provided governments a convenient pretext for scuttling cash as a health hazard. Gates and his foundation are spearheading the global shift from a cash economy towards digital transactions. Gates and Microsoft are perfectly positioned to profit from a digital payments system. By controlling digital transactions (and removing cash), Gates can control and monitor everything commercial that a country and its citizens do.

Western financial institutions—Mastercard, PayPal, Visa, eBay, and Citi—have long pushed for a cashless world. Electronic banking allows banks and financial consortiums to levy fees on every transaction.

The Digital Economy will allow the Government to monitor and scrutinize every transaction, to freeze digital accounts, and to block “financial flows” to punish disobedience. Operating in a public-private partnership with government, tech billionaires will not only control the nation but will be able to micromanage the worldwide population. Digitized currency is the ultimate instrument of social control. After all, in a cashless society, survival is impossible without access to the digitized economic system. The poor—lacking bank accounts—will suffer disproportionately.

Trillionaire Borg

While the lockdown is a cataclysm for the world economy, it is an opportunity for Gates. By purchasing our devalued assets at a penny on the dollar, Gates’ $100 billion might make him the world’s first trillionaire. But the quarantine is also an opportunity to enlarge his power and domination. Under Gates’ leadership, Microsoft became known as “The Borg” because of his appetite for total market control. Now, Gates seeks to bring all humanity under his boot. His worship of technology and his megalomania threaten our freedoms, our democracy, our biology, our planet, our humanity, and our souls.

The microwave radiation used for wireless surveillance of the world is not biologically tolerable, especially for developing children. Thousands of peer-reviewed, published studies abundantly document wireless technology’s profound, adverse, physical effects on humans, animals and plants. Sickness and environmental degradation from wireless technology is already widespread. Big Telecom control of U.S. and global regulatory agencies and media and Gates’ financial control of the World Health Organization have allowed a few billionaires to propagate the patent lie that wireless is safe.

Gates’ technological dreams are not biologically sustainable. His Tower of Babel is bound to collapse, with catastrophic impact for lesser humans. It’s time to dismantle the Tower before it’s too late.

© May 8, 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.




Catherine Austin Fitts Explains the Politics of COVID-19


Catherine Austin Fitts says there is a connection between what she calls the current plandemic and the fact that we are in the middle of an economic war. America traded the gold standard for pegging the US dollar to oil, but the rest of the world wants to break free from the US dollar. She says the pandemic is being used to stop inflation, which will result from an economic slump. China is planning the Silk Road to capture the center of global power. China is no longer buying US Treasury notes but is using the ones she already holds to buy American businesses, natural resources, and land. Fitts also says Israel and the US co-engineered 5G for crowd-control purposes and that the contest between China and the US over 5G is to determine who will control the backdoor of the technology. She has much more to say about globally prominent personalities, housing bubbles, missing trillions of government money, civil war, global war, and crypto currency. If you are looking for a different perspective on current affairs, this is it. -GEG

https://youtu.be/Gv1ITJr3uZw