1

Defective PCR Tests Are Used to Test Sewage Across the US for Covid Virus

The CDC launched the National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) in September 2020 to track the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that they say causes COVID-19 in fecal sewage samples collected across the country. The CDC claims that wastewater surveillance provides an early warning that COVID-19 is spreading and enables communities to act quickly. Surveillance can be implemented in almost any community as nearly 80% of US households are served by municipal wastewater collection systems. Officials use the notoriously inaccurate PCR test to monitor sewage and identify asymptomatic people who are not even sick. Critics are concerned that demographics and communities may be targeted for lockdowns and other harmful COVID policies. The Washington Post claims that the virus’s genetic material in the sewer water can’t make you sick.

As the United States enters year three of the coronavirus pandemic, disease trackers are trying to stay one step ahead of the constantly evolving virus — by hunting for it in feces.

In Maine, hospitals are on alert for a potential surge of patients, tipped off by consistently rising levels of the coronavirus in wastewater. In Ohio, which has used sewage surveillance to identify new variants, authorities are tracking substantial increases at a dozen of the state’s 71 monitoring sites, including south of Columbus. In Houston, steady increases have not been accompanied by a rise in hospitalizations, the first time in almost two years, suggesting that vaccinations and previous infection may be keeping people out of hospitals.

The secrets of the virus can be found in wastewater because most infected people shed tiny pieces of virus when they use the toilet. So regularly analyzing wastewater from sewage treatment plants allows scientists to measure when those levels are rising or falling — and what variants are present — about four to six days before people start testing positive.

Wastewater surveillance has long been used to contain polio outbreaks, and its potential for helping stanch the coronavirus was recognized at the start of the pandemic. Now, sewage monitoring has gained increasing importance as prevention measures — mask mandates and social distancing, for instance — vanish in much of the country at the same time that the highly transmissible omicron subvariant known as BA.2 fuels a rise in coronavirus cases in some regions, including the Northeast.

With official reporting of cases and testing data becoming less frequent and less reliable, especially as people test at home, officials need other ways to track the virus.

Read full article here…

CDC document:   https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/surveillance/wastewater-surveillance/wastewater-surveillance.html




PCR Tests are the Key to Covid Fraud and False Reporting of ‘Cases’

PCR tests used to diagnose COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely known to be incapable of diagnosing infection. Even Dr. Fauci has admitted the problem of PCR false positives when the machines are dialed up to too many amplification cycles. Even when the tests are not turned up too high, they still don’t work as intended because they are not designed to diagnose illness in the first place. They are lab instruments designed to amplify detection sensitivity of microbes for research analysis only. They definitely are not specific for SARS-CoV-2, because no one even knows for sure what they are looking for. Since the COVID-19 virus has never been isolated or photographed, the virus hunters simply guessed what the DNA segments likely would be like, and that is what they are looking for. Even so, the theoretical fragments happen to be found in many other illnesses including common colds and seasonal flu. Viola! If you catch a cold, the PCR will report that you are COVID-19 positive. PCR false-positive results explain how COVID cases and deaths increase, how vaccinated people can test positive, how a piece of fruit can test positive, how cases can ‘spike’ during lockdowns, how asymptomatic people can be diagnosed with COVID, and why COVID ‘kills’ people who really die from something else. -GEG

The PCR tests don’t work to diagnose active infection with covid19.

We all keep saying that don’t we, but we don’t seem able to grasp what it means, because even though we know PCR tests don’t work to diagnose infection we keep accepting all the statistics that are produced as a result of assuming PCR tests diagnose infection.

We say – “0h wow, covid numbers rising despite the lockdown”. Or “massive spike in people getting covid in THIS care home despite precautions”. Or “look the ‘vax’ doesn’t work because people who get it still catch covid”.

No. Wrong. They’re not “covid numbers”, they’re positive-test numbers. It’s not a spike in people ‘getting Covid’ in the care home, it’s a spike of people testing positive. The people who get the vax don’t “still catch covid”, they still test positive.

And the reason why these ‘anomalies’ happen, the reason why vaxxed people can still test positive, etc etc is the same reason a papaya can test positivebecause the PCR tests don’t work.

We know it but keep forgetting it. So let’s say it again.

The PCR tests don’t work.

The PCR tests. Don’t. Work.

We all know the danger of false positives if too many cycles are run. This is admitted even by Fauci.

If you run your tests at 30 cycles or more the results are very likely to be junk and any positives meaningless. And, incredibly, most labs performing these tests have been doing just that – running cycles of 30 or more, even up to 45.

But this well known and important fact hides the even more important fact that even when the tests are done properly they still don’t work – in that they are not designed to do what they are being used for.

They don’t diagnose infection or detect active infection. They aren’t, for the most part, even specific for SARSCOV2. They just look to see if you have some random fragments of RNA in your body that someone has identified as being similar to some types of assumed viral RNA.

Even if the test truly finds this stuff inside you, and isn’t just spewing out nonsense from having its cycle threshold set too high, there is literally nothing to show this bit of junk has anything to do with your runny nose, sore throat, pneumonia or death. It might, but much more likely does not.

They weren’t even designed using real viral RNA from the (alleged) Sars-Cov-2 virus. They used “synthetic RNA” or “contrived sources”, because there were no isolated samples of Sars-Cov-2 available.

The CDC says that the 59 different PCR tests on the market can’t have their performance` compared…because they all used different “contrived samples” for their production.

So, in terms of diagnosis or epidemiology, the information we get is little better than if we took a six-sided die, labeled one side ‘positive’ and five sides ‘negative’ and started rolling.

Looked at like that, the mystery of post-vaccine “breakthrough infections” or “repeat infections” or “lockdown spikes” etc is not so mysterious is it? Turns out there’s one simple answer to all of them.

Why can you test positive and then negative and then positive again on the same day?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why do ‘breakthrough cases’ turn up?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why do ‘spikes’ sometimes happen during lockdowns?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why can you ‘catch covid’ more than once?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why can you ‘have covid’ without symptoms?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why does covid only ‘kill’ people already dying of something else?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why can you test positive after getting vaxxed?

Because the tests don’t work.

Why can a piece of fruit have covid?

Because the tests DON’T WORK.

Why does all-cause mortality not show any sign of a real pandemic?

Because theres isn’t one, because the killer bug is an illusion created by tests – that don’t work.

Absorb this fact. Internalize it. Stop talking about ‘cases’, stop buying the fundamental lie which sells all the other lies.

The pandemic is as real as the tests. And the tests don’t work.

The powers that be have even basically admitted it. Over and over again.

Why did the WHO start warning about false positives and high CT values after the vaccines were “approved”?

Because they know the tests don’t work.

Why is the CDC testing vaccinated people at lower CT values than unvaccinated people?

Because they know the tests don’t work.

Read full article here…




India’s Covid ‘Cases’ Explode Using Flawed PCR Tests and Diagnoses Policies Popularized in Europe and the US

Citizens are reporting that media accounts of people dying in the streets from COVID-19 are staged and that there is a heavy lockdown in Mumbai, with shops open only from 7 am to 11 am. Most reports coming from India follow the story line that the virus is is killing alarming numbers, that hospitals are overwhelmed, but that the situation will get better when everyone is vaccinated. This is the same scenario popularized in Europe and the US. In Mumbai, at least 45,000 people off the streets are being tested per day. The totally useless PCR test is the standard for diagnosing ‘cases’ of COVID-19. 96% of those diagnosed in Bangalore were without symptoms. Anyone who dies after receiving a false-positive PCR test, no matter what the cause, is classified as a death from COVID-19. The mortality death rate is similar to the flu. The government is paying influencers to promote the vaccines, especially among the youth. It’s the same scenario, over and over. Perhaps the most interesting factor here is that the upward statistics of death are perfectly paired to the number of people taking the COVID vaccines. In other words, there is a possibility that the deaths are caused, not by COVID but by the vaccines. -GEG




World Health Organization Warns of ‘False Positives’ in PCR Tests for Covid-19, Says Some Patients May Not Be ‘Truly Infected’

The World Health Organization released a statement on December 14, 2020 that finally owned up to the “Problem” of flawed PCR tests amid a flurry of lawsuits exposing the incompetence of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not meant to diagnose disease. WHO admitted that the PCR test is arbitrary because “…many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.” Since it is well known that the PCR test is, in fact, being used as the primary diagnostic tool, WHO apparently was compelled to remove this message from the Internet.

A month later, WHO issued a medical product alert on January 20 that stated “Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis,” which means the PCR test is not itself a diagnostic tool, but merely an aid in diagnosis. WHO recommends that “health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.” In other words, the PCR test alone is not adequate, and that other factors, including who you have been near, must be considered to determine whether someone is “truly infected”.

The World Health Organization is warning that widely deployed technology used to test for COVID-19 may, if interpreted incorrectly, lead at least some patients to believe they have the virus when in fact they are not “truly infected.”

In a “medical product alert” issued last week, the WHO said that anyone “interpreting results for [COVID-19] specimens tested using [polymerase chain reaction] methodology” should be aware that “careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed.”

The WHO’s alert specifically addresses a controversial aspect of COVID-19 PCR tests: the “cycle threshold,” or the number of amplification cycles the test must undergo before detecting a COVID-19 specimen.

If a test must go through a high number of cycles before detecting the COVID virus, it potentially indicates that the original viral specimen was weak and the patient from whom it came may not be infectious or even “truly infected,” as the WHO put it in its announcement.

Read full article here…

WHO advisory dated January 20, 2021:  https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

Additional source:  https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/




World Health Organization (WHO) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives

The World Health Organization released a ‘guidance memo’ on December 14th, warning that high-cycle thresholds on PCR tests result in false positives. WHO advised that healthcare providers should consider testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms and confirmed status of contacts. The author of the article expresses concern that the reason the CDC is admitting the high rate of positive PCR test results is that, when the tests can be done properly, thereby decreasing the number of Covid ‘cases’, the lower case number can be attributed to successful vaccination of the masses, making the vaccine appear to be effective. -GEG

The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.

While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?

The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.

This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.

To quote their own words [our emphasis]:

Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.

They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:

The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.

Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.

Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:

with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”

And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:

If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”

Read full article here…




Portuguese Appeals Court Deems PCR Tests to Diagnose Covid-19 Are Unreliable


On November 11, 2020, a Portuguese appeal court ruled it was unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. The court stated that the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present and concluded that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that the individual is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The case was brought to court after four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, only one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test, and the other three were deemed to have been at high risk for exposure, which required all four of them to go into isolation.

On November 11, 2020, a Portuguese appeal court ruled it was unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.

This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority.  Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.

Read full article here…




PCR Tests Show Positive Because They Respond to Genetic Material Present in All Humans


New evidence shows that the controversial PCR test that tests for genetic material instead of the virus itself, is testing for a genetic sequence that is naturally found in humans. The sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. The primer sequences are the items that are amplified by the PCR process in order to designate a “positive” test result. The exact same 18-character sequence, in the same order, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8! Chromosome 8 governs our intelligence and our immune system, especially resistance to cancer. This, alone, explains why there are so many false positive results.

Dr. Kaufman says no one has ever purified the virus, therefore, it cannot be proven that it is a new, never-been-seen before virus that is causing illness. He estimates a 100% error rate in this test. He says the media switched reporting from the number of deaths to the number of cases so lockdowns, masks, and other tyrannical polices may remain in place. So-called cases are easily supported by fraudulent tests. These tests are combined with counting people who test positive for COVID-19 when they die and adding them to those who die from COVID-19, no matter what the real cause of death may be. In this way, the mortality rate is totally fictional. Dr. Kaufman says there are zero cases of anyone becoming ill when exposed to asymptomatic people. He says the HIV antibody test is very similar to the COVID-19 antibody test and there are 60 health conditions that will create a false positive test result for HIV. -GEG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv8i5YPWDEw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFH6IyRplH0

WHO Primer

This was important enough that I wanted to get it out immediately. My research into the NCBI database for nucleotide sequences has lead to a stunning discovery. One of the WHO primer sequences in the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 is found in all human DNA!

The sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. The primer sequences are what get amplified by the PCR process in order to be detected and designated a “positive” test result. It just so happens this exact same 18-character sequence, verbatim, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8! As far as I can tell, this means that the WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans. Can anyone explain this otherwise?

I really cannot overstate the significance of this finding. At minimum, it should have a notable impact on test results.

Read full article here…




Bulgarian Pathology Association Says COVID-19 PCR Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless



The Bulgarian Pathology Association published a paper concluding that PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2, yet these are the tests used to determine case numbers and death statistics to justify lockdowns, masks, social distancing, contact tracing, and more. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, said PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection. Furthermore, researchers have failed to prove that the virus is even a novel virus, meaning it could be any one or a group of virusus that have been harmlessly circulating for decades. [The significance of this is that the government mandate to” test-test-test” has only one purpose, and it is not to detect COVID-19. It is to produce statistics for a bogus second wave.] -GEG

Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”

But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.

UNFOUNDED “TEST, TEST, TEST,…” MANTRA

At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said:

We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”

The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.

Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:

Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”

This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.

But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”

So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.

Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.

The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.

How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

LACK OF A VALID GOLD STANDARD

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.

As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

Read full article here…




Oxford University Says PCR Swab Tests for COVID-19 Return False Positive Results

New research from the University of Oxford’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England found that the swab-based technique used for most COVID-19 testing is at risk of returning “false positives” since copies of the virus’s RNA detected by the tests might simply be dead, inactive material from a weeks-old infection. They say that patients infected with COVID-19 are typically only infectious for a week or less, tests can be triggered by virus genetic material left over from a weeks-old infection. Professor Heneghan warned of “the dangers of isolating non-infectious people or whole communities” based on the flaws PCR tests.

Governments and health officials, aided by the media, have been hyping the increased  number of “cases” of COVID-19, due to increased and invalid tests, in the interest of expanding their power. The number of deaths attributed to COVID-19, however, has not risen.

In the past, our reports raising questions about the accuracy of COVID-19 tests have been met with accusations of ‘fearmongering’ and spreading ‘misinformation’.

But not today.

That’s because new research from the University of Oxford’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England has found that the swab-based technique used for most COVID-19 testing is at risk of returning “false positives” since copies of the virus’s RNA detected by the tests might simply be dead, inactive material from a weeks-old infection. Although patients infected with COVID-19 are typically only infectious for a week or less, tests can be triggered by virus genetic material left over from a weeks-old infection.

The team’s research involved analyzing 25 studies on the widely used polymerase chain reaction test. PCR tests use material collected with a swab – the most common type of test around the world, and especially in the US – then utilize a “genetic photocopying” technique that allows scientists to magnify the small sample of genetic material collected, which they can then analyze for signs of viral RNA.

What the researchers here have effectively found is that these PCR tests just aren’t sensitive enough to distinguish if the viral material is active and infectious, or dead and inert.

For those who desire a more comprehensive understanding of how these tests work, the chart below can be helpful.

Read full article here…




Johns Hopkins U Confirms You Can Be Vaccinated with a PCR Swab Test Without Knowing

Journalist John O’Sullivan warned that the massive PCR testing campaign could be a WHO vaccination program in disguise. He was referring to a new technology developed at Johns Hopkins University that developed tiny, star-shaped micro-devices called ‘Theragrippers’ that attach to the intestinal mucosa and can deliver drugs into the body. The devices are made of metal and a thin film that changes shape and are as small as a dust particle. According to Johns Hopkins University, Theragrippers are administered with a cotton swab, similar to PCR tests. In October 2020, a Johns Hopkins University research team published positive results from an animal study confirming that the new technology works flawlessly.

In January 2019, the WHO defined the growing number of vaccination critics as one of the top ten threats to global health, and since the unprecedented Corona vaccination fiasco, the number of vaccination refusers has truly multiplied.

Meanwhile, resistance is forming even within the orthodox medical establishment. But the masterminds of the WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination coverage rate of at least 70 percent.

In this article, Jan Walter describes, with extensive source citations, which techniques are possible to still vaccinate the population, when people are becoming increasingly critical of vaccinations. This is only fueled by the continuing pressure for mass “vaccination” against a non-lethal disease for 99.8% of people, with a new type of “vaccine” that is actually gene therapy by means of mRNA. It seems like science fiction and is chilling, but the metohodes and techniques are available. There question is how far do we let it get?

Vaccinations increasingly scrutinized and the chilling alternative

In January 2019, WHO [1] defined the growing number of vaccine critics as one of the ten greatest threats to global health, and since the unprecedented corona vaccination fiasco [2], the number of vaccine refusers has really multiplied. Meanwhile, resistance is emerging even within the conventional medical community. But the masterminds at WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination rate of at least 70 percent.

Now several experts and former mainstream journalists like John O’Sullivan are warning that the massive PCR testing campaign could be a WHO vaccination program in disguise. (see Principia Scientific) [3] O’Sullivan is referring to a new technology developed at Johns Hopkins University that is supposed to make it possible to carry out covert vaccinations through a PCR test. (See Johns Hopkins Universitiy) [4]

Inspired by a parasitic worm that digs its sharp teeth into the intestines of its host, Johns Hopkins researchers have developed tiny, star-shaped micro-devices that attach to the intestinal mucosa and can deliver drugs into the body.

These tiny devices, known as “Theragrippers,” are made of metal and a thin film that changes shape. They are covered with heat-sensitive kerosene wax and each no larger than a dust particle.

When the kerosene coating on the Theragripper reaches body temperature, the devices close autonomously and clamp onto the wall of the colon. Because of the sealing action, the tiny, six-pointed devices burrow into the mucosa and attach to the colon, where they are held and gradually release their drug load to the body. Eventually, the Theragripper lose their grip on the tissue and are removed from the colon through normal gastrointestinal muscle function.

Note: According to Johns Hopkins University, Theragrippers are actually administered with a cotton swab. (see Figure 2)

Read full article here…




Bombshell: CDC Drops Post-Isolation PCR Test Because They Can ‘Remain Positive Up To 12 Weeks’

The Biden administration is now dropping PCR tests from its Covid end-of-isolation guidelines because they can stay positive for up to 12 weeks. Antigen tests do not indicate if a person can transmit a pathogen and are not recommended at the end of quarantine either. People who test positive for Covid-19, yet have no symptoms, can leave isolation after five days instead of ten. The CDC also admits that PCR tests cannot differentiate between Covid and the flu. The FDA has had two years to assess quarantines, but kept people home for extra days over false positive results. The flawed PCR tests have been used the tests to destroy the economy.

 

And here it is.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky on Wednesday said the agency’s updated Covid guidance was based on [as much tyranny] as people would tolerate.

The CDC suddenly updated its Covid guidelines and took into consideration the economic impact that long quarantine times and forced isolation has on society.

A quick recap of the CDC’s sudden shift in the last 48 hours after Biden said “there is no federal solution to Covid”:

TRENDING: PART 4: – It Was a Set-Up: As Soon as Jan 6 Committee Obtained Deep State Operative Don Berlin’s Bogus Election Dossier Claims, They Were Leaked to the Mainstream Media to Claim ‘Trump Insurrection’

  • The CDC was wrong about Omicron and they suddenly shifted their guidelines on quarantine times in just a matter of 24 hours.
  • The CDC on Monday recommended shorter Covid isolation and quarantine time for all Americans.
  • The CDC made the decision to cut isolation time from 10 to 5 days in an effort to help Joe Biden and make sure there isn’t a total collapse of society under his watch.
  • The CDC withdrew the use of PCR tests for Covid and finally admitted the test cannot differentiate between Covid and the flu.
  • The CDC also admitted testing at the end of isolation is no longer needed because the PCR and antigen tests are faulty.

CDC Director Walensky on Wednesday said the decision to update Covid guidelines was in part due to making sure society doesn’t collapse.

Then she said this…

“It really had a lot to do with what we thought people would be able to tolerate,” Walensky said.

Read full article here…

Read full article here…

ZeroHedge:   https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/bombshell-admission-cdc-drops-post-isolation-pcr-test-because-they-can-remain-positive-12

 




CDC Plans to Authorize Updated PCR Test. Will It Be Any Better than the Old One?

Investigative journalist and author Jon Rappoport, after analyzing the CDC report “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing”, said their request to withdraw the Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR diagnostic test is not a sign that the CDC and the FDA have giving up on PCR testing but, instead, are preparing for an upgrade. The CDC’s document admits it did not have a SARS-CoV-2 virus when it concocted the PCR test. They created a theoretical fabrication of it by using “contrived specimens” generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources. The CDC granted emergency authorizations to 59 different PCR tests, based on 59 varieties of “contrived specimens”, in which no two were alike. The tests, of course, were useless. The CDC and FDA now are claiming they finally do have virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; that they now know what to look for, and that labs should start gearing up for new and improved PCR tests. They have yet to present the isolated virus to back their claims -GEG

The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.

The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” [1] It begins explosively:

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.

They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.

In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” [2] [2a] Here is a killer quote:

“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.

Read full article here…