Link for video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BrVlJTsYZ6x4/
Dr. Ryan Cole, who has been a pathologist for 26 years, identified the rubbery fibrous structures or clots that embalmers have been finding in deceased after the rollout of Covid injections as congealed protein, an amyloid-like material. he said the spike protein can induce inflammation in blood vessels that can cause blood clots. The spike protein, covered by a lipid nano-layer, was designed to cross the blood-brain barrier.
Dr. Cole examined the Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Pfizer ingredients. He found a microscopic glass shard and said that there are problems with contamination from debris in the ‘vaccines’. According to Johnson & Johnson’s application to the FDA, their product contains trace human DNA and human proteins from aborted fetal tissue. Proteins from other people trigger a immune response in the injected person.
Dr. Cole said the microscopic rod and circuit-like structures others have identified as graphene oxide are actually cholesterol crystals, stacked-layered cholesterol, salt flakes and sugar crystals. He said that there are metallic and mineral contaminants in COVID shots. He affirmed that the injections do contain polyethylene glycol (“PEG”), which can trigger allergies. He said that the samples that looked like parasites were simply part of a leaf that was a contaminant from the environment. Dr. Cole said that COVID shots that were not properly frozen and preserved lost their potency. Some of the samples had broken RNA that produce shortened proteins, which are known carcinogens.
Lipid nanopartical and a gene sequence that makes vaccine recipients make foreign proteins are the cause of harm in vaccinated people. The lipid nanopartical is hyper-inflammatory and can be toxic to cells. Lipid nanopartical injections were designed to only be given once. There may be a cumulative toxicity. He said that the more the gene that triggers production of the spike protein is injected into a person’s body, the more spike protein is produced, which has numerous side effects including blood clotting, potential increase in cancer, and more.
I am a biologist & I have to disagree. Dr Cole did not use sterile techniques, nor is he using an electron microscope which would be necessary to find nanoparticles….NOTE that these vials may contain many different ’embodiments’ (according to the patents!). It is possible that Drs Madej, Ardis, Ruby, Merritt, and dozens of others are all correct as well as the RIP losses we’ve had (Noack, Zelenko, among them). There are so many different variations in the adverse effects, as well as the death patterns…the ingredients are NOT quality controlled either! Brooke Jackson, Satya Latypova, Ana Mihalcea, Jessica Rose,… Read more »
Sandy, thank you for spelling particle correctly (i.e., “nanoparticles” in your above comment).
Yes. Immaculate spelling is critical during these trying times.
Yes, plus they have been using this technique for years.
He is either compromised or cannot get his head around such a thing or just plain stupid.
Most likely they tried all sorts of stuff to see what needs fine tuning etc. for the next one.
Right. Only scientists in line with the New World Order agenda are qualified to speak.
What we need is legislation with enough bite to ensure that no one else gets to speak on issues like these who doesn’t have a either have his jab papers or a Kosher Seal of Approval.
Sorry to disagree, but I think that the research others have done, in combination with statistical evidence and other circumstantial evidence , not to mention all the instances where people have keeled over dead for no apparent reason, in combination with the comments of people like Dr Robert Malone and Kerry Mullis , is more than sufficient to tag these ghouls have have profited immensely from the economic and moral destruction of the US and other countries as GLOBALISTS. Anyone who fails to see the way this PLANNEDemic dovetails so neatly into the quest for world domination needs to do… Read more »
Sure and what branch of big pharma pays you to post your thoughts online? Focus on why a gene therapy was needed for a flu with IFR 0.03%, in healthy populations? Or how about why the definitions of vaccine had to be changed? No healthy person will ever need a series of gene therapy injections for something comparable to rhinovirus.
‘No amount of evidence, will ever persuade an Idiot” ~Mark Twain ~
The lie(s) that men wish to believe will always prevail over the truth(s) that they don’t.
SINE QUA NON
Liberty, Truth, Reason
To that I say a hearty “Amen”.
But there’s a big difference between convincing an idiot and a candid admission of the truth from a congenital liar or someone who stands to profit from lies.
Seems like there is everything in there but the kitchen sink.
This is a deplorable situation. The people who are responsible must be charged
with a crime.
sorry but you guys really dropped the ball on this article. very disappointing. generally this website is my go-to source but, really, Dr Cole is not correct. Graphene is real and is in the jab – the evidences is monumental. the parasite like structures are not leaves. it is really insulting to one’s intelligence.
I bought into Dr. Cole’s explanation when this information was being presented on the Highwire show. Others have cautioned me, however, that you don’t find what you don’t seek, which is true but cuts both ways. If you are seeking something that you have imagined, you will probably find it. If you don’t think that there are any strange contents in the vaxxes you will not look for them. While I greatly respect and trust Dr. Cole, I will suspend judgment until some time has elapsed and more information has been examined. At such a time as this, there is… Read more »
Just go to John O Looney a funeral director in the Uk, don’t listen to most of these so called scientists and doctors, they are probably on the payroll of big pharma?
I also tend to disagree with Dr. Cole’s conclusions on this matter. Many respected scientists have provided evidence of graphene oxide in the COVID shots. Using the scientific method can never really PROVE a hypothesis or theory; you can only find more evidence that your hypothesis/theory is true or false. This is how science is supposed to work. Ideally the different scientists studying this should get together to share and discuss their findings with each other and attempt to resolve any discrepancies. We definitely don’t need a poll telling us something like “57 percent of Republicans believe there’s graphene in… Read more »