Zero Warming in US for 17 Years, According to NOAA Data that Removes Heat Distortions

Rural area, Pixabay
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
There has been no temperature warming for at least 17 years across the United States, according to results from a rarely referenced dataset that is compiled from a select group of 114 stations across the country that have been specifically sited away from urban development to remove heat distortions. The dataset, compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the US, shows oscillating temperature changes, but very little evidence to indicate a warming trend. In fact, the US was cooler in May 2022 compared to May 2005.

Specific mention of NOAA’s urban heatless data – showing the absence of domestic warming for at least 17 years – was missing from its recent 2021 climate report. North America was said to have had its seventh warmest year on record, with nine of the 10 warmest years having occurred since 2001.

Note: This article incorrectly references the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as the “Natural” Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

There has been no temperature warming for at least 17 years across the United States, according to results from a rarely referenced dataset that was designed to remove all urban heat distortions. The dataset, compiled by the Natural Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the U.S., shows oscillating temperature changes, but very little evidence to indicate a warming trend. In fact, the above graph clearly shows the United States to be cooler in May 2022 compared to May 2005.

The information is contained in the latest survey of all NOAA’s weather stations by the U.S. meteorologist Anthony Watts. The data is compiled from a select group of 114 stations across the country that have been specifically sited away from urban development. Called the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), NOAA started it in 2005 and noted that it was aiming for “superior accuracy and continuity in places that land use will not likely impact during the next five decades”. Representative pictures of the weather stations, as seen in this 2013 science paper, show there is no sign of any urban development. In his latest survey of U.S. “Corrupted Climate Stations”, Anthony Watts notes the existence of USCRN, adding: “It is free of localised heat biases by design, but the data it produces is never mentioned in monthly or yearly climate reports published by NOAA for public consumption.”

The USCRN disclosures are the latest evidence suggesting global warming started to run out of steam over 20 years ago. Local temperature measurements by the U.K. Met Office show that the average temperature across the U.K. fell to 9.17oC in the 2010s, compared to 9.31oC in the 2000s. Meanwhile, global datasets run by NOAA, the Met Office and NASA continue to show substantial warming since 2000, helped by regular ‘adjustments’ that mostly warm the recent record and depress earlier readings. As a result, surface global datasets show an increasing disconnect from accurate satellite and meteorological balloon records, both of which point to a lengthy pause from about 1998-2012, and a current one that has lasted almost eight years. The only significant temperature rise during this period occurred around 2016, and was caused by a powerful, and natural, El Nino oscillation.

State-funded weather services around the world have become increasing politicised in recent years, and they offer strong support for the command-and-control Net Zero project. With global warming currently dying on its feet, they have increasingly turned to the promotion of what used to called ‘bad’ weather, but has now been re-branded as ‘extreme’. Datasets that continue to show some warmth are used to proclaim records, and promote the political view that one-off events are caused by man-made climate change, i.e., burning fossil fuel. Having bet the ranch on global warming, any suggestion that the current warming phase, seen countless times in the paleoclimatic record, is pausing, or even stopping, is a major blow to the elite backers of the trillion-dollar Net Zero project. Without warming, the need for Net Zero, and the economic and societal devastation it will cause, disappears.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Taarna
Taarna
4 months ago

They covered themselves from being proved wrong when they changed the term “global warming” to “Climate Change.” How convenient. I knew this whole thing was a scam right from the very beginning.

Edward Bernhart
Edward Bernhart
4 months ago

NOAA = “National” proofread please.

jim
jim
4 months ago

Geoengineering is adding significantly to the climate change hysteria, except they are
still hush hush about geoengineering causing the extreme weather events. As a result, weather risk markets are booming! See artemis.bm – that’s one source for investments in Catastrophe Bonds,Weather Derivatives, Insurance Linked Securities, Reinsurance and Risk Transfer. You can actually change the weather based on your investments. That is pure evil! Thank the U.N. and the U.S. Dept. of Commerce – they are the lords over all National and worldwide weather manipulation operations.

Tom Ball
Tom Ball
4 months ago
Reply to  jim

If Bill Gates openly suggested dumping chalk into the atmosphere in order to reflect heat , and in light of the FACT that the military is KNOWN to spray particulates into the atmosphere , and that “cloud seeding” is a well established practice , isn’t it equally possible that they could dump substances into the atmosphere in order to TRAP HEAT , whether it is for the purpose of creating localized heat pockets to mislead the public, or to shift the direction of winds as an aid to create fronts and/or generate winds or perhaps increase the possibility for localized… Read more »

Tom Ball
Tom Ball
4 months ago

No one as of yet has explained to me what caused the Ice Age, and especially the role man played in the subsequent warming!

Regardless of which side the public gravitates toward, (whether due to ignorance or political bias) , it should be clear enough by now to all of them that the issue is being used as a means of establishing a GLOBAL CARBON TAX, which in turn provides the means for the “elitist” banker tribalists to gain TOTAL CONTROL of the entire planet.

Uwe
Uwe
3 months ago
Reply to  Tom Ball

well, Ice Age, I don’t believe anymore in those fantastic fabrications of billions of years. The fact that the great extinction of animals had occurred at the end of the Ice Age is just ludicrous. That rhinos would migrate from Central Europe to Northern Africa in winter and back in summer during the Ice Age is baloney.

clrariz
clrariz
3 months ago

The “k” in Monkeypox is silent.