Holland: Farmers Protest Govt. Policy to Shut Down Farms to Reduce Nitrogen

Dutch farmers are fighting for their very livelihoods, taking to the streets over a climate change policy that will cap nitrogen emissions, and will lead to mass job loss across the 54,000 agricultural businesses. The policy requires Dutch businesses to reduce nitrogen emissions nationwide by 50% and up to 95% in some provinces by 2030. Cows and fertilizers are significant contributors of nitrogen oxide and ammonia. A government statement admitted that “The honest message…is that not all farmers can continue their business.” Drastically reducing herds will reduce the food supply. The government will buy some of the farms.

A small group of farmers protested outside the home of Christianne van der Wal, the Cabinet minister overseeing the Netherlands’ reforms to curb pollution and spread manure on a nearby street. At another protest, farmers attacked a police car. Other farmers have protested by using their tractors to block traffic on highways.

Dutch farmers are fighting for their very livelihoods, taking to the streets over a climate change policy that will cap nitrogen emissions and lead to mass job loss.

Video shows several farmers on the streets attacking police and emergency vehicles with sledgehammers while others chase the vehicles down and launch kicks against the windows.

According to Bloomberg, yesterday, several farmers also brought their cows to parliament to protest the policy, going so far as threatening to slaughter them on the spot.

“If the nitrogen measures are adopted, one of these two ladies [cows] will not go home but will receive a one-way ticket to the slaughterhouse,” farmer Koos Cromwijk told Dutch news agency ANP outside parliament.

The policy in question will require Dutch businesses to reduce nitrogen emissions nationwide by 50% and up to 95% in some provinces by 2030, with cows and fertilizers being significant contributors.

“The honest message … is that not all farmers can continue their business,” a government statement reads.

The agriculture industry isn’t the only one being targeted, though — aviation has also come under fire.

According to Climate Change News, by the end of 2023, Schipol airport, one of the busiest in Europe, will be forced to limit annual flights to accommodate just 440,000 passengers (12% less than the number of flights in 2019).

Read full article here…

ABC:   https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/dutch-pm-condemns-farmers-protests-ministers-home-85914491

Yahoo News:   https://news.yahoo.com/explainer-why-dutch-farmers-protesting-122334722.html




G. Edward Griffin’s Red Pill Expo, on July 9 and 10, to Reveal Hidden Agendas and Health Secrets

G. Edward Griffin’s 8th Red Pill Expo, the major public event of Red Pill University, is less than two weeks away, and will be held in Indianapolis, Indiana on July 9 and 10. It also will be livestreamed on the Internet. The mission of the Expo and the University is to bring together world-class experts to set the record straight on fake narratives, fake history, and fake news. The goal is to dispel the illusions that often shroud the most important aspects of our lives. The Red Pill Expo features 17 outstanding speakers and includes topics that range from geoengineering and transhumanism to energy medicine and healing through light.

G. Edward Griffin’s eighth Red Pill Expo, the major public event of Red Pill University, is less than two weeks away, and will be held in Indianapolis, Indiana on July 9 and 10. It also will be livestreamed on the Internet. The purpose is to help truth seekers understand how the world really works – contrary to commonly held illusions. The visionary of this movement is G. Edward Griffin, author of numerous books and documentary films including the famous exposé of the Federal Reserve, The Creature from Jekyll Island and also World without Cancer; The Story of Vitamin B17.

The mission of the Expo and the University is to bring together world-class experts to set the record straight on fake narratives, fake history, and fake news. The goal is to dispel the illusions that often shroud the most important aspects of our lives.

Seventeen outstanding presenters have been scheduled, including Elana Freeland, the author of Geoengineered Transhumanism who will discuss the biological and electormagnetic elements of chemtrails that are associated with transhumanism and can be controlled remotely through 5G and 6G systems (video); Martin Bales, an electrical engineer and Doctor of Oriental Medicine who will speaking about energy medicine, including light therapy for pathogen ablation (video); Peter Breggin, MD, a medical legal expert, author of 20 books & 70 scientific papers who will be speaking about the global predators who view us as prey (video);  John Klyczek, the author of School World Order who will address how the education technology industry is advancing two agendas that include a social credit infrastructure and engineering a new transhuman species as the brain computer interface and nanotechnology industries are being set up to merge students with artificial intelligence (video); please click this link for the full list of speakers and more videos.

Since you are a subscriber to Need to Know News, you almost certainly will be highly rewarded by attending this event – either in person or by livestream. Learn about hidden agendas behind wars, political corruption, legalized plunder, criminal health care, culture chaos and more. The Red Pill Expo will be held in Indianapolis, Indiana on July 9 and 10, tickets are available at https://redpilluniversity.org/expo-homepage.

Read full article here…




Texas: 53 Migrants Found Dead in Tractor-Trailer. Are Thousands More Deaths Going Unreported?

Authorities found an 18-wheeler that carried up to 100 individuals abandoned on a side road in San Antonio, including at least 51 individuals who were deceased. It is estimated that 100 people were in the truck. Texas Governor Abbott tweeted that the deaths were a result of President Biden’s “deadly open border policies. They show the deadly consequences of his refusal to enforce the law.”

Alex Jones claims that Mexican drug cartels and coyote smugglers are actually killing migrants. He said that the migrants who fail to pay coyotes the second half of the human smuggling fee are killed. Or, the coyotes take the migrants’ cell phones and extort more money from their families; if the families can’t pay, the migrants are locked in the trailers to die in heat that reaches 130 degrees. Jones said that the mainstream media is covering up reports of abandoned trucks containing dead migrants every week in Texas, Arizona and California. He further stated that tens of thousands of dead bodies are found in towns along the border each year.

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/yvKWAAw3wZq1/

AT least 53 migrants have been found dead in the back of a truck that reached an estimated 150F as cops discovered stacks of bodies following desperate cries for help.

Another 16 people – including four children – were rushed to a hospital in a critical condition following the horrifying discovery in San Antonio, Texas.

Officials announced on Wednesday that the death toll has risen to 53 people, which include 22 migrants from Mexico, seven from Guatemala and two from Honduras.

The migrant bodies were found inside an abandoned tractor-trailer, officials said. The victims include 39 men and 12 women.

The horror discovery was made after a worker heard a cry for help – leading to “stacks of bodies” being found inside the vehicle, the San Antonio Police Department said.

San Antonio has recorded temperatures of 100F (37.8C) or more on 17 days this month.

It’s estimated that the temperature inside the vehicle was around 150F (65C).

Three suspects were taken into custody following the deadly discovery, but it is unclear if they are “absolutely connected to this or not,” SAPD Chief William McManus said.

Police said they found 16 victims – 12 adults and four kids – conscious in the back of the truck and rushed them to local hospitals.

It’s understood the survivors are “fighting for their lives” in hospital, suffering from severe heat stroke and exhaustion.

“The patients that we saw were hot to the touch… no signs of water in the vehicle or visible working AC inside,” the city’s fire chief Charles Hood said.

“None of these people were able to extricate themselves out of the truck, so they were still in there awaiting help when we arrived. Too weak in state to actually get out and help themselves.”

San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg said the gruesome find was a “horrific human tragedy”.

“There are, that we know of, 46 individuals who are no longer with us, who had families, who were likely trying to find a better life,” he said.

“And we have 16 folks who are fighting for their lives in the hospital.”

Images from the scene showed roads blocked and dozens of first responders surrounding the now-abandoned truck next to railroad tracks.

US Border Patrol, police, the San Antonio fire department and ambulances are at the scene.

Officials have yet to confirm the cause of the 50 that perished.

According to the Washington Post, the truck was registered under the name of an Alamo man.

However, the man’s son-in-law, Isaac Limon, told the outlet the number on the truck had been fraudulently used by smugglers.

“It was a perfect setup,” he told the outlet, adding that his father-in-law was shaken up by the incident.

“The truck is here. I’m looking at it right now. Sad to say, but he’s a bit of a victim, too, because people believe it was him.”

Local resident Ruby Chavez, 53, told the New York Times the area where the bodies were discovered is a well-known “drop-off spot” for migrants.

“You can tell they just get here. We see them with backpacks or asking for food or money,” she told the paper.

Read full article here…




California Court Relases 2 Suspects Arrested with 150,000 Fentanyl Pills Without Bail

California: Tulare County Court Commissioner Mikki Verissimo of California signed an order to release two suspected drug traffickers, Jose Zendejas, 25, and Benito Madrigal, 19, who were arrested with 150,000 fentanyl pills, enough to potentially kill several million people. Neither the Tulare County District Attorney nor Sheriff Mike Boudreaux were involved in releasing the alleged criminals without bail. Sheriff Boudreaux was reportedly infuriated by the court and blamed California Governor Newsome and soft on crime legislators for passing Proposition 47 and 57 that allow criminals to be released from jails, thwarting law enforcement and endangering public safety.

Tulare County Court Commissioner Mikki Verissimo of California signed an order to release two suspected drug traffickers recently arrested with 150,000 fentanyl pills in their possession, Fox News confirmed Tuesday.

Officials arrested Jose Zendejas, 25, and Benito Madrigal, 19, during a traffic stop on Friday and transported them to the Tulare County Pre-Trial Facility on charges of possession, transportation and selling of illegal drugs, but they were released over the weekend.

The Tulare County District Attorney Tim Ward’s office said in a statement to Fox News Digital that it was “not involved with or agree with the decision to release these individuals.”

“The time in which they were released was after their arrest and prior to police reports being submitted to our office. Through a risk assessment by the county probation department, they were released by a judicial officer,” Ward’s office said.

Sheriff Mike Boudreaux also expressed concern with the suspects’ release, telling Fox News’ “The Story” on Tuesday that he only learned of an order to release Zendejas and Madrigal “until it was far too late.”

“This assessment was done behind the scenes, basically without ever contacting me as the sheriff or even asking me what I believe the risk to our public safety would be,” he said. “I could not believe that we had 150,000 fentanyl pills — one of the most dangerous epidemics that is facing our nation today — with people in custody, that we may potentially be able to impact the future of this type of drug trafficking organization and or cartels in California — in my county — and we let them go.”

He continued: “California’s system of justice is failing us all. … Law enforcement up and down the state of California is frustrated. We want to hold people to their justice and hold them accountable for the crimes that they commit. But Proposition 47 and 57 — through Governor Newsom and the legislators in California who are really soft on crime — allowing people like this to be released from our facilities, we have no control over that. And for law enforcement leaders in California, it’s incredibly frustrating when we are responsible for public safety.”

Bordeaux went on to say that the record-breaking flow of migrants coming into the United States through the southern boarder is part of the reason fentanyl is coming into the country and creating danger “to the quality of life.”

Read full article here…




Ghislaine Maxwell Sentenced to 20 years in Jeffrey Epstein Sex Trafficking Case

Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 in prison for her role in helping powerful pedophile Jeffrey Epstein abuse young girls, capping off a dramatic fall from grace for the British socialite turned-convicted sex-trafficker. Prosecutors detailed how Maxwell and Epstein, who dated in the 1990s, preyed on poor, vulnerable teens, luring them into their orbit with the promise of cash and adventure. Maxwell has denied that she abused anyone.

British socialite turned-convicted sex-trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell finally got her due Tuesday when she was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her role in helping rich-and-powerful pedophile Jeffrey Epstein abuse young girls.

US District Judge Alison Nathan said the sentence of 240 months was “sufficient and not greater than necessary,” for Maxwell, who earlier addressed the court and told victims in a half-hearted apology, “I am sorry for the pain that you experienced.”

As she finally learned her fate, the 60-year-old predator’s face remained inscrutable, and she briefly hugged her attorney before leaving the courtroom, wearing blue jail scrubs, her dark brown locks cut in a bob and her ankles in shackles. She did not speak to her siblings, who were seated in the row behind her.

“The number of people harmed is impossible to measure,” victim Annie Farmer, who testified at trial, told the court during Tuesday’s hearing, as Maxwell’s shoulders tensed.

The Epstein madam tried to avoid looking at her victims as they spoke, but did lock eyes with Sarah Ransome when her victim told her, “You broke me in unfathomable ways. But you didn’t break my spirit nor did you dampen my internal flame that now burns brighter than ever before.”

Ransome broke down in tears as she described how she attempted to escape from Epstein’s private sex island by trying to “jump off a cliff into shark-infested waters” and said she had twice attempted suicide.

“Like Hotel California, you could check into the Epstein-Maxwell dungeon of sexual hell, but you could never leave,” she said. “I frequently experience flashbacks and wake up in a cold sweat from nightmares reliving the awful experience.”

“‘I am sorry’ doesn’t cut it,” Ransome told reporters after justice was meted out. “I wish she was sorry when she was forcing me into a room to be raped. That’s when I wish she was sorry.”

Read full article here…




California AG Publishes Names and Addresses of Concealed Carry Gun Permit Holders

California Attorney General Rob Bonta posted the names, addresses and birth dates of concealed-carry permit holders on the California Department of Justice website on Monday. Bonta claimed the move was to help the public access data on guns in California, including information about the issuance of Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) permits and Gun Violence Restraining Orders. The list included 244 judge permits and 420 reserve officers. Lee Williams, an editor at the Second Amendment Foundation, said that Bonta published the names of CCW permit holders was retaliation for the Supreme Court’s recent decision that affirmed the right to bear arms outside the home. He wrote that Bonta’s true intent was to put Californians on notice that if they want to exercise this right, they will pay a price, and the price will be their privacy, safety, and security. Guns are the third most sought-after item by burglars and these gun owners are now targets.

On Monday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta posted the names and addresses of concealed-carry permit holders on the California Department of Justice website.

In a press release, Bonta claimed the move was to “improve transparency and information sharing for firearms-related data and includes broad enhancements to the platform to help the public access data on firearms in California, including information about the issuance of Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) permits and Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs).”

He also claimed it will help promote “gun violence” research, and foster “trust between law enforcement and the communities we serve.”

Make No Mistake, This Was 100% BS.

Bonta’s move was clearly retaliation for the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, which affirmed the right to bear arms outside the home.

Bonta’s true intent was to put Californians on notice that if they want to exercise this right, they will pay a price, and the price will be their privacy, safety, and security.

You see, Bonta has created a handy reference guide for burglars, home invaders, and other criminals. Now, they’ve got a searchable database of firearm owners and homes where guns are kept. Guns have always been the third most sought-after item by burglars, after prescription meds and cash.

What’s not included in Bonta’s press release, tweets or media interviews is the chilling effect this will have on the Second Amendment in the Golden State. Anyone who wants to carry a defensive firearm must now risk a complete loss of their privacy and the increased likelihood they and their family will be targeted by criminals.

I’m sure California’s booming gun-ban industry, which likely played a significant role in developing this idea, has already made plans on how to use the database to its advantage. Look for massive doxing, which will include false red-flag complaints, cyber-crimes, and other online harassment.

Read full article here…




The Supreme Court Overturned Roe v. Wade, States to Decide Abortion Laws

Summary by JW WIlliams

Five Supreme Court Justices overturned Roe v. Wade, and Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion that returns the issue of abortion to the states as the Constitution does not guarantee the right to abortion. Alito was joined by Clarence Thomas and three other Justices who were appointed by former President Trump, including Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The decision was opposed by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Chief Justice John Roberts voted with the majority to uphold the Mississippi abortion restrictions to 15 weeks of gestation, but did not approve of tossing out Roe altogether.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-overturned-by-supreme-court-ending-federal-abortion-rights.html

Twenty-two states are preparing to restrict abortions or ban them outright.

The mainstream media reports that 80% of Americans support abortion, but the figure is misleading because 30% of those polled agreed with it under any circumstance, but a higher percentage, 42%, said only under certain circumstances. In the same Gallup poll, the the pro-choice/pro-life split was 49-47. According to the CDC, over 91% of all abortions in the US in 2015 were done before or at the 13th week of pregnancy, and abortions after 21 weeks made up less than 1.3% of all abortions. One in four women will have an abortion by the time they’re 45.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/alex-christy/2021/10/04/msnbc-warns-scotus-not-overturn-roe-claims-80-support-abortion

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/sg5PN7C3yoY/

Republican Senator Steve Daines of Montana said that there is massive misinformation coming from the mainstream media and the left that claim abortions are banned because Roe v. Wade was overturned. The US had the most permissive abortion policies in the world as only 7 countries allow late-term abortions. Daines said that over 77% of Americans want restrictions on late-term abortions. Democrats support allowing abortions up to the moment of birth.

Link for video:    https://www.bitchute.com/video/xTDR9v_vTSY/

Utah Senator Mike Lee said that the main contributing factor to overturning Roe v. Wade is improved science that shows that human life begins before birth and that babies have the ability to feel and respond to painful stimuli. This new information spurred states like Mississippi that banned abortions after 15 weeks to protect the pre-born developing human from pain.

Link for video:    https://www.bitchute.com/video/RLd37Vk7LiE/

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson said that the left pushed extreme abortion agendas that went far beyond the safe, legal and rare argument for abortion. Leftists promoted abortion on demand for any reason, through all nine months of pregnancy, which includes partial-birth late-term abortions, and they wanted American taxpayers to fund it. In response, a number of states rose up and passed laws against some of the policies.

On the opposite end of the issue, protesters took to the streets out after Roe v. Wade was overturned and some riots ensued. Thousands of protesters in Los Angeles were reportedly marching on the 110 and 101 freeways, assaulting vehicles that refused to stop. Critics pointed out the the protesters likely did not know that abortion will remain legal in California and will not affect any woman living there. Protests also took place in of New York City, Washington, DC, Boston, Nashville, Detroit, Columbus, and more.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/24/pro-abortion-protesters-take-to-los-angeles-streets-hold-up-highway-traffic-legal-abortion-on-demand/

Shortly after the Supreme Court ruling, California Governor Newsom announced a joint West Coast “commitment to reproductive freedom” with the governors of Oregon and Washington.

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/ft4UnJEzPX2d/

Tucker Carlson noted the irony that the left is opposing the Roe v. Wade decision, because it actually restores democracy over abortion laws to voters within the states. But leftists only care about power. He reported that in states limiting or banning abortion, many companies, including Disney, have offered to fly pregnant employees out-of-state to obtain abortions because it is cheaper for the companies instead of paying for maternity leave and adding a child to an insurance policy.




58 Babies who Received COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Suffered Life-Threatening Injuries

RT Magazine conducted an analysis of the cases reported to CDC’s voluntary Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), on reactions among babies and toddlers up to 3 years old who received mRNA COVID-19 injections. The study revealed that at least 58 cases were reported of severe and life-threatening adverse events/ injuries. This information is in conflict with the FDA’s briefing document that claimed that the majority of adverse events in Pfizers’ clinical trial were non-serious. The VAERS reports were incomplete as it was unclear if the babies survived. It is also unclear whether they were part of the clinical trials.

The Pfizer clinical trials only examined adverse events limited to seven days after each of the doses – the first and the second dose. It is unethical to give a baby a vaccine for a disease that the chances of getting severely ill or dying from it is almost zero while life-threatening adverse reactions/ vaccine injuries are very significant. The FDA should have been aware of so many serious adverse events, and if they did know about them, why did they ignore them?[/su_note]

An analysis of VAERS reports shows that contrary to the FDA’s briefing document claiming that the majority of adverse events in Pfizers’ clinical trial were non-serious – at least 58 cases of life-threatening side effects in infants under 3 years old who received mRNA vaccines were reported. For some, it is unclear if they survived. It is also unclear why the infants were vaccinated, and whether they were part of the clinical trials. However, in the upcoming FDA meeting on Wednesday, the FDA will not be able to argue it did not know.

  • While the FDA is preparing to approve the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for infants and toddlers aged 6 months to four years, and claims in its’ VRBPAC Briefing Document released today that the majority of adverse events found in Pfizers’ trial were non-serious – Real-Time magazine analysis reveals at least 58 life-threatening adverse events  in infants and toddlers aged under 3 years old reported to VAERS.
  • The most common serious adverse events were life-threatening bleeding, anaphylactic shock, anticholinergic syndrome, encephalitis, hypoglycemia and neuroleptic syndrome. In most of the reported cases, these are multi-system injuries.
  • In some cases it is not clear what happened to the babies – did they survive? And if so, have they recovered?
  • Most reports do not specify under what circumstances the infants were vaccinated, and if they participated in the clinical trials.
  • While the FDA claims in its’ briefing document that the vaccine efficacy in infants is 80.4%, the  document reveals that the claim is based on a total of 10 symptomatic cases of COVID-19 identified in the trial among 1415 participants – 7 of them in the placebo group vs. 3 in the vaccine group.

 “Chest pain; cardiac arrest; Skin cold clammy”. This short description of a cardiac arrest, which occurred one hour after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, is taken from the VAERS system – the US Vaccine Adverse Eve Reporting System ( case number 1015467), and it does not refer to an elderly person, nor to a young adult, or even a teenager. It is hard to believe, but this report refers to a two-month-old baby. “A 2-month-old male patient received bnt162b2 (PFIZER-BioNTech COVID-19 VACCINE) lot number: EL 739, via an unspecified route of administration on 02 Feb 2021 at single dose for COVID-19 immunisation”, thus stated in the report. “Patient administered vaccination, observed for 15 minutes left the clinic then returned one hour later on 02 Feb 2021, presenting as skin cold, clammy and with chest pain, cardiac arrest event then developed, patient stabilised and transferred for further medical treatment… The outcome of the events was unknown. This case was reported as serious with seriousness criteria-life threatening from HA. No follow-up attempts possible. No further information expected”.

How did a 2-month-old baby receive the mRNA vaccine? These vaccines have not yet received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for approved use in children ages five and under by the FDA, or any other regulatory authority, and even if it will, the EUA will only include babies 6 months and older.

Was this baby a participant in Pfizer-BioNTech’s clinical trials, testing efficacy and safety among babies?

The answer is unclear. According to the person who wrote the report “Unsure if patient was enrolled in clinical trial”. However, the author of the report also states that the report was ”received from a contactable Other Health Care Professional by Pfizer from the Regulatory Agency”. This note implies that the infant might have actually participated in Pfizer’s trial. The regulatory agency report Safety Report Unique Identifier GB-MHRA-ADR 24687611 – indicates that the report came from Great Britain (the first 2 letters in the report ID stand for the country of origin, GB- Great Britain, and MHRA indicate that the source of reporting was its’ drug authority).

Why did they not follow up on the 2-month-old baby’s condition, after going into cardiac arrest an hour after receiving an experimental vaccine? Why is there no further information? Is it because he died? Or was the baby removed form an experiment? Why would the author of the report not mention this?

Shockingly, it turns out that this incident is not isolated, but in fact one of many in the VAERS system, describing babies and children under five exposed to mRNA Covid vaccines, who suffered life-threatening adverse reactions.

Even though children under five were not considered eligible for these vaccines unless they were part of a clinical trial, astonishingly, it appears that there are many reports in the system describing babies and toddlers who were vaccinated. Some of the children suffered from life-threatening adverse events. In some cases, it is not clear what happened to them; did they survive and recover, do they still suffer from health problems, or did they die.

In a couple of days, on June 15, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will discuss Moderna and Pfizer’s EUA requests for vaccines for infants and toddlers aged 6 months to 4 years – the only group not yet eligible for COVID-19 vaccination today. According to the FDA’s briefing document released today ahead of the VRBPA committees’ meeting, there were “245 US reports” to the VAERS system “in children 6 months through 4 years of age”, who were injected (“product administered to patient of inappropriate age” or “off-label use”) or exposed to the vaccine “via breastmilk”.  Nevertheless, both companies announced already in May that their findings indicate that their vaccines are safe and effective. The VRBPAC Briefing Document lists a variety of adverse events reported following the exposure to the vaccine in this age group, including “pyrexia…, body temperature…, cough, headache, rash, diarrhea”. According to the document, “Among US VAERS reports for individuals aged 6 months through 4 years, which may reflect unauthorized use of the vaccine or may reflect a reporting error, the majority (96.3%) were non-serious”. While the document specifies safety concerns identified from post-authorization safety surveillance data in VAERS, including anaphylaxis, myocarditis, and pericarditis, it does not relate to these safety concerns identified in the younger age group. Instead, it states: “No unusual frequency, clusters, or other trends for adverse events were identified that would suggest a new safety concern”.

But is that really the case? It seems that regardless of the results, and despite the disturbing and shocking findings that are being exposed from Pfizer’s documents, it is expected that both companies will receive the desired EUA very soon. In fact, the CDC website, already in April, had advertised a protocol regarding children’s vaccination, which included babies 6 month to 4 years as well.

In light of this expected approval, RT Magazine conducted an analysis of the cases reported in the VAERS system referring to babies up to 3 years old.

Read full article here…




Soros-Funded Women’s March Behind Riot in Phoenix Following Roe v. Wade Decision

On Friday, June 24, 2022, riots broke out in Phoenix and a violent mob attacked the Arizona Senate building following the historic overturn of Roe v. Wade. Arizona has competing laws that either completely ban the procedure or limit it to 15 weeks after a woman becomes pregnant.  The Women’s March is gearing up for protests and riots across the country related to the Roe v. Wade decision according to open-source information. The Women’s March, which was funded by George Soros in the past, appears to be behind all these protests and riots scheduled between now and June 30th.

Twenty-two states had laws or constitutional amendments that were already in place which could be quickly used to try to ban abortion as a result of the decision. In response, 84 prosecutors from 29 states signed a joint statement vowing to disregard the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade that sends the issue back to the states. Some of the prosecutors are funded by Soros. The list of prosecutors includes Kim Foxx from Chicago, Chesa Boudin, the impeached prosecutor from San Francisco, Alvin Bragg from NYC, Keith Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General, George Gascon from LA, Marilyn Mosby, State’s Attorney from Maryland, and Dana Nessel, Michigan Attorney General.

The Woman’s March, the same group that was behind the 2017 protests and civil disobedience, was behind last night’s riot in Phoenix at that Arizona Senate Building.  Open sources show that they are planning similar events across the county through at least June 30th. 

Last night (Friday) riots broke out in Phoenix and a violent mob attacked the Arizona Senate building.

According to open-source information, the Women’s March and all 50 protests after the 2016 Election were funded by George Soros.

Now the Women’s March is gearing up for protests and riots across the country related to the Roe v. Wade decision on Friday by the Supreme Court. We know this from open-source information.

The Women’s March appears to be behind all these protests and riots scheduled between now and June 30th.

See the entire operation as outlined in the presentation below.

Read full article here…

NY Post:   https://nypost.com/2022/06/25/arizona-abortion-protest-police-release-tear-gas-lawmakers-held-hostage-in-senate-building/

Gateway Pundit:    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/84-lawless-prosecutors-29-states-including-several-soros-funded-das-vow-disregard-law-not-prosecute-women-seek-abortions-medics-provide/




The Billionaire Pritzker Family Is Pushing Transgender/ Synthetic Sex Identities on America

Over the past decade, the Pritzkers of Illinois who helped Obama win the presidency, include among their number former US Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, current Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, and philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker. They appear to have used a family philanthropic apparatus to promote gender confusion among adults and children and to drive commerce to their transgender medical businesses. They are funding the integration of transgender/ Synthetic Sex identities into our medical, legal, cultural, and educational institutions. LGBTQ+ is a protected class for discrimination purposes and works closely with the big tech, the medical complex, big banks, international law firms, pharma giants, and corporate power to solidify the idea that humans are not a sexually dimorphic species. They have set their sights on a new God-like goal: using gender ideology to remake human biology.

One of the most powerful yet unremarked-upon drivers of our current wars over definitions of gender is a concerted push by members of one of the richest families in the United States to transition Americans from a dimorphic definition of sex to the broad acceptance and propagation of synthetic sex identities (SSI). Over the past decade, the Pritzkers of Illinois, who helped put Barack Obama in the White House and include among their number former U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, current Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, and philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker, appear to have used a family philanthropic apparatus to drive an ideology and practice of disembodiment into our medical, legal, cultural, and educational institutions.

I first wrote about the Pritzkers, whose fortune originated in the Hyatt hotel chain, and their philanthropy directed toward normalizing what people call “transgenderism” in 2018. I have since stopped using the word “transgenderism” as it has no clear boundaries, which makes it useless for communication, and have instead opted for the term SSI, which more clearly defines what some of the Pritzkers and their allies are funding—even as it ignores the biological reality of “male” and “female” and “gay” and “straight.”

The creation and normalization of SSI speaks much more directly to what is happening in American culture, and elsewhere, under an umbrella of human rights. With the introduction of SSI, the current incarnation of the LGBTQ+ network—as distinct from the prior movement that fought for equal rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and which ended in 2020 with Bostock v. Clayton County, finding that LGBTQ+ is a protected class for discrimination purposes—is working closely with the techno-medical complex, big banks, international law firms, pharma giants, and corporate power to solidify the idea that humans are not a sexually dimorphic species—which contradicts reality and the fundamental premises not only of “traditional” religions but of the gay and lesbian civil rights movements and much of the feminist movement, for which sexual dimorphism and resulting gender differences are foundational premises.

Through investments in the techno-medical complex, where new highly medicalized sex identities are being conjured, Pritzkers and other elite donors are attempting to normalize the idea that human reproductive sex exists on a spectrum. These investments go toward creating new SSI using surgeries and drugs, and by instituting rapid language reforms to prop up these new identities and induce institutions and individuals to normalize them. In 2018, for example, at the Ronald Reagan Medical Center at the University of California Los Angeles (where the Pritzkers are major donors and hold various titles), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology advertised several options for young females who think they can be men to have their reproductive organs removed, a procedure termed “gender-affirming care.”

The Pritzkers became the first American family to have a medical school bear its name in recognition of a private donation when it gave $12 million to the University of Chicago School of Medicine in 1968. In June 2002, the family announced an additional gift of $30 million to be invested in the University of Chicago’s Biological Sciences Division and School of Medicine. These investments provided the family with a bridgehead into the world of academic medicine, which it has since expanded in pursuit of a well-defined agenda centered around SSI. Also in 2002, Jennifer Pritzker founded the Tawani Foundation, which has since provided funding to Howard Brown Health and Rush Memorial Medical Center in Chicago, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Foundation Fund, and the University of Minnesota’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, all of which provide some version of “gender care.” In the case of the latter, “clients” include “gender creative children as well as transgender and gender non-conforming adolescents …”

In 2012, J.B. Pritzker and his wife, M.K. Pritzker, worked with The Bridgespan Group—a management consultant to nonprofits and philanthropists—to develop a long-term strategy for the J.B and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation. Their work together included conducting research on developments in the field of early childhood education, to which the foundation committed $25 million.

Ever since, a motivating and driving force behind the Pritzkers’ familywide commitment to SSI has been J.B.’s cousin Jennifer (born James) Pritzker—a retired lieutenant colonel in the Illinois Army National Guard and the father of three children. In 2013, around the time gender ideology reached the level of mainstream American culture, Jennifer Pritzker announced a transition to womanhood. Since then, Pritzker has used the Tawani Foundation to help fund various institutions that support the concept of a spectrum of human sexes, including the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the Williams Institute UCLA School of Law, the National Center for Transgender Equality, the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Palm Military Center, the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH), and many others. Tawani Enterprises, the private investment counterpart to the philanthropic foundation, invests in and partners with Squadron Capital LLC, a Chicago-based private investment vehicle that acquires a number of medical device companies that manufacture instruments, implants, cutting tools, and injection molded plastic products for use in surgeries. As in the case of Jon Stryker, founder of the LGBT mega-NGO Arcus Foundation, it is hard to avoid the impression of complementarity between Jennifer Pritzker’s for-profit medical investments and philanthropic support for SSI.

Pritzker also helps fund the University of Minnesota National Center for Gender Spectrum Health, which claims “the gender spectrum is inclusive of the wide array of gender identities beyond binary definitions of gender—inclusive of cisgender and transgender identities, gender queer, and nonbinary identities as a normal part of the natural expression of gender. Gender spectrum health is the healthy, affirmed, positive development of a gender identity and expression that is congruent with the individual’s sense of self.” The university, where Pritzker has served on the Leadership Council for the Program in Human Sexuality, provides “young adult gender services” in the medical school’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health.

Pritzker’s philanthropy is also active in Canada, where Jennifer has helped fund the University of Toronto’s Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies, a teaching institution invested in the deconstruction of human sex. An instructor in the Bonham Centre and the curator of its Sexual Representation Collection—“Canada’s largest archival collection of pornography”—is transgender studies professor Nicholas Matte, who denies categorically that sexual dimorphism exists. Pritzker also created the first chair in transgender studies at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. The current chair, Aaron Devor, founded an annual conference called Moving Trans History Forward, whose keynote speaker in 2016 was the renowned transhumanist, Martine Rothblatt, who was mentored by the transhumanist Ray Kurzweil of Google. Rothblatt lectured there on the value of creating an organization such as WPATH to serve “tech transgenders” in the cultivation of “tech transhumanists.” (Rothblatt’s ideology of disembodiment and technological religion seems to be having nearly as much influence on American culture as Sirius satellite radio, which Rothblatt co-founded.) Rothblatt is an integral presence at Out Leadership, a business networking arm of the LGBTQ+ movement, and appears to believe that “we are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful, and beneficent.”

We are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful, and beneficent.

For-profit medical corporations and nonprofit institutions that intersect with the goliath LGBT NGO infrastructure, many of which receive Pritzker funding, have created a political scaffolding to engineer the institutionalization of SSI ideology and medical practice in the United States—solidifying the concept of people being born in wrongly sexed bodies or wrongly being born in sexed bodies at all. At least two clinics in California are now providing nonbinary surgeries and nullification surgeries for individuals who feel both male and female, or like neither.

The Gender Multispeciality Service (GeMS) at Boston Children’s Hospital, “the first major program in the U.S. to focus on gender-diverse and transgender adolescents,” was founded in 2007. “Since that time,” says the GeMS website, “we have expanded our program to welcome patients from ages 3 to 25.” The first such clinic for children in the Midwest, the Gender & Sex Development Program at Lurie Children’s Hospital, opened in Chicago in 2013 with a $500,000-$1 million gift pledge from Pritzker. (The husband of Jean “Gigi” Pritzker, another cousin, sits on Lurie’s board of directors.) The Gender Mapping Project estimates that there are now thousands of similar “gender clinics” around the world, and over 400 that offer to medically manipulate the sex of children.

Like Stryker’s Arcus Foundation, the Pritzkers have forged a close relationship with the psychiatric establishment. The Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health at Lurie was launched with a $15 million gift from the Pritzker Foundation in 2019, and received another $6.45 million in 2022 to address “concerns about mental health consequences for children and adolescents arising from the COVID pandemic.” Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Jennifer’s cousin, signed into law SB 2085, Coverage of the Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model (CoCM)—the American Psychiatric Association’s model legislation requiring private insurers and Medicaid in Illinois to cover CPT codes for CoCM, which “requires a primary care (or other) physician or clinician to lead a team that includes a behavioral health care manager who checks in with patients at least once a month and an off-site psychiatric consultant who regularly reviews patients’ progress and offers advice.”

Jeanne Pritzker, married to J.B.’s brother Anthony, who is Jennifer’s cousin, is a training psychologist at UCLA where she and her husband established the Anthony and Jeanne Pritzker Family Scholarship to support medical students at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Mrs. Pritzker is a member of the Board of Visitors at the Geffen School, which is affiliated with a children’s hospital named after Mattel—the multinational toy company that debuted a “transgender Barbie” recently made in the likeness of the actor Laverne Cox.

On June 30, 2019, Gov. Pritzker issued Executive Order 19-11, titled Strengthening Our Commitment to Affirming and Inclusive Schools, to welcome and support children with manufactured sex identities. A task force was established to outline statewide criteria for schools and teachers that recommended districts amend their school board policies “to strengthen protections for transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming students.”

In August 2021, Gov. Pritzker signed into law a new sex education bill for all public schools in Illinois, the first of its kind designed in accordance with the second edition of the National Sex Education Standards (NSES) to update sex ed curricula in K-12 schools. Bill SB0 818 will be implemented on or before Aug. 1, 2022. Though the bill includes a written opt-out for parents (but not an alternative if they do opt-out), many are concerned with the material being brought into children’s schools under the auspices of teaching them sexual health—namely gender identity ideology and other related material.

Read full article here…

The 11th Hour Blog:   https://www.the11thhourblog.com/post/follow-the-money-how-the-pritzker-family-makes-a-killing-from-the-transgender-industry-flow-chart#viewer-98aof




The Federal Reserve Raises Interest Rates as Inflation Soars

As food, gasoline and and utilities continue to rise, the Federal Reserve recently boosted interest rates by 0.75 percentage points to ostensibly tame soaring inflation by making it more difficult to borrow and buy things like homes and cars. More than 8 million American renters, which amounts to 15% of renters, are late on paying their rent after getting deferrals due to COVID in 2020. Mortgage rates have already surged in response to the Fed’s rate increases this year. The average 30-year mortgage stood at 5.23% on June 9, according to Freddie Mac. That’s up from 2.96% a year earlier. Higher interest rates have raised payments on medium-priced homes by over $600 a month. Average credit card interest rates have topped 20%. The Federal Reserve is the cause of the problems and intends to raise rates again by .75 points again in July.

Earlier this year, the Federal Reserve turned to its most potent weapon — raising interest rates — to combat soaring inflation. But with consumer prices having only accelerated since then, the central bank boosted rates by 0.75 percentage point on Wednesday — its largest hike since 1994 — to try to tame the nation’s fiercest bout with inflation in 40 years.

The rate hike follows the announcements of a 0.25 percentage point hike in March and a 0.5 percentage point move in May — with the latter marking the sharpest increase since 2000.

The Fed had earlier been expected to boost rates by a more modest 0.5 percentage point, but the bank opted for a larger hike after the Consumer Price Index, a broad basket of goods and services used to track inflation, surged 8.6% in May, from an 8.3% annual rate in April. Gasoline prices have continued to hit new highs almost daily amid depleted domestic production and Russia’s war in Ukraine, while food and housing costs are also surging.

The idea behind the Fed’s rate hike is to make it costlier to borrow money, which in theory should tamp demand for purchases that require borrowing, like home buying or buying items with credit cards. With the latest rate increase, consumers and businesses should brace themselves for a hit to their wallet, experts say.

“The cost of borrowing is becoming more expensive, particularly for those with variable rate products,” said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate. “Fortunately, on the other side of the rate equation, returns on savings will likely be improving, particularly for those who investigate more generous high-yield savings options.”

By year-end, the federal funds rate — the rate that determines borrowing between banks — could be almost twice as high as its pre-pandemic level of about 2%, according to forecasts.

“It was just a few weeks ago that investors were forecasting the funds rate to be ~2.58% at the end of this year, but that number is now more than 100 [basis points] higher at 3.7%,” analyst Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge told clients in a research note. “And the ‘terminal’ funds rate (the level at which the Fed will stop hiking this cycle) is now seen north of 4%.”

Here’s what the Fed jacking up interest rates could mean for your wallet.

What will the rate hike cost you?

Every 0.25 percentage point increase in the Fed’s benchmark interest rate translates to an extra $25 a year in interest on $10,000 in debt. So Wednesday’s 0.75 percentage point increase means an extra $75 of interest for every $10,000 in debt.

Economists expect the Fed will continue to raise rates throughout the year as it battles inflation. Some analysts now forecast the central bank will announce another 0.75 percentage point increase in July, followed by two 0.5 percentage point hikes in September and November.

By early 2023, the federal funds rate could be 3.75% to 4%, according to TD Macro. That implies a rate increase of at least 2.75 percentage points higher than the current federal funds rate of 1%. For consumers, that means they could pay an additional $275 in interest for every $10,000 in debt.

How could it impact the stock market?

The stock market has slumped this year amid various headwinds, including the impact of high inflation and the Fed’s monetary tightening. But a bigger-than-expected interest rate increase on Wednesday “could be welcomed by stocks,” Crisafulli said before the rate hike was announced.

“It would represent a powerful signal by [Fed Chair Jerome Powell], help the Fed recapture control of the policy narrative and clamp down on the massive change in tightening forecasts,” he noted.

The S&P 500 rose 15 points, or 0.4%, to 3,750 on Wednesday.

Credit cards, home equity lines of credit

Credit card debt will become more expensive, with higher APRs hitting borrowers within one or two billing cycles after the Fed’s announcement, according to LendingTree credit expert Matt Schulz. For instance, after the Fed’s March hike, interest rates for credit cards increased for three-quarters of the 200 cards that Schulz reviews every month.

Consumers with balances may want to consider a 0% balance transfer credit card or a low-interest personal loan, Schulz said. Consumers can also ask their credit card companies for a lower rate, which research has shown is frequently successful.

Credit with adjustable rates may also see an impact, including home equity lines of credit and adjustable-rate mortgages, which are based on the prime rate.

What’s the impact on mortgage rates?

Mortgage rates have already surged in response to the Fed’s rate increases this year. The average 30-year mortgage stood at 5.23% on June 9, according to Freddie Mac. That’s up from 2.96% a year earlier.

That is adding thousands to the annual cost of buying a property. For instance, a purchaser buying a $250,000 home with a 30-year fixed loan would pay about $3,600 more per year compared with what they would have paid a year earlier.

The Fed’s newest rate hike might already be baked into current mortgage rates, said Jacob Channel, senior economic analyst for LendingTree, in an email.

“The Fed’s rate hike may not mean that mortgage rates are going to significantly increase,” he noted.

The housing market reflects one part of the economy where the Fed’s rate increases are slowing demand. Channel added: “These high rates have significantly dampened borrower desire to refinance current loans, and they’re also showing signs of reducing demand for purchase mortgages as well.”

Read full article here…




US Supreme Court Rules that Americans Are Legally Allowed to Carry Guns in Public

The US Supreme Court issued a rare decision supporting constitutional gun rights and ruled 6-3 that Americans have the right to carry arms outside of the home and in public — in a major victory for advocates of the Second Amendment. The case stems from a lawsuit filed by the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association against the state. The suit argued that the restriction made it almost impossible to get a legal carry permit and made the Second Amendment a privilege and not a right. The ruling will affect other states that have similar laws, including California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday issued a rare decision involving constitutional gun rights and ruled that Americans have the right to carry arms outside of the home and in public — in a major victory for advocates of the Second Amendment.

The high court voted 6-3 in striking down a New York law that said gun owners must demonstrate a need to carry firearms outside the home.

The court was split along ideological lines, with all six conservative justices voting against the New York law and the three progressive justices voting to uphold the gun-safety statute.

Writing for the majority, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas said that the New York law goes too far in restricting legal possession of firearms and said it violated the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“Because the state of New York issues public-carry licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the State’s licensing regime violates the Constitution,” Thomas wrote in the ruling.

Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett wrote concurring opinions and Justice Stephen Breyer, who is retiring at the end of the current term, wrote a dissenting opinion.

Read full article here…