AstraZeneca CEO: Millions of Immunocompromised People Can’t Be Vaccinated

AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot, Wiki
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
A leaked recording from 2020 showing AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot Saying, ‘Millions of [immunocompromised] people can’t be vaccinated…antibody [treatment] has enormous potential.’ Project Veritas’ founder James O’Keefe asks, “If the CEO of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies realized back in 2020 that antibody treatments are necessary for the immunocompromised, why would governments around the world force vaccine mandates when millions of people are at risk if they get it?”

James O’Keefe asks, “If the CEO of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies realized back in 2020 that antibody treatments are necessary for the immunocompromised, why would governments around the world force vaccine mandates when millions of people are at risk if they get it?”

Project Veritas on Tuesday released a leaked recording from 2020 showing AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot Saying, ‘Millions of [immunocompromised] people can’t be vaccinated…antibody [treatment] has enormous potential.’

“Like if you have an immune disease, lupus, or some other immune condition, you cannot – or multiple sclerosis, you can’t be vaccinated. So, there are millions of people in the world that will need a protection that cannot be coming from a vaccine. So, the longer antibody has enormous potential,” Soriot said on a December 2020 company-wide Zoom call.

“The long-acting antibody is quite unique because this is the only combination potentially will last more than six months, up to potentially 12 months and protect people for a long period of time,” he said.

Project Veritas reported:

A source within pharmaceutical giant, AstraZeneca, has provided Project Veritas with a 2020 recording of an internal company-wide Zoom call in which CEO, Pascal Soriot, makes statements about vaccine compatibility that contradict guidance from health agencies and organizations such as the World Health Organization.

Monoclonal antibody treatments were known to be effective relatively early in the COVID-19 pandemic and some states in the U.S. moved quickly to use it as a front-line defense. However, the federal government actively pushed against the use of those treatments in favor of the vaccine.

In a video published Tuesday afternoon, James O’Keefe asks, “If the CEO of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies realized back in 2020 that antibody treatments are necessary for the immunocompromised, why would governments around the world force vaccine mandates when millions of people are at risk if they get it?”

In a March 16, 2022 health advisory, the World Health Organization reasserted its stance that the AstraZeneca vaccine is safe for immunocompromised individuals. “It should be noted that the full two dose regimen of this vaccine is believed to be more protective against variants of concern than a single dose alone,” the advisory says. “Further to this, SAGE [Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization] recommends that severe and moderately immunocompromised persons should be offered an additional dose of vaccine.”

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
squodgy
squodgy
2 months ago

Could the reason be something to do with the Agenda 2030 culling programme?
Surely the Globalists & Bankers aren’t considering hurting we serfs?

Jimbo
Jimbo
2 months ago

Google, Georgia’s Guidestones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature..” -In other words cull 90+% of world’s population so the self-appointed elites can control a one world Plantation.

Who do you suppose will be their new world slaves?

Ragnar D.
Ragnar D.
2 months ago

Clearly it’s very important to the globalists that they get these injections into as many people as possible. They view their work as too critical to be bothered with little details like how the injection may affect an individual patient. These scumbag medical fascists have been exposed for the frauds that they are. Their credibility on all health matters is now destroyed, and no one should trust them on ANY issue at this point. Now let’s see some prosecutions.

Janet
Janet
2 months ago

When these toxic shots first came out I went to look up the Pfizer one and right there in their own words it stated who should NOT take it and top of the list was IMMUNOCOMPROMISED and people on blood thinners. According to the T.V. talking heads immunocompromised was first on the list for extermination. Aren’t all those who are “immunocompromised” already on a toxic stew of pharmaceutics already and the whole reason why they are immunocompromised??? All a total mind screw.

Questionit21
Questionit21
2 months ago

We need to also consider that there was a Patent for Snake
Venom Peptides which is in all the Covid 19 Gene Editing Bioweapon Inoculations Stew Peters on Rumble talks to Dr Ardis and gives this Hypothesis.
Also why has International Red Cross crying for pure bloods for not one person had the jab. Could it be its contaminated more so for the Plasma the Liquid Gold 🤔🤔🤔

wilma
wilma
2 months ago

The multi Billion dollar question is: Why bother with the vaccine at all …If the Antibody treatment Mr. AstraZeneca suggests is so much better for the immune compromised who should Not be vaccinated, then why not use for and how much better for the non-immune compromised i.e. regular or healthier folks?

wilma
wilma
2 months ago

The follow up question: Aren’t most or far too many folks immune compromised to some degree or why would we need any treatment of any kind? Therefore, according to Mr. AstraZeneca, shouldn’t the suggested treatment for everyone except those with full immune function be the Antibody treatment?

It should go without saying, those with full immune function would need NO treatment at all. However, those with a financial incentive and/or depopulation agenda driven, tend to decide those that don’t need help from govt(or anyone else) should be forced to take their poisons anyway.