Pfizer Forced to Release ‘Confidential’ Data about Vaccine Side Effects and Injuries

Pixabay
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
Pfizer wanted to hide their data from the public for for 50 years, but a court ordered them to produce it. Attorney Thomas Renz reacted to Pfizer’s latest data drop of a report listing possible side effects from their COVID gene therapy “vaccines”. He said that the FDA, under the law, is required to do a balancing test comparing the potential harm to the potential benefit of a new drug or vaccine when they use the Emergency Use Authorization, and the shot should have been pulled from the market. Renz said Pfizer vaccine recipients did not receive informed consent when they took the vaccine because the potential side effects were kept secret. He said that people who were responsible need to be held accountable, but only law enforcement can put them in prison. He intends to sue vaccine manufacturers and authorities who knowingly pushed harmful vaccines. Vaccine manufacturers may not be sued, unless their actions were wilful.

Link for video:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/uHCaSqyDeltT/

Link for video:    https://www.bitchute.com/video/5DoJP7Q7Evxv/

Pfiser Document on Vaccine Adverse Events:   https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cal
Cal
3 months ago

Yes, the vaccine companies can be sued because no where within the US Constitution (Supreme law of this land and the Supreme Contract for ALL who serve within our governments) was the lawful authority to bestow immunity authorized. Go read it. The US Constitution gives immunity ONLY to those who serve within the legislative branch when they are debating law. That is the ONLY lawful immunity.

Lyn P
Lyn P
3 months ago
Reply to  Cal

I think the Constitution has pretty much never applied to any aspect of the Vaccination Industry, or we wouldn’t still have The 1986 Act, National Vaccine (Kangaroo) Court or many continuing human travesties wrought by these unaccountable injection sociopaths.

Jon Nellis
Jon Nellis
3 months ago

Some times I forget it may not be common knowledge that the events post WWI, (you know the war to end all wars), left a newly blooming chemical (warfare) industry with no where to sell their wares. A little research shows exactly what the likes of DOW chemicals and DuPont among others did with their toxins. In some cases they just relabeled them fertilizers, pesticides, soaps, and detergents put them in a new bag and sold them to the gullible masses. This was during the time where the average person could still use the phrase, Truth and Justice as the… Read more »