10+ Things You Should Know about the New Pfizer Documents

Unsplash
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
Pfizer released documents last week that show that the company’s own data does not support the claim that their COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” Pfizer seemingly lied to the FDA by claiming their vaccines prevent COVID-19, and the FDA and mainstream media then lied to the American people repeating this false claim.

Excerpt:

Things the documents tell us now

Here are the some of the issues we will cover in this review. More to come as we learn more:

  1. Pfizer claimed repeatedly in their documents to the FDA that their vaccine would “prevent” COVID-19.
  2. Pfizer knew the injection’s adverse effects would increase with more injections of continuing boosters.
  3. Pfizer knew their injections did not stay at the injection site.
  4. Pfizer knew that the vaccinated group reported far more systemic adverse events than the placebo group.
  5. Pfizer knew that the efficacy of the vaccine waned very quickly over time; by as much as 50% in as little as 1 month after the second dose. How come we weren’t warned about that???
  6. Pfizer defended VAERS (because they didn’t want extra reporting cost burdens).
  7. There are six individuals that signed up for two different clinical trials at two different sites which is really odd.
  8. Pfizer knew vaccinated individuals could still catch COVID-19 and test positive.
  9. There are 1,448 pages comprising 9,704 individual subjects who were excluded from the trials. There isn’t enough detail to know why.
  10. Pfizer paid $2,875,842.00 for their application to the FDA. This is more of a point of information for now.
  11. It is troubling that Pfizer redacts information that is not proprietary that would be very helpful in assessing the data such as the number of doses administered in the ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST” (AESI) document (aka the 5.3.6 document).
  12. Pfizer only tests you for COVID if you have at least one symptom. If the vaccine suppresses symptoms (which it apparently does), then it will falsely appear as if the vaccine reduces the number of COVID cases.
  13. How could anaphylaxis not show up in the Phase 3 trial on any of the 44,000 patients, yet show up as a major safety concern in the post-marketing document?!?

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

  • Save
Money

Fraud: $163 BILLION in COVID Unemployment Funds Stolen

May 16, 2022 Newsmax 3

An estimated $163 billion in pandemic-related benefits were fraudulently obtained by criminals, according to the Labor Department. The Biden administration said that it inherited the problem and blamed out-of-date systems and the lack of state-by-state data sharing.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ragnar D.
Ragnar D.
2 months ago

We continue to witness stunning examples of institutional failure among the FDA, CDC, state and local public health agencies, and physician groups like the AMA. One might be reassured that the media would perform their watchdog duties by exposing the Big Pharma “vaccine” corruption. But alas, we learned earlier this week that our federal health overlords actually paid off the media not to report negatively about the COVID shots!