Canada: Man Says his Court Case Caused Alberta to Remove COVID Restrictions – But Did It?

Patrick King in Alberta, Canada
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save
Canada: Alberta has abandoned some of its harsh Covid-19 policies, claiming the action is in response to the province having reached a high rate of vaccination. Patrick King, however, says his court case is responsible. He fought a $1,200 ticket for violating Covid restrictions and subpoenaed Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw, asking her to provide evidence that there really is a SARS-CoV-2 virus. She failed to produce evidence of the virus and responded that it was not relevant to his case. Ezra Levant and Rebel Media have reluctantly challenged King’s conclusions by pointing out that Alberta had already relaxed  Covid restrictions before his trial, and that anyone following his legal strategies may be in for big trouble. They love King’s passion but not his knowledge of the law. -GEG

Link for video here:   https://rumble.com/vkorz0-freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta.html

Link for Rebel Media video featuring court reporter Sheila Gunn Reid:   https://rumble.com/vkrvxk-no-one-alberta-man-did-not-end-the-lockdown-and-mask-mandate.html
.

Summary by JW Williams
.
Alberta, Canada: Patrick King, a Canadian father and protester, told his story in a viral video claiming to have ended masking, shots and quarantine after he represented himself in court in a case over a $1,200 fine for breaking Covid restrictions. As part of his defense, he asked for proof of the SARS-CoV-2 Covid virus as it is the justification for lockdowns, quarantines, masks, contact tracing, vaccines and more. The prosecution and medical authorities failed to supply physical proof of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It has never been isolated, and therefore cannot be proven to exist. The judge allowed King to to subpoena Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) Deena Hinshaw. King showed her response that read:
.
The CMOH Has No Material Evidence
.
Mr. King has no material evidence showing that the evidence sought from the CMOH is likely to be material to the Provincial Court proceeding contrary to ss. 698 and 699 of the Criminal Code. As such, the Justice of the Peace did not have jurisdiction to issue the subpoena, and it should be quashed on this basis.”
.
King claimed victory because evidence of the virus was not produced. He exhorted others to challenge the Public Health Act in Provinces and States because the judge will be forced to subpoena the government officials responsible for the policies. He says he has laid a foundation for the thousands of other who also received tickets to follow. He says this can end Covid policies because SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated, and therefore cannot be proven to exist, so people cannot be forced to do anything in the name of something that cannot be proven to exist.
.
Sheila Gunn Reid, a court reporter, analyzed Patrick King’s court documents for Rebel Media and said that Hinshaw’s statement that “CMOH Has No Material Evidence” means that evidence was not provided because it was not relevant to the case (material = relevant), rather than there is no SARS-CoV-2 virus. Reporter Reid said that masking and the end of the lockdown was on July 1, prior to King’s case, and it is not correct to give him credit for stopping the lockdown. She said that the Justice of the Peace did not have jurisdiction to issue the subpoena and it should be squashed. King wanted CMOH Hinshaw to produce evidence of isolation of the virus. The CMOH response said that the court case was about the enforcement of the law and the ticket that was issued, not the rationale behind the law, contending that it was not material/ relevant to the case. King tried to raise a constitutional issue, but it should have been done sooner to give notice to the court, so they were not compelled to produce that evidence related to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
.
According to critic Ezra Levant, the owner of Rebel Media and a former attorney, the title of the viral video featuring King, ‘Freedom Fighter Court VICTORY! Ends Masking, Shots, Quarantine in Alberta!’ is incorrect. Levant said that while there have been changes in Alberta’s Covid restrictions, there is no court ruling in Alberta that struck down masking, testing, quarantine in that province or anywhere else in Canada.
.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media reported in late July that Alberta is softening certain Covid restrictions due to a high rate of Covid vaccination, claiming that 75% of eligible Albertans have received at least one dose of a Covid vaccine and 64% are fully immunized.
.
The changes in the Covid restrictions include: no isolation after exposure, unless the individual has Covid-19 symptoms, no isolation following an asymptomaric positive COVID-19 test, isolation hotels and quarantine support will no longer be available, contact tracers will no longer notify close contacts of exposure but will continue to investigate cases in high-risk setting like acute and continuing care facilities, asymptomatic testing is no longer recommended but tests will be available to individuals who are symptomatic, and province-mandated masking orders will be lifted but may be required in some acute care or continuing care settings.
.
It is unknown if King’s case may have influenced Alberta to remove some Covid restrictions. Alberta is now treating Covid as mild flu, instead of a made-up disease that cannot be proven to exist because the SARS-CoV-2 virus has yet to be isolated and proven to exist. An internet commenter/critic wrote that the Province has chosen to IMAGINE that a disease exists though the causal agent does not, and mitigates the imaginary disease to a “mild flu”. If the virus doesn’t exist, Covid doesn’t exist. There should be a follow-up case to clarify that. A judicial declaration that there is no Sars-CoV-2 and thus no Covid disease whatsoever needs to be issued.

Patrick King’s transcript:  https://tapnewswire.com/2021/08/alberta-court-victory-ends-covid-transcript/

Yahoo News:  https://ca.news.yahoo.com/alberta-covid-19-rules-mask-isolation-banff-161121666.html

Link for Ezra Levant video here:  https://www.rebelnews.com/patrick_king_albert_court_case_subpoena_deena_hinshaw_covid

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sister CH
Sister CH
1 month ago

I remember seeing another case reported in the area by an attorney – I forget whom now – that reported they were the reason for the pandemic being abandoned in the area.

bman
bman
1 month ago

First off: I don’t completely trust anyone who requires me to be a member of facebook in order to comment on their material – RebelNews. Second off: Did Mr. King have to pay his $1200 fine or not? Apparently he didn’t. So he won. Third off: “Sheila Gunn Reid, a court reporter, analyzed Patrick King’s court documents for Rebel Media and said that Hinshaw’s statement that “CMOH Has No Material Evidence” means that evidence was not provided because it was not relevant to the case (material = relevant), rather than there is no SARS-CoV-2 virus.” Apparently the judge disagreed when… Read more »

Douglas Jack
Douglas Jack
1 month ago
Reply to  bman

bman Thank you for this well researched & Expressed statement in response to a deficient statement by Sheila Gunn Reid posted on Rebel Media. Is Ezra Levant involved in Rebel Media’s statement? Your interpretation & the only legal interpretation for the mandated “material-evidence” is “physical” evidence such as the report of qualified genetic virologists who have produced a full description of the charted virus. The term ‘relevant’ is an ‘irrelevant’ value judgement, quite separate from actual physical ‘material’ such as a report & the credible peer reviewed science, it must represent to be presented legally. Thank you Patrick King for… Read more »

Gill
Gill
1 month ago
Reply to  bman

A little long winded, but bang on.