Was the Capitol Riot an FBI False Flag Used to Frame Patriots as Domestic Terrorists?

Inside the Capitol, Youtube
  • Save
  • Save
Darren Beattie of Revolver.news explains that some protesters at the January 6 Capitol siege have not been prosecuted, despite appearing to be more aggressive, while Trump supporters have been charged with crimes that could imprison them for decades. He questions whether the FBI or other intelligence agencies infiltrated militia groups, including the Oathkeepers, ProudBoys and Three Percenters, that attended the event. He suggests that if the event was a monumental entrapment scheme by the federal government, it could be used to frame patriotic Americans as domestic terrorists and target them through new legislation (HR 350 and HR 353). 

Beattie explained that the January 6 event was similar to a plot to storm the Michigan State Capitol to overthrow the government and to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020. The FBI infiltrated the group of plotters, and 5 out of the 14 people arrested in the case were undercover agents and federal informants who played leadership roles in planning the Michigan insurrection. Individuals allegedly involved in this plot appear to belong to the “Three Percenters,” one of the very same militia groups now blamed for storming the Capitol on January 6. Critics are concerned that the FBI may have entrapped the men arrested in the Michigan plot and question whether the FBI infiltrated and orchestrated the riots at the Capitol on January 6. The head of the FBI field office in Detroit, Steven D’Antuono, who oversaw the infiltration of the operation in the Michigan plot now oversees the investigation into the 1/6 Capitol Siege in Washington DC.

After 1/6, it came to light that Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio had been a “prolific” FBI informant for years, and Proud Boys “thought leader” Joseph Biggs had been an FBI informant for several months.

Darren Beattie interview with Alex Jones (link):

Of all the questions asked, words spoken, and ink spilled on the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6, 2021, none hold the key to the entire event quite like what Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked of Christopher Wray.

The Democrat from Minnesota asked the Trump-appointed FBI Director: Did the federal government infiltrate any of the so-called “militia” organizations claimed to be responsible for planning and executing the Capitol Siege?

Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.

Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:

  • In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
  • Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
  • Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?

From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers.

If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in.

If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups.

Read full article here…

Democrats target patriotic Americans as Domestic Terrorists (link):

The FBI has a long history of infiltrating groups and entrapping people:



Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Let’s look at the logic. Cancel culture wants to cancel anything with a label “white supremacy.” These groups were labeled just that. They had FBI agents infiltrated the groups. So, by transitive property, the FBI is a white supremacy group and must be cancelled. lol time to get a defund the FBI sign. Trolling aside, I can’t believe 1/6 has been played up so much.