How Can a Virus Become a Bioweapon through ‘Gain of Function’ If the Virus Doesn’t Exist?

  • Save
  • Save
COVID-19 is the illness and SARS-CoV-2 is the name of the virus, however, the virus has never been properly isolated because it has never been separated from everything else, filtered, and placed under a microscope. Therefore, it has never been proven to exist. In addition, it is impossible to determine the genome sequence without an isolated virus. Author and researcher Jon Rappoport presents evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome has been cobbled together by a computer program.

The US government has reportedly funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, tweaking it to produce a dangerous entity, but that narrative falls apart because of the death toll used inflated and fraudulent numbers. If the pandemic was real, the numbers would not have had to have been pumped up. Rappoport makes the case that other causes of death, such as new poisonous vaccines, toxic pesticides, lagoons of feces in giant pig factory-farms, opioid drugs, and electromagnetic technologies were collected under one umbrella and mis-categorized as COVID-19.

What I’m about to lay out might seem “too staggering to believe.”

Fortunately, what people do or don’t believe isn’t the issue.

And with that, here we go. Buckle up.

For the past year, I’ve been presenting evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. It’s never been proven to exist. [1]

Those who claim it does exist have two legs to try to stand on. One: the virus has been isolated (discovered). [2] And two: its genetic sequence has been found. [3] [3a]

However, the mainstream scientific definition of “isolated” turns out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in a lab. The soup contains all sorts of material. We never extracted the virus from the soup.” In other words, “isolated” means its opposite.

In the soup, in addition to the purported virus, there are human and monkey cells, toxic drugs, chemicals, and other genetic material. When the cells begin to die, researchers assert (with no proof) that the cause of cell-death must be the virus.

Therefore, the virus IS in the soup, and it is deadly.

However, the drugs and chemicals could be killing the cells, and the cells are being starved of nutrients, so that could certainly account for their death.

Bottom line: There is no proof of isolation. It isn’t even close. There is no evidence that the purported virus is in the soup.

I’ve published a typical account of virus-isolation from a study, and Dr. Andrew Kaufman did a step-by step analysis of this process and tore it to pieces. I published his analysis. Dr. Kaufman showed there was no merit to the claim that SARS-CoV-2 had been isolated. [2]

What about the genetic sequencing of the virus? You can’t sequence something you haven’t isolated (discovered). To claim you have sequenced it would be like saying, “We have a generic fragment of iron dust, and we know it comes from a 1932 Ford Moon Rover fender.” There was never a 1932 Ford Moon Rover.

Researchers presume, assume, guess, pretend that “SARS-CoV-2” WOULD HAVE certain pieces of genetic material, and referring to libraries which contain data about such material, they use a computer program to cobble together pieces of data and present a genetic portrait of “SARS-CoV-2.” [3] [3a]

If we were discussing a science fiction novel about a virus, we might say, “That’s an interesting genetic sequence. An interesting castle in the air.”

Now—to bridge over from this part of the article to the Wuhan lab, gain of function research, tweaking a coronavirus to produce a dangerous entity, we need to know one thing:

Mainstream researchers—virologists, molecular biologists—BELIEVE they are working with a real virus. Most of them certainly believe this. They are married to their fallacious and fantastical processes of proving a given virus exists.

And because they believe, so do politicians and public health officials and military leaders.

Therefore, we could certainly say, if the evidence is convincing, that there has been an effort to ramp up the function of a coronavirus in Wuhan.

But EFFORT and TRYING have nothing to do with the truth.

Based on unproven and untenable beliefs, people have TRIED TO DO all sorts of things. And some of those people have CLAIMED that they SUCCEEDED.

Therefore, it’s really quite easy to see how a) the virus has never been proven to exist and b) some researchers have been trying to ramp up the function of a fantasy they call a virus.

“But…but if the virus doesn’t exist, what are these researchers in their lab in Wuhan doing? What are they working with? What’s going on?”

Yes, I like that question. But you see, in the Church of the Virus, the inner sanctum, the holy of holies—THE HIGH-SECURITY LAB—is not open to you or me or anyone from the outside.

Read full article here…

Link at Bitchute:

David Icke explains that the discovery of ‘gain of function’ research at the Wuhan lab is a psychological operation to keep the COVID-19 lie progressing.


Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

This coincides with everything been stated in this article just one step further that Stefan Lanka did a Control Experiment with out a contagion and got the same results from those who published scientific articles that Covid 19 Virus was Isolated was never allowed to be published I wonder why. Now it appears to be not the case. Here is a Brave Russian woman and a English Narrator

Douglas J. Hains
Douglas J. Hains
1 year ago

I agree with Jon. The study/studys of purification of the virus has been called for and not produced neither has the electron micrograph. So how can we have a vaccine without a virus? The first clue that the we had a weaponized problem was once announced, not proven, it shut down the world economies and all the citizens within them. It is quite strange that with the clinical trial of this experimental MRNA mutagenic gene project that is not a vaccine in the sense of using an inert virus or a live virus but a manufactured spike protein manufacturing messenger… Read more »

Gerard Schultz
Gerard Schultz
1 year ago

Fort Dietrich has the virus, obtained early on, from Wa state. That said,it is easy to believe that a virus escaped in Wuhan, or was spread there, that some Chinese came to the US to spread it here, and it was not transmissible enough. Then a fake pandemic arose from the errant testing fueled by people who wanted the government to collapse.

1 year ago

check out this excellent interview
alternate link here:

I can’t wait to see Dr Kaufman’s documentary “Terrain” when it gets released, and i already have Dr Sam Bailey’s book that she co-authored, called “Virus Mania”. (The new edition, with an added chapter dealing with ‘covid’.)

1 year ago

I have a theory about what’s really going on with these devious people. When the pharmaceutical companies experimented with the new RNA vaccines on the animals, in there eyes it was a success, killing huge numbers of animals. Why else would they use the same fake vaccines on the world population without testing them properly and lie about the real cures so they could do it. The weaponizing of the viruses is the RNA vaccines. Fauci’s e-mail showing the first ingredient to add to the vaccine to weaponize it was HIV. What does HIV do? it destroys your immune systems… Read more »