1

Was the Capitol Riot an FBI False Flag Used to Frame Patriots as Domestic Terrorists?

Darren Beattie of Revolver.news explains that some protesters at the January 6 Capitol siege have not been prosecuted, despite appearing to be more aggressive, while Trump supporters have been charged with crimes that could imprison them for decades. He questions whether the FBI or other intelligence agencies infiltrated militia groups, including the Oathkeepers, ProudBoys and Three Percenters, that attended the event. He suggests that if the event was a monumental entrapment scheme by the federal government, it could be used to frame patriotic Americans as domestic terrorists and target them through new legislation (HR 350 and HR 353). 

Beattie explained that the January 6 event was similar to a plot to storm the Michigan State Capitol to overthrow the government and to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020. The FBI infiltrated the group of plotters, and 5 out of the 14 people arrested in the case were undercover agents and federal informants who played leadership roles in planning the Michigan insurrection. Individuals allegedly involved in this plot appear to belong to the “Three Percenters,” one of the very same militia groups now blamed for storming the Capitol on January 6. Critics are concerned that the FBI may have entrapped the men arrested in the Michigan plot and question whether the FBI infiltrated and orchestrated the riots at the Capitol on January 6. The head of the FBI field office in Detroit, Steven D’Antuono, who oversaw the infiltration of the operation in the Michigan plot now oversees the investigation into the 1/6 Capitol Siege in Washington DC.

After 1/6, it came to light that Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio had been a “prolific” FBI informant for years, and Proud Boys “thought leader” Joseph Biggs had been an FBI informant for several months.

Darren Beattie interview with Alex Jones (link):

Of all the questions asked, words spoken, and ink spilled on the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6, 2021, none hold the key to the entire event quite like what Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked of Christopher Wray.

The Democrat from Minnesota asked the Trump-appointed FBI Director: Did the federal government infiltrate any of the so-called “militia” organizations claimed to be responsible for planning and executing the Capitol Siege?

Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.

Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:

  • In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
  • Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
  • Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?

From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers.

If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in.

If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups.

Read full article here…

Democrats target patriotic Americans as Domestic Terrorists (link):

The FBI has a long history of infiltrating groups and entrapping people:

 

 




Arizona Governor Ducey Signs EO: No Mandatory Vaccines On Campus – But Is There A Catch?

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey issued an executive order (EO) that protects students from authoritative measures to segregate students who received the COVID-19 vaccine from unvaccinated individuals. Ducey’s EO is in response to a letter from Arizona State University Vice President of Student Services Dr. Joanne Vogel who wrote an email to remind students that the school “expected” that all students attending in-person classes to be vaccinated. She wrote that students who are unvaccinated would be required to wear face masks both indoors and outdoors while on the ASU campus and to take two COVID-19 tests per week.

Ducey’s EO states that a public university or community college may not mandate that students obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, show proof of COVID-19 vaccination, or require testing and mask usage, “unless such a requirement has been mandated by law in the state of Arizona.” This suggests that COVID-19 vaccines may be mandated by the state of Arizona in the future.

On Tuesday, Ducey issued an executive order which protects students from this authoritative measure to segregate the jabbed from the un-jabbed.

“The state of Arizona has routinely sided with individual freedom when it comes to vaccination.”

“Arizona State University communicated a new policy to all students mandating that they be vaccinated prior to returning to campus”

The policy requires that students who are not vaccinated or choose not to share their vaccination status will be subject to invasive restrictions such as daily health checks, twice-weekly testing and mandated mask-wearing”

“This policy has the potential to treat those with religious beliefs about vaccinations differently”

“Both federal and state law allows individuals the option to accept or refuse vaccinations”

“The policy adopted by Arizona State University attempts to usurp the constitutional authority of the executive and the legislature”

“1. A public university or community college may not mandate that students obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, show proof of COVID-19 . vaccination, or place any conditions on attendance or participation in classes or academic activities, including but not limited to mandatory testing and mandatory mask usage, if a person chooses not to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine or disclose that they have been vaccinated against COVID-19 unless such a requirement has been mandated by law in the state of Arizona.

This is concerning. Why is it necessary to include that “unless”? Is mandated vaccination coming to the state of Arizona? Why else would he make that statement?

Read full article here…

Excerpts from article about ASU vaccine policy:

On June 14th, The ASU Dean of Students sent a letter to all students regarding their new guidelines, which require students to be vaccinated if they want to be free.

Vice President of Student Services Dr. Joanne Vogel begins the email welcoming students back in fall 2021, but the real purpose of the email was to remind everyone of their “expectation” that all students participating in on-campus learning are vaccinated. “Students are expected to be vaccinated two weeks prior to the first day of classes”.

Not asked. Expected.

— SNIP —

Unvaccinated students or those who do not share their status will be required to:

  • Submit a daily health check
  • Participate in twice-weekly to COVID-19 testing
  • Wear face covers in all indoor and outdoor spaces on ASU campuses

Fully vaccinated students who consent to share their status will not be required to:

  • Submit a daily health check
  • Participate in COVID-19 testing
  • Wear face coverings indoors or outdoors, unless otherwise directed

SERIOUSLY!? Unvaccinated students or those who want to keep their health information private must wear face covers in all indoor and outdoor spaces on ASU campuses, submit a daily health check and get a covid test twice weekly while the vaccinated enjoy their rights and freedoms.

Read full article here…




Tucker Carlson: FBI Operatives Coordinated the Capitol Riots

Darren Beattie of Revolver.news published a bombshell report about the FBI’s involvement in the siege of the Capitol on January 6th. Tucker Carlson explained how the FBI infiltrated the march on the Capitol to stage a false flag attack meant to demonize Trump supporters. While the Justice Department has thrown the book at Trump supporters who went inside the Capitol, some of the key people participating on January 6th have not been charged with crimes, despite their actions that were more aggressive. The government calls those people ‘unindicted coconspirators’ and Carlson said that more than 20 of them were almost certainly working for the FBI. The government’s own documents admit that the riots were organized at least in part by government agents. In March, FBI Director Christopher Wray implied that the bureau was infiltrating groups that oppose the Biden regime.

Former assistant FBI director Frank Figliuzzi suggested members of Congress should be arrested for the Capitol protest.

Republican Representative Matt Gaetz demanded FBI Director Wray explain the extent FBI agents infiltrated and embedded into militia groups, including the Oathkeepers, Proud Boys, and Three Percenters, that entered the Capitol building.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson explained how the FBI infiltrated the march on the Capitol on January 6th to stage a false flag attack meant to demonize Trump supporters.

In his opening monologue on Tuesday’s edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Carlson broke down known facts about the Capitol protest that show the FBI organized the coordinated breach of the Capitol building.

“Law enforcement officers participated in the riot. Sometimes in violent ways. We know that because without fail, they’ve thrown the book and most people were present and in the capitol on January 6. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight,” Carlson began.

“But strangely, some of the key people participating on January 6th have not been charged. Look at the documents, the government calls those people unindicted coconspirators. What does that mean? It means that potentially with every single case there were FBI officers on January 6th,” he said.

Carlson then described court documents revealing numerous individuals who participated in rioting at the Capitol have not been arrested and their identities have not been disclosed.

“For example, one of those unindicted coconspirators is someone that a document as ‘Person to go.’ According to those documents, they stayed in the same hotel room as an insurrectionist, someone who alleged to be part of the group the oath keepers. They stormed the barricades alongside Thomas Caldwell.”

“The government’s indictments further indicate — by the way, a 65-year-old man is a dangerous insurrectionist, was led to believe there would be a ‘Quick reaction.’ Also participating on January 6th. That quick reaction would be led by someone called ‘Person 3’ who had a hotel room and an accomplice with them.”

“But wait, here’s the interesting thing. Person 2 and person 3 were organizers of the riot. The government knows who they are, but they have not charged them. Why is that? You know why. They were all certainly working for the FBI. So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the capital.”

“On January 6th. According to documents. And those two are not alone. In all, they said they were upwards of 20 unindicted coconspirators all playing roles in the conspiracy who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities.”

“And in some cases, much, much more severe activity as those named alongside them in the indictment. So it turns out that this white supremacist insurrection was again, by the government’s own admission in these documents, organized at least in part by government agents,” Carlson said.

“Are you shocked? We are shocked, we shouldn’t be shocked. Because in March, the FBI director admitted that the bureau was infiltrating as many groups that oppose the regime as they possibly can,” Carlson rhetorically asked.

Revolver News founder Darren Beattie joined the show to break down his bombshell article laying out the evidence Carlson described as well as former assistant FBI director Frank Figliuzzi suggesting members of Congress should be arrested for the Capitol protest.

Read full article here…




UK: Heathrow Airport Is Now a Quarantine Prison

Quarantine hotels were introduced by the UK government on February 15, 2021 as a means to prevent the spread of the virus and its variants from countries and territories where travel to the UK is banned. Travelers to the UK who have visited or passed through any of these areas are required to complete a full 10-day quarantine at a government-approved hotel. According to this article, time outdoors was limited to a 20-minute walk while escorted by security. The cost was $3342 for 10 days. A conversation with a quarantine detainee taking exercise in the Heathrow car park who was harassed by a guard is posted in the video below.

While the UK is subjected to lockdowns and severe restrictions, Prime Minister Boris Johnson attended a crowded barbecue at the G7 summit in Cornwall. There were more than 30 people who attended the barbecue, social distancing was ignored and only the staff wore masks. He is now facing backlash.

Video link:  https://rumble.com/viohop-heathrow-airport-now-a-quarantine-prison.html

Reem Ahmed and her sister paid £2,400 for ten days in a small room, allowed 20 minutes of exercise a day in a small car park and fed aeroplane-style meals three times a day.

Over the last year, self-isolation has become a norm in society – not only in Wales but across the globe.

If you developed a new, continuous cough, came into contact with someone who has Covid, or even caught the virus yourself, chances are you’ve had to stay cooped up at home for 10 days and keep a distance from your loved ones.

But not many of us have experienced a much more restrictive form of self-quarantine that has arisen in response to the pandemic – a quarantine hotel.

Quarantine hotels were introduced by the UK government on the 15th February this year as a means to prevent the spread of the virus and its variants from countries and territories where travel to the UK is banned.

These are known as ‘red list’ locations and a list of them can be found on the government website . You can only travel to the UK from these countries if you’re a British national, an Irish national, or anyone with residence rights in the UK

By law, travellers to the UK who have visited or passed through any of these areas in the 10 days before their arrival are required to complete a full 10-day quarantine at a government-approved hotel.

p:nth-of-type(6)”,”type”:”performPlaceholder”,”relativePos”:”after”}” data-placeholder-placeholder=”” data-response-start=”16445″ data-type=”placeholder”>

The day you arrive counts as day 0, and you are allowed to leave from midnight of the 11th day.

The stay will set you back a hefty £1,750 for 1 adult, with a rate of £650 for each additional adult in the same room, and £325 for 1 child.

From Saturday 17th April until Wednesday 28th April this year, after travelling from Dubai, I stayed with my sister in one of these hotels, the Courtyard by Marriott, right next to London Heathrow Airport.

Read full article here…




Jeff Bezos’ Ex-Wife MacKenzie Scott Donates $2.7B to Fund Open Borders Lobby, Racial Justice NGOs and More

MacKenzie Scott, who received $38 billion from her divorce with Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, is giving the open borders lobby and “racial justice” agitators their greatest windfall in history after giving leftist organizations $6 billion in 2020. She gave an undisclosed amount to HIAS, formerly known as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which works to resettle refugees through America, and is going global. She also funded Muslim Advocates that is currently suing Facebook for not censoring enough.

MacKenzie Scott, one of the richest women in the world, announced on Tuesday a third multibillion-dollar round of donations in less than a year. Scott who was married to Jeff Bezos, Amazon's founder, gave away nearly $6 billion in 2020. https://t.co/NVJDb2PnxH

— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 15, 2021


Scott on Tuesday released a list of 286 groups she’s giving another $2.7 billion in divorce money to on her blog.

The first which stands out is HIAS, formerly known as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which works to resettle refugees through America.

They didn’t say how much her donation was but the head of the group said it “would enable the group to become an emergency responder to refugee crises around the world in addition to a resettlement agency,” eJewishPhilanthropy reported.

Read full article here…




Stop Radical UN Paris Climate Agreement Implementation Disguised as “Infrastructure” Bill

Democrats and the Biden administration are seeking to pass the ‘American Jobs Plan’ that is a radical climate change bill disguised as an ‘infrastructure’ bill that would implement the Paris climate agreement and the Great Reset. Only 25% of the $2.5 trillion bill will be spent on infrastructure, and the rest will be used to fund a far-left environmental agenda that calls for “100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2035” and “net-zero emissions by 2050.” To achieve this, a radical government-mandated restructuring of the American economy would occur as outlined in the the Paris climate agreement with the United Nations driving US domestic policy.

Proposed Spending:

$700 billion on subsidies and tax credits for “green” energy
$300 billion for business and manufacturing
$400 billion for care for the elderly and the disabled
$100 billion for workforce development programs
$100 billion for school construction
$25 billion for child-care facilities
$174 billion on electric vehicles
$85 billion for mass transit

URGENT: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer formally began the budget reconciliation process, which allows the Senate to pass legislation with only a simple majority. Schumer stated that he will use “reconciliation” to force through Biden’s “infrastructure” plan. Tell your senators to put an end to this!

Joe Biden, his administration, and congressional Democrats are seeking to pass a radical “climate change” bill – disguised as an “infrastructure” bill – that would codify the Paris climate agreement and the Great Reset.

Overview

On March 31, 2021, the Biden White House unveiled its so-called “American Jobs Plan.” This plan is estimated to spend about $2.5 trillion and would raise an estimated $2.75 trillion through record tax increases. While advertised as an “infrastructure” plan, only 5% of the funds would actually go to roads and bridges, and even if one takes an expansive view of “infrastructure,” only 25% of the plan would fund such projects.

Where will the remaining 75% of the funds go? They will be used to advance a far-left environmental-Marxist agenda that would codify the Paris climate agreement and the Great Reset into U.S. federal law.

Environmentalists recognize the plan’s potential to implement their agenda. According to the left-wing Atlantic magazine:

If you want the United States to act at a national level to fight climate change, this bill is it. This is the climate bill.

Plan Provisions

First, the plan calls for “100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2035” and “net-zero emissions by 2050.” The plan’s provisions are all designed to meet these goals; to achieve this, a radical government-mandated restructuring of the American economy would occur. In other words, the Paris climate agreement would effectively become American law, and the United Nations would be in the driver’s seat of U.S. domestic policy.

Among other provisions, the plan would spend $10 billion to create a “Civilian Climate Corps,” which would implement the Biden administration’s climate projects, and $35 billion for climate change “research.” It would spend another $174 billion on electric vehicles, including to electrify all federal vehicles and at least 20% of school buses. Additionally, the plan would spend $700 billion on subsidies and tax credits for “green” energy, even as it ends all subsidies for the so called “fossil fuel” industry – thus rigging the U.S. economy in favor of environmentalist policies.

This climate change agenda stretches into housing. Biden’s plan would spend “$213 billion to produce, preserve, and retrofit more than two million affordable and sustainable places to live.” It would also seek to abolish local zoning rules – including “minimum lot sizes” and “prohibitions on multifamily housing” – that preserve the quality-of-life in communities. This would destroy America’s suburbs. In other words, Biden’s plan is consistent with the Great Reset’s goal of mass urbanization and driving individuals out of rural or low-density areas, along with his “30 by 30” federal land grab that the plan alludes to.

Implementing high-density housing goes hand-in-hand with implementing mass transit programs. Biden’s plan does just that, with $85 billion going generally to mass transit programs and an additional $80 billion to Amtrak specifically. According to a Heritage Foundation analysis, Biden’s plan “would spend nearly 50% more on trains and buses than on roads.”

Biden’s plan also calls for enacting the pro-labor union “PRO Act,” which would unconstitutionally abolish state “right-to-work” laws and help destroy American sovereignty by aligning its labor laws with the USMCA’s dictates. The plan’s call for a global minimum corporate tax – which the Treasury Department formally proposed – would further restrict national sovereignty while also hurting the economy.

The numerous other provisions in Biden’s plan include “$400 billion for care for the elderly and the disabled,” “$300 billion for business and manufacturing,” “$100 billion for school construction,” “$100 billion for workforce development programs,” and “$25 billion for child-care facilities.” As Charles Scaliger points out in The New American magazine, not only are these provisions enormously expensive, but they have absolutely no legal basis under the U.S. Constitution. Under the 10th Amendment, all of these areas are reserved to the states.

Biden’s “infrastructure” plan is not limited to domestic policy or spending. At the June 2021 G7 meeting, he proposed a $40 trillion global plan to “Build Back Better for the World.”

Legislative Activity

Negotiations over the specifics of an “infrastructure” spending bill are ongoing and a bill number has not yet been assigned. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has announced that he will move on the bill in July regardless of whether negotiations succeed or not.

Congressional Republicans must not compromise on such a radical and unconstitutional “climate change” plan. Unfortunately, the Senate GOP negotiated with the Biden administration; it published a $568 billion counterproposal, along with a subsequent $1 trillion proposal. In addition to including multiple spending provisions that, again, violate the Constitution, their plan would establish a national pilot program for a draconian “vehicle-miles-traveled” tax. On June 8, Biden ended talks with Senate Republicans, and a bipartisan group of senators are now working on an $880 billion plan. Meanwhile, several Republican and Democrat senators announced a $1.2 trillion agreement.

Although the Biden administration has expressed pleasure at Senate Republicans’ cooperation with its spending proposals, it and congressional Democrats plan to unilaterally pass this bill if the GOP does not cave-in to enough Biden Plan provisions. The Biden administration moved the goalposts during negotiations, indicating its unwillingness to compromise. The House has already begun the process for passing Biden’s plan. Even if this draconian plan passes, it will not satisfy the Left; Biden has already announced a new proposal on top of his “infrastructure” proposal.

Tell your U.S. representative and senators to reject this radical Paris agreement implementation plan – disguised as an “infrastructure” bill – regardless of whether it is the full plan or a “compromise.” Instead, tell them to abide by the U.S. Constitution and to promote fiscal responsibility.


Although we provide a way to easily email legislators (blue box), we know from long experience that it takes a lot more interaction with your legislators to get your point across than that provided by emails alone.

That’s why we provide an easy way not only to email them, but to contact them by phone, tweet, and even video message them.

Read full article here…