No Guns Seized from Capitol Demonstrators and No Shots Fired – Except by a Security Guard – So Why Is It Called an Armed Insurrection?

Non-violent Trump supporters remain inside the velvet ropes while 'storming' the Capitol. Youtube
image_pdf
  • Save
image_print
  • Save


Jill Sanborn, chief of FBI counterterrorism, admitted that no firearms were confiscated during the so-called Capitol “insurrection” and the only shot fired was from a Capitol police officer who killed unarmed protester Ashli Babbitt with a bullet to the neck.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald says that liberals insist that the protest at the Capitol was an armed insurrection to elevate fear and make people think that they are fighting domestic terrorists. Leftists want new laws that will give the FBI, CIA and NSA immense powers against American citizens. People in fear will accept tyrannical policies.

The FBI admitted under questioning from Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) on Wednesday that no firearms were confiscated during the so-called Capitol “insurrection,” no one has been charged for having a firearm in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds, and the only shot fired was from a Capitol police officer killing unarmed protester Ashli Babbitt with a bullet to the neck.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RockyMtn 1776
RockyMtn 1776
6 months ago

Why ? Because the media aka The Ministry of Truth 1984 wants it called an armed insurrection.

Tom Ball
Tom Ball
6 months ago

GREENWALD ought to know since it is HIS ‘tribe’ that’s pushing these narratives. By making public pronouncements of the obvious , this is supposed to exonerate them from culpability, as though “someone else” is promoting it. “How could I possibly be guilty of same if I am the one telling you about it?” He doesn’t have to tell me about it. I already know. And they are aware no doubt of how many of us DO know, hence the need to play feign innocence by pretending to be shocked by it all. Anyone who is familiar with their methods isn’t… Read more »