False Claims Still Being Spread about the Capitol Riot

Capitol, Wiki
image_pdfimage_print
Journalist Glen Greenwald dispels the continuing false narratives about the January 6 invasion of the Capitol building. The New York Times created a story that a Trump mob bashed Capitol Police Officer Sicknick over the head with a fire extinguisher, but the story has no proof or even evidence to support it. Nevertheless, the narrative was used in the impeachment trial of Trump. The pattern of calling the Capitol incident an armed insurrection is a gross mischaracterization of what actually happened. Greenwald says that false narratives are being used to militarize Washington, DC. Both parties are still exploiting the emotions to justify a new domestic War on Terror. And the FBI is on the prowl for so-called dissidents. -GEG

What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned.

But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media. Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are.

Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago. And anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful reporting about what happened, then you’re trying to “minimize” what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves.

One of the most significant of these falsehoods was the tale — endorsed over and over without any caveats by the media for more than a month — that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by the pro-Trump mob when they beat him to death with a fire extinguisher. That claim was first published by The New York Times on January 8 in an article headlined “Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage.” It cited “two [anonymous] law enforcement officials” to claim that Sicknick died “with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress” and after he “was struck with a fire extinguisher.”

A second New York Times article from later that day — bearing the more dramatic headline: “He Dreamed of Being a Police Officer, Then Was Killed by a Pro-Trump Mob”.

After publication of these two articles, this horrifying story about a pro-Trump mob beating a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher was repeated over and over, by multiple journalists on television, in print, and on social media. It became arguably the single most-emphasized and known story of this event, and understandably so — it was a savage and barbaric act that resulted in the harrowing killing by a pro-Trump mob of a young Capitol police officer.

It took on such importance for a clear reason: Sicknick’s death was the only example the media had of the pro-Trump mob deliberately killing anyone. In a January 11 article detailing the five people who died on the day of the Capitol protest, the New York Times again told the Sicknick story: “Law enforcement officials said he had been ‘physically engaging with protesters’ and was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher.”

But none of the other four deaths were at the hands of the protesters: the only other person killed with deliberate violence was a pro-Trump protester, Ashli Babbitt, unarmed when shot in the neck by a police officer at close range. The other three deaths were all pro-Trump protesters: Kevin Greeson, who died of a heart attack outside the Capitol; Benjamin Philips, 50, “the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo,” who died of a stroke that day; and Rosanne Boyland, a fanatical Trump supporter whom the Times says was inadvertently “killed in a crush of fellow rioters during their attempt to fight through a police line.”

This is why the fire extinguisher story became so vital to those intent on depicting these events in the most violent and menacing light possible. Without Sicknick having his skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher, there were no deaths that day that could be attributed to deliberate violence by pro-Trump protesters. Three weeks later, The Washington Post said dozens of officers (a total of 140) had various degrees of injuries, but none reported as life-threatening, and at least two police officers committed suicide after the riot. So Sicknick was the only person killed who was not a pro-Trump protester, and the only one deliberately killed by the mob itself.

It is hard to overstate how pervasive this fire extinguisher story became. Over and over, major media outlets and mainstream journalists used this story to dramatize what happened.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Kakistocracy

No Guns Seized from Capitol Demonstrators and No Shots Fired – Except by a Security Guard – So Why Is It Called an Armed Insurrection?

Liberals insist that the protest at the Capitol was an armed insurrection to elevate fear and make people think that they are fighting domestic terrorists. Leftists want new laws that will give the FBI, CIA and NSA immense powers against American citizens. People in fear will accept tyrannical policies.

Health

Researchers Report that Deaths from Covid Vaccine for Israel’s Elderly is 40 Times Greater than Deaths from Covid-19 Itself

Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ examined the statistics and concluded that the Pfizer vaccine killed “about 40 times more elderly people than the disease itself would have killed”. They say the death count is too low for vaccinated people because there will be delayed deaths from long-term complications.

Immigration

Biden’s ‘Kids in Cages’ Prove Hypocrisy on Immigration

March 1, 2021 NY Post and Breitbart 2

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris savaged President Trump for keeping “kids in cages.” But now they’re doing the same thing by housing 700 migrant teens in some of the very same facilities they decried. Biden is ending Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” program for Central American asylum seekers, which took pressure off the border.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Truth
Truth
10 days ago

Be sure to read the FULL article not just the beginning part that is listed above, the The fire extinguisher tale lacks supporting evidence:

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims

MJ Raichyk
MJ Raichyk
10 days ago

**this** is what took place on Jan6th leading to the *shooting*……

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41/

Theater and crisis acting……