Shocking Report on COVID Vaccine Adverse Effects: the Roll-Out Continues Anyway

  • Save
  • Save

After two National Health Services (NHS) workers in the UK experienced severe allergic reactions to the new Pfizer COVID vaccine, which now has been approved in the US, the regulator warned that “People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine.” The NHS further advised that resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations and that vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.

The two vaccine companies, Pfizer and BioNTech, excluded people from their drug trials with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the performance of the vaccine looked safer than it will in the rollout. Past efforts to introduce RNA technology have failed, because serious autoimmune reactions occurred. The three major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were designed to prevent nothing more than a “mild case of COVID-19.” That means a cough, or chills and fever. But cough, chills and fever usually are cured naturally, which means there is no need for a vaccine. -GEG

From the UK, The Guardian has the story [1]: “People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine, the medicines regulator has said, after two NHS workers experienced symptoms on Wednesday.”

They just figured this out? Now?

The Guardian is referring to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, which has just been approved in the US.

Two people experiencing significant adverse effects may not sound important, particularly since they already a history of allergic reactions, but the following quote in the Guardian article raises major red flags a mile high:

“The MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] advice states: ‘Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine. Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available’.”

First of all, a very large number of people have a history of allergic reactions to a vaccine or medicine or food. Automatically, these people should not take the vaccine. But how many people in the general public are aware of this restriction?

Second, with the operation to vaccinate hundreds of millions of people running at top speed, who actually believes that many locations where shots are given will have the necessary resuscitation equipment on hand? Sheer insanity.

Then, on top of all this, we have a bombshell statement from the Denver Post [2]: “Documents published by the two [vaccine] companies [Pfizer and BioNTech] showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from the [clinical vaccine] trials, and doctors were advised to look out for such reactions in trial participants who weren’t previously known to have severe allergies.”

In other words, the clinical trials were already biased, because they excluded people with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the performance of the vaccine looked safer. Therefore, no one would find out that allergic reactions to the vaccine are a MAJOR danger.

And NOW, as if it’s nothing more than an afterthought, we get—“Oh, by the way, if people have allergies, they shouldn’t take the vaccine.”

Why don’t regulators simply admit, “This vaccine is as disastrous as possible, but we can’t let that cat out of the bag.”

I have written about the inherent dangers of the new experimental RNA technology deployed with this COVOD vaccine. The world population is a vast group of guinea pigs. Past efforts to introduce RNA tech have failed because serious autoimmune reactions have occurred. [3] The body basically attacks itself.

What rational person would line up to take this shot?

You have to ask yourself why some Pittsburgh and Chicago medical centers aren’t making the new COVID vaccine mandatory for their own healthcare workers. [4] [5]

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
terry shead
terry shead
1 year ago

People are going to die from this vaccine, they are being brain washed, stupid people, has Ronald Reagan said so many years ago the worst words you can hear from a government is the government is coming to save you, covid vaccination?

Walter Kendall
Walter Kendall
1 year ago

Sweden reacted to the pandemic with the premise that the Covid-19 virus was unstoppable and did not shut down their economy. They were correct. They found that 98% of those who tested positive for the virus had either very light symptoms or none at all indicating that the peoples natural immunity was adequate to fend off the ill effects of the virus. And thus, they developed natural immunity. No vaccinations needed. A study in Indonesia of 700 people who died indicated that 98 % of those had a vitamin D 3 level of less than 20 died. And of those… Read more »

stuart newman
stuart newman
1 year ago

I do not want this cov 19 vaccine, I belive it is dangerous and I will defend myself if anyone tries to assault me with it.